Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:04,713 --> 00:00:05,505
Now, what can we
2
00:00:05,505 --> 00:00:08,509
do if we want to slow down our clip
even more?
3
00:00:08,592 --> 00:00:10,677
This clip was shot at 60 frames
per second.
4
00:00:10,677 --> 00:00:14,306
So we know that the maximum
that we can slow it down to is 40%.
5
00:00:14,390 --> 00:00:16,892
Well, what happens
if we want to slow it down to 10%?
6
00:00:16,892 --> 00:00:18,644
So let's just see what it looks like.
7
00:00:18,644 --> 00:00:20,062
So, I mean, hey, Commander.
8
00:00:20,062 --> 00:00:22,356
Command shift.
Ah, let's do the same thing.
9
00:00:22,356 --> 00:00:27,737
And at this point, let's slow
this section down to 10%.
10
00:00:27,821 --> 00:00:31,992
So I'm going to drag these speed handles
here,
11
00:00:32,075 --> 00:00:35,412
these speed points to 10%,
12
00:00:35,495 --> 00:00:40,042
and I'm going to select the keyframes
here, smooth them out.
13
00:00:40,084 --> 00:00:42,378
Let's play it
14
00:00:42,378 --> 00:00:43,295
very choppy.
15
00:00:43,295 --> 00:00:45,881
We can clearly see that it's skipping.
16
00:00:45,881 --> 00:00:47,883
It's showing us frame by frame.
17
00:00:47,883 --> 00:00:50,553
And it just it doesn't look good.
18
00:00:50,553 --> 00:00:51,721
Like it looks very unprofessional.
19
00:00:51,721 --> 00:00:53,681
No one would actually ever do that.
20
00:00:53,681 --> 00:00:56,851
Now, individually,
we have this really cool section
21
00:00:56,851 --> 00:01:00,814
inside of our inspector here at the bottom
re time in scaling.
22
00:01:01,022 --> 00:01:02,232
Normally it's close like this.
23
00:01:02,232 --> 00:01:06,320
You could just click it and open it
and it gives us some options as to how
24
00:01:06,320 --> 00:01:12,076
we want this slow motion or the speed
change with individually to be processed.
25
00:01:12,159 --> 00:01:15,830
So in this case,
what we're going to want to do is ask
26
00:01:15,871 --> 00:01:20,668
Da Vinci to analyze
this part of the clip differently.
27
00:01:20,668 --> 00:01:24,214
We want it to instead of
just slow down the clip.
28
00:01:24,214 --> 00:01:27,175
So it's you know,
we can see each frame individually.
29
00:01:27,175 --> 00:01:31,638
We want it to generate frames
in between these frames
30
00:01:31,722 --> 00:01:37,519
to basically make it seem as though
it's smooth motion.
31
00:01:37,603 --> 00:01:41,065
Right now, we're missing
frames in between these frames.
32
00:01:41,065 --> 00:01:43,401
And that's why we can see that skipping.
33
00:01:43,401 --> 00:01:46,320
We can see each individual frame.
It doesn't look smooth.
34
00:01:46,320 --> 00:01:51,409
So the way that we can do that is change
the re time process to optical flow.
35
00:01:51,492 --> 00:01:54,579
Optical flow is basically
just asking the program to create
36
00:01:54,579 --> 00:01:58,959
those artificial frames
and to make the footage look smoother.
37
00:01:59,042 --> 00:02:01,336
And what I found is optical flow
38
00:02:01,336 --> 00:02:04,631
is not that processor intensive.
39
00:02:04,715 --> 00:02:07,801
I'm able to playback the clip right away
40
00:02:07,801 --> 00:02:11,764
and it doesn't require
too much power from my computer.
41
00:02:11,847 --> 00:02:16,519
So let's play this back. Let's press play
42
00:02:16,561 --> 00:02:19,814
so we can see
that we're experiencing a bit of lag right
43
00:02:19,814 --> 00:02:23,693
now, slowing down a bit.
44
00:02:23,777 --> 00:02:26,780
And that looks really good.
45
00:02:26,822 --> 00:02:29,074
We can see that we no longer
have that skipping.
46
00:02:29,074 --> 00:02:32,244
Da Vinci has created extra frames
to make this feel smooth.
47
00:02:32,244 --> 00:02:34,288
And in this situation, it's done
an amazing job.
48
00:02:34,288 --> 00:02:36,498
I'm super stoked on this end result.
49
00:02:36,498 --> 00:02:40,795
Now, in some situations, optical flow
might not do the best job.
50
00:02:41,045 --> 00:02:44,173
So what we're going to want to do in
some situations
51
00:02:44,173 --> 00:02:47,176
is go to the second option here
motion estimation
52
00:02:47,302 --> 00:02:50,889
and change that from project settings
to speed warp down here.
