Afrikaans
Akan
Albanian
Amharic
Arabic
Armenian
Azerbaijani
Basque
Belarusian
Bemba
Bengali
Bihari
Bosnian
Breton
Bulgarian
Cambodian
Catalan
Cebuano
Cherokee
Chichewa
Chinese (Simplified)
Chinese (Traditional)
Corsican
Croatian
Czech
Danish
English
Esperanto
Estonian
Ewe
Faroese
Filipino
Finnish
French
Frisian
Ga
Galician
Georgian
German
Greek
Guarani
Gujarati
Haitian Creole
Hausa
Hawaiian
Hebrew
Hindi
Hmong
Hungarian
Icelandic
Igbo
Indonesian
Interlingua
Irish
Italian
Japanese
Javanese
Kannada
Kazakh
Kinyarwanda
Kirundi
Kongo
Korean
Krio (Sierra Leone)
Kurdish
Kurdish (SoranĂ®)
Kyrgyz
Laothian
Latin
Latvian
Lingala
Lithuanian
Lozi
Luganda
Luo
Luxembourgish
Macedonian
Malagasy
Malay
Malayalam
Maltese
Maori
Marathi
Mauritian Creole
Moldavian
Mongolian
Myanmar (Burmese)
Montenegrin
Nepali
Nigerian Pidgin
Northern Sotho
Norwegian
Norwegian (Nynorsk)
Occitan
Oriya
Oromo
Pashto
Persian
Polish
Portuguese (Brazil)
Portuguese (Portugal)
Punjabi
Quechua
Romanian
Romansh
Runyakitara
Russian
Samoan
Scots Gaelic
Serbian
Serbo-Croatian
Sesotho
Setswana
Seychellois Creole
Shona
Sindhi
Sinhalese
Slovak
Slovenian
Somali
Spanish
Spanish (Latin American)
Sundanese
Swahili
Swedish
Tajik
Tamil
Tatar
Telugu
Thai
Tigrinya
Tonga
Tshiluba
Tumbuka
Turkish
Turkmen
Twi
Uighur
Ukrainian
Urdu
Uzbek
Vietnamese
Welsh
Wolof
Xhosa
Yiddish
Yoruba
Zulu
Male narrator: In the beginning, there was darkness,
and then, bang,
giving birth to an endless expanding existence
of time, space, and matter.
Every day, new discoveries are unlocking the mysterious,
the mind-blowing, the deadly secrets
of a place we call The Universe.
Thousands of witnesses have claimed to see UFOs,
and their accounts are often strikingly similar.
- You have a crashed saucer but also some crashed bodies.
You have government cover-up.
Narrator: Mainstream science
says the evidence just isn't there.
- Oh, my God.
- It's a big jump between a UFO
and an extraterrestrial spacecraft.
Narrator: But if UFOs were really extraterrestrial craft,
what kind of mind-bending technologies would we find
under the hood?
- You'd have to have some sort of technology
that was capable of canceling the effects of inertia.
Narrator: When it comes to unidentified flying objects,
what is the real deal?
[electronic whirring]
For millions of believers, it all began on June 24, 1947.
A businessman and pilot named Kenneth Arnold is flying solo
near Mount Rainier, Washington.
Suddenly he sees a group of nine aircraft
moving at incredible speeds.
- They were highly reflective,
and they were flying at supersonic speeds,
in formation, changing course abruptly.
The speeds were unattainable at the time.
This was before the age of jets and certainly supersonic jets.
- Being a trained pilot, he did several things
to corroborate their existence to make sure he wasn't seeing
some kind of atmospheric effect.
He changed his— his head angle.
He changed the aircraft angle.
He even positioned the aircraft
such that there was a light snow in the background
behind the objects,
and they appeared dark against a light surface.
Narrator: Before Arnold can maneuver closer,
the objects are gone.
- It was basically unprecedented in modern times.
No one had seen anything like this.
Narrator: In the days that follow,
newspaper reporters misquote Arnold
as he tries to make sense of the incident.
- In fact, he said it moved like saucers skipping on water.
