All language subtitles for 5. Edit tab - Optical Flow and Speed Warp Edit Tab Kolder Creat

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese) Download
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:04,713 --> 00:00:05,505 Now, what can we 2 00:00:05,505 --> 00:00:08,509 do if we want to slow down our clip even more? 3 00:00:08,592 --> 00:00:10,677 This clip was shot at 60 frames per second. 4 00:00:10,677 --> 00:00:14,306 So we know that the maximum that we can slow it down to is 40%. 5 00:00:14,390 --> 00:00:16,892 Well, what happens if we want to slow it down to 10%? 6 00:00:16,892 --> 00:00:18,644 So let's just see what it looks like. 7 00:00:18,644 --> 00:00:20,062 So, I mean, hey, Commander. 8 00:00:20,062 --> 00:00:22,356 Command shift. Ah, let's do the same thing. 9 00:00:22,356 --> 00:00:27,737 And at this point, let's slow this section down to 10%. 10 00:00:27,821 --> 00:00:31,992 So I'm going to drag these speed handles here, 11 00:00:32,075 --> 00:00:35,412 these speed points to 10%, 12 00:00:35,495 --> 00:00:40,042 and I'm going to select the keyframes here, smooth them out. 13 00:00:40,084 --> 00:00:42,378 Let's play it 14 00:00:42,378 --> 00:00:43,295 very choppy. 15 00:00:43,295 --> 00:00:45,881 We can clearly see that it's skipping. 16 00:00:45,881 --> 00:00:47,883 It's showing us frame by frame. 17 00:00:47,883 --> 00:00:50,553 And it just it doesn't look good. 18 00:00:50,553 --> 00:00:51,721 Like it looks very unprofessional. 19 00:00:51,721 --> 00:00:53,681 No one would actually ever do that. 20 00:00:53,681 --> 00:00:56,851 Now, individually, we have this really cool section 21 00:00:56,851 --> 00:01:00,814 inside of our inspector here at the bottom re time in scaling. 22 00:01:01,022 --> 00:01:02,232 Normally it's close like this. 23 00:01:02,232 --> 00:01:06,320 You could just click it and open it and it gives us some options as to how 24 00:01:06,320 --> 00:01:12,076 we want this slow motion or the speed change with individually to be processed. 25 00:01:12,159 --> 00:01:15,830 So in this case, what we're going to want to do is ask 26 00:01:15,871 --> 00:01:20,668 Da Vinci to analyze this part of the clip differently. 27 00:01:20,668 --> 00:01:24,214 We want it to instead of just slow down the clip. 28 00:01:24,214 --> 00:01:27,175 So it's you know, we can see each frame individually. 29 00:01:27,175 --> 00:01:31,638 We want it to generate frames in between these frames 30 00:01:31,722 --> 00:01:37,519 to basically make it seem as though it's smooth motion. 31 00:01:37,603 --> 00:01:41,065 Right now, we're missing frames in between these frames. 32 00:01:41,065 --> 00:01:43,401 And that's why we can see that skipping. 33 00:01:43,401 --> 00:01:46,320 We can see each individual frame. It doesn't look smooth. 34 00:01:46,320 --> 00:01:51,409 So the way that we can do that is change the re time process to optical flow. 35 00:01:51,492 --> 00:01:54,579 Optical flow is basically just asking the program to create 36 00:01:54,579 --> 00:01:58,959 those artificial frames and to make the footage look smoother. 37 00:01:59,042 --> 00:02:01,336 And what I found is optical flow 38 00:02:01,336 --> 00:02:04,631 is not that processor intensive. 39 00:02:04,715 --> 00:02:07,801 I'm able to playback the clip right away 40 00:02:07,801 --> 00:02:11,764 and it doesn't require too much power from my computer. 41 00:02:11,847 --> 00:02:16,519 So let's play this back. Let's press play 42 00:02:16,561 --> 00:02:19,814 so we can see that we're experiencing a bit of lag right 43 00:02:19,814 --> 00:02:23,693 now, slowing down a bit. 44 00:02:23,777 --> 00:02:26,780 And that looks really good. 45 00:02:26,822 --> 00:02:29,074 We can see that we no longer have that skipping. 46 00:02:29,074 --> 00:02:32,244 Da Vinci has created extra frames to make this feel smooth. 47 00:02:32,244 --> 00:02:34,288 And in this situation, it's done an amazing job. 48 00:02:34,288 --> 00:02:36,498 I'm super stoked on this end result. 