Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:13,166 --> 00:00:15,533
I really loved color when I was a child
2
00:00:15,533 --> 00:00:16,633
watching these films
3
00:00:17,600 --> 00:00:22,500
and I found that as the color process changed
4
00:00:22,533 --> 00:00:24,066
the color changed you know
5
00:00:25,300 --> 00:00:28,166
and eventually by the early 50s
6
00:00:29,466 --> 00:00:32,399
the change from three strip to monopack
7
00:00:32,533 --> 00:00:34,166
change the nature of the color
8
00:00:35,066 --> 00:00:36,366
and colors became more muted
9
00:00:36,366 --> 00:00:40,399
I thought I happen to like the very bright colors of
10
00:00:40,766 --> 00:00:41,966
early Technicolor
11
00:00:42,000 --> 00:00:44,000
that doesn't mean I don't like black and white
12
00:00:44,166 --> 00:00:45,533
that's that's the difference
13
00:00:45,533 --> 00:00:48,399
that the black and white was color
14
00:00:48,400 --> 00:00:49,466
and still is
15
00:00:49,566 --> 00:00:52,866
but I was really fascinated by
16
00:00:53,766 --> 00:00:55,566
that projection on the screen
17
00:00:55,700 --> 00:00:57,066
and I think it may have been because
18
00:00:57,066 --> 00:00:59,299
the first film I saw was dueling the sun
19
00:00:59,866 --> 00:01:01,666
was three script Technicolor in that
20
00:01:02,066 --> 00:01:02,766
the credits
21
00:01:02,766 --> 00:01:04,366
the opening credits come up
22
00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:07,100
the blazing hot yellow sun
23
00:01:07,100 --> 00:01:09,133
and the titles come up
24
00:01:09,133 --> 00:01:10,133
and hear gunshots
25
00:01:10,133 --> 00:01:11,233
and it was absolutely
26
00:01:12,933 --> 00:01:14,733
overpowering feeling
27
00:01:14,733 --> 00:01:16,166
watching that film or trying to watch
28
00:01:16,166 --> 00:01:16,999
actually terrified me
29
00:01:17,000 --> 00:01:18,233
I was about 5 years old
30
00:01:19,333 --> 00:01:20,566
but the use of color in that
31
00:01:20,566 --> 00:01:21,333
I think set
32
00:01:21,333 --> 00:01:22,799
set the tone for me
33
00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:25,700
and there's no doubt that I um
34
00:01:25,966 --> 00:01:29,899
I respond to vibrant use of color in that
35
00:01:29,900 --> 00:01:30,366
or the moment
36
00:01:30,366 --> 00:01:31,599
like in 1948
37
00:01:31,600 --> 00:01:32,966
when my brother took me to see
38
00:01:32,966 --> 00:01:34,166
a re release of Wizard of Oz
39
00:01:34,166 --> 00:01:37,466
when the sepia sequences at the beginning
40
00:01:37,466 --> 00:01:39,166
and the house lands and Oz you know
41
00:01:39,166 --> 00:01:40,166
and it's still in sepia
42
00:01:40,166 --> 00:01:42,266
but she opens the door and it's Technicolor
43
00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:43,900
um that moment
44
00:01:43,900 --> 00:01:45,900
I've always been something that I I love
45
00:01:45,900 --> 00:01:48,600
I love when films in the late 40s
46
00:01:48,600 --> 00:01:49,400
were in black and white
47
00:01:49,400 --> 00:01:51,133
and then there was one sequence in color
48
00:01:51,133 --> 00:01:52,966
like The Portrait of Dorian Gray
49
00:01:53,066 --> 00:01:56,699
um or the end of portrait of Jenny where um
50
00:01:56,700 --> 00:01:57,966
it's tinted green
51
00:01:57,966 --> 00:01:59,899
the storm and ultimately
52
00:01:59,900 --> 00:02:02,166
the last shot is in color of the film
53
00:02:02,400 --> 00:02:04,200
this made it very special for me
54
00:02:04,200 --> 00:02:05,266
and then seeing
55
00:02:05,266 --> 00:02:09,233
um uh the uh
56
00:02:09,300 --> 00:02:10,733
two color films uh
57
00:02:10,733 --> 00:02:14,599
which I I felt were magical to me
58
00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:20,166
and so this all revolved around that technical process
59
00:02:20,166 --> 00:02:23,099
that Oswald Mars and John Houston used on Moby Dick
60
00:02:23,100 --> 00:02:24,866
the desaturation of the color
61
00:02:25,066 --> 00:02:26,766
which I tried to do many times
62