Now, of course, the reporter
kind of messed that up in reporting it
and said that they looked like saucers.
Narrator: The term "flying saucer” is born.
And Arnold's encounter launches the modern UFO phenomenon.
Weeks later, in the summer of 1947,
perhaps the most famous incident
involving an unidentified flying object
is reported near Roswell, New Mexico.
- Roswell's become the poster child of the UFO phenomenon
because it has all the necessary ingredients.
You have a crashed saucer but also some crashed bodies.
You have government cover-up.
There was some sort of cover-up.
There was misinformation given out by the authorities.
- The original account put out by the Air Force at the time
was that this was a flying saucer of alien origin.
And then later, very quickly, it was denied,
and the story then was that this was a weather balloon
which had crashed
and that there were no occupants on board
and that there was nothing extraterrestrial about it.
Narrator: Other witnesses claimed to have seen
actual pieces of a crashed spacecraft,
materials that are reportedly unknown to science.
Both Arnold's sightings and the Roswell incident
remain officially unconfirmed and highly controversial.
- Just about every year, there are thousands
of reported sightings, mostly in the sky,
of objects that they assume are extraterrestrial craft,
so-called UFOs.
The U is important, of course.
They're unidentified.
- I personally have seen a bright light
start at the horizon and shoot off into the clouds.
Now, strictly speaking, that was a UFO.
It's a big jump between a UFO
and an extraterrestrial spacecraft.
Narrator: Scientists argue that most UFO sightings
either have earthly origins—
like satellites, balloons, and aircraft—
Or cosmic origins,
such as meteors, comets,
or even an especially bright planet Venus.
But when a UFO sighting has no known explanation,
could it be an extraterrestrial craft?
And if so, what kind of technologies
could possibly explain the behaviors
that witnesses actually report?
How would such craft be built?
And what problems would they have to overcome?
- A lot of the behavior of UFOs that people have reported
are things that are beyond our current level of physics:
extreme rates of speed or extreme acceleration,
extreme turn rates,
things that just we're— we're not capable of doing
without extreme harm to a pilot or destroying a spacecraft.
Narrator. Eyewitness accounts of super fast accelerations,
lightning turns, and sudden stops
seem to violate known laws of physics,
but could aliens find a way around these laws?
- So what we have to keep in mind here
is the principle of inertia.
That principle, stated first by Isaac Newton,
says that an object at rest or in motion
tends to stay at rest or in motion
unless acted on by an outside force.
So to generate these kinds of crazy changes in inertia,
you'd really have to act on that object
with an immense amount of force.
Narrator: Following the same logic,
a fighter pilot traveling near the speed of sound,
attempting to make a 90-degree turn at the same speed,
would experience something close to 300 "g's" of force.
The most that a human pilot wearing a pressure suit
can manage without blacking out
is around 10 "g's".
If his physiology were remotely similar to humans,
an extraterrestrial pilot undergoing a 300-g maneuver
would instantly perish.
His internal organs would continue moving forward
and crush against the skeleton.
- If they were similar to us,
they'd probably have to have a way of injecting fluid—
Internal fluid— inside their bodies
so that they dealt with this problem
of their organs floating around inside,
and if they were strapped in properly
and cushioned properly, uh,
end up not having internal damage
when they accelerated and decelerated.
Narrator: To effectively cancel the inertial effects
on the craft itself,
the pilots might switch on a technology
that is beyond the reach of modern humans.
- So in order to cancel out the effects of a 300-g turn
and not be squished by that amount of force,
you'd have to have some sort of technology
or a device that was capable
of canceling the effects of inertia.
Narrator: The device would have to manipulate
the force of gravity, using a type of force field
to counteract the gravitational forces
that rule the entire universe.
- This device, you could turn on if you wanted to,
then turn it off if you wanted to,
or maybe it would come on and off automatically.
This is high technology that's out of sight.
Narrator: But if science can't yet explain
how these craft could overcome the deadly problem of inertia,
can it help explain their shapes?
Particularly the most famous shape of all:
the flying saucer.
