All language subtitles for Europa - The Last Battle - Part 9 - 015555.eng

"Every record has been destroyed
or falsified, every book rewritten,

every picture has been repainted,

every statue and street building has been
renamed, every date has been altered.

And the process is continuing
day by day and minute by minute.

History has stopped.
Nothing exists except an endless present

in which the Party is always right."
- George Orwell, 1984

See, I think it's quite possible that
the 1960's represented the last burst

of the human being before
he was extinguished

and that this is the beginning
of the rest of the future now,

and from now on, there'll simply
be all these robots walking around,

feeling nothing,
thinking nothing.

And there'll be nobody
left almost to remind them

that there once was a
species called a human being,

with feelings and thoughts,

and that history and memory
are right now being erased,

and soon nobody will really remember
that life existed on the planet.

AFTERMATH

- We didn't fight against you.
- Just against the Russians?

To be exact, not against the Russians,
but against Bolshevism.

- They were people like you and I.
- Against Stalinist Bolshevism.

We defended our country against it,
and more importantly, all of Europe.

If we hadn't stopped it, it would have
reached your country and France, too.

Right up to the channel.
That was their plan.

We also had to fight the Americans,
when they landed.

In France, Italy and Africa.

In the end, the Russians sometimes
outnumbered us twelve to one.

And we still tried to keep them
away from the borders of the Reich.

To defend our people.

The Russian didn't sign
the Geneva Convention.

He didn't need to respect international
conventions of war, and he showed it.

Stirred up by Bolshevist propaganda,
he massacred our people...

and also molested them,
in particular the women.

We tried to prevent that until the end.
We didn't succeed.

German soldiers didn't do that.
Maybe. But it was strictly forbidden.

I think�

- What do you mean?
- Rape. The Russians did that.

- The Germans didn't do that?
- No.

It is something you always hear,
but the Wehrmacht didn't do that.

You couldn't. You'd be shot or
sent to a punishment battalion.

Yet bad things happened between
the Wehrmacht and the population.

In the Netherlands? Where?

In Putten. The village I'm from.
The Wehrmacht surrounded it...

and deported the men to
labor camps in Germany.

More than 600 men were
deported and only 49 returned.

Is there evidence of that?

Yes, they never came back.
My great-uncles died as well.

The Wehrmacht did that?
I don't believe that.

The Wehrmacht had nothing
to do with labor allocation.

Maybe it was the police.

A German car had been ambushed near
the village, but it wasn't clear�

So that's why. There was always a
cause for such a fierce reaction.

But it was a violation of
the conventions of war.

But if those who had ambushed that car
had been partisans, noncombatants...

then they'd violated the conventions
of war as well. Or were they soldiers?

- No, resistance fighters.
- There you go. Partisans.

That was the cause. It was a reaction
to the car being attacked by partisans.

But the first crime was the invasion
of the Netherlands. We didn't start it.

That's right, we marched in...

We marched in without
asking permission.

The Wehrmacht should have asked if
we could march into the Netherlands.

- Or declared war.
- No one would have given permission.

War has its own laws.

I grew up just as every other
American looking back at World War II

of which my father
was a veteran, in fact,

of the Normandy invasion,
D-day plus two.

I looked back on with other
Americans with great pride

at what Americans were able to do
and to liberate Europe and so on.

However, I don't feel the same
way about that war anymore

and I'm convinced that if
my father was still living,

that he would also greatly question
what he had actually participated in.

Again, the Soviet Union was
manipulating the American war effort,

and the British war effort as well,

in order to defeat Hitler,
to supplant him with Stalin,

and this is exactly what happened.

The logic of the map is what tells
us that what I'm saying has credence,

because when you look at that
post-war map, what happened,

there is a devastated
Germany and in that vacuum

there is a new thriving, powerful
US-supplied Soviet empire in its place.

World War II was the
crossroads of human history.

It was a battle of two opposing
ideologies, philosophies and worldviews.

It was a battle between
nationalism and globalism.

It was a war between Germany
and the Jewish powers

who controlled the allied
governments and their media.

Adolf Hitler and his allies fought to
preserve the concept of nationalism,

not just for Germans,
but for all peoples the world over.

The world that we're living in today is
the world of the victors of that war.

This is the world of globalism,
capitalism and communism.

The outcome of World War II decided
the fate of our civilization.

Countries did not lose the Second
World War, but humanity as a whole.

Over 60 million people died in the
most horrific war in human history.

After Germany's defeat,

Europe was placed back again
on the heel of the bankers

where it remains to this day.

The old debt payments originating
from the post Treaty of Versailles

was reinstituted in 1948,
and was not paid off until 2010.

Germany is now totally controlled

by the Rothschild,
Goldman Sachs and the Federal Reserve.

These same forces of international
Jewry are the very same

about which Adolf Hitler tried
to forewarn the German people.

All of Germany's gold reserves

are now held in the U.S. Federal
Reserve Bank of New York.

Today,
the German people find themselves

in the same state of economic servitude
of which Hitler tried to correct.

Germany is still paying off war
reparations for World War II.

On the 23rd of May, 1949,

the Western Allies ratified
a new German constitution

known as "The Basic Law",
Grundgesetz.

Two days prior,

a secret state treaty, Geheimer
Staatsvertrag, was also signed.

This granted complete allied control
over education and all licensed media,

press, radio, television and
publishing houses until the year 2099.

Germany is still an occupied land

with over 100,000 foreign
troops stationed on her soil

and the Jews have never
made peace with her.

No peace treaty has been concluded
with any of the Allied powers.

Free speech and freedom
of thought is gone,

not only in Germany,
but in most parts of Europe.

The Jew Martin Schulz, president of
the European Parliament, explained:

"The new Germany exists
only in order to ensure

the existence of the State of
Israel and the Jewish people."

There you have World
War II in one quote.

That was what the war was all about.

Breaking down Germany and making her
a milking cow to the bankers again.

The globalist United Nations

began with the London declaration,
12th of June, 1941.

The name United Nations was
coined by Franklin Roosevelt

and was used during the Declaration
by United Nations of January 1942.

On June 26, 1945, The founding Charter
for the United Nations was signed.

At the founding San Francisco conference
that established the United Nations,

the U.S. official serving
as Secretary General

was the communist agent Alger Hiss who
was exposed as a Soviet spy in 1948.

The UN replaced the
globalist League of Nations

as the foundation of the
globalist New World Order.

The UN was put up based upon
Karl Marx Communist Manifesto,

but this time the whole world

would slowly be turned
into the new Soviet Union.

The new world government would
now be headquartered in New York

on 18 acres of prime real estate
donated by the Rockefeller family.

This was the final nail in the coffin.

International communism
had officially won the war.

The globalist NATO and EU also
came as a consequence from the war

as stepping-stones to a
future world government.

The United Nations,
the Council of Foreign Relations,

the Trilateral Commission,
the Bilderberg Group,

the Gorbachev foundation
and the Club of Rome,

and many other shadowy
Fifth Column organizations

now work together to destabilize
the sovereign nations

to create a communist World Order.

Communism would spread from the Soviet
Union with the help of communist Jews.

Even in China, Soviet Jews
worked helping Mao Zedong.

High up in the political
department of the Red Army in China

were W. N. Levitschev
and J. B. Gamarnik.