00:02:26,866 --> 00:02:29,633
basically coming up with an image that looked um
63
00:02:30,200 --> 00:02:32,566
so desaturated that uh
64
00:02:32,566 --> 00:02:34,466
it was almost like uh the uh
65
00:02:34,700 --> 00:02:37,033
colorized agora type in a way
66
00:02:37,200 --> 00:02:37,933
and had a great
67
00:02:37,933 --> 00:02:39,166
great sense of almost like
68
00:02:39,166 --> 00:02:39,966
uh looking at
69
00:02:39,966 --> 00:02:41,266
uh paintings
70
00:02:41,300 --> 00:02:42,600
or I should say
71
00:02:43,133 --> 00:02:44,933
scrimshaw uh
72
00:02:44,933 --> 00:02:45,799
etchings done on
73
00:02:45,800 --> 00:02:47,166
um whalebone
74
00:02:47,300 --> 00:02:48,300
uh it was quite
75
00:02:48,300 --> 00:02:49,700
quite beautiful I thought
76
00:02:55,700 --> 00:02:57,000
you see when a picture is made in color
77
00:02:57,000 --> 00:02:58,500
you also have to design in color
78
00:02:58,500 --> 00:03:01,233
that means the color means something uh
79
00:03:01,500 --> 00:03:03,666
and uh color is special
80
00:03:03,766 --> 00:03:05,633
you know um
81
00:03:05,900 --> 00:03:08,433
and the use of color was something new in a way
82
00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:09,566
but just to shoot
83
00:03:09,566 --> 00:03:11,899
because it's color doesn't quite make sense
84
00:03:11,900 --> 00:03:14,033
so the use of um
85
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:16,100
primary colors is important
86
00:03:16,100 --> 00:03:18,166
as I say color means something
87
00:03:18,566 --> 00:03:20,833
even when you don't want it to it does
88
00:03:21,100 --> 00:03:22,300
and so you have to be very careful
89
00:03:22,300 --> 00:03:23,600
the colors you allow in the frame
90
00:03:23,600 --> 00:03:27,900
and color became somewhat expected all the time
91
00:03:27,900 --> 00:03:30,133
it lost its special nature for me
92
00:03:30,133 --> 00:03:31,499
that was a different way of using color
93
00:03:31,500 --> 00:03:32,900
to different lenses
94
00:03:32,900 --> 00:03:35,733
then different film stocks
95
00:03:35,733 --> 00:03:38,066
so you really had people utilizing color
96
00:03:38,066 --> 00:03:38,799
to tell a story
97
00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:43,266
also in a different way from the studio films
98
00:03:44,133 --> 00:03:46,433
um because they did tell a story there too
99
00:03:52,166 --> 00:03:54,699
all this this obsession with color on film
100
00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:56,366
found its way into
101
00:03:56,366 --> 00:03:57,866
one of the reasons why I did the aviator
102
00:03:57,866 --> 00:03:59,999
and I decided that we're gonna try to do
103
00:04:00,600 --> 00:04:01,733
color in the film
104
00:04:01,733 --> 00:04:03,799
that represented the color as it
105
00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:06,266
as it was available
106
00:04:06,266 --> 00:04:09,766
in whatever process Technicolor had at the time
107
00:04:09,766 --> 00:04:11,866
so if the film starts in 1922
108
00:04:11,866 --> 00:04:13,299
whatever the color looks like
109
00:04:13,300 --> 00:04:17,366
two color will represents two color of that period
110
00:04:17,366 --> 00:04:19,133
and so Sandy Paul
111
00:04:19,133 --> 00:04:21,633
at the design costumes that would play in that color
112
00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:23,566
often I think there's one scene
113
00:04:23,566 --> 00:04:25,933
where they go to the Coconut Grove and uh
114
00:04:25,933 --> 00:04:27,266
uh Cape Blanchett's dress
115
00:04:27,266 --> 00:04:30,199
which is a kind of LA Mei I think um
116
00:04:30,200 --> 00:04:32,966
I believe is a kind of gold color
117
00:04:32,966 --> 00:04:34,766
but I think in actuality was green
118
00:04:35,733 --> 00:04:37,799
and so we tested all of this
119
00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:39,466
the thing about creating that
120
00:04:39,466 --> 00:04:41,233
is really an obsession with color
121
00:04:41,733 --> 00:04:46,199