53
00:02:51,055 --> 00:02:53,767
Now, I'm not actually going
to press speed warp right now
54
00:02:53,767 --> 00:02:57,062
because it slows down my computer
significantly.
55
00:02:57,187 --> 00:03:00,566
It's very processor intensive
and my fully maxed out
56
00:03:00,566 --> 00:03:03,736
20 2016 inch MacBook Pro
57
00:03:03,944 --> 00:03:07,531
top tier just starts to lag like crazy.
58
00:03:07,698 --> 00:03:10,660
I literally can't even like open up
59
00:03:10,660 --> 00:03:13,496
a new safari window
while this is happening.
60
00:03:13,496 --> 00:03:16,708
Like it's just sucking all the power
out of my computer.
61
00:03:16,791 --> 00:03:18,585
So here I rendered out two examples.
62
00:03:18,585 --> 00:03:21,963
So the first one is just optical flow.
63
00:03:22,047 --> 00:03:24,508
So we have a seal swimming over here
64
00:03:24,508 --> 00:03:27,511
and it does this little jump
and I wanted to slow that down
65
00:03:27,594 --> 00:03:30,472
and we can see that things kind of look
66
00:03:30,472 --> 00:03:33,475
a bit off, doesn't look too great.
67
00:03:33,601 --> 00:03:37,646
So I decided to use Speed Warp,
68
00:03:37,730 --> 00:03:41,317
which is a setting in motion estimation.
69
00:03:41,317 --> 00:03:43,569
So I changed it from project
settings to speed warp.
70
00:03:43,569 --> 00:03:46,072
And if we view that,
71
00:03:46,072 --> 00:03:48,032
we can see in this situation
72
00:03:48,032 --> 00:03:52,162
it actually did not make things
much better.
73
00:03:52,245 --> 00:03:54,664
We can see a lot of weird stuff
74
00:03:54,664 --> 00:03:57,668
happening down here, down below.
75
00:03:57,668 --> 00:04:00,045
Things are just looking off.
76
00:04:00,045 --> 00:04:02,965
So in this situation
I would say that it didn't
77
00:04:02,965 --> 00:04:06,010
necessarily
do a better job at on the top here.
78
00:04:06,010 --> 00:04:08,179
It looks like
it might have done a better job.
79
00:04:08,179 --> 00:04:12,517
I'm not seeing as much skipping
that movement of the rocks
80
00:04:12,517 --> 00:04:16,771
feels a bit smoother,
but down below, everywhere else,
81
00:04:16,855 --> 00:04:19,774
there's some weird stuff going on.
82
00:04:19,774 --> 00:04:21,902
So in this situation, optical
83
00:04:21,902 --> 00:04:24,905
flow might have actually been better
84
00:04:24,988 --> 00:04:28,659
than applying speed warp,
but that's not always the case.
85
00:04:28,659 --> 00:04:31,370
That's why it's important to experiment
with this kind of stuff.
86
00:04:31,370 --> 00:04:36,709
Unfortunately, using speed warp
can sometimes take a very long time.
87
00:04:36,709 --> 00:04:40,588
So what I actually do is
when I want to apply
88
00:04:40,630 --> 00:04:44,050
speed warp to my clip, I'll change motion
estimation to speed warp.
89
00:04:44,300 --> 00:04:47,679
And then right away,
the first thing that I'll do
90
00:04:47,762 --> 00:04:48,555
is right click on the
91
00:04:48,555 --> 00:04:51,558
clip and render in place.
92
00:04:51,641 --> 00:04:55,479
Now, I'm not going to do that right now
because my computer's going to die.
93
00:04:55,562 --> 00:04:59,692
But what that allows you to do
is it renders the clip in place.
94
00:04:59,692 --> 00:05:03,487
You'll get a pop up window on DaVinci,
so I'll just do it for the clip.
95
00:05:03,487 --> 00:05:07,033
Without that selected,
it gives you the option
96
00:05:07,033 --> 00:05:10,036
to select
how you want this to be exported.
97
00:05:10,161 --> 00:05:12,455
And when you press render,
it will render it in place.
98
00:05:12,455 --> 00:05:15,458
It'll render it
to whatever folder you've selected
99
00:05:15,625 --> 00:05:18,920
and it'll replace what you have here
with a rendered clip.
100
00:05:19,004 --> 00:05:23,467
And when I'm changing
the motion estimation to speed warp,
101
00:05:23,550 --> 00:05:27,721
I'm pretty much always going to do that
because otherwise there's no chance
102
00:05:27,721 --> 00:05:32,643
that I, with my MacBook, can get DaVinci
to actually playback the clip
103
00:05:32,643 --> 00:05:36,647
it needs to render it and replace it
in order for it to playback.