By progressive social movements
in the name of helping people,

communism killed over

60 million in the Soviet Union

70 million in the
People's Republic of China

3 million in Korea

2 million in Cambodia

1.7 million in Africa

1.6 million in Vietnam

1.6 million in Poland

1.5 million in Afghanistan

1.2 million in Tito's Yugoslavia

1 million elsewhere in Eastern Europe

1 million in Ethiopia

400,000 in Romania

200,000 in Bulgaria

150,000 in Latin America

100,000 in Mongolia

100,000 in Albania

73,000 in Cuba

70,000 in the German Democratic Republic

65,000 in Czechoslovakia

27,000 in Hungary

10,000 by Communist Parties not in power

and the International
communist movement;

yet, no movies,
no Holocaust reparations,

no memorials for these victims.

The communist flag is not banned

and communist policies
are still normalized

and Marxism is even taught
as standard in our schools.

Western civilization that literally
took thousands of years to develop

with the help of the Romans
laying the foundation

was destroyed in less
than two centuries.

All healthy societal norms
have been broken down.

Healthy nationalism has been
replaced with the cultural guilt,

ethno-masochism, self-hatred, apathy,
degeneracy and pathological altruism.

Traditionalism is labeled
sick and outdated.

Views on parenting have
changed significantly.

Just 50 years ago, a person in Europe
was first considered to be a grown-up

after they had created
a strong family.

Thanks to the cultural
Marxism brainwashing,

Europeans don't anymore believe
their position in society

will be improved by having offspring.

Consequently, they instead
focus on materialist matters

to fill up their void
and unfulfillment.

As Europeans, we are no longer defined
by our virtues, our intellects.

We do not longer exist as people with
common history, heritage or values.

We have been reduced into ruthless,
cultureless, genderless,

alienated, infertile, overmedicated
and undereducated tax and debt slaves.

We are no longer people defined
by our qualities or intellects.

We have become soulless machines,
taxpayers and human resources.

We are defined solely
by our net worth

and our ability to consume
crap that we don't even need.

People no longer talk with
each other on the streets.

We have forgotten everything that
meant something to our ancestors.

We have lost touch with both
our past and our present,

and we live in some
imaginary fantasy world

where happiness is
just around the corner,

but never really is found.

This is the world of blind equality

where all sexes, races, cultures,
ethnicities are the same

in one homogeneous,
rootless, ruthless, gray goop.

Each individual is the same.

Without roots, identities or cultures

we will be exploited by the
tyrannical global elite.

Our identities are installed into us
by the state instead of our parents.

Our people are stripped of a
path to defend in our future.

The European spirit that was
rooted in vital institutions

such as family, farm, folk and the
community has been totally wiped out.

We are no longer defined by
common cultures, traditions,

bloodlines and a set of
everlasting values.

We are not united in our desire to
protect our culture and a way of life.

This is our modern world.

This is the world of consumerism,

nihilism, hedonism
and empty materialism.

The world of uninspiring, generic,
modern abstract art and architecture.

The destruction of
Western civilization

is applauded as something
progressive and tolerant.

We now live in the world of cheap
chinese imports for the rich

and eternal wage
slavery for the poor.

This is a world of globalism

installed by the victors
of the Second World War

by the ideology of
international communism.

This was exactly what
the National Socialists

during World War II
tried to warn humanity of.

Our governments are acting on
behalf of influential lobbyists,

NGOs and globalist organizations,
which in turn work for a global elite.

The essential driving force and
cohesive core of this global elite

consists of Jews who see
the ethnic transformation

of former white homogenous
Western countries

as beneficial for ethnically
Jewish minority interests.

Because of historical,
religious and mere tactical reasons

many Jews view the white
race as their greatest enemy

and the fight for
power and influence.

It is critical to
realize that these powers

do not have our well-being in mind.

In their eyes, we are simply
seen as their cattle.

In a multicultural society
with other more visible

and on the surface more
problematic minority groups,

Jews appear as a seemingly
invisible minority

and not as an outside
hostile social category.

In this way, the Jews can safely
continue to exercise their power

by pushing their specific
ethnic group interest

at the expense of the
indigenous populations.

All the Jewish organizations
got on board with the idea

that we have to import other peoples,

we have to change the demographic
profile of these societies,

so that they will not
be homogeneous anymore,

that they will not be able to
gang up again against the Jews.

So, I think those are two big reasons.

One is to push aside
the previous elite

to make room for Jewish elite,
but also to the fear and real hatred

that the Jews have had historically
towards white Christian societies.

The most powerful globalist currently
is the Hungarian Jew George Soros.

He is known for his intense
hatred for white people

and having his long tentacles
in basically everything

that weakens Western civilization.

Everything that divides

and inflames minorities with
hatred for white Europeans.

Soros nongovernmental organizations
have engineered the migrant crisis,

knowing full well that there will
inevitably be a major culture clash.

Soros funds the "divide and conquer"
terror organization Black Lives Matter

that encourages violence against whites.

Soros funds the radical
feminist organization Femen

who pits white women
against their own men,

teach them to hate their fathers
and despise their brothers

in relentless bashing of
the hetero white male.

Femen and other feminist organizations,
while marching around bare breasted,

advocate for radical Islam.

A religion that cuts up the
clitorises of little girls

and requires the women to be
covered up from head to toe.

Not only Germany and Europe
lost the Second World War,

but even the nations in the Middle East,

as the Zionists and neo-cons
invented the fictitious war on terror

after the 9/11 attacks to
destabilize any nation that would try

to emulate the economic success
of National Socialist Germany

and go against the globalists.

About ten days after 9/11
I went through the Pentagon

and I saw secretary Rumsfeld
and deputy secretary Wolfowitz.

I went downstairs just to say hello to
some of the people on the Joint Staff

who you used to work for me and one
of the generals called me and he said,

"Sir, you've gotta come in
and talk to me a second".

I said, "Well, you're too busy".
He said, "No, no", he says,

"We've made the decision
we're going to war with Iraq."

This was on or about
the 20th of September.

I said "We're going to war with Iraq?
Why?"

He said "I don't know."

He said "I guess they
don't know what else to do."

So I said "Well,
did they find some information

connecting Saddam to Al-Qaeda?"

He said "No, no.
It says there's nothing new that way.

They just made the decision
to go to war with Iraq."

He said "I guess it's like we don't
know what to do about terrorists,

but we got a good military and
we can take down governments."

And he said "I guess if the
only tool you have is a hammer,

every problem has to
look like a nail."

So, I came back to see
him a few weeks later

and by that time we were
bombing in Afghanistan.

I said
"Are we still going to war with Iraq?"

and he said
"Oh, it's worse than that."

He said, he reached over on his desk,
he picked up a piece of paper, he said

"I just...", he said "I just got
this down from upstairs meeting,

the secretary of defense office today",
and he said

"This is a memo that describes how we're
gonna take out 7 countries in 5 years

starting with Iraq and then Syria,
Lebanon, Libya, Somalia,

Sudan and finishing off Iran."

What is Israel's role in this,
Ken O'Keefe?

Well, the Greater Israel project is all
about destabilizing surrounding nations,

ultimately in pursuit of
this dream of Greater Israel,

from the Euphrates down to the Nile,

all the way over to the
eastern Mediterranean.

This is the dream of
the psychopaths and so,

destabilizing governments,
creating sectarian strife

is all part of that menu and all part
of the design to create Greater Israel.

So, that goes... that's self-evident.