In the late 1950s,
the US. Air Force tested the Avrocar,
but the design had poor stability
and few aerodynamic advantages,
proving that high speeds are unattainable
for saucer craft in Earth's atmosphere.
The delta wing, or wedge shape, is a far stronger candidate,
a fact that is well known
by modern military aircraft designers.
In fact, the percentage of UFO sightings
reporting a wedge-shaped craft
have increased in recent decades,
a trend that mirrors the emergence of swept-wing jets
and even flying-wing designs like the B-2 stealth bomber.
- The shapes that people have reported over the years
have changed, with the most recent ones
being more wedge-shaped.
So, really, people's accounts tend to reflect
the most advanced aircraft of the time.
Narrator: Beyond movement and shape,
any attempt to explain the science of UFOs
has to deal with the noise factor,
or rather, the lack of noise.
UFO reports consistently claim that the objects move
without making any sound.
- Almost all of these sightings—
It's a real rule—- there's no noise,
which you would expect to hear from any fast-moving craft
in the Earth's atmosphere.
You would hear it.
- What actually happens is that you get
what's called a sonic boom,
and that's a special pressure wave
that sweeps through the atmosphere
along with the craft.
So you're on the ground,
and that huge sonic boom is the result
of that pressure difference
between the front of the aircraft
and the back of the aircraft
as it pushes through the atmosphere.
Narrator: Could an alien craft somehow cancel out
the enormous pressure wave that supersonic flight generates?
The answer could lie in the technology used
in the latest generation
of digital noise-canceling headphones.
- So there is such a thing as a sound-canceling technology,
where you take a particular sound
that you're interested in canceling
and kind of broadcast the negative of that sound
to cancel it out.
Now, I'm not aware of any technology that's capable
of doing that with shock waves.
Narrator. Canceling out
the earsplitting, body-shaking effect of a sonic boom
would certainly require some advanced engineering skills.
And if there is silence, what about invisibility?
Some reports claim that UFOs simply disappear into thin air.
One promising human technology currently being researched
might explain such phenomenon.
- There is a technology on the horizon
which might change things visually.
And that is a kind of light-bending technology.
As a class, they're called met a materials.
If you want to think about popular movies,
think the invisibility cloak in the Harry Potter movies.
Narrator: Meta materials use combinations
of polymer substrates, gold, and copper
to forcibly bend electromagnetic waves around an object.
The light is guided around the object
rather than being reflected or refracted.
But advanced materials, stealth capability,
and mind-bending maneuverability would all come to nothing
if our visitors were unable to get to Earth
in the first place.
- I'd say that the chances of another civilization
making it here to visit us are pretty minuscule.
But if they did make it,
it would mean that they had solved
a whole bunch of problems,
including material-science problems
that we don't have answers to.
So they'd have technology far beyond ours,
perhaps even beyond what we've dreamt of at this point.
Narrator: But scientists can imagine
several ingenious technologies that could bridge
the seemingly unbridgeable distance between the stars,
including one explosive propulsion source
that's so apocalyptic,
we might see them coming light-years away.
For decades, countless UFO reports have surfaced
from cities and countries around the globe.
But not all UFO sightings have been reported
from the surface of planet Earth.
On July 19, 2009,
viewers of a NASA video feed from the space shuttle Endeavor
reported seeing a disc-shaped object
hovering above the shuttle's mechanical arm.
- Roger on that visual...
narrator. Space-based UFO sightings like this
have purportedly happened throughout the history
of manned spaceflight.
Unspecified cosmic phenomenon?
Or could it suggest the possibility
that huge extraterrestrial star ships
are cruising the Milky Way galaxy?
- Space travel between the stars,
it's a staple of science fiction, right?
You see it every night on television.
You see it in the movies all the time.
But could we really do it,
or could any species really do it?
Well, the distances between the stars are enormous,
really enormous.
Interstellar travel doesn't violate physics.
It isn't that you can rule it out and say,
"There's absolutely no way they can come here."
It's just that it's very, very hard.
