Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:01,030 --> 00:00:06,979
Welcome to Jeremy’s IT Lab. This is a free,\n
2
00:00:06,979 --> 00:00:12,070
these videos, please subscribe to follow along\n
3
00:00:12,070 --> 00:00:17,030
a comment, and share the video to help spread\n
4
00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:23,929
In this video we will return to Layer 3, after\n
5
00:00:23,929 --> 00:00:32,028
VLANs, DTP, VTP, Spanning Tree, and EtherChannel. This\n
6
00:00:32,029 --> 00:00:37,210
routing. ‘Dynamic routing’ is in contrast\n
7
00:00:37,210 --> 00:00:43,829
in Day 11 of this course. Static routing involves\n
8
00:00:43,829 --> 00:00:49,838
with the ‘IP ROUTE’ command. Dynamic routing,\n
9
00:00:49,838 --> 00:00:54,488
dynamic routing protocol on the router, and\n
10
00:00:54,488 --> 00:01:01,479
the best routes to destination networks. It’s\n
11
00:01:01,479 --> 00:01:06,399
If you add a new LAN, routers will automatically\n
12
00:01:06,400 --> 00:01:12,380
new destination network. If one path to a\n
13
00:01:12,379 --> 00:01:18,560
will automatically start using the next-best\n
14
00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:26,079
to cover a large portion of the exam topics\n
15
00:01:26,079 --> 00:01:32,048
of the CCNA exam, and we’re going to cover\n
16
00:01:32,049 --> 00:01:37,200
later. We’ve already covered some of the\n
17
00:01:37,200 --> 00:01:44,890
parts of 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3. My plan is to\n
18
00:01:44,890 --> 00:01:49,799
give a general overview of dynamic routing\n
19
00:01:49,799 --> 00:01:55,560
of two routing protocols, RIP and EIGRP, in\n
20
00:01:55,560 --> 00:02:00,539
days to cover OSPF, which is actually the\n
21
00:02:00,539 --> 00:02:06,989
the exam topics list, in 3.4. However, even\n
22
00:02:06,989 --> 00:02:11,150
still need a basic understanding of other\n
23
00:02:11,150 --> 00:02:14,900
able to compare and contrast them to OSPF.
24
00:02:14,900 --> 00:02:20,908
Here’s what we’ll cover in today’s video.\n
25
00:02:20,908 --> 00:02:25,489
routing protocols, to demonstrate how they\n
26
00:02:25,489 --> 00:02:30,989
over static routes. There are a few types\n
27
00:02:30,989 --> 00:02:37,580
them down. We will then take a brief look\n
28
00:02:37,580 --> 00:02:42,519
‘metric’ is how it measure how ‘far’\n
29
00:02:42,519 --> 00:02:47,330
spanning tree protocol, and it’s used to\n
30
00:02:47,330 --> 00:02:52,269
Finally, we’ll talk about something called\n
31
00:02:52,269 --> 00:02:57,719
part of determining the best route to a destination.\n
32
00:02:57,719 --> 00:03:03,789
for a bonus question from Boson ExSim for\n
33
00:03:03,789 --> 00:03:09,469
and the ones I used when I studied for my\n
34
00:03:09,469 --> 00:03:13,090
follow the link in the description.
35
00:03:13,090 --> 00:03:17,158
Here is the network topology I’ll use for\n
36
00:03:17,158 --> 00:03:27,919
routers, R1, R2, R3, and R4, and there is\n
37
00:03:27,919 --> 00:03:33,208
be focusing mostly on R1’s perspective for\n
38
00:03:33,209 --> 00:03:38,158
or dynamic routing protocol, R1’s routing\n
39
00:03:38,158 --> 00:03:44,449
local routes which were automatically added\n
40
00:03:44,449 --> 00:03:49,269
Let me take a minute to clarify a few points\n
41
00:03:49,270 --> 00:03:59,719
here, 10.0.12.0/30 and 10.0.13.0/30, are examples\n
42
00:03:59,718 --> 00:04:07,609
a route to a network or subnet. In other words,\n
43
00:04:07,610 --> 00:04:14,420
For example, if we configure a static route\n
44
00:04:14,419 --> 00:04:21,639
also. It’s not a route to a single host,\n
45
00:04:21,639 --> 00:04:31,000
10.0.12.1/32 and 10.0.13.1/32, are examples\n
46
00:04:31,009 --> 00:04:38,149
a specific host, a single address, specified\n
47
00:04:38,149 --> 00:04:44,679
automatically added, and are host routes to the\n
48
00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:51,430
and G1/0 interfaces. To configure a static\n
49
00:04:51,430 --> 00:05:00,649
the host’s address, then 255.255.255.255,\n
50
00:05:00,649 --> 00:05:06,899
aside, so you understand those two terms.\n
51
00:05:06,899 --> 00:05:10,918
Instead of configuring static routes on each\n
52
00:05:10,918 --> 00:05:19,589
routing protocol on them. Then, R4 will ‘advertise’\n
53
00:05:19,589 --> 00:05:26,638
R2, saying ‘you can reach this network via\n
54
00:05:26,639 --> 00:05:34,099
It will then advertise the same thing to R1,\n
55
00:05:34,100 --> 00:05:40,820
via R2. R1 will add this route to its route\n
56
00:05:40,829 --> 00:05:48,990
you can see that R2 also advertised the 10.0.24.0/30\n
57
00:05:48,990 --> 00:05:55,240
added it to its route table. R1 will then\n
58
00:05:55,240 --> 00:06:04,389
can reach 192.168.4.0/24 via R1. It will also\n
59
00:06:04,389 --> 00:06:11,180
learned from R2, as well as the 10.0.12.0/30\n
60
00:06:11,180 --> 00:06:15,389
focusing on the one network for now.