But I have to go back to what this
gentleman is saying in Washington DC

about America not wanting to get
involved, Obama not getting involved.

What are you talking about?

We have been arming people
directly who are Al-Qaeda.

Our neutral front is Al-Qaeda.

These people are psychopaths
to the worst order.

They're conducting suicide attacks,
they're gassing people.

We know Carla Del Ponte said in May that
it was the so-called rebels in Syria

that were using sarin gas,
not the Bashar al-Assad regime.

No, it was not.
We know that the United States president

is arming people who are
on the U.S. terrorist list.

He should be convicted
of aiding and abetting,

giving material support to
a terrorist organization,

but then, again, you know what?
We are.

We, the West, the United States
in particular, Israel and Britain

are the biggest
terrorists on the planet.

So, our little junior
partners in Al-Qaeda,

which is nothing more than CIA database,
thus the name al Qaeda,

this is nothing more than a group
of terrorists working together,

each play, one different role,

but all of them working
together for the same goal,

which is to maintain this hideous and

sick and twisted injust
world that we have,

which is a perpetual state of war.

Always one illusion,
one boogeyman after another,

but the fact is Obama is nothing
more than a puppet war criminal

just like his predecessor and
every other US president before him.

So, please don't tell our people out
there that the U.S. is not involved.

It's directly involved and it is arming
people who are absolute psychopaths.

That is what we discussed earlier,
the Greater Israel project

to destabilize any Arab regime

which might have any kind of
autonomy and self-determination.

Any regime in the Arab world that is not
an absolute puppet cannot be tolerated.

And who are the
nations that we target?

Those that are not puppets. We don't
target those like the Saudi regime,

which is the biggest human
rights violator in that region.

It's cutting off people's heads
in public, cutting off hands.

It is the most grotesque
regime on the planet,

and yet we get that regime weapons.
It's no problem, whatsoever.

The duplicity and hypocrisy of
the United States and the West

can't even be measured,
it is so enormous

and these mouthpieces, such as
this gentleman in Washington,

is only doing a disservice
to himself and his country.

And the fact is that
American sons and daughters

will get involved in this yet again.
And these chickenhawks,

who are pretending to care
about the Syrian people,

are gonna be sacrificing not
their own sons and daughters.

I would like this man to
send his sons and daughters

and his grandchildren off to Syria,
when this turns into a greater conflict,

because this is what we're
flirting with is a world war.

A third world war.
This is not a joke.

We are flirting with a third world
war on the basis that apparently

we care so much about
the Syrian people,

just like we care so much about the
Iraqi people and the Afghani people.

The only people that buy
this sort of stuff are either

bought off prostitutes or
the dumbest of the dumb.

And we're also led
to believe that Assad

is the dumbest idiot dictator
on the planet. Now, isn't he?

Because he invited UN
inspectors to come in

and he brought them in,
on the very day that they come in,

he decides to attack his own people

ten miles away from where
the inspectors arrived.

This is beyond ridiculous and the
only people that buy this, again,

are bought off prostitutes
or the dumbest of the dumb.

The greater Israel plan
was actually preplanned

by Theodor Herzl long before,
when he said

"The area of the Jewish State

stretches from the Brook
of Egypt to the Euphrates."

But they did not learn what
went on in World War II.

The perpetrators, the victorious
Allies and their Jewish handlers,

they hid the crimes from the
world with a blitz of books,

TV programs, documentaries
and movies as you point out,

and to this day � look around just,
look around ourselves,

we have wars in the
Middle East non-stop.

And for the sake (?) of Israel and Israel alone.

Now, Israel has a proxy
called United States.

Let's just call him uncle
stupid or uncle sucker.

Every time Israel wants
an enemy taken out,

whether it's Afghanistan,
whether it's Iraq, or hopefully,

I mean hopefully not Iran,
they want us to attack Iran.

Well, they just point their pitbull,
uncle stupid, in that direction

and uncle stupid dutifully goes to
war with that nation and destroys it.

That has got to stop.
We didn't learn from World War II

and we're still committing
the same mistakes.

Being a dreadful, awful,
ghastly racist such as myself,

does tend to give me an advantage,

because it means I can
actually talk about race.

And we do need to talk about race,

because the 21st century,
unless things change,

will see the virtual extinction
of my white European race.

THE GREAT REPLACEMENT

Back in Europe and by extension America,
Canada and Australia,

the indigenous people, cultures
and nations have now lost their right

to exist in their own homelands
and are now facing extinction.

In fact, today it is basically a
crime for an area to be too white.

No school, no town, no nation
is allowed to be white anymore.

Yet, there are no one pushing
for Israel, the Middle East,

Africa or Asia to become
multicultural, right?

The indigenous people of
Europe are treated like

second-class citizens
in their own countries.

The governments are actively working

to lift up so called minorities
and push whites down.

As an example of the utter hypocrisy,

Israel, Saudi Arabia,
United Arab Emirates, Qatar,

Kuwait and Bahrain have
refused to take in refugees.

So, have you seen any
media footage about this?

Have you seen anyone
calling them racist?

While white European women
of childbearing age today

are a small minority of 2% of
the entire world's population,

they are encouraged to breed
outside of their own race

to throw away thousands of years
of ethnic heritage and culture.

The result will be that
those pure genetics

that have been refined in Europe for
thousands of years will be gone forever.

So, what is diversity? Is it this?

Or is it this?

According to the establishment,
this is not diverse,

but this very diverse.

Not diverse.

Very diverse.

No diversity here.

So diverse.

We get it.

The meaning of diversity as
used by the establishment

is everyone but white people.

Well, unless they are sexual deviants.

So, it's everyone but
straight white people.

Diversity is being rewritten to mean

the inclusion of individuals representing
more than one national origin,

color, religion, socioeconomic group,
sexual orientation.

Did you get that?

This definition says it's non-whites,
muslims, Jews and anyone not Christian,

poor people meaning the third world,
and sexual deviance.

According to them,

if you don't include these groups,
you will never qualify as diverse.

So, if you're a straight white person

living in a homogeneous,
nationalist, Christian white country

you won't ever get a
gold star for diversity.

This new definition of diversity was
inspired by Marxist critical theory,

which arose from the
Frankfurt School in the '30's.

They were hostile communists
who fled to America

and pushed words like racism,
xenophobia, anti-Semite to sow division.

They pointed their fingers at others

while they agreed with
violent communist revolutions

that killed more than any
other ideology on the planet.

You know what diversity
doesn't include for a Marxist?

Diversity of political opinions.

Diversity can only mean
thinking like a leftist.

They're not welcoming a wide
range of political viewpoints.

They're not saying

"it doesn't matter if you're a
rightist because we accept you."

No, they shout "Nazi,
racist" and demand censorship.

They want to ruin your
life and destroy you

because of your deferring
political views.

They don't want diversity of thought.

They want leftist rule where dissenting
opinions are shut down by force.

Diversity is used as a
weapon against nationalists.

And leftists use minority
groups to further their agenda,

to be the wedge that breaks apart
the cohesion of the majority.

We were told we must overcome our
racist nature and embrace open borders

for a more utopian world where we
accept everyone holding hands as one.

We're told it's our
duty as white people,

that we alone hold the key
to usher in world peace.

It's up to us to make our
countries a home for everyone

where all races, religions and
ideologies live together in our country,

because only white people are racist.

Well, if you want to talk about peace,

the most peaceful countries in
the world happen to be white.