Narrator: Just traveling from the Earth to Alpha Centauri,
our closest neighboring star at nearly 4 1/2 light-years,
is beyond the reach of our most powerful rockets.
- If an advanced civilization were to visit us
from a distant star system,
we can pretty much rule out that they would use
chemical rockets to get here.
Despite the impressive pillar of fire and smoke
that we see during Apollo Saturn 4
or shuttle launches,
chemical rockets don't get you very far in a solar system.
- To give you some context for that distance,
our furthest known space probe is Voyager 1,
launched in 1977.
It's been flying for 34 years at 38,000 miles per hour,
and it's only now starting to leave our solar system.
- If its destination were Alpha Centauri,
it would take over 56,000 years
to reach even the closest star system.
To engage in interstellar missions
on time frames of a human lifetime,
around about 50 years,
we can see that we need
to increase the speed that we can travel
by at least a factor of 1,000.
Narrator: Scientists have determined
that the speed of light is a mind-blowing
186,000 miles per second.
A spacecraft traveling the star systems
would have to reach a significant percentage
of that speed even to reach the nearest star.
The biggest obstacle is weight.
A chemical rocket exacts a huge weight penalty
because its entire fuel supply must be carried on board.
- We can calculate that
even to reach 6% of the speed of light
using chemical rocket fuel,
you would need more rocket fuel
than exists mass in the universe.
So we really know that it's actually impossible
to reach another star system using chemical rocket fuel.
Narrator: If extraterrestrial visitations are even possible,
their spacecraft must solve this problem.
In 2011, NASA's NanoSail-D
became the first solar sail to orbit the Earth.
The ultra thin 100-square-foot sail uses sunlight,
or photon pressure, as a source of propulsion.
- One of the immutable limitations of rocket propulsion
is the fact that any rocket has to carry its fuel with it.
A solar sail can take advantage
of the naturally occurring resources,
namely photons emanating from the Sun,
which can be used to propel that solar sail.
Similarly, a hang glider can fly without any fuel or an engine
just by taking an advantage of the natural resources
we're surrounded by, namely the atmosphere
and the laws of aerodynamics.
Narrator: To achieve sufficient speeds
to tow a spacecraft supporting life-forms,
the sail would have to be huge,
up to hundreds of miles in diameter.
And because the photon pressure from a star would decrease
the further the sail traveled,
some have envisioned a concentrated laser beam
directing energy at the sail.
- Eventually and sadly,
this hang glider and all hang gliders
at some point have to land,
but a solar sail riding a beam of laser energy
could conceivably travel to the stars.
Narrator. The max speed of a solar sail:
about 10% the speed of light.
Travel from Earth to Alpha Centauri
using laser-generated photons:
about 45 years.
Currently, NASA and other space agencies
have plans for launching more solar sails.
But there are other, more powerful sources
of propulsion in the universe.
- In the 1960s, a method of propulsion was proposed
where a spacecraft would literally
drop a series of explosive charges out the back,
and the force of the explosions
would push the spacecraft forward.
The prototype was called the Orion drive,
and there were actually a series of experiments done
with conventional charges to show that it would work.
The Orion drive, however,
was proposed to use nuclear charges.
In order to simulate an Orion-style propulsion system,
Paul and Jim here are rigging up a demonstration
where they're going to put a small chemical charge
inside this barrel,
and we're going to lift this off the ground
50, 60 feet in the air.
We're going to actually calculate
the energy released in this explosion
and compare it to a nuclear charge
you might find on an actual Orion spacecraft system.
Our Orion spacecraft simulator is rigged and ready to go.
We're going to light off the charges inside,
blow the can up into the air,
and compare that with the energy release
from a typical nuclear explosion
that would be used on an Orion-style drive.
[muted bang]
Narrator: The Orion spacecraft,
studied at Los Alamos in the late 1950s,
proposed nuclear fission as its propulsion source.
Fission energy is produced when the nucleus of an atom
splits into smaller parts,
producing free neutrons and protons
that release tremendous gamma ray energy.
[booming and crackling]
[whooshing]
- [laughs]
The explosive charge in this 35-pound barrel
lofted it about 60 feet in the air.