49 00:02:36,498 --> 00:02:40,795 Now, in some situations, optical flow might not do the best job. 50 00:02:41,045 --> 00:02:44,173 So what we're going to want to do in some situations 51 00:02:44,173 --> 00:02:47,176 is go to the second option here motion estimation 52 00:02:47,302 --> 00:02:50,889 and change that from project settings to speed warp down here. 53 00:02:51,055 --> 00:02:53,767 Now, I'm not actually going to press speed warp right now 54 00:02:53,767 --> 00:02:57,062 because it slows down my computer significantly. 55 00:02:57,187 --> 00:03:00,566 It's very processor intensive and my fully maxed out 56 00:03:00,566 --> 00:03:03,736 20 2016 inch MacBook Pro 57 00:03:03,944 --> 00:03:07,531 top tier just starts to lag like crazy. 58 00:03:07,698 --> 00:03:10,660 I literally can't even like open up 59 00:03:10,660 --> 00:03:13,496 a new safari window while this is happening. 60 00:03:13,496 --> 00:03:16,708 Like it's just sucking all the power out of my computer. 61 00:03:16,791 --> 00:03:18,585 So here I rendered out two examples. 62 00:03:18,585 --> 00:03:21,963 So the first one is just optical flow. 63 00:03:22,047 --> 00:03:24,508 So we have a seal swimming over here 64 00:03:24,508 --> 00:03:27,511 and it does this little jump and I wanted to slow that down 65 00:03:27,594 --> 00:03:30,472 and we can see that things kind of look 66 00:03:30,472 --> 00:03:33,475 a bit off, doesn't look too great. 67 00:03:33,601 --> 00:03:37,646 So I decided to use Speed Warp, 68 00:03:37,730 --> 00:03:41,317 which is a setting in motion estimation. 69 00:03:41,317 --> 00:03:43,569 So I changed it from project settings to speed warp. 70 00:03:43,569 --> 00:03:46,072 And if we view that, 71 00:03:46,072 --> 00:03:48,032 we can see in this situation 72 00:03:48,032 --> 00:03:52,162 it actually did not make things much better. 73 00:03:52,245 --> 00:03:54,664 We can see a lot of weird stuff 74 00:03:54,664 --> 00:03:57,668 happening down here, down below. 75 00:03:57,668 --> 00:04:00,045 Things are just looking off. 76 00:04:00,045 --> 00:04:02,965 So in this situation I would say that it didn't 77 00:04:02,965 --> 00:04:06,010 necessarily do a better job at on the top here. 78 00:04:06,010 --> 00:04:08,179 It looks like it might have done a better job. 79 00:04:08,179 --> 00:04:12,517 I'm not seeing as much skipping that movement of the rocks 80 00:04:12,517 --> 00:04:16,771 feels a bit smoother, but down below, everywhere else, 81 00:04:16,855 --> 00:04:19,774 there's some weird stuff going on. 82 00:04:19,774 --> 00:04:21,902 So in this situation, optical 83 00:04:21,902 --> 00:04:24,905 flow might have actually been better 84 00:04:24,988 --> 00:04:28,659 than applying speed warp, but that's not always the case. 85 00:04:28,659 --> 00:04:31,370 That's why it's important to experiment with this kind of stuff. 86 00:04:31,370 --> 00:04:36,709 Unfortunately, using speed warp can sometimes take a very long time. 87 00:04:36,709 --> 00:04:40,588 So what I actually do is when I want to apply 88 00:04:40,630 --> 00:04:44,050 speed warp to my clip, I'll change motion estimation to speed warp. 89 00:04:44,300 --> 00:04:47,679 And then right away, the first thing that I'll do 90 00:04:47,762 --> 00:04:48,555 is right click on the 91 00:04:48,555 --> 00:04:51,558 clip and render in place. 92 00:04:51,641 --> 00:04:55,479 Now, I'm not going to do that right now because my computer's going to die. 93 00:04:55,562 --> 00:04:59,692 But what that allows you to do is it renders the clip in place. 94 00:04:59,692 --> 00:05:03,487 You'll get a pop up window on DaVinci, so I'll just do it for the clip. 95 00:05:03,487 --> 00:05:07,033 Without that selected, it gives you the option 96 00:05:07,033 --> 00:05:10,036 to select how you want this to be exported. 97 00:05:10,161 --> 00:05:12,455 And when you press render, it will render it in place. 98 00:05:12,455 --> 00:05:15,458 It'll render it to whatever folder you've selected 99 00:05:15,625 --> 00:05:18,920 and it'll replace what you have here with a rendered clip. 100 00:05:19,004 --> 00:05:23,467 And when I'm changing the motion estimation to speed warp, 101 00:05:23,550 --> 00:05:27,721 I'm pretty much always going to do that because otherwise there's no chance 102 00:05:27,721 --> 00:05:32,643 that I, with my MacBook, can get DaVinci to actually playback the clip 103 00:05:32,643 --> 00:05:36,647 it needs to render it and replace it in order for it to playback. 