When someone says

"You white people aren't diverse
and can only become diverse

by importing the third
world into your countries",

this is psychological warfare.

An action intended to undermine
our morale and unity as a people.

An enemy can use pretty words
while having dirty motives.

Remember, communists talked
about the greater good

while they mass murdered
millions of Russians

who disagreed and stood in
the way of their utopia.

Migrant invaders in
Europe learned very fast

to shout racism and diversity,
because it gets them stuff.

They don't care about
sharing and equality.

They want to be the King on the top.

MONEY MONEY MONEY

Europeans are the most compassionate
and giving of any people.

Third world nations receive
billions and aid from us,

and when they need medicine
or education, who do they call?

Us.

But our goodwill is also easy to
take advantage of. We get hustled.

It's sad that a white
man can go to the moon,

but just don't call him racist
or he will have a breakdown.

That's how deep anti-white
propaganda and lies

has rotted our morale and
confidence as a people.

We don't even take our own side,

because it's practically the Holocaust,
if we do.

In the beginning, leftists who
pushed the dream of diversity

were naive idealists,
but not anymore.

Despite terrorist attacks,
increasing violence, rape,

and constant conflict in
our multicultural societies,

we continue to be propagandized
at every level that

diversity is our strength.

We're expected to deny reality.

The truth is in our face

and the whites who live in diverse
areas have to take the brunt of it.

Rich white liberals who
are activists for diversity

live in their ivory towers surrounded
by other rich white people,

chauffeured from white place to white
place untouched by all diversity.

Harvard political scientist
and leftist Robert Putnam

set out to do a study on
how awesome diversity is.

What did he really learn?

When you shove a bunch of different
people together � diversity,

it creates less social
cohesion, distrust,

conflict and it hurts
overall civic life.

People stop trusting each other
and they stop being nice and happy.

Daily life becomes a battle.

When you mix thousands
of people together

from different cultures
and languages, religions,

social classes and political views,
they won't get along.

What a shocking revelation.

Diversity isn't like the TV shows where
one of each race and creed goes shopping

and lunches together,
talking about how awesome liberalism is.

Before the word diversity,

white Americans were once
whole as a united group

in a country that was
nearly entirely white.

Even blacks did better during
segregation versus today.

It is diversity that has divided
white people. We are now divergent.

If there's a white neighborhood,
company, government or movie

we hear how it needs diversity.

In other words, it needs non-whites.

It is all about race.

All about replacing white
people wherever they are.

We can't have anything
that is all our own

without hearing non-whites
complain about it.

They want us to facilitate
them in everything we create

and they shout "slavery, colonialism,
Jim Crow, white supremacy"

to get a leg up, because they
couldn't do it on their own.

White people,
give your fucking money,

your fucking house,
your fucking property.

We need it. Fucking all.
We need these reparations...

It's a strategy to win. They didn't
even come up with it on their own.

Non-white minority groups

have learned they can get ahead
simply by crying diversity,

even when they're not
qualified for the position.

It's a shakedown.

Out-groups have learned
they can align together,

cry minority and chisel
their way into our spaces,

weakening our cohesion as a group.
It's a power grab.

All the while, they pretend to care
about the goodwill of all mankind

through pretty words like
equality and tolerance, diversity,

but their actions say the opposite.

They want their group to
hold power and influence.

They also want revenge and think
white people owe them, but we don't.

They don't care about the truth.

They want to get ahead and
they want to win as a group.

It's not white people going to
black or Asian areas demanding

they include white people in
every facet of their existence.

They have things that
are exclusively theirs

and they also have countries
where they are the majority.

They have no obligation to include
anyone else and neither do we.

We, whites,
should be a majority in our country.

We made every aspect of it.

There's nothing wrong with us
being dominant in our own country.

But even though we
are still a majority,

we're told it's supremacy when we
occupy the majority of society.

(?) It's why society's
become increasingly diverse,

there's no end in sight.

And in cities where
non-whites are the majority,

they're calling for an
anti-white privilege,

even though the job market openly
discriminates against whites.

And we hear how
campuses must end racism

even when they are fully
dictated by diversity politics.

When will diversity finally be achieved?

At what point will commies
and non-whites be satisfied?

I'll tell you.

When Europeans no
longer have an identity,

culture or country of their own.
When white people no longer exist.

It's a kind of utopia,

just the fact that the whole
world will mix up with each other,

that in, I don't know, 70, 80 years,

there will be no white people anymore
and only cappuccino-colured people.

That's the only way.
This is the only solution.

- Yeah, mixed up.
- It's our only hope...

- to (bleep) our way out of this.
- Yes!

It's gonna take some time,
but it's really the only way.

The sort of Singaporean model
where everybody is so mixed up

that you really don't
know who to hate,

because everybody is so
hopelessly intertwined.

But we're a long way from that.

They're advocating the biggest
genocide in all of history.

I mean, once white is gone, it's gone.

- You ain't gonna get it back, right?
- Yeah.

It's just interesting,
because this is only targeting whites.

They're not talking about
"no more brown people"

or "no more black people".

Just "no more white people", because
then that will solve the problem.

If we're all just darker-skinned,
then we won't hate each other.

This is the solution to the problem.

- Cappuccino-coloured, you know... Germans.
- That's right.

They started talking about
Cologne and all the rapes,

and then it goes into
the final solution.

The only solution is for those
women to have brown babies.

Are you fucking kidding me?

I think that we should go
down there and tell them that

Jews and Palestinians should
blend for peace, right?

Yeah, of course.

You need to just end this by mixing
yourself out and have mixed babies,

- and then maybe the conflict will end.
- Exactly.

Well, there's another coincidence
there and you brought this out.

The changing face of America.
Do you remember that? Pushing all this?

Oh, yeah, yeah. Of course.

Lise Funderburg,
who turns out is Jewish, you know?

Remember these pictures of
these very unrealistic babies?

Oh, yeah. Yeah. The dream of the
mocha-coloured, the future of all of us.

Israel has a huge wall
around its country.

There will be no white people anymore...

Let's take a look at Israel
in the meantime, right?

Okay, fine, I get that.
It's not a problem.

You don't want these people
in your countries, I get that.

But then don't come and
judge us for not wanting it

and push it into our countries.
That's the problem I have with here.

Israel recognizes less than
one percent of asylum seekers.

I mean,
talk about the utter hypocrisy.

They even have DNA, you know,
issues in terms of immigration, right?

That you have to have,
for you to get in to Israel,

- you have to be Jewish by DNA.
- That is correct.

And it's actually worse. It's worse than
that, because what they're doing now

is that they're actually
shipping people out of Israel,

to send them to places like Sweden,
right?

So, they actually pay,
specifically African migrants,

because Jews, many Jews in Israel,
they actually hate blacks.

They have a huge problem
with racism in Israel.

But they're going to
the shores of Europe

to welcome Syrian migrants,
African migrants, Afghani migrants,

Iraqi migrants, pointing the way,
standing out, in like, waving, you know,

"Here, here it is... coming!
This way!", right?

- Yeah. Literally, literally doing that.
- Unbelievable.

Again, you have Jewish
women showing up in Europe,

in a country that is not theirs,
that are welcoming invaders.

Let's go to Israel.
I saw this on Twitter.

Let's get a good group together, go to
Israel, start up some aid, you know,

and then welcome, just welcome, all
the non-jews, the Arabs, the Africans.