104
00:05:36,731 --> 00:05:41,736
So this is another clip that I have here
that I wanted to show you guys,
105
00:05:41,820 --> 00:05:46,825
because this is an example
of where Speed Warp actually works
106
00:05:47,033 --> 00:05:50,787
really well and it shows just how powerful
107
00:05:50,954 --> 00:05:53,957
this option is within Da Vinci.
108
00:05:53,957 --> 00:05:55,834
So I have this clip here.
109
00:05:55,834 --> 00:05:58,796
This is shot at 4K 60 on a phone
110
00:05:58,796 --> 00:06:01,966
and I want to slow it down just up here.
111
00:06:02,216 --> 00:06:06,053
Now, I've actually rendered out
each version of this clip,
112
00:06:06,220 --> 00:06:11,267
one with optical flow, one with speed warp
and one with just the project settings
113
00:06:11,267 --> 00:06:14,271
so that you guys can see the difference
between all of these.
114
00:06:14,312 --> 00:06:16,189
So the first one is just project settings.
115
00:06:16,189 --> 00:06:21,904
So where we're going from 100% to 10%,
116
00:06:21,987 --> 00:06:24,031
there's a little little section right here
117
00:06:24,031 --> 00:06:28,118
where we're at 10% and obviously
it looks very unprofessional.
118
00:06:28,327 --> 00:06:31,330
You can see each individual frame.
119
00:06:31,330 --> 00:06:33,249
It just doesn't look good.
120
00:06:33,249 --> 00:06:37,795
Now, I tried optical flow
and let's take a look at optical flow.
121
00:06:37,879 --> 00:06:39,964
We got some weird stuff happening here.
122
00:06:39,964 --> 00:06:41,341
Even with optical flow,
123
00:06:41,341 --> 00:06:43,176
I thought that optical flow
is going to work
124
00:06:43,176 --> 00:06:46,888
well because it's a simple, simple
kind of frame, you know?
125
00:06:46,888 --> 00:06:49,141
And we have a blue background.
126
00:06:49,141 --> 00:06:50,976
Your subject is removed
from the background.
127
00:06:50,976 --> 00:06:54,897
So this I thought,
would be a great example for optical flow.
128
00:06:54,980 --> 00:06:58,693
But we can still see that
there's like a lot of blending here.
129
00:06:58,734 --> 00:07:02,530
We can see at this stage
where is it right here?
130
00:07:02,530 --> 00:07:05,408
Like that just does not look good.
131
00:07:05,408 --> 00:07:07,076
The helmet, it's like blurry.
132
00:07:07,076 --> 00:07:09,078
Things just don't look good.
133
00:07:09,078 --> 00:07:11,623
Now, what I did in this situation
134
00:07:11,623 --> 00:07:14,960
was I, I selected Speed warp.
135
00:07:15,001 --> 00:07:17,921
So now we can watch Speed Warp.
136
00:07:18,005 --> 00:07:19,089
It looks much better.
137
00:07:19,089 --> 00:07:20,758
It's still not perfect,
138
00:07:20,758 --> 00:07:25,429
but we're not getting that same kind
of artifacting and ghosting.
139
00:07:25,429 --> 00:07:30,601
That optical flow was giving us
the tire is staying solid
140
00:07:30,726 --> 00:07:35,481
throughout the entire time
and things are looking pretty good. Now.
141
00:07:35,481 --> 00:07:39,027
If I wanted to make this look even better,
142
00:07:39,110 --> 00:07:42,030
I would have shot at a much
higher shutter speed.
143
00:07:42,030 --> 00:07:44,408
Now I shot this at double shutter.
144
00:07:44,408 --> 00:07:48,453
So since since we're shooting 60 frames
per second, I was shooting
145
00:07:48,453 --> 00:07:50,372
at a shutter of one over 120.
146
00:07:50,372 --> 00:07:52,917
That's basically the rule
that every filmmaker follows.
147
00:07:52,917 --> 00:07:56,754
But if I wanted to make this clip
feel like it was actually shot
148
00:07:56,962 --> 00:08:00,049
at a very high frame rate,
I would have shot at a much higher
149
00:08:00,049 --> 00:08:03,553
shutter speed
so that we're not getting any motion blur.
150
00:08:03,636 --> 00:08:06,639
So optical flow and speed warp,
151
00:08:06,639 --> 00:08:10,185
they're going to struggle with motion blur
152
00:08:10,268 --> 00:08:14,398
because you don't have that crisp, clean
edge, you don't have all the detail.
153
00:08:14,398 --> 00:08:17,192
Everything is kind of already blurry
because of the motion blur.
154
00:08:17,192 --> 00:08:21,488
So if you do want to achieve
the best effect possible,
155
00:08:21,572 --> 00:08:24,450
then you're going to want to shoot
on a higher shutter speed.