A small nuclear charge in the Hiroshima range
would liberate about 27 million times more energy.
Clearly, that's a practical propulsion drive
for interplanetary or even interstellar travel.
Because of the huge explosions
that an Orion drive would require,
on the back of the spacecraft,
you would have a huge, thick metal plate
that would absorb the thrust of the explosion
and a series of shock absorbers
to keep the crew from getting jolted
each time the charges went off.
Narrator. The max speed
of a nuclear-powered fission spacecraft:
about 5% the speed of light.
Travel time from Earth to Alpha Centauri:
about 90 years.
Despite its powerful fuel source,
the fission craft is actually slower than a solar sail.
Boosting speed would mean turning to another
more intense nuclear reaction.
- Fission technology is well known and understood.
And we've been using it to generate power here on Earth
for decades, but there's another kind of nuclear technology,
and that's nuclear fusion.
- Fusion is the power source of the Sun.
In the core of our Sun, the temperatures are so high,
atoms are moving so fast that they slam into each other,
creating new elements and liberating energy.
Narrator: The opposite of fission,
fusion energy is produced when two atomic nuclei
fuse together to form a single, heavier nucleus.
The result is a huge liberation of energy.
A fusion-powered spacecraft was proposed in a 1970s study
called Project Daedalus.
Its mission called for a trip to Barnard's Star,
some 5.9 light-years distant.
Instead of nuclear bombs, the fusion-powered craft
creates the propulsion on board in a reaction chamber.
- The fuel pellets for the Daedalus-class stars hip
consisted of pellets composed of a deuterium-helium-3 mix.
These would have been ignited
by what we call relativistic electron beams.
These are extremely high energy electrons
that would have hit the deuterium-helium-3 pellets,
caused them to fuse,
and a huge amount of energy would be released.
The Daedalus design called for 250 of these pellets
to be released every second for over two years.
The spacecraft would have weighed 55,000 tons,
most of which would have been fuel.
Narrator. The weight penalty for such a spacecraft
would be high, but an advanced civilization
could eliminate the problem by mining the hydrogen fuel
during its interstellar journey.
Deuterium, or heavy hydrogen,
exists in abundance on Earth, notably in seawater,
but helium-3 is a much rarer isotope.
In our solar system, it can be found on the Moon
and in vast quantities on Jupiter and Saturn.
Scientists have proposed using huge hydrogen scoops
to mine the helium-3 needed to cross the void of space.
- So it's conceivable that if you had a craft
that was powered by nuclear fusion,
you could go to another star system
and then use the hydrogen
available from that star to refuel.
Narrator: The self-contained fusion-powered spacecraft
could avoid a huge weight penalty
and reach speeds that could allow near-star exploration
in a reasonable time frame.
The max speed
of a nuclear-powered fusion spacecraft:
up to 15% the speed of light.
Travel time from Earth to Alpha Centauri:
about 35 years.
The immense costs, the logistics,
and even the politics of nuclear-powered spaceflight
long ago caused humanity to scrap any and all plans.
But a sufficiently advanced society
could trade nuclear propulsion
for what seems like an impossible paradox:
traveling at light speed without moving at all.
Can UFOs actually achieve
the immense speeds required for interstellar travel?
One potential answer may be buried
30 feet beneath the ground in America's heartland:
the Fermi lab Tevatron Collider outside Chicago, Illinois.
Racing just below the speed of light,
particles of protons and antiprotons
are launched in opposing directions.
They meet in a high-energy collision.
The impact produces gamma rays,
the highest energy source known in the universe
and potentially the key to interstellar travel.
- The best way of making antimatter here on Earth
is to employ probably the most famous equation
that Einstein taught us,
which is E equals MC squared,
which tells us that for a certain amount of matter,
we can get energy.
It's a great idea because it's incredibly efficient.
You essentially take all of the mass in those particles
and convert it into energy.
Narrator: But how can antimatter exist in the universe
if it must be artificially manufactured?
That's the question that Stefan H. from Philadelphia
texted The Universe.
