All language subtitles for 1. Fusion Preface Fusion Kolder Creative

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese) Download
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:07,333 So if you're coming from Adobe like I am, 2 00:00:07,333 --> 00:00:11,166 then fusion is the part of resolve that's similar to Adobe after Effects. 3 00:00:11,250 --> 00:00:14,916 Similar in the sense that it's meant for visual effects and motion graphics. 4 00:00:15,000 --> 00:00:18,500 Now fusion is actually a lot different in terms of the way that you work in it 5 00:00:18,500 --> 00:00:22,416 because it's node based, whereas after Effects is layer based, 6 00:00:22,500 --> 00:00:26,333 Node based compositing can feel pretty daunting when you're starting off 7 00:00:26,541 --> 00:00:29,625 because it's a very different workflow to layer based compositing. 8 00:00:29,875 --> 00:00:33,333 Working with nodes at the start made absolutely no sense to me. 9 00:00:33,541 --> 00:00:36,000 I would always just ask, but where's the timeline? 10 00:00:36,000 --> 00:00:37,625 And that's the thing that no one told me. 11 00:00:37,625 --> 00:00:41,500 You still work with a timeline in fusion and you still work with keyframes 12 00:00:41,500 --> 00:00:42,458 on a timeline. 13 00:00:42,458 --> 00:00:44,500 The interface is just laid out differently, 14 00:00:44,500 --> 00:00:47,000 and you don't use a timeline like you typically would. 15 00:00:47,000 --> 00:00:50,916 You still use the timeline view to position where your clips and keyframes 16 00:00:50,916 --> 00:00:54,500 sit in relation to each other in time just like you would in after Effects. 17 00:00:54,583 --> 00:00:58,166 But the order in which your clips are stacked in your fusion timeline 18 00:00:58,375 --> 00:01:00,458 doesn't affect your final image. 19 00:01:00,458 --> 00:01:02,541 That doesn't actually matter in fusion. 20 00:01:02,541 --> 00:01:04,416 It's the way that the nodes are connected 21 00:01:04,416 --> 00:01:07,791 to each other in the node area that affects your final image. 22 00:01:07,791 --> 00:01:10,541 Now, don't worry if you have no idea what I'm talking about, 23 00:01:10,541 --> 00:01:13,166 I'll be showing you examples in the coming lessons 24 00:01:13,166 --> 00:01:16,375 so that you can get a better understanding of exactly what I mean. 25 00:01:16,500 --> 00:01:17,125 Now, one thing 26 00:01:17,125 --> 00:01:20,875 I want to let you guys know now is that the nodes we work with infusion 27 00:01:21,083 --> 00:01:24,000 are much different from the nodes we're going to be using in the color 28 00:01:24,000 --> 00:01:27,000 tab, which we're going to be learning about later on in this course. 29 00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:30,791 Nodes in the color tab are much easier to understand, and in my opinion, things 30 00:01:30,791 --> 00:01:32,291 just make sense right away. 31 00:01:32,291 --> 00:01:33,416 Whereas the node space 32 00:01:33,416 --> 00:01:36,833 within fusion requires you to have an understanding of the rules 33 00:01:36,958 --> 00:01:39,666 on how you assemble things in the fusion node area 34 00:01:39,666 --> 00:01:42,375 before you can actually start doing things. 35 00:01:42,375 --> 00:01:45,208 It's not as intuitive at first, in my opinion, but 36 00:01:45,208 --> 00:01:48,208 once you understand the foundations and how things work, 37 00:01:48,291 --> 00:01:51,083 then it starts to make a lot more sense and then you start to understand 38 00:01:51,083 --> 00:01:54,500 how much more beneficial it is to be able to view your entire project 39 00:01:54,500 --> 00:01:59,000 from the perspective of a node tree versus a bunch of layers in a timeline. 40 00:01:59,083 --> 00:02:01,541 These are two examples of the same project. 