and slowly the color in aviator slips into
122
00:04:47,066 --> 00:04:48,766
a feeling of a more saturated
123
00:04:48,766 --> 00:04:50,199
three strip Technicolor
124
00:04:54,100 --> 00:04:56,466
and then finally a colder color in the end
125
00:04:59,466 --> 00:05:00,066
but ultimately
126
00:05:00,066 --> 00:05:02,399
I was really one of the reasons for making the picture
127
00:05:02,466 --> 00:05:04,599
and that was not possible really
128
00:05:04,600 --> 00:05:07,400
until the use of the digital intermediate
129
00:05:07,533 --> 00:05:08,066
part of this
130
00:05:08,066 --> 00:05:09,299
part of this is beyond me in terms
131
00:05:09,300 --> 00:05:12,033
I was learning as I was going along um
132
00:05:12,733 --> 00:05:14,266
with um on aviator
133
00:05:14,266 --> 00:05:14,499
and it was a
134
00:05:14,500 --> 00:05:18,100
it was a really a exciting experience
135
00:05:18,100 --> 00:05:20,666
because I was able to use pre visualization
136
00:05:20,666 --> 00:05:21,366
for the first time
137
00:05:21,366 --> 00:05:23,133
taking my notes and little drawings
138
00:05:23,133 --> 00:05:27,266
and transferring them into the previous
139
00:05:27,966 --> 00:05:29,399
Rob the god always doing with me
140
00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:32,200
and so the storyboard came alive in a way
141
00:05:33,666 --> 00:05:36,999
and there was a new way of making pictures in a sense
142
00:05:37,000 --> 00:05:37,933
for the action sequences
143
00:05:37,933 --> 00:05:39,566
I'm talking about the flying scenes
144
00:05:39,866 --> 00:05:43,166
we had seen a beautiful show on color and film
145
00:05:43,300 --> 00:05:46,666
right before we did The Aviator at the Academy in LA
146
00:05:46,733 --> 00:05:49,866
in which they first screened beautiful black and white
147
00:05:49,866 --> 00:05:52,399
nitrate of Midsomer Night stream sections
148
00:05:52,400 --> 00:05:53,500
that you screen sections of it
149
00:05:53,500 --> 00:05:54,500
then they screened
150
00:05:54,600 --> 00:05:57,166
beautiful examples of tinting and toning
151
00:05:57,166 --> 00:05:59,533
from silent films and nitrate prints they had
152
00:05:59,533 --> 00:06:02,599
leading up to full use of color um
153
00:06:03,133 --> 00:06:04,833
and it was really a revelation
154
00:06:04,866 --> 00:06:06,299
even the beautiful um
155
00:06:06,933 --> 00:06:10,599
print they had of east of Eden at that time
156
00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:12,000
cause I recall that color
157
00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:15,966
and 53 and 54 Warner Brothers scope films
158
00:06:15,966 --> 00:06:19,199
had more of a brownish blue feel to them um
159
00:06:19,200 --> 00:06:20,500
as opposed to
160
00:06:20,500 --> 00:06:22,666
as opposed to Fox um
161
00:06:22,666 --> 00:06:25,699
and the films they were making so um uh
162
00:06:25,700 --> 00:06:28,266
there was always a slight difference um
163
00:06:28,266 --> 00:06:30,099
and it became sort of uh
164
00:06:30,100 --> 00:06:32,366
encoded in my head um
165
00:06:32,366 --> 00:06:34,166
and so we use them as references
166
00:06:34,266 --> 00:06:35,799
but I must say that the uh
167
00:06:35,800 --> 00:06:37,666
the use of the di has
168
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:39,766
they increase the
169
00:06:41,300 --> 00:06:42,800
possibilities of color
170
00:06:44,066 --> 00:06:44,866
and
171
00:06:46,100 --> 00:06:49,433
in a in a way it's strange because there is no limit
172
00:06:49,900 --> 00:06:53,666
very very there's so many possibilities now and
173
00:06:53,666 --> 00:06:54,599
and it's exciting
174
00:06:54,600 --> 00:06:55,633
but at the same time
175
00:06:55,666 --> 00:07:00,033
you have to force yourself to limit those possibilities
176
00:07:00,200 --> 00:07:02,366
and don't let the technology take over you know
177
00:07:02,366 --> 00:07:04,233
because you can do it doesn't mean you should do it
12368
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.