61
00:06:15,389 --> 00:06:20,949
How about if there is an error and R4’s\n
62
00:06:20,949 --> 00:06:26,490
will automatically adapt and remove the route\n
63
00:06:26,490 --> 00:06:33,168
has removed the route. This will prevent R1\n
64
00:06:33,168 --> 00:06:38,098
What if the same situation happened when using\n
65
00:06:38,098 --> 00:06:43,978
on R1. It can send traffic to R4’s network\n
66
00:06:43,978 --> 00:06:49,620
failure on the link occurs? Because there\n
67
00:06:49,620 --> 00:06:55,569
is unaware that it can no longer reach the\n
68
00:06:55,569 --> 00:07:00,790
destined for that network, it will continue\n
69
00:07:00,790 --> 00:07:06,080
no longer reach the network. Okay, so that’s\n
70
00:07:06,079 --> 00:07:11,978
remove invalid routes. However, we really\n
71
00:07:11,978 --> 00:07:16,139
so instead of totally removing the destination\n
72
00:07:18,160 --> 00:07:25,830
So, I’ve added another connection between\n
73
00:07:25,829 --> 00:07:33,389
internal network. via R2, and via R3. Let’s\n
74
00:07:33,389 --> 00:07:40,069
has the route via R2 in its route table, as\n
75
00:07:40,069 --> 00:07:45,240
will happen if I disable R4’s G0/0 interface\n
76
00:07:45,240 --> 00:07:52,180
So, I did that, and now let’s check R1’s\n
77
00:07:52,180 --> 00:08:00,259
R2 was now automatically replaced with the\n
78
00:08:00,259 --> 00:08:07,360
lost the preferred route to 192.168.4.0, but\n
79
00:08:07,360 --> 00:08:13,560
may be wondering, why the route via R2 was\n
80
00:08:13,560 --> 00:08:18,939
because this connection here is a fastethernet\n
81
00:08:18,939 --> 00:08:22,939
already familiar with the spanning-tree concept\n
82
00:08:22,939 --> 00:08:28,370
the best path to the root bridge. Well, dynamic\n
83
00:08:28,370 --> 00:08:35,700
determine the best path to a destination.\n
84
00:08:35,700 --> 00:08:42,280
from both R2 and R3, however it determined\n
85
00:08:43,870 --> 00:08:49,200
Okay, so that’s a very quick introduction\n
86
00:08:49,200 --> 00:08:55,720
purpose. Here are a few key points. Routers\n
87
00:08:55,720 --> 00:08:59,860
information about their connected routes as\n
88
00:08:59,860 --> 00:09:06,580
devices. They form ‘adjacencies’ , also\n
89
00:09:06,580 --> 00:09:12,509
with adjacent routers to exchange this information.\n
90
00:09:12,509 --> 00:09:18,779
adjacencies with R2 and R3, its directly\n
91
00:09:18,779 --> 00:09:23,329
a destination are learned, the router determines\n
92
00:09:23,330 --> 00:09:28,400
routing table. It uses the ‘metric’ of\n
93
00:09:28,399 --> 00:09:33,850
the lower metric is superior. Just like in\n
94
00:09:33,850 --> 00:09:40,450
when determining the root port on a switch.\n
95
00:09:40,450 --> 00:09:45,530
Now lets talk about the different types of\n
96
00:09:45,529 --> 00:09:52,449
protocols can be divided into two main categories,\n
97
00:09:52,450 --> 00:09:59,230
and EGP, which stands for Exterior Gateway\n
98
00:09:59,230 --> 00:10:04,840
to share routes within a single autonomous\n
99
00:10:04,840 --> 00:10:12,379
for example a company. EGPs are used to share\n
100
00:10:12,379 --> 00:10:19,000
Maybe this diagram will make it easier to\n
101
00:10:19,000 --> 00:10:26,639
ISP B are each their own autonomous system,\n
102
00:10:26,639 --> 00:10:31,399
to exchange routing information. However,\n
103
00:10:31,399 --> 00:10:39,079
an EGP is used. The basic purpose of IGPs\n
104
00:10:39,080 --> 00:10:44,600
about routes to destinations. However they\n
105
00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:50,620
course, we will focus mostly on OSPF, which\n
106
00:10:50,620 --> 00:10:55,629
other IGPs and the one EGP that is in use\n
107
00:10:58,509 --> 00:11:03,179
Now let’s break down these categories further.\n
108
00:11:03,179 --> 00:11:10,759
Interior Gateway Protocols, IGPs, and Exterior\n
109
00:11:10,759 --> 00:11:15,960
further break these categories down by the\n
110
00:11:15,960 --> 00:11:22,629
used by each protocol to share route information\n
111
00:11:22,629 --> 00:11:28,279
There is only one type of EGP algorithm, Path\n
112
00:11:28,279 --> 00:11:34,990