156
00:08:24,450 --> 00:08:27,662
That speed warp
clearly did a much better job
157
00:08:27,745 --> 00:08:33,501
and it's a very viable option
in this situation.
158
00:08:33,543 --> 00:08:37,130
I would probably use that clip
if I needed to slow it down.
159
00:08:37,130 --> 00:08:42,427
That much in an actual production,
in an actual commercial or whatever.
160
00:08:42,511 --> 00:08:44,596
Speed Warp actually uses
161
00:08:44,596 --> 00:08:48,767
A.I., It uses artificial intelligence
to try to figure things out.
162
00:08:48,976 --> 00:08:50,728
That's why it takes much longer.
163
00:08:50,728 --> 00:08:54,857
This dirt
bike clip actually took about 5 minutes.
164
00:08:54,941 --> 00:09:00,196
I timed it just to analyze the clip
and apply that speed warp effect to it.
165
00:09:00,279 --> 00:09:05,118
And then right away
I had to right click and render in place
166
00:09:05,201 --> 00:09:10,540
just so that DaVinci wouldn't bottleneck
and I can still edit in the program.
167
00:09:10,540 --> 00:09:14,378
So it's important to render in place
when you're changing the motion estimation
168
00:09:14,378 --> 00:09:15,671
to speed warp.
169
00:09:15,671 --> 00:09:20,468
Now there are some other options here in
real time process and motion estimation.
170
00:09:20,551 --> 00:09:23,095
We have some other options here.
171
00:09:23,095 --> 00:09:26,015
I've experimented with these and really
172
00:09:26,015 --> 00:09:29,686
the only one that I have personally
use is speed warp.
173
00:09:29,769 --> 00:09:35,567
If you are not getting the desired
effect with speed warp or
174
00:09:35,650 --> 00:09:36,902
optical flow,
175
00:09:36,902 --> 00:09:40,781
feel free to play around, experiment,
try different things.
176
00:09:40,864 --> 00:09:46,495
But in my experience, both optical flow
and speed warp work, the best.
177
00:09:46,578 --> 00:09:49,915
Now we do have this other setting frame
blend here
178
00:09:49,915 --> 00:09:52,919
and nearest
and I pretty much never use those.
179
00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:56,839
Let me just show you guys an example
of what frame blend it looks like.
180
00:09:56,881 --> 00:10:01,010
If you go back to the steel clip,
I have this frame blend example.
181
00:10:01,052 --> 00:10:04,806
And basically what frame Blend does
is it blends the
182
00:10:04,973 --> 00:10:07,976
the previous frame
and the next frame together.
183
00:10:08,101 --> 00:10:13,816
And in this case
it might not look so terrible.
184
00:10:13,899 --> 00:10:16,443
But when we compare this image
185
00:10:16,443 --> 00:10:20,281
to just optical flow,
186
00:10:20,364 --> 00:10:21,741
optical flow
187
00:10:21,741 --> 00:10:25,495
looks way, way better in my opinion.
188
00:10:25,578 --> 00:10:27,413
So frame blend is there.
189
00:10:27,413 --> 00:10:28,581
It will blend
190
00:10:28,581 --> 00:10:32,627
the previous frame in the next frame
to try to kind of generate a metal frame.
191
00:10:32,711 --> 00:10:35,130
In my opinion, I haven't ever used it.
192
00:10:35,130 --> 00:10:38,467
I don't think I'm ever going to use it,
but it's there.
193
00:10:38,550 --> 00:10:40,052
So that is my exact process.
194
00:10:40,052 --> 00:10:43,847
On how I read Time and Speed ramp my clips
with in Da Vinci, as well as how I use
195
00:10:43,889 --> 00:10:47,351
optical flow and speed Warp
to slow things down even more.
196
00:10:47,601 --> 00:10:49,270
I highly recommend that you go ahead.
197
00:10:49,270 --> 00:10:51,856
Open Da Vinci
if it's not already open and experiment
198
00:10:51,856 --> 00:10:54,609
with all of these different features
just so that you can get
199
00:10:54,609 --> 00:10:57,278
a firsthand experience
on how all of this works.
200
00:10:57,278 --> 00:11:01,116
The more you play around and experiment
with these features, the more experienced
201
00:11:01,116 --> 00:11:03,451
you'll be as an editor,
and you'll have a better idea
202
00:11:03,451 --> 00:11:07,080
as to what options work
best in certain situations in the future.
203
00:11:07,205 --> 00:11:09,249
So that's it for this video.
I hope you guys enjoyed.
204
00:11:09,249 --> 00:11:11,669
I hope you learn something new
and I'll catch you in the next one.
17853
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.