- Stefan, antimatter definitely exists,
and when it meets up with normal matter,
it explodes in a burst of electromagnetic radiation.
Now, we can make small bits of antimatter in laboratories,
but we can also collect antimatter from space.
Some cosmic rays,
which are charged, very energetic particles
coming from space,
actually consist of antimatter.
Narrator: Currently, the super collider
is the only practical way to produce antimatter.
And right now, it's created in very small quantities.
- If we could figure out a way
to both create and store enough antimatter,
we would have a storable fuel,
which, when mixed with ordinary matter,
would liberate a huge amount of energy
at a rate way beyond what either fission or fusion can do.
- Because we know antimatter exists
and we know antimatter can be created and stored,
it is conceivable that an advanced civilization
could create and harness the power of antimatter
in sufficient quantities to create an antimatter rocket.
Narrator: An antimatter ship
could achieve unbelievable velocities,
cruising just below light speed,
nearly matching the speed of a star beam
streaking across the galaxy.
Travel time from Earth to Alpha Centauri
4 1/2 light-years distant:
about 5 years.
In human terms, the cost of creating
enough antimatter particles to power such a stars hip
would be astronomical.
It might be affordable in alien currency,
but an antimatter spacecraft like this
comes at a high price.
The gamma rays from antimatter propulsion are so dangerous,
they could destroy the cell structure
of any living beings aboard ship.
This stars hip would have to include
an advanced shielding mechanism to keep the crew alive.
And at such high rates of speed,
there are equally destructive threats in the universe.
- Space is pretty empty,
but if you were moving close to the speed of light,
you'd need an extremely effective shielding system
that would allow you to be protected
from interstellar dust particles that would all but annihilate
a spacecraft traveling that fast.
Narrator: But if space debris is so dangerous,
why not avoid it completely?
The solution might be one familiar to Star Trek fans,
namely a stars hip that could achieve light speed
without even moving.
- In effect, one would create what is called a "warp bubble,"
the name taken straight out of science fiction,
and that would involve
compressing a region of space-time
in front of a spacecraft
and expanding a region of space-time behind a spacecraft
while the spacecraft itself sat stationary
inside this flat bubble.
So one would effectively be riding a wave of space-time.
Narrator: A warp drive may seem like pure sci-fi fantasy,
but in 1994, a well-respected young physicist
named Miguel Alcubierre published a serious proposal
outlining how to travel in a controllable space warp.
There are huge obstacles to Alcubierre's
warp drive solution.
The biggest is called dark energy,
a cosmic phenomenon recognized in 2011
when three scientists were awarded the Nobel Prize
for proving its existence.
- The simplest explanation that's been proposed
for the phenomenon of dark energy
is that there's an intrinsic property of space itself
that makes it want to expand.
You can actually see it by looking at receding parts
of the universe and seeing that
there's this extra acceleration component,
but it isn't a stored energy source
like solar energy or other kinds of energy.
- And so it's not inconceivable.
It's not beyond the realms of possibility
that some advanced civilization
existing somewhere in the universe
has learned how to harness dark energy
to create an exotic form of propulsion.
Narrator: But there's another obstacle
to a workable warp drive.
The only known way to pull a spacecraft forward
within a warp requires harnessing the intense energy
of a black hole.
- The sort of simple notion
is somehow to make a very concentrated bit of matter,
extremely concentrated,
on the level which would cause a black hole.
If you could generate a black hole on a small scale,
so to speak, you could dangle it in front of the ship
and use its space distortion to sort of drag the ship along.
Narrator: And exactly how fast could a warp drive
tow an extraterrestrial spacecraft?
- The clear implication of Alcubierre's work
was that it should be possible,
if you can make this design of a warp drive,
to achieve speeds almost any multiple of the speed of light.
Narrator: Travel time from Earth to Alpha Centauri
aboard a light speed craft powered by a space warp:
about 4 1/2 years...
Or less, as long as everyone on board doesn't incinerate.
- One problem with the Alcubierre drive is,
within that warp bubble, temperatures would rise
to far hotter than the core of our Sun.