EGP algorithm, but there is only one EGP that\n
113
00:11:34,990 --> 00:11:40,649
Border Gateway Protocol. Because it’s not\n
114
00:11:40,649 --> 00:11:45,519
about BGP. I will mention a few important\n
115
00:11:45,519 --> 00:11:51,100
need to know BGP for the CCNA. Just make sure\n
116
00:11:51,100 --> 00:11:56,860
share route information between autonomous\n
117
00:11:56,860 --> 00:12:02,200
that is used in modern networks. So, you also\n
118
00:12:02,200 --> 00:12:08,759
‘Path Vector’ algorithm functions. Now,\n
119
00:12:08,759 --> 00:12:13,610
and link state. I’ll repeat, when I say\n
120
00:12:13,610 --> 00:12:19,629
protocol uses to share route information and\n
121
00:12:19,629 --> 00:12:24,610
All routing protocols have the same goal.\n
122
00:12:24,610 --> 00:12:30,289
and select the best route to each destination.\n
123
00:12:30,289 --> 00:12:37,349
for each routing protocol. There are two distance\n
124
00:12:37,350 --> 00:12:43,820
Protocol, and EIGRP, Enhanced Interior Gateway\n
125
00:12:43,820 --> 00:12:48,390
protocols in depth, although I will give you\n
126
00:12:48,389 --> 00:12:56,600
compare and contrast them with OSPF. So, RIP\n
127
00:12:56,600 --> 00:13:04,190
There are also two link state protocols. OSPF,\n
128
00:13:04,190 --> 00:13:11,190
System to Intermediate System. Like BGP, I\n
129
00:13:11,190 --> 00:13:16,790
to learn more about IS-IS, consider looking\n
130
00:13:16,789 --> 00:13:24,120
the CCNA. OSPF, however, I will spend plenty\n
131
00:13:24,120 --> 00:13:28,669
For now, what I want you to remember is, first\n
132
00:13:28,669 --> 00:13:35,670
protocols. Then remember which protocols use\n
133
00:13:35,671 --> 00:13:42,540
a distance vector algorithm, OSPF and IS-IS\n
134
00:13:42,539 --> 00:13:48,759
path vector algorithm. The flashcards I provide\n
135
00:13:48,759 --> 00:13:53,559
want to outline the characteristics of distance\n
136
00:13:53,559 --> 00:13:58,639
I’ll start with distance vector routing\n
137
00:13:58,639 --> 00:14:04,799
protocols we will learn about are RIP and\n
138
00:14:04,799 --> 00:14:11,459
before link state protocols, in the early\n
139
00:14:11,460 --> 00:14:20,330
are RIP and Cisco’s proprietary protocol\n
140
00:14:20,330 --> 00:14:24,040
Distance vector protocols operate by sending\n
141
00:14:24,039 --> 00:14:29,370
connected neighbors. their known destination\n
142
00:14:29,370 --> 00:14:34,539
known destination networks. This method of\n
143
00:14:34,539 --> 00:14:39,789
‘routing by rumor’. Why the name? It’s\n
144
00:14:39,789 --> 00:14:45,509
network beyond its neighbors. It only knows\n
145
00:14:45,509 --> 00:14:49,179
This is different than link state routing\n
146
00:14:49,179 --> 00:14:54,289
more complete picture of the network. When\n
147
00:14:54,289 --> 00:14:58,721
hand, all the router knows is the routes its\n
148
00:14:58,721 --> 00:15:04,440
to reach those destinations. The reason for\n
149
00:15:04,440 --> 00:15:08,720
the routers only learn the ‘distance’,\n
150
00:15:08,720 --> 00:15:14,720
which is the direction to send the traffic, the\n
151
00:15:14,720 --> 00:15:18,950
distance vector protocols work by sharing\n
152
00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:27,920
So, the example I showed you before of R4\n
153
00:15:27,919 --> 00:15:34,049
example of distance vector logic. R4 tells\n
154
00:15:34,049 --> 00:15:41,379
can reach 192.168.4.0/24 via me. My metric\n
155
00:15:41,379 --> 00:15:45,769
metric numbers yet, each routing protocol\n
156
00:15:45,769 --> 00:15:52,049
cover those soon. Anyway, R2 doesn’t know\n
157
00:15:52,049 --> 00:16:01,500
via R4, and that R4’s metric is 1. Similarly,\n
158
00:16:01,500 --> 00:16:07,221
the metric as 2. Once again, R1 doesn’t\n
159
00:16:07,221 --> 00:16:13,899
it knows is that it can reach 192.168.4.0/24\n
160
00:16:13,899 --> 00:16:20,879
is 2. And of course, R1 advertises the network\n
161
00:16:20,879 --> 00:16:26,529
network. Once again, RIP and EIGRP are the\n
162
00:16:26,529 --> 00:16:31,409
are used, and we will talk more about them\nin day 25’s video.