Why can't we do that?
What would happen then?

How about we go there and set
up aid for the Palestinians

and why aren't these women doing that,
if they claimed that,

"Oh, we're in such a good
relationship with Muslims"?

If we would have gone to Israel
and done something like this,

there would be military
descending on us in ten minutes.

We probably would not even
make it there, to be honest,

of invading their space, right?

Again, without people realizing, it's
actually a huge strategy behind this

to bring in more migrants into Europe
to destroy them ethnically, right?

They're against everything
white and pro-minority.

Up and down, they're pro-gun control.
Always pro-gun control.

Always pro-minority.
Always pro-illegal immigration.

They're always pro Middle Eastern war (?)
and American body bags.

They're always anti-white.
Jews are always foremost

in promoting race mixing among
whites and browns and blacks.

You can see it in American TV, as far
back as 20 and 30... 40 years even.

And on top of this actual
phenomenon that we can all witness,

we have the propaganda.

Every ad I see now has some kind
of mixed couple of some sort.

I see this being pushed everywhere.

White men are made to
look nerdy and stupid.

They can't dance and
they're so boring,

but the non-white men are made to
look strong, masculine and heroic.

It is no longer a good thing
to have white children.

They are considered
boring and nondiverse.

Not only do you have propaganda
which is massively anti-white,

we have weaponized words.

Anyone that talks about
any of these topics

is always called one particular word.
Can you guess what that word is?

- The "R" word.
- Racist.

Anytime you have propaganda and
weaponized words especially,

words that are supposed
to set off triggers

to shut you down,
to keep you shut up.

And we have phenomenon we're no
longer in the realm of propaganda.

If you have propaganda backed up by
phenomenon, we're now into warfare.

- Psychological warfare.
- Yeah.

And psychological warfare
is always reduced down to,

you know,
you're either with us or against us.

You have to have something to say
when people are calling you a name,

especially in a mean,
malicious way,

and the word racist is used as a
weapon all over Western civilization.

It's used to stigmatize. It's used
basically to silencing the opposition.

And what you want to
do is not be silenced.

So, when someone calls
you a racist, you just say

"You're just saying that
because I'm white.

Anti-racist is a
codeword for anti-white."

Racism only applies to
white people's homes,

white people's churches,
white countries.

It doesn't apply to anyone else. They're
not trying to yell racism anywhere else.

Racism is an anti-white hate slur.
It's really what it is.

And the phenomenon in
Western civilization

is massive amounts of immigration.
You can't debate it.

You can't even talk about
it or you're a Nazi...

we've all heard the word before.

So, we have forced immigration,
forced integration, forced assimilation

and then they tell us about
our inevitable brown future.

They're doing this in white countries
and only in white countries.

You know, China is still going
to be Chinese 50 years from now,

Africa is still going to be Africa,

Saudi Arabia is still
gonna be full of Arabs,

but we're all supposed to be blended.

United Nations data show
that the African population

is rising from 200 million in 1950
to a projected 4.2 billion in 2100.

This is an increase of 2,000 %.

These projections foresee
40% of the world's population

and about half of its children being
African by the end of this century.

The world has right now
more than 60 million people

that would want to get to the West.

Relocating these people
geographically to every white country

will not help anybody,

and our nations, people and
cultures will never survive it.

Some people say that mass
immigration into the United States

can help reduce world poverty.

Is that true? Well, no, it's not.
And let me show you why.

This gum-ball represents the
1 million legal immigrants

that the United States has taken
every year on average since 1990.

Now, who in the world deserves
our humanitarian compassion?

The World Bank has one measure of
the desperately poor of the world,

they make less than two dollars a day.

And how many people make less than
two dollars a day in the world?

We'll start with Africa.

In Africa alone,
there are 650 million people

who make less than 2 dollars a day.
650 million.

And in India? Another 890
million people, desperately poor.

China? Add another 480 million people
making less than two dollars a day.

And unfortunately, the rest of Asia
has a heartbreaking 810 million people

who the World Bank says make
less than 2 dollars a day.

And finally, there is 105 million
of Latin America's population

that are desperately poor.

All total, the World Bank says that
there are 3 billion people in the world,

3 billion people,
who are desperately poor,

making less than two dollars a day.
That's 3 thousand gum-balls.

And every year,

we take a million

and suggest

that we have somehow made
a humanitarian difference?

Of course,
we don't pull our immigrants

from these desperately poor population,
do we?

These people are too poor,
too sick, too disconnected,

to make it here as immigrants.

We tend to pull our immigrants out
of the better off poor of the world.

How many people in the
world live in countries

that have average incomes
lower than that of Mexico?

And the World Bank tells
us that that number is

these 3 billion plus
another 2.6 billion people.

5.6 billion people in the world...

who live in countries with average
incomes below that of Mexico.

That's 5600 gum-balls.

So, what is it that the
elites are telling us?

They're telling us that when we
take this 1 million immigrants

that we somehow or another
are tackling world poverty.

And we have to do it regardless
of the effect on our unemployed,

the working poor, the most
vulnerable members of our society.

Regardless of the effect
on our natural resources.

Even if we went by the most
radical proposals of Washington,

which are to actually double our
immigration to 2 million a year,

which would totally overwhelm
our physical, natural

and social infrastructures, we
couldn't make a noticeable difference.

And we may be really hurting the
impoverished people in the world,

because the million that we do take
are amongst the most energetic,

often the better educated,
certainly the most dissatisfied people

that, if the did not immigrate,
would be the agents for change

to improve the lot of all the
people in these countries.

The true heroes in the
global humanitarian field

are the people in these countries
who have the wherewithal

to emigrate to another country,
but instead stay in their countries

to apply their skills to
help their fellow countrymen.

Unfortunately,
our immigration system tends to entice

these very type of people
to abandon their countrymen.

The impossibility of
making even a dent

is actually worse than its looks here,
because...

last year,
when we took 1 million immigrants,

these countries added,
births over deaths,

80 million more people into
the impoverished populations.

And this year, Congress is bringing
in a million legal immigrants.

And this year,
according to the United Nations,

these countries are expected to
add another 80 million people.

And next year,
you can be quite sure that Congress,

unless stopped by
the American voters,

will bring in another
million immigrants.

And these countries
unfortunately will be adding...

another 80 million people
into these impoverished nations.

We can take 5 million a year,

but we'd never get ahead of what's
happening in these countries.

Not in this century.

Don't you see?

Immigration can never be an
effective or significant way

to deal with the suffering
people in the world.

They have to be helped
where they live.

99.9% of them will never be able
to immigrate to a rich country.

There is no hope for that. They
have to bloom where they're planted.

The only place that 99.9% of these
people can be helped is where they live.

Let's help them there.

What is happening today is the
replacement of the white race

which the UN even admits to and
calls replacement migration.

This is, in fact, according to
the UN's definition, a genocide.

White genocide.

Massive non-white immigration

to all European white
countries is textbook genocide.

Genocide is simply the intentional
attempt to get rid of an ethnic group

or destroy its foundations of life,
which is exactly what is happening

to white Europeans in the world as
millions of hostile third-world migrants

are flooding their countries,
changing their demographics rapidly.

At the very same time,
our establishment is promoting abortion,

divorce, feminism, hookup culture,
miscegenation and homosexuality

to lower the birth rates
of the white Europeans.