104 00:05:36,731 --> 00:05:41,736 So this is another clip that I have here that I wanted to show you guys, 105 00:05:41,820 --> 00:05:46,825 because this is an example of where Speed Warp actually works 106 00:05:47,033 --> 00:05:50,787 really well and it shows just how powerful 107 00:05:50,954 --> 00:05:53,957 this option is within Da Vinci. 108 00:05:53,957 --> 00:05:55,834 So I have this clip here. 109 00:05:55,834 --> 00:05:58,796 This is shot at 4K 60 on a phone 110 00:05:58,796 --> 00:06:01,966 and I want to slow it down just up here. 111 00:06:02,216 --> 00:06:06,053 Now, I've actually rendered out each version of this clip, 112 00:06:06,220 --> 00:06:11,267 one with optical flow, one with speed warp and one with just the project settings 113 00:06:11,267 --> 00:06:14,271 so that you guys can see the difference between all of these. 114 00:06:14,312 --> 00:06:16,189 So the first one is just project settings. 115 00:06:16,189 --> 00:06:21,904 So where we're going from 100% to 10%, 116 00:06:21,987 --> 00:06:24,031 there's a little little section right here 117 00:06:24,031 --> 00:06:28,118 where we're at 10% and obviously it looks very unprofessional. 118 00:06:28,327 --> 00:06:31,330 You can see each individual frame. 119 00:06:31,330 --> 00:06:33,249 It just doesn't look good. 120 00:06:33,249 --> 00:06:37,795 Now, I tried optical flow and let's take a look at optical flow. 121 00:06:37,879 --> 00:06:39,964 We got some weird stuff happening here. 122 00:06:39,964 --> 00:06:41,341 Even with optical flow, 123 00:06:41,341 --> 00:06:43,176 I thought that optical flow is going to work 124 00:06:43,176 --> 00:06:46,888 well because it's a simple, simple kind of frame, you know? 125 00:06:46,888 --> 00:06:49,141 And we have a blue background. 126 00:06:49,141 --> 00:06:50,976 Your subject is removed from the background. 127 00:06:50,976 --> 00:06:54,897 So this I thought, would be a great example for optical flow. 128 00:06:54,980 --> 00:06:58,693 But we can still see that there's like a lot of blending here. 129 00:06:58,734 --> 00:07:02,530 We can see at this stage where is it right here? 130 00:07:02,530 --> 00:07:05,408 Like that just does not look good. 131 00:07:05,408 --> 00:07:07,076 The helmet, it's like blurry. 132 00:07:07,076 --> 00:07:09,078 Things just don't look good. 133 00:07:09,078 --> 00:07:11,623 Now, what I did in this situation 134 00:07:11,623 --> 00:07:14,960 was I, I selected Speed warp. 135 00:07:15,001 --> 00:07:17,921 So now we can watch Speed Warp. 136 00:07:18,005 --> 00:07:19,089 It looks much better. 137 00:07:19,089 --> 00:07:20,758 It's still not perfect, 138 00:07:20,758 --> 00:07:25,429 but we're not getting that same kind of artifacting and ghosting. 139 00:07:25,429 --> 00:07:30,601 That optical flow was giving us the tire is staying solid 140 00:07:30,726 --> 00:07:35,481 throughout the entire time and things are looking pretty good. Now. 141 00:07:35,481 --> 00:07:39,027 If I wanted to make this look even better, 142 00:07:39,110 --> 00:07:42,030 I would have shot at a much higher shutter speed. 143 00:07:42,030 --> 00:07:44,408 Now I shot this at double shutter. 144 00:07:44,408 --> 00:07:48,453 So since since we're shooting 60 frames per second, I was shooting 145 00:07:48,453 --> 00:07:50,372 at a shutter of one over 120. 146 00:07:50,372 --> 00:07:52,917 That's basically the rule that every filmmaker follows. 147 00:07:52,917 --> 00:07:56,754 But if I wanted to make this clip feel like it was actually shot 148 00:07:56,962 --> 00:08:00,049 at a very high frame rate, I would have shot at a much higher 149 00:08:00,049 --> 00:08:03,553 shutter speed so that we're not getting any motion blur. 150 00:08:03,636 --> 00:08:06,639 So optical flow and speed warp, 151 00:08:06,639 --> 00:08:10,185 they're going to struggle with motion blur 152 00:08:10,268 --> 00:08:14,398 because you don't have that crisp, clean edge, you don't have all the detail. 153 00:08:14,398 --> 00:08:17,192 Everything is kind of already blurry because of the motion blur. 154 00:08:17,192 --> 00:08:21,488 So if you do want to achieve the best effect possible, 155 00:08:21,572 --> 00:08:24,450 then you're going to want to shoot on a higher shutter speed. 