163
00:16:31,409 --> 00:16:36,769
Next I’ll briefly introduce link state routing\n
164
00:16:36,769 --> 00:16:42,100
protocol, every router creates a ‘connectivity\n
165
00:16:42,100 --> 00:16:48,670
same on each router. To allow this, each router\n
166
00:16:48,669 --> 00:16:53,569
its connected networks, to its neighbors.\n
167
00:16:53,570 --> 00:16:58,760
routers, until all routers in the network\n
168
00:16:58,759 --> 00:17:03,450
each router independently uses this map to\n
169
00:17:03,450 --> 00:17:07,539
I think you can see how this is different\n
170
00:17:07,539 --> 00:17:13,220
vector protocols. In link state protocols,\n
171
00:17:13,220 --> 00:17:19,120
so that it can calculate the best routes.\n
172
00:17:19,119 --> 00:17:24,350
CPU power and memory, on the router, because\n
173
00:17:24,351 --> 00:17:28,640
state protocols tend to be faster in reacting\n
174
00:17:28,640 --> 00:17:36,250
protocols. The two link state protocols in\n
175
00:17:36,250 --> 00:17:43,160
mention some things about IS-IS, but as for\n
176
00:17:43,160 --> 00:17:47,300
Now let’s talk about those metrics that\n
177
00:17:47,299 --> 00:17:52,859
table contains the best route to each destination\n
178
00:17:52,859 --> 00:17:58,039
a dynamic routing protocol learns two different\n
179
00:17:58,039 --> 00:18:03,889
determine which is ‘best’? As I briefly\n
180
00:18:03,890 --> 00:18:09,480
of the routes to determine which is best.\n
181
00:18:09,480 --> 00:18:15,150
like the root cost in spanning tree. A lower\n
182
00:18:15,150 --> 00:18:21,340
with the lowest root cost will become the\n
183
00:18:21,339 --> 00:18:25,530
the route with the lowest metric is considered\n
184
00:18:25,530 --> 00:18:32,919
table. Each routing protocol uses a different\n
185
00:18:32,920 --> 00:18:40,571
Here in this slide I showed you before, although\n
186
00:18:40,570 --> 00:18:48,230
via R2 and one via R3, only the route via\n
187
00:18:48,230 --> 00:18:53,360
connection here has a higher metric cost than\n
188
00:18:53,359 --> 00:18:59,149
this route is less favorable. Now, you might\n
189
00:18:59,150 --> 00:19:04,009
ethernet connection? Both routes would have\n
190
00:19:04,009 --> 00:19:07,029
to the route table? Let’s see what happens.
191
00:19:07,029 --> 00:19:12,131
I changed the connection between R3 and R4\n
192
00:19:12,131 --> 00:19:19,800
others. Let’s check out R1’s route table.\n
193
00:19:19,799 --> 00:19:28,879
via 10.0.13.2, which is R3, and via 10.0.12.2,\n
194
00:19:28,880 --> 00:19:34,860
more) routes via the same routing protocol\n
195
00:19:34,859 --> 00:19:40,630
both will be added to the routing table. Traffic\n
196
00:19:40,631 --> 00:19:46,570
that they must be exactly the same destination,\n
197
00:19:46,569 --> 00:19:52,109
Here’s a larger view. In this case both\n
198
00:19:52,109 --> 00:19:58,509
protocol OSPF, as indicated by the code O\n
199
00:19:58,509 --> 00:20:06,609
same destination, 192.168.4.0/24, and they\n
200
00:20:06,609 --> 00:20:12,389
itself is also displayed in this output. Where\n
201
00:20:12,390 --> 00:20:17,821
square brackets is the metric value of the\n
202
00:20:17,820 --> 00:20:24,309
both were added, and traffic will be load-balanced\n
203
00:20:24,309 --> 00:20:31,139
MultiPath, or ECMP, load-balancing. Make sure\n
204
00:20:31,140 --> 00:20:37,250
up often in these videos about dynamic routing\n
205
00:20:37,250 --> 00:20:42,150
side of the square brackets, this is another\n
206
00:20:42,150 --> 00:20:48,950
or AD, which I will talk about a few slides\n
207
00:20:48,950 --> 00:20:55,100
Don’t memorize that now, as I said I’ll\n
208
00:20:55,099 --> 00:21:01,069
Since I just showed you ECMP, equal cost multipath\n
209
00:21:01,069 --> 00:21:05,849
I just want to let you know that you can do\n
210
00:21:05,849 --> 00:21:13,589
OSPF on R1, and then configured two static\n
211
00:21:13,589 --> 00:21:19,490
via R3. Then, both are added to the routing\n
212
00:21:19,490 --> 00:21:25,279
both routes. Notice that both routes have\n
213
00:21:25,279 --> 00:21:31,819
use the concept of ‘metric’ so you’ll\n
214
00:21:31,819 --> 00:21:37,650
distance, AD, value of static routes is 1.\n
215
00:21:37,651 --> 00:21:42,390
a few slides. For now, let’s return back\nto the topic of metric.
