Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
Dutch
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (Soranî)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
MICHAEL HEMANN: All right, so how
can we use this information?
So we know that we expect this ratio of a PD
to one NPD to two Ts.
Right?
So the total number of double crossovers
equals 4 times the number of NPDs.
So again, why is that?
Because all of these outcomes are equally likely,
and so the total equals, we can just
say, 4 times the number of NPDs that you would get.
You have one PD, one NPD, two Ts,
but you can look at the total number of double crossovers
as four NPDs.
And so then we can look at the number of T tetratypes
that are not single crossovers.
So you remember here that this first crossover,
this single crossover here generates a T tetratype.
So if we want to know how many are actually
expected to come from double crossovers,
we can actually just look at the number over here, which
is 2 times the number of NPDs.
Total are four NPDs, but the ones that are tetratypes
are basically half of these, so 2 times the number of NPDs.
All right, so if we think about the number of tetrads
and the number of crossover gametes,
the number of double crossover tetrads is four NPDs.
That's what we figured out here above.
And how many crossover gametes are in an NPD tetrad?
Four.
So all of these four here are crossover gametes.
So the number of crossover gametes per tetrad is four.
So how many single crossovers do we have?
Well, essentially the number of single crossovers
we have are the number of T tetratypes
that we have that are singles and not doubles.
So it's the number of Ts we have minus the number of T
tetratypes that are not singles, which is 2 times NPD.
So it's this term that we came up there.
And how many crossover gametes are present in a T tetratype?
Two.
So it was a single crossover event
which results in two crossover gametes.
So there are a total of two of these.
So we can put these together in a distance formula.
The distance in centimorgans equals
100 times 4 times 4 NPDs.
So why 4 times 4?
Well, they're the number of tetrads
that are NPD tetrads or a number of double crossover tetrads
times the number of gametes per double cross over tetrad, which
is four.
So you have 4 times 4 times the number of NPDs plus--
so that's the double crossover number,
and the single crossover number is going to be 2 times--
this 2 times T minus 2 NPD over 4E.
So again, we've accounted for double crossovers
there and single crossovers there,
the number of crossover gametes in each of those contexts.
So question, does sample size matter here?
So sample size does matter, I think in all of these cases
in determining how accurate your--
whether you can actually exclude a possibility.
So in that you can reason within a chi-square analysis.
So you would actually have to look at the number of NPDs, Ts,
and PDs, and look at what you would expect
given another hypothesis.
So you think that they are unlinked
or they're a certain distance apart,
and how do those numbers compare actually
the numbers that you get.
So if you actually want to draw a statistical conclusion,
absolutely.
You have to use numbers.
So this is 100 times, I think, 16NPDs plus 2T minus 4NPD
over 4E, which can be reduced to basically T plus 6NPD over 2E.
So this is essentially the formula
for genetic distance, recombination distance
in yeast.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.