156 00:08:24,450 --> 00:08:27,662 That speed warp clearly did a much better job 157 00:08:27,745 --> 00:08:33,501 and it's a very viable option in this situation. 158 00:08:33,543 --> 00:08:37,130 I would probably use that clip if I needed to slow it down. 159 00:08:37,130 --> 00:08:42,427 That much in an actual production, in an actual commercial or whatever. 160 00:08:42,511 --> 00:08:44,596 Speed Warp actually uses 161 00:08:44,596 --> 00:08:48,767 A.I., It uses artificial intelligence to try to figure things out. 162 00:08:48,976 --> 00:08:50,728 That's why it takes much longer. 163 00:08:50,728 --> 00:08:54,857 This dirt bike clip actually took about 5 minutes. 164 00:08:54,941 --> 00:09:00,196 I timed it just to analyze the clip and apply that speed warp effect to it. 165 00:09:00,279 --> 00:09:05,118 And then right away I had to right click and render in place 166 00:09:05,201 --> 00:09:10,540 just so that DaVinci wouldn't bottleneck and I can still edit in the program. 167 00:09:10,540 --> 00:09:14,378 So it's important to render in place when you're changing the motion estimation 168 00:09:14,378 --> 00:09:15,671 to speed warp. 169 00:09:15,671 --> 00:09:20,468 Now there are some other options here in real time process and motion estimation. 170 00:09:20,551 --> 00:09:23,095 We have some other options here. 171 00:09:23,095 --> 00:09:26,015 I've experimented with these and really 172 00:09:26,015 --> 00:09:29,686 the only one that I have personally use is speed warp. 173 00:09:29,769 --> 00:09:35,567 If you are not getting the desired effect with speed warp or 174 00:09:35,650 --> 00:09:36,902 optical flow, 175 00:09:36,902 --> 00:09:40,781 feel free to play around, experiment, try different things. 176 00:09:40,864 --> 00:09:46,495 But in my experience, both optical flow and speed warp work, the best. 177 00:09:46,578 --> 00:09:49,915 Now we do have this other setting frame blend here 178 00:09:49,915 --> 00:09:52,919 and nearest and I pretty much never use those. 179 00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:56,839 Let me just show you guys an example of what frame blend it looks like. 180 00:09:56,881 --> 00:10:01,010 If you go back to the steel clip, I have this frame blend example. 181 00:10:01,052 --> 00:10:04,806 And basically what frame Blend does is it blends the 182 00:10:04,973 --> 00:10:07,976 the previous frame and the next frame together. 183 00:10:08,101 --> 00:10:13,816 And in this case it might not look so terrible. 184 00:10:13,899 --> 00:10:16,443 But when we compare this image 185 00:10:16,443 --> 00:10:20,281 to just optical flow, 186 00:10:20,364 --> 00:10:21,741 optical flow 187 00:10:21,741 --> 00:10:25,495 looks way, way better in my opinion. 188 00:10:25,578 --> 00:10:27,413 So frame blend is there. 189 00:10:27,413 --> 00:10:28,581 It will blend 190 00:10:28,581 --> 00:10:32,627 the previous frame in the next frame to try to kind of generate a metal frame. 191 00:10:32,711 --> 00:10:35,130 In my opinion, I haven't ever used it. 192 00:10:35,130 --> 00:10:38,467 I don't think I'm ever going to use it, but it's there. 193 00:10:38,550 --> 00:10:40,052 So that is my exact process. 194 00:10:40,052 --> 00:10:43,847 On how I read Time and Speed ramp my clips with in Da Vinci, as well as how I use 195 00:10:43,889 --> 00:10:47,351 optical flow and speed Warp to slow things down even more. 196 00:10:47,601 --> 00:10:49,270 I highly recommend that you go ahead. 197 00:10:49,270 --> 00:10:51,856 Open Da Vinci if it's not already open and experiment 198 00:10:51,856 --> 00:10:54,609 with all of these different features just so that you can get 199 00:10:54,609 --> 00:10:57,278 a firsthand experience on how all of this works. 200 00:10:57,278 --> 00:11:01,116 The more you play around and experiment with these features, the more experienced 201 00:11:01,116 --> 00:11:03,451 you'll be as an editor, and you'll have a better idea 202 00:11:03,451 --> 00:11:07,080 as to what options work best in certain situations in the future. 203 00:11:07,205 --> 00:11:09,249 So that's it for this video. I hope you guys enjoyed. 204 00:11:09,249 --> 00:11:11,669 I hope you learn something new and I'll catch you in the next one. 17853

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.