216
00:21:42,390 --> 00:21:47,590
As I already mentioned, each routing protocol\n
217
00:21:47,589 --> 00:21:53,559
of these in more detail in later videos, but\n
218
00:21:53,559 --> 00:21:59,539
RIP uses by far the simplest metric, hop count.\n
219
00:21:59,539 --> 00:22:05,960
counts as one ‘hop’, and the total metric\n
220
00:22:05,960 --> 00:22:11,620
One big downside is that links of all speeds\n
221
00:22:11,619 --> 00:22:17,359
megabit per second ethernet link is one hop,\n
222
00:22:17,359 --> 00:22:24,889
So, this is a very primitive way of calculating\n
223
00:22:24,890 --> 00:22:29,830
the most complicated metric of the IGPs, which\n
224
00:22:29,829 --> 00:22:36,369
by default, however with configuration other\n
225
00:22:36,369 --> 00:22:40,699
to note is that only the bandwidth of the\n
226
00:22:40,700 --> 00:22:46,670
the metric, but the total delay values of\n
227
00:22:46,670 --> 00:22:51,440
value is a little misleading, since by default\n
228
00:22:51,440 --> 00:22:56,009
on its bandwidth. Anyway, I’ll talk more\n
229
00:22:56,009 --> 00:23:03,759
more depth on EIGRP. Next up is OSPF, its\n
230
00:23:03,759 --> 00:23:07,990
link is calculated based on the bandwidth,\n
231
00:23:07,990 --> 00:23:13,220
route make up the metric of the route. This\n
232
00:23:13,220 --> 00:23:18,940
but also clearly better than RIP’s which\n
233
00:23:18,940 --> 00:23:25,160
IS-IS also uses a metric called ‘cost’.\n
234
00:23:25,160 --> 00:23:32,540
calculated based on bandwidth. All links have\n
235
00:23:32,539 --> 00:23:38,649
it functions the same as RIP, being a simple\n
236
00:23:38,650 --> 00:23:42,990
talk about much, but these other three I will\n
237
00:23:42,990 --> 00:23:49,779
now just remember the basics. RIP uses hop\n
238
00:23:49,779 --> 00:23:56,420
and delay, and OSPF uses a cost based on bandwidth.\n
239
00:23:56,420 --> 00:24:01,860
same, to let the router select the best route\n
240
00:24:01,859 --> 00:24:05,449
To briefly demonstrate how the difference\n
241
00:24:05,450 --> 00:24:11,610
selects, let’s look at this diagram again\n
242
00:24:11,609 --> 00:24:20,099
to 192.168.4.0/24 to select for its route\n
243
00:24:20,099 --> 00:24:28,159
Via R2, the hop count is 2. One hop to R2,\n
244
00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:35,029
2. One hop to R3, one hop to R4, even though\n
245
00:24:35,029 --> 00:24:41,069
fastethernet connection. So, both routes will\n
246
00:24:41,069 --> 00:24:46,980
load balance traffic using both routes, even\n
247
00:24:46,980 --> 00:24:53,390
is used instead of RIP, which path will be\n
248
00:24:53,390 --> 00:24:59,160
take into account bandwidth. So, the slower\n
249
00:24:59,160 --> 00:25:05,200
a higher metric value, making it less favorable.\n
250
00:25:05,200 --> 00:25:11,660
route table, and R1 will send all traffic\n
251
00:25:11,660 --> 00:25:18,740
R2. RIP views both routes as equal, but OSPF\n
252
00:25:18,740 --> 00:25:23,549
metrics is the same, to let the router select\n
253
00:25:23,549 --> 00:25:28,480
routing protocols might make better decisions\nthan others.
254
00:25:28,480 --> 00:25:33,289
Now let’s talk about administrative distance,\n
255
00:25:33,289 --> 00:25:38,889
cases a company will only use a single IGP\n
256
00:25:38,890 --> 00:25:45,810
EIGRP if they only use Cisco equipment. However,\n
257
00:25:45,809 --> 00:25:50,039
example, if two companies connect their networks\n
258
00:25:50,039 --> 00:25:55,230
protocols might be in use. You might connect\n
259
00:25:55,230 --> 00:26:01,450
EIGRP. Metric, which I just showed you, is\n
260
00:26:01,450 --> 00:26:07,350
routing protocol. If a router learns two routes\n
261
00:26:07,349 --> 00:26:12,919
metric to choose which route is better. However,\n
262
00:26:12,920 --> 00:26:20,800
metrics, so they cannot be compared. For example,\n
263
00:26:20,799 --> 00:26:28,759
a metric of 30, while an EIGRP route to the\n
264
00:26:28,759 --> 00:26:33,308
Which route is better? Which route should\n
265
00:26:33,308 --> 00:26:38,549
really answer those questions by looking at\n
266
00:26:38,549 --> 00:26:44,879
different metrics. So, the administrative\n
267
00:26:44,880 --> 00:26:50,400
routing protocol is preferred. A lower AD\n
268
00:26:50,400 --> 00:26:55,650
protocol is considered more ‘trustworthy’,\n
269
00:26:55,650 --> 00:27:00,269
As you saw before, RIP’s hop count-based\n
270
00:27:00,269 --> 00:27:05,549
a high AD, because it’s not as trustworthy.\n
271
00:27:05,549 --> 00:27:12,419