That's hot.
Narrator: Just one more small problem to solve
for the chance to reach planet Earth.
But what if such an alien spacecraft were to arrive
in Earth's atmosphere,
riding in a warp bubble, towed by a black hole?
It might not be the first mass-witness UFO sighting,
but it would certainly be the last.
March 13, 1997,
thousands of people witness an optical phenomenon
drifting across the Arizona skies.
Reports of a series of bright lights in geometric patterns
are widespread, including multiple sightings over Phoenix
of a craft up to a mile wide
with lights winking on and off in sequence.
- Reconstructing the events of that evening,
the lights of the Phoenix lights were almost certainly flares
dropped by an Air Force A-10 aircraft
in conjunction with the human tendency
to envision a solid shape connecting them.
That's the best explanation for the Phoenix lights.
Narrator. For many, the Phoenix lights incident
was direct proof that
a huge extraterrestrial craft had arrived.
Some even called it a mother ship.
The purpose of an extraterrestrial mother ship
is fundamental to the theories of alien visitation.
It's the only way to bridge the vast distances
of interstellar space.
- The term "mother ship," I think, came into being
around the same time that "flying saucers" as a term
came into being.
And I think the universal notion was,
you couldn't make an interstellar trip
in a person-sized craft.
You have to have something really large.
- An apt earthly analogy of a mother ship
is that of an aircraft carrier.
An aircraft carrier travels the vast distances
across the oceans,
but its purpose is to transport smaller aircraft
which can then go on
and engage in whatever their missions may be.
Narrator: If the journey to Earth is long,
on the order of centuries or even millennia,
the mother ship would be much more
than just an aircraft carrier.
- There's the generational or "ark ship,"
which is a very large spacecraft
that is essentially an enclosed ecosystem,
in which generations of inhabitants
expect to be born, grow old, and die
over the long period it takes the spacecraft
to reach its ultimate destination.
Narrator: Perhaps with technology,
such as suspended animation,
biological alien passengers could be put to sleep
and revived after the vast journey.
Surviving such a journey would also mean surviving
the destructive energy powering the spacecraft itself.
One logical design solution,
a cigar-shaped mother ship,
is precisely what many UFO witnesses claim to have seen.
- For any advanced propulsion system,
you would want to situate the crew
as far away as possible from the engine source.
So one possible design would be a very long, thin design,
with the engine located at one end of the spacecraft
and then some kind of truss connecting the crew section
as far away as possible so as to avoid damage
from high-energy neutrons, X-rays, or gamma rays
from the advanced propulsion system.
Narrator: If such ark ships have in fact
visited planet Earth,
the evidence would be overwhelming and undeniable.
- Something all these exotic
and advanced propulsion technologies have in common
is that they all radiate prodigious amounts of energy,
and so we'd be able to see them, like beacons on a lighthouse,
from sometimes light-years away.
- The concentrated emission of X-rays, gamma rays,
or subatomic particles would be suspicious,
'cause we don't see that in our environment locally
under any normal circumstances.
Narrator. Beyond the obvious visual evidence,
the physical effect of a mother ship approaching
so close to the Earth's surface
could be a terrifying form of apocalypse.
- If, for whatever reason,
this extraterrestrial technology or civilization
chose not to turn off their engines,
it could be catastrophic for life on Earth,
as we would be bathed
in high-energy neutrons, X-rays, and gamma rays.
- If it's something which is a version of a warp drive,
then you're talking about space distortion,
and you wouldn't want to be too close to any major mass,
including a planet.
Narrator: Such catastrophic visitations
assume that aliens are willing to risk their own lives
in interstellar space,
but there might be a better way.
They could stay at home
and explore the cosmos using a race of thinking machines.
For many ardent believers in the UFO phenomenon,
the Roswell, New Mexico, event in the summer of 1947
is the defining alien encounter in human history.
In popular culture,
the most lasting detail from the purported crash
came from the descriptions of extraterrestrial bodies
found at the scene.