41 00:02:01,541 --> 00:02:02,958 On the left we have a fusion, 42 00:02:02,958 --> 00:02:05,958 no tree, and on the right we have after effects layers. 43 00:02:06,083 --> 00:02:06,875 From my node tree. 44 00:02:06,875 --> 00:02:10,875 I can see every single element of my composition, including effects, 45 00:02:11,083 --> 00:02:15,500 resizing and masks without even having to open up a single layer. 46 00:02:15,583 --> 00:02:19,416 Whereas on the After Effects project, I need to open up each individual layer 47 00:02:19,583 --> 00:02:23,541 to get access to the masks, effects and any other kind of changes I've made 48 00:02:23,541 --> 00:02:26,541 on each layer, which is a lot more time consuming in the long run. 49 00:02:26,708 --> 00:02:30,708 Now this is a fairly simple transition, so doing this in a layer based setting 50 00:02:30,833 --> 00:02:32,041 might not be that bad. 51 00:02:32,041 --> 00:02:35,708 But once things start to get complicated and you're working with a ton of media 52 00:02:35,708 --> 00:02:37,250 effects, masks and more, 53 00:02:37,250 --> 00:02:41,041 then the node style of editing can allow you to work much more efficiently. 54 00:02:41,291 --> 00:02:43,083 Personally, I prefer the node based workflow, 55 00:02:43,083 --> 00:02:46,583 even if what I'm doing is very simple because I've learned the foundations 56 00:02:46,583 --> 00:02:49,583 and I can go into fusion and do whatever I want pretty quickly. 57 00:02:49,708 --> 00:02:52,125 Another thing to keep in mind is that After Effects 58 00:02:52,125 --> 00:02:55,125 is a completely separate program to Premiere Pro, 59 00:02:55,250 --> 00:02:58,166 and although Adobe has something called Dynamic Link, 60 00:02:58,166 --> 00:03:01,166 so you can quickly open up files from Premiere in After Effects, 61 00:03:01,208 --> 00:03:04,000 I would never end up using it because I always ran into issues 62 00:03:04,000 --> 00:03:08,041 when doing anything more complex than basic title tracking and things like that. 63 00:03:08,250 --> 00:03:11,250 I would always have to export the files I want to play with in Premiere 64 00:03:11,416 --> 00:03:13,125 and then create a whole new project 65 00:03:13,125 --> 00:03:15,458 in After Effects and then play around from there. 66 00:03:15,458 --> 00:03:17,083 With Fusion, I no longer need to do that. 67 00:03:17,083 --> 00:03:20,458 Fusion is built into DaVinci and it's super easy for me to get in there 68 00:03:20,458 --> 00:03:23,166 and start doing some more advanced compositing work. 69 00:03:23,166 --> 00:03:24,791 Now, one last thing I want to mention. 70 00:03:24,791 --> 00:03:27,958 When I first got into Fusion, I would get extremely frustrated 71 00:03:27,958 --> 00:03:31,625 and unmotivated simply because I didn't understand things right away. 72 00:03:31,708 --> 00:03:33,041 I want you to know that it's 73 00:03:33,041 --> 00:03:36,041 okay if you feel the same way and you're not alone. 74 00:03:36,041 --> 00:03:36,833 Too many of you. 75 00:03:36,833 --> 00:03:40,250 This is a new method of video editing, and it's more of a learning curve. 76 00:03:40,375 --> 00:03:43,375 But the key is to study the foundations of how it works. 77 00:03:43,375 --> 00:03:45,958 Stay consistent and experiment yourself. 78 00:03:45,958 --> 00:03:47,458 I personally learned the fastest 79 00:03:47,458 --> 00:03:50,541 when I go into the program and try things myself after learning. 80 00:03:50,750 --> 00:03:52,250 But thankfully for you, I've compiled 81 00:03:52,250 --> 00:03:54,166 all of the best information on the Internet 82 00:03:54,166 --> 00:03:56,916 about how to get started in fusion within this course. 83 00:03:56,916 --> 00:03:59,750 So I hope you guys enjoy this series of videos on fusion 84 00:03:59,750 --> 00:04:02,541 and I hope that you end up loving fusion just as much as I do. 7947

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.