they have the same hop count, although really\n
272
00:27:12,420 --> 00:27:17,200
Ready for some memorization? These are the\n
273
00:27:17,200 --> 00:27:22,990
of routes. I HIGHLY recommend you use the\n
274
00:27:22,990 --> 00:27:29,000
if you don’t get a question on the exam\n
275
00:27:29,000 --> 00:27:35,269
are learned, one from OSPF and one from EIGRP.\n
276
00:27:35,269 --> 00:27:41,940
To answer that question, you would need to\n
277
00:27:41,940 --> 00:27:47,049
route is preferred and will be entered in\n
278
00:27:47,049 --> 00:27:52,069
is preferred, and will be selected over a\n
279
00:27:52,069 --> 00:27:58,389
values used on Cisco devices, other vendors\n
280
00:27:58,390 --> 00:28:04,860
preferred routes are those to directly connected\n
281
00:28:04,859 --> 00:28:12,259
are the next best, they have an AD of 1. Next\n
282
00:28:12,259 --> 00:28:20,059
with an AD of 20. There is another kind of\n
283
00:28:20,059 --> 00:28:27,700
later. EIGRP routes have an AD of 90. Next\n
284
00:28:27,700 --> 00:28:38,759
an AD of 100. OSPF has an AD of 110. IS-IS\n
285
00:28:38,759 --> 00:28:46,690
So, of the IGPs I showed you, which are RIP,\n
286
00:28:46,690 --> 00:28:55,019
preferred, it has the lowest AD. However,\n
287
00:28:55,019 --> 00:29:00,259
These are beyond the scope of the CCNA, but\n
288
00:29:00,259 --> 00:29:08,279
the EIGRP network, that are then advertised\n
289
00:29:08,289 --> 00:29:15,928
AD of 200. Then one more. Routes with an AD\n
290
00:29:15,929 --> 00:29:22,190
Cisco. If the administrative distance is 255,\n
291
00:29:22,190 --> 00:29:27,570
that route and does not install the route\n
292
00:29:27,569 --> 00:29:32,019
these. If you’re not using the flashcards,\n
293
00:29:32,019 --> 00:29:37,730
this. Without flashcards it might be difficult\n
294
00:29:39,579 --> 00:29:45,329
Here’s a quick quiz question to demonstrate\n
295
00:29:45,329 --> 00:29:53,970
network 10.1.1.0/24 are learned. A route with\n
296
00:29:53,970 --> 00:30:00,750
with a metric of 5. A route with a next hop\n
297
00:30:00,750 --> 00:30:09,819
of 3. And a route with a next hop of 192.168.3.1,\n
298
00:30:09,819 --> 00:30:16,109
route to 10.1.1.0/24 will be added to the\n
299
00:30:16,109 --> 00:30:26,089
the answer. Okay, so the answer is the OSPF\n
300
00:30:26,089 --> 00:30:31,339
is used to compare routes learned from the\n
301
00:30:31,339 --> 00:30:37,419
metrics, AD is used to select the best route.\n
302
00:30:37,420 --> 00:30:42,610
over the RIP routes, because it has a lower\nAD.
303
00:30:42,609 --> 00:30:47,199
Looking back at the route table I showed you\n
304
00:30:47,200 --> 00:30:52,480
static routes. The connected and local routes\n
305
00:30:55,589 --> 00:31:02,039
And another look at this route table with\n
306
00:31:02,039 --> 00:31:06,339
Remember that the number on the left inside\n
307
00:31:09,869 --> 00:31:15,259
One final point before moving on to the quiz.\n
308
00:31:15,259 --> 00:31:20,250
and I will demonstrate this when we cover\n
309
00:31:20,250 --> 00:31:25,450
want OSPF routes to be preferred over EIGRP\n
310
00:31:25,450 --> 00:31:31,980
that. You can also change the AD of a static\n
311
00:31:31,980 --> 00:31:38,490
to configure a static route. IP ROUTE, followed\n
312
00:31:38,490 --> 00:31:44,460
the next hop address. However, I used the\n
313
00:31:44,460 --> 00:31:49,370
Here it says ‘distance metric’ for this\n
314
00:31:49,369 --> 00:31:53,599
but don’t confuse this for the metric we\n
315
00:31:54,599 --> 00:32:01,469
So, I configured the route with an AD of 100.\n
316
00:32:01,470 --> 00:32:07,589
can see that the AD is now 100, instead of\n
317
00:32:07,589 --> 00:32:10,509
why would you want to do this?
318
00:32:10,509 --> 00:32:15,109
By changing the AD of a static route, you\n
319
00:32:15,109 --> 00:32:20,079
by a dynamic routing protocol to the same\n
320
00:32:20,079 --> 00:32:24,799
the static route’s AD is higher than the\n
321
00:32:24,799 --> 00:32:30,079
route will still be preferred. This kind of\n
322
00:32:30,079 --> 00:32:35,019
route’. The route will be inactive, meaning\n
323
00:32:35,019 --> 00:32:40,299
the route learned by the dynamic routing protocol\n
324
00:32:40,299 --> 00:32:45,139
router stops advertising it for some reason,\n
325
00:32:45,140 --> 00:32:49,911
with a neighbor to be lost. You can see here\n
326
00:32:49,911 --> 00:32:55,200
exam topics list. Make sure to watch the lab\n
327
00:32:55,200 --> 00:32:57,798
to get practice configuring everything we\ncover.