After the fall of the Third Reich,
genocidal Kaufmann, Coudenhove-Kalergi

and the Hooton plans for Germany became
the reality for all of Western Europe

through the creation of the
European Union and the UN.

Not only Germany,
but the entire white Western world

has since then undergone attacks of
unprecedented scales demographically

that will lead to the indigenous
European population very soon

becoming minorities in the
homelands of their own ancestors.

...compiled for the program
suggest that in the next 20 years

the ethnic diversity of the
city will change dramatically.

The first time ever the number
of people who class themselves

as white British is now
a minority in London.

People who identify as
white British citizens

are now a minority
in the capital city.

White folks are on track to becoming,
and I hate to say this,

the minority in America.

A new report out by the government
shows that by the year 2042

white Americans will no longer represent
the majority of the population.

That prediction is 8 years
sooner than previously expected.

That the native French population
would be finding itself

in a rapidly decreasing minority.

Ethnic Norwegian in the
minority in 20 years

In 2030's

Children from white families
in Birmingham are set to become

a minority group for the first time and
this year census is collected in March.

The latest census suggest white
British people are now in a minority.

Census Bureau says white
will be a minority.

Californians know a thing or
two about demographic change.

70% of all state school pupils
in Los Angeles are Hispanic.

For the first time
in American history,

non-whites make up half or
more of the next generation,

according to a new study
by the Pew Research Center.

Latest census suggest that white
Brits are now a minority in London.

And the fact that we are
going to become a minority

in our own country before 2050,
well before 2050 for the younger people.

When the parent culture
kind of dissipates,

you're left thinking
"what's going on?"

Through the immigration law of 1965,
a group of Jews, including: Jacob Javits,

Emanuel Celler, Leo Pfeffer (Former
president of American Jewish Congress, AJC),

Norman Podhoretz (writer and member
of the Council of Foreign Relations)

decided that America would open its
borders and become a "Melting Pot".

Ten years later, the Zionist Jews
David Schwartz and Inga Gottfarb

would do the same with Sweden.

With a population of 10 million people,
Sweden is today home to just 20,000 Jews.

Being just 0,2% of the population,
they own the majority

of Sweden's anti-Swedish media
through the Bonnier family

and a disproportionate number of
journalists and experts have names like

Wolodarski, Silberstein, Radetzki,
Rothstein, Aschberg, Leman, Epstein, etc.

Another example is Jersey Sarnecki,
a Jewish criminologist

who is trotted out on a regular basis to
"debunk" that crime

is increasing or that migrants
commit more crime than natives.

The end of days you're going
to need the iron (?) of yourself,

which represents a
dome which is the West,

Europe and the Americas to
get intermixed with Ishmael,

which is basically Arabs and Muslims.

How in the world was this ever going to
happen if not for this refugee crisis?

At the end of days, you're going to
have this intermixing between a South,

a dome, which is the West, and the East,
which is the Muslims and the Arabs.

Making this through this
influx into the world.

And they're going to have children,
you know,

I don't wanna say by the dozens,

but they're going to have
a far larger birth rate

than the indigenous people there

and they're going to,
sort of, conquer by number.

There many different
sources for this.

One of them in ???,
chapter 14 and many other sources

as far as this is concerned, where
it's mentioned very, very vividly,

what will happen to the Jews
and what will happen to ???,

what will happen to
the world at that time,

where there will be many many people
killed and so on and so forth.

So, the idea of having these
refugees come into Europe

it's no longer a matter of
whether it's right or wrong,

it's just simply a fulfillment
of what it was meant all along,

it's the fulfillment of ???
and the prophecies.

This has to happen ant it's just
another sign that we are nearing,

you know, the completion of ???
of the entire world.

(EU should 'undermine national
homogeneity' says UN migration chief)

(Islamization of Europe a good thing)

"There shall be no remnants and survivors
from the impurity of Christianity."

Rabbi Baruch Efrati
Jewish school head in West Bank

I think there is a resurgence
of anti-Semitism, because
BARBARA LERNER SPECTRE

at this point in time, Europe has not
yet learned how to be multicultural.
Founding Director, Paideia Stockholm

And I think we are going
to be part of the throes

of that transformation,
which must take place.

Europe is not going
to be the monolithic

societies they once were
in the last century.

Jews are going to be
at the centre of that.

It's a huge transformation
for Europe to make.

They are now going into
a multicultural mode

and Jews will be resented,
because of our leading role.

But without that leading role
and without that transformation,

Europe will not survive.

There are two issues at the top
of our agenda at the very moment.

One is the unbelievably important
immigration debate in this country.

To make sure that immigrants
from around the world,

particularly those from south of
our border, have a chance here.

The 12 million,
then the 13 million that live here

and do work and aren't
really going home.

That they have a chance to stay
here justly and as legal immigrants.

Now, coming back to your
question of the clash between

the secular post-Christian Europe
and the new immigration wave,

which is essentially religious � yes,
this is what exactly what is happening.

There is a clash of
civilizations and we, the Jews,

we are in the middle of
this clash of civilization.

I've always believed that Britain is
a country of migrants. I'm Jewish...

The Jews want us dead, because we
have been their greatest challenge

ever since they started their program
of basically dividing and conquering.

Ladies and gentlemen, I hereby prompt
you to participate at the protest

"Live better without Nazis �
diversity is our future",

on the 6th of June at
10a.m. in Neurupinn.

We have to take a stand
against the Nazis.

Because of our history
between 1933 - 1945,

we are obliged to
treat refugees properly.

We also have to save their
lives in the Mediterranean.

There has to be a legal [unbureaucratic]
way to get asylum in Europe.

Countries like Poland,
very Catholic by the way,

have to be willing to
accept [more] refugees.

Oh, and by the way:

Every year, more native Germans
die than there are born.

That is very fortunate.

It's because the Nazis are not
very good at having offspring.

This decline [of Germans]
is why we are so dependent

on immigration from foreign countries.

AJC has always worked on the
premise that, as a minority,

our security, our strength,
our well-being in America

is interdependent with
those of other minorities.

This is a Jewish issue.

The thing that makes Judaism
dangerous to everybody,

to every race,
to every nation, to every idea

is that we smash
things that aren't true.

We don't believe in the
boundaries of nation-state,

we don't believe in the ideas
of these individual gods

that, you know, that protect
individual groups of people.

These are all artificial constructions

and Judaism really teaches
us how to see that.

In a sense, our
detractors have us right,

in that we are a corrosive force,
we're breaking down

the false gods of all nations and
all people, because they're not real.

Immigration is the future.
You cannot work and live

in a globalized world,
in the middle of the world, in Europe,

without immigration
and moving populations,

so, you have to really make a good
policy of immigration all over Europe

and we see that the history of Europe
with this long history of nationalism

and small countries is
now getting into a crisis,

so, this will need a long
time to make it better,

but you have to in front (?) this,

you have to really change the policy
of immigration inside Europe.

This is very important.
You have to adapt the educational system

and adapt all the self
understanding of the states.

They are not anymore only
white or only Swedish

or only Portuguese or only German.

They are multicultural
places in the world.

The Messiah will return only
once Edom (Europe, Christianity)

will be totally destroyed.

So I ask you: is it good news
that Islam invades Europe?

It's excellent news!
It means the coming of the Messiah.

Excellent news.

The liberal democrats
will always stand up

for Britain that is open,
tolerant and diverse.