In the ensuing decades, this vision of alien beings,
known as "the grays," became the accepted standard
in science fiction and recurring alien encounter reports.
The over sized heads may explain
an expected feature in alien biology:
greater intelligence.
The larger skulls would contain larger, more advanced brains
compared to ours.
Mastering the profound challenges
of interstellar travel would certainly require
great intelligence,
but might it require something that is beyond organic biology?
- One area of science fiction where we might be making
kind of a big mistake is to assume that the aliens
are biological, that they're living things.
- I think that the possibilities for the kinds of organisms
which might travel between the stars are really wide open.
And one possibility that has appeared on occasion
in science fiction is machine intelligence.
Narrator: According to a recent earthly equation
known as Moore's Law,
the number of transistors on a single computer chip
doubles every 18 months,
meaning computer processing speed doubles.
This trend has continued for more than half a century
and is expected to continue through 2020 or later.
The exponential explosion of processing speed
is opening the door on a staple of science fiction
called artificial intelligence.
- So if you invent a thinking machine,
100 years later, that machine
is not only smarter than you are,
it's smarter than all humans that have ever lived.
And that's the difference between artificial intelligence
and real intelligence.
Artificial intelligence can evolve enormously faster.
But I think the form of A.I. that we find
most both menacing and promising
is the kind of A.I that could in fact
do what our brains can do, can think the way we can think.
Narrator: At Stanford University's
Artificial Intelligence Laboratory,
the future of truly intelligent machines
is rapidly approaching.
- There are a few things that make A. difficult.
One is, we don't really know yet how to make computers
learn as effectively as humans can.
It seems that our computers today just aren't as fast
as we would like them to get
to simulate the learning processes
that take place in the human brain.
Narrator: To demonstrate
early-stage artificial intelligence,
Stanford students designed a fighting robot,
one that attempts to learn as it fights.
- Okay, so what it's doing now,
it's trying to defend itself,
so it's reacting to your motion.
So depending on how you move your sword,
the robot will adapt to your motion and to your behavior.
- How important a step on the road
to true artificial intelligence are robots like this, Torsten?
- So here we are using artificial intelligence methods,
like learning methods,
to adapt to the environment of the robot,
but we are still not at a stage
where the robot is really thinking.
- Today's computers are still far less intelligent
than almost any human.
But in the future, I think computers
could eventually reach and maybe even surpass
human intelligence.
And if that's the case,
imagine that each of us has a computer in our wallet—
A cell phone or wallet-
that was as smart as Einstein or even smarter.
How will civilization change,
and what are the amazing things we could do then?
Narrator: Advanced as it is on Earth,
the fencing robot is but a crude analogy
for the type of machine intelligence
that could pilot an interstellar spacecraft.
The immense obstacles of space travel,
including the sheer time scale and cosmic hazards,
build a strong case that a race of intelligent machines
will make first contact.
- But honestly, if interstellar travel really takes place,
it seems sort of reasonable
to not send the biological beings.
I mean, they're fragile.
They have finite lifetimes.
- Just as NASA sends robotic probes
to explore the solar system in advance of human explorers,
our first contact with an alien civilization
may be with its robotic probes.
Narrator: Biologic being or A super being?
Our vision of an extraterrestrial
will remain mere speculation until first contact is made.
But how long will we wait?
And despite a lack of hard evidence,
just how likely is the existence
of another intelligent civilization?
Some believe it is highly likely
that the universe teems with life.
- The galaxy has been around for a long time.
The solar system's been around for quite a long time
but the galaxy much longer.
And the stars in it,
many of them are much older
than the Sun and our solar system.
So the chances are, if civilizations are out there,
they've been around for longer than we have.
If they exist, say, for 100,000 years,
then the chances are pretty good, I think,
they will have learned to either communicate
across interstellar space or possibly travel.
Narrator: Until first contact occurs,
humanity will continue to scan the skies for UFOs.
None have been proven to be extraterrestrial craft so far,
but that does not rule out the possibility
that humanity may one day discover evidence
of an intelligent civilization,
either in the far flung heavens or much closer to home.
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.