328
00:32:57,798 --> 00:33:03,970
Okay, so let’s quickly review what we covered\n
329
00:33:03,970 --> 00:33:08,870
to dynamic routing protocols. They allow routers\n
330
00:33:08,869 --> 00:33:15,009
destinations without having to manually configure\n
331
00:33:15,009 --> 00:33:19,160
in large networks it’s not practical to\n
332
00:33:19,160 --> 00:33:24,610
configure thousands of different routes, which\n
333
00:33:24,609 --> 00:33:30,080
types of dynamic routing protocols. First,\n
334
00:33:30,080 --> 00:33:36,629
gateway protocols, used for routing within\n
335
00:33:36,630 --> 00:33:43,090
gateway protocols, used for routing between\n
336
00:33:43,089 --> 00:33:48,859
The only EGP in use these days is BGP. We\n
337
00:33:48,859 --> 00:33:55,490
kind of algorithm they use. There is one type\n
338
00:33:55,490 --> 00:34:02,599
there are two different kinds of IGP algorithms.\n
339
00:34:02,599 --> 00:34:09,929
link state, used by OSPF and IS-IS. Then we\n
340
00:34:09,929 --> 00:34:15,250
uses a different metric, which is a value\n
341
00:34:15,250 --> 00:34:21,000
within the same routing protocol. However,\n
342
00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:26,590
With administrative distance. Use the flashcards\n
343
00:34:26,590 --> 00:34:31,730
routing protocol, I’m sure you’ll need\n
344
00:34:31,730 --> 00:34:36,320
in this video, so I want to say that you shouldn’t\n
345
00:34:36,320 --> 00:34:42,720
completely yet. In the next video I will cover\n
346
00:34:42,719 --> 00:34:48,359
videos after that will cover OSPF. In those\n
347
00:34:48,360 --> 00:34:52,240
topics again, such as administrative distance\nand metric.
348
00:34:52,239 --> 00:34:58,000
Okay let’s move on to today’s quiz. At\n
349
00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:03,659
question from Boson ExSim, the best practice\n
350
00:35:03,659 --> 00:35:09,259
for the CCNA exam and you want to make sure\n
351
00:35:09,260 --> 00:35:13,619
my opinion, the single best thing you can\n
352
00:35:13,619 --> 00:35:17,000
Follow the link in the description to get\nBoson ExSIm.
353
00:35:17,000 --> 00:35:25,130
Here’s quiz question 1. R1 learns four routes\n
354
00:35:25,130 --> 00:35:33,559
protocols: RIP, EIGRP, OSPF, and IS-IS. Which\n
355
00:35:33,559 --> 00:35:42,989
A, the RIP route only. B, the EIGRP route\n
356
00:35:42,989 --> 00:35:51,659
route only. E, the RIP and EIGRP routes, because\n
357
00:35:51,659 --> 00:35:57,949
and IS-IS, because both are link state protocols.\n
358
00:35:57,949 --> 00:36:05,799
table. Pause the video to think about your\nanswer.
359
00:36:05,800 --> 00:36:14,000
The answer is B, only the EIGRP route will be added to the routing
360
00:36:14,010 --> 00:36:19,480
destination to add to the routing table, and\n
361
00:36:19,480 --> 00:36:24,809
the AD is used to determine which will be\n
362
00:36:24,809 --> 00:36:30,889
lowest AD of the four protocols, so only the\n
363
00:36:34,809 --> 00:36:40,420
Which type of routing protocol is also known\n
364
00:36:40,420 --> 00:36:53,220
B, path vector. C, distance vector. Or D,\n
365
00:36:53,219 --> 00:36:57,919
The answer is C, distance\n
366
00:36:57,920 --> 00:37:03,470
RIP and EIGRP operate by telling neighboring\n
367
00:37:03,469 --> 00:37:08,849
metrics to reach those networks, this is known\n
368
00:37:08,849 --> 00:37:14,710
because, when using a link state protocol\n
369
00:37:14,710 --> 00:37:18,909
a complete map of the network to calculate\n
370
00:37:18,909 --> 00:37:24,139
minimal information a router receives from\n
371
00:37:24,139 --> 00:37:30,170
B, path vector, is a type of EGP, exterior\n
372
00:37:30,170 --> 00:37:37,150
current CCNA, and operates differently than\n
373
00:37:37,150 --> 00:37:42,670
or IGP, is a category which includes both\n
374
00:37:42,670 --> 00:37:46,970
so it is incorrect. Let’s go to question\n3.
375
00:37:46,969 --> 00:37:59,059
R1 learns two routes to 172.16.0.0/16 via\n
376
00:37:59,059 --> 00:38:05,860
Both routes are 5 hops away. Which route/routes\n
377
00:38:05,860 --> 00:38:16,130
both routes. B, only the route via 10.0.0.1.\n
378
00:38:16,130 --> 00:38:26,780
route will be added because RIP’s AD value\n
379
00:38:26,780 --> 00:38:31,610
The answer is A, both routes\n
380
00:38:31,610 --> 00:38:39,360
are to the same destination, 172.16.0.0/16.\n
381
00:38:39,360 --> 00:38:44,900
RIP. And they have the same metric, 5. So,\n
382
00:38:44,900 --> 00:38:51,400
added to the routing table and R1 will load-balance\n
383
00:38:51,400 --> 00:38:59,809
D, if R1 also learned a route to 172.16.0.0/16\n
384
00:38:59,809 --> 00:39:05,639
this would be true, because RIP’s AD value\n
385
00:39:05,639 --> 00:39:12,059
However, there was no mention of another routing\n
386
00:39:12,059 --> 00:39:16,409
take a look at a bonus question from Boson\nExSim for CCNA.