And in that spirit, I very much welcome
the Jewish European election manifesto

calling for a strengthening
of EU hate crime legislation.

As a party, we wholeheartedly
value the relationship we have

with the Jewish community,
both in Britain and internationally.

You see ourselves together, fighting
together with our Muslim brothers

and they are our natural allies.

We'll bring in a million Africans,
half a million Filipinos,

2 or 3 million Chinese and
that's the end of it for Israel!

Why is it threatening if there were
to be another million Africans here?

It's threatening because this
will no longer be a Jewish state.

Our country is different
from other countries.

Our country is a Jewish state.
A Jewish and democratic state.

So, how many people in
Europe would be eligible

under the law of return to move here?

3 million, 4 million maybe, altogether.
It could change the geopolitics.

What you mean that could
change the geopolitics?

Who knows? For demography is a key
of everything, as you know.

Between the Jordan
and the Mediterranean,

these are borders [for]
10 million people,

about half [of them] Jews
and a half [of them] Arabs.

And if we want to remain
a democratic state,

we have to have a majority
of Jews in this place.

Europe is not always going to be there,
I'm afraid.

2025 in Europe will be
very different to 2015

and 2035 will be different
to 2025 ad infinitum.

And this is purely
down to demographics.

You know, the English have
taken on board the preaching

of the feminists groups and we
no longer have enough children.

And we're now down to
1.5 child per couple,

which means tomorrow's generation is
25% smaller than today's generation,

but the Islamic immigrants coming in
are averaging 4 children per couple.

And that's not just per couple,
because they also have 4 wives.

Not all of them,
but some of them.

So, some of them are having
16 children per one man.

And furthermore, when the
average English woman,

if she can be bothered
to have a child at all,

is in her mid 30's or early 40's,

these Muslim women are having
children aged 16 to 21.

We are really going to start to notice
the rise not just in demographics,

but as they grow they
they start demanding more

and they start pushing more, and because
they back this up with terrorism,

with Jihad,
the government listens to them.

You know. They push, we submit.

And that's what's happening in Britain

and, of course, with laws (?)
in Denmark and all across Europe.

Sweden is literally a lost country.

Now, we in Britain
have maybe two decades

before everything
really hits the wall.

In Sweden, we're looking
at 5 years to 10 years

and Sweden has terrible,
enormous problems.

Malmo is now the rape capital
of the European continent.

Aside from South Africa,

I think it's the rape capital
of the world. It is that bad.

By the time the politicians
have finally got the balls

to stand up and tell the truth,
it may be too late at that time

from demographic reasons to
actually do anything about it.

I came here really today
to make the point that

do not let what has happened in Europe
and in Britain happen to America.

You all need to look at what's happening
in Britain and Sweden and Europe,

and you all need to make sure that you
retain your First Amendment rights,

because,
unless we can talk about this,

unless we can bring
it out in the open,

you in America will
go the same way.

You need to stand up and look
at what we're doing and say

"This is never going to happen here."

Thank you.

A lot of the Jews that I talked to
seem to be very pro-immigration,

but not to Israel.

Do you think that Israel should be
taking a lot of Syrian refugees in?

...it's probably not in
their self-interest...

It's not what I asked.

Man, that's hard.

Oh, really?

Probably...

- Yes or no?
- Probably not.

Why?

Well, because they sort of want to
kill the people that they'd emigrate to.

My concern is doing
away with whiteness...

whiteness is a form of
racial oppression, sure.

The suggestion is that
is somehow possible

to separate whiteness from
oppression and it is not.

There can be no white race without
the phenomenon of white supremacy.

If you abolish slavery,
you abolish slaveholders.

In the same way,
if you abolish racial oppression,

you do away with whiteness.

Treason to whiteness
is loyalty to humanity.

Your views are fairly
well received in academia.

Yes, they legitimate. Not to say
that everyone agrees, but sure.

I could not point to any examples

where it has provoked
political censorship.

To me, white is just an identity that
arises entirely out of oppression.
"The white race is the cancer of humanity."
- Jewish activist Susan Sontag

Whiteness is not a culture, it's
not a religion, it's not a language.

It's simply an oppressive
social category.

Blacks' blackness is an identity
that can be plausibly argued

to arise out of a
resistance to oppression.

Black Studies is a study of a
people that has formed itself

in resistance to its oppression.

And the task is to bring this
minority together in such a way

that it makes it impossible

for the legacy of whiteness to
continue to reproduce itself.

Europe must be multicultural.

Jews are going to be
at the centre of that.

#Endwhitepeople

Germany is facing a drastic number
of refugees by the end of 2015.

Believed to be in the
region of 1.5 million.

It is not quite on a biblical scale,
but an exodus - it certainly is.

Migrants who've been trapped in
the railway station in Budapest

now deciding to walk the
hundreds of miles to Germany

and what they see is the promise land.

The other side of this tragedy
is how it will change Europe.

Non-western migrants had already
been flooding into Europe for decades.

Leaders refuse to stop it.

We're afraid.

We're in danger every day,
every minute.

They're coming inside...
the police...

They want to kill each other.

You have to do something!

Someone has to protect us!

They are in our houses!

We are the victims here, not them.

We have to live like
we used to before.

We have to live our lives,
they took it from us!

We're not in war, they are!

They have to take them from here.

It's the city...

It's not a place for people...
like them!

They wish they were dead!

They have lost their fertility!

So they look for
fertility in our midst!

We shall give them fertility!
We will breed children with them!

Take the "refugees"!

We shall soon collect them in
the name of the coming Caliphate!

I'm telling you honestly,
Islam will come to Germany,

whether you like it or not.

Your daughter will wear a headscarf
(Hijab)! Your son wil wear beard.

Okay? And your daughter
will marry a bearded man.

We are reproducing faster and faster.

You Germans are not
getting any children.

In best case, you get 2 children.

We make 7-8 children! (arabic)

Okay, my colleague? And then we take 4
wives each, then we have 22 children.

Maybe you Germans have 1 child
and a dog. And that's it.

This is not our fault,
it's your fault, mate.

If you exploited our countries,
colonized our countries,

So you can drive Mercedes and use
your digital camera there?!

So make it Allah (blessed be his name),
the almighty god, that we conquer you,

Not with war, here in Germany,
but with birth rates, firstly!

And secondly,
we will marry your daughters.

And your daughter will wear a
Muslim headscarf. That's how it is.

Now you can get really mad.
I can see the hate in your eyes.

Where do we go?
Germany!

Germany! Germany!

Godfather of the European Union,
Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi,

published the plan
for a united Europe

and the ethnocide of
the peoples of Europe,

the encouragement of mass non-white
immigration was central to the plot.

Since then, an unholy alliance
of leftists, capitalists

and Zionist supremacists has schemed to
promote immigration and miscegenation

with the deliberate aim of breeding us
out of existence in our own homelands.

As indigenous resistance to this human
genetic-modification industry grows,

the criminal elite seeks new
ways to camouflage their project.

First, their immigrant pawns
were temporary guest workers;

then it was a multiracial experiment;

then they were refugees, and then
the answer to a shrinking population.

Different excuses, different lies �
and asylum is just another one.

But the real aim stays the same:
the biggest genocide in human history,

the final solution of the
Christian European problem.

This crime demands a new
set of Nuremberg trials,

and you people will be in the dock.

Mr. president, I'm really ashamed

of the racist and xenophobic terms
that were used by Mr. Griffin,

and my only question to him is

if he dare to make any
concrete suggestions

and amendments to
those legislations.

Is your policy serious
or are you just shouting?

And I hope you will not be reelected,
if you seek reelection,

because it's a shame
for this parliament

the kind of statements
you have just made.

It's you... the shouting,
because obviously the truth hurts.

Yes, I will be seeking reelection.

Yes, I will return here to speak
up about for indigenous Europeans

which the founder of this place has
deliberately set out to wipe out,

because that is a crime,
I'm telling the truth.

I have a constructive suggestion to help
those poor asylum seekers from Africa.

Yes, make it clear
they can't come here,

so they don't try to cross the
sea and drown in huge numbers.

The best way for them to is to get the
banks off the backs of their countries,

so they can live in
peace in their countries

and we, Europeans,
can live in peace in ours.

I just want to tell
what me and my dog

experienced when we
were out walking today.

We were out walking,

as we always do,

and then we were going down to the lake,
because it's such a sunny day

and we are going out to play and
"kejser" [dog] should be allowed

to have fun and play in
the water, by the lake,

then 4 guys walks toward
us and first asks questions

about my dog and then
they start to kick my dog,

which makes me very very angry,
and we start arguing

and then they start to throw
stones against us [me and the dog].

I can't remember what else happened
at that time, but suddenly there are

multiple persons at the scene,
and pulls in me as you can see.

I don't know if you can see it,

but then they started to throw me onto
the ground and kicking me on the ground

and roll me around and then
they throwed me into the lake.

Now I'm standing here,
wet from top to toe

with a dog that needs to go to a vet,

because it's scared
and was hit with a rock

and I'm angry about all
this happened just because

I have a dog that people don't like.

If you don't like my dog,
then stay away from us!

I thought I was the only one who's
in a bad mood because of this.

No, none of us want this.
We're all scared.

What is this?
How will this be in 100 years?

This is not my life. It just shows
you how many of them are here already.

Now there's another 1.5
million who came this year.

Every year 2-3 million arrive.

- It's generally about foreign infiltration.
- Yes, exactly.

We won't dress like we do now.

Here, no!
They won't take anything from me!

Look, when I walk through the streets of
the city, it's only foreigners [blacks]!

There are walking 50 foreigners
and I only see 1 European face.

Look at the women!
They're all veiled (wearing Burka/Hijab)

This is our future.

Merkel says we'll make it!

Yes, we'll make it!
We'll make it to our collective doom!

No, we won't make it.

Low birthrate amongst host population +

mass imigration & state enforced
multiculturalism +

high birthrates amongst immigrants =

demographic genocide

(The new Europeans)

"I don't think there will be white people
in 200 years and that's a good thing."

Dr. Wilfred Reilly, Professor of Political Sciences
Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences

Increasing groups of people are
essentially asking a question.

If the political establishment
continues to get its way

in 5, in 10, in 20 years time, how many
Germans are gonna be left in Germany?

How many French people are
gonna be left in France?

How many English people are
gonna be left in England?

French writer Renaud Camus calls
the influx "the great replacement",

and says it's the biggest thing to
happen to France since the 15th century.

What's the goal?

The goal is to meet the [EU]
challenge of interracial marriage.

It's not a choice.

It's an obligation.

If voluntarism does not
work for the republic,

then the state will move in
with more coercive measures.

We must change,

therefore, we will change!

Hardly anyone imagined just 20 years
ago that the native French population

would be finding itself in a
rapidly decreasing minority here.

London has got so ethnically diverse

that white Britons are
now a minority here.

White families in Birmingham

are set to become a minority
group for the first time.

The country's most rapidly
growing demographic is Muslim.

With Mohammed now the most popular
name for baby boys in London.

The high Muslim birth rate is
changing the political landscape.

Imran is looking forward to replacing
Belgian law with Sharia law,

including amputation for theft, stoning
for adultery and death to homosexuals.

If they want to push us
back or something like that,

I don't know, maybe they
can start to marry 4 wives

and have a lot of children.

Start with that. Maybe they will
have a chance, but I don't think so.

Something else that Muslim immigration
appears to have brought to Norway

is what some here
call a rape epidemic.

Recent police statistics showed
that in the capital of Oslo

100% of assault breaks
between strangers

were committed by
immigrant non-western males

and nine out of ten of their
victims were native Norwegian women.

They're taking this gay pride march

through a predominantly Muslim
neighborhood here in Stockholm

and there are fears that it
could stoke tensions between

some of the local residents and
the people demonstrating here.

Mostly provocation.

Is there propagation against
the Muslim population here?

May Allah make it
difficult on their women!

Allah gives victory
to Islam everywhere!

Basically the U.S. is
providing these flows for us,

"you make war and we get refugees",
so...

The United Nations report says
Sweden will be a third world nation

in about 15 years,
below Libya and Bulgaria.

This is my country,
this is your country,

I am so happy to share it with you!

My country is yours!
My country belongs to you!

For there is no other path to victory,

except through sacrifice

and Jihad for the sake of Allah.

Swedes who disagree with that plan

risk being labeled racist,
fascist, even Nazis.

This footage of the revolutionary front
smashing the home of a suspected fascist

We're not even talking France,
we're not talking Germany,

we are not talking Belgium or any
of the other countries in the EU.

In the UK alone, we have
23,000 known Jihadists.

23,000.

That is larger than some
portions of our military.

We basically have a foreign
military in our lands

as a consequence of
this immigration policy.

And our politicians
continue to welcome

tens of millions of
Muslims into our country.

Our politicians are directly endangering
the citizens of our countries.

At the very least,
this is extreme negligence.

At worst, this is pure treason.

We cannot stand for this.
We cannot let this happen.

We need to close our borders.

We need to have the military on our
borders guarding our borders now.

Yes, but you also have
a declining birthrate

and you need, for a flourishing economy,
you need some growth.

And... It has to be replaced
by migrants from outside.

I believe in breaking down borders.
I believe in European integration.

I was part of the 1992
process that removed borders.

Our society will change.

Our city will change radically.

I hold that in 20, 30 years

there will no longer be
[German] majority in our city.

And I want to make it very clear,
especially towards those right wingers:

This is a good thing!

this is
Greece

this is
England

this is
France

this is
Germany

this is
France

this is
England

this is
Belgium

this is
Sweden

this is
Bulgaria

this is
Greece

this is
France

this is
the Netherlands

this is
Germany

this is
Norway

this is
Denmark

this is
Europe

this was
Europe

Goyim are mentally inferior to Jews
and can't run their nations properly.

For their sake and ours,
we need to abolish their governments

and replace them with
a single government.

This will take a long time
and involve much bloodshed,

but it's for a good cause.

Here's what we'll need to do:

Place our agents and
helpers everywhere.

Take control of the media and use
it in propaganda for our plans.

Start fight between different races,
classes and religions.

Use bribery,
threats and blackmail to get our way.

Use free Masonic lodges to attract
potential public officials.

Appeal to successful people's egos.

Appoint public leaders who can
be controlled by blackmail.

Replace royal rule with socialist rule,
then communism, then despotism.

Abolish all rights and freedoms,
except the right of force by us.

Sacrifice people (including
Jews sometimes) when necessary.

Eliminate religion,
replace it with science and materialism.

Control the education system to spread
deception and destroy intellect.

Rewrite history to our benefit.

Create entertaining distractions.