387
00:39:16,409 --> 00:39:21,799
Okay, for today's Boson ExSim practice question\n
388
00:39:21,800 --> 00:39:26,900
it's a good question about route selection.\n
389
00:39:26,900 --> 00:39:31,840
IP ROUTE command on RouterA and receive the\n
390
00:39:31,840 --> 00:39:42,530
four routes, S R D O. S is a static route,\n
391
00:39:42,530 --> 00:39:49,430
That's right, its D, not E. And O is OSPF.\n
392
00:39:49,429 --> 00:39:54,589
All of them begin '10.20.0.0', but they have\n
393
00:39:54,590 --> 00:40:02,090
as different destinations. The static route\n
394
00:40:02,090 --> 00:40:09,079
same destination. So that's why, even though\n
395
00:40:09,079 --> 00:40:14,239
most preferred, all of the routes appear in\n
396
00:40:14,239 --> 00:40:21,429
So, RouterA receives a packet that is destined\n
397
00:40:21,429 --> 00:40:28,000
will RouterA use to send the packet? Select\n
398
00:40:28,000 --> 00:40:33,110
it has the highest administrative distance.\n
399
00:40:33,110 --> 00:40:38,309
with the longest prefix match. C, the static\n
400
00:40:38,309 --> 00:40:45,079
over dynamic routes. Or D, the EIGRP route\n
401
00:40:45,079 --> 00:40:55,889
Okay, pause the video here to think about\n
402
00:40:55,889 --> 00:41:03,608
So, in today's video I just talked about metric\n
403
00:41:03,608 --> 00:41:09,319
routes from multiple routing protocols to\n
404
00:41:09,320 --> 00:41:15,480
distance to select the route. But if you get\n
405
00:41:15,480 --> 00:41:20,679
you use the metric. However, these routes\n
406
00:41:20,679 --> 00:41:26,429
different destinations, as I just said, because\n
407
00:41:26,429 --> 00:41:32,779
AD and metric numbers are irrelevant. So,\n
408
00:41:32,780 --> 00:41:38,630
11's video about static routes? How does the\n
409
00:41:38,630 --> 00:41:43,869
destination matches multiple entries in the\n
410
00:41:43,869 --> 00:41:48,170
all of these entries, so it could use any\n
411
00:41:48,170 --> 00:41:54,720
most specific match. And 'most specific' means\n
412
00:41:54,719 --> 00:42:05,119
should use this OSPF route and send the packet\n
413
00:42:05,119 --> 00:42:10,670
So, I think B, 'the OSPF route because it\n
414
00:42:10,670 --> 00:42:17,610
is the correct answer. Let's check. And it\n
415
00:42:17,610 --> 00:42:21,450
explanation, here is Boson's explanation.\n
416
00:42:21,449 --> 00:42:27,039
is the great thing about Boson ExSim, is it\n
417
00:42:27,039 --> 00:42:33,900
why B is correct, but also why A, C, and D\n
418
00:42:33,900 --> 00:42:38,420
to some Cisco documentation, which is freely\n
419
00:42:38,420 --> 00:42:44,019
in Cisco routers'. Okay, so that was today's\n
420
00:42:44,019 --> 00:42:48,269
to get a copy of ExSim, please follow the\n
421
00:42:48,269 --> 00:42:53,349
exams I used when I studied for my CCNA and\n
422
00:42:53,349 --> 00:42:57,620
me pass all of my exams on the first try.\n
423
00:42:57,619 --> 00:43:03,599
ExSim, please follow the link in the video\ndescription.
424
00:43:03,599 --> 00:43:08,170
There are supplementary materials for this\n
425
00:43:08,170 --> 00:43:12,809
the software ‘Anki’. There will also be\n
426
00:43:12,809 --> 00:43:18,559
some hands-on practice. That will be in the\n
427
00:43:18,559 --> 00:43:22,400
the link in the description, and I’ll send\n
428
00:43:25,849 --> 00:43:30,650
Before finishing today’s video I want to\n
429
00:43:30,659 --> 00:43:37,299
you to John, funnydart, Joshua, Scott, Aleksa,\n
430
00:43:37,300 --> 00:43:43,940
Samil, Velvijaykum, C Mohd, Johan, Mark, Miguel,\n
431
00:43:43,949 --> 00:43:50,368
of ExSim, Sidi, Magrathea, Devin, Charlsetta,\n
432
00:43:50,369 --> 00:43:56,271
Sorry if I pronounced your name incorrectly,\n
433
00:43:56,271 --> 00:44:00,950
of you is still displaying as Channel failed\n
434
00:44:00,949 --> 00:44:06,089
and I’ll see if YouTube can fix it. This\n
435
00:44:06,090 --> 00:44:11,720
of recording by the way, June 13th 2020, if\n
436
00:44:11,719 --> 00:44:16,609
on here don’t worry, you’ll be in future\nvideos.
437
00:44:16,610 --> 00:44:21,490
Thank you for watching. Please subscribe to\n
438
00:44:21,489 --> 00:44:26,459
and share the video with anyone else studying\n
439
00:44:26,460 --> 00:44:32,179
check the links in the description. I'm also\n
440
00:44:32,179 --> 00:44:37,139
or Basic Attention Token, tips via the Brave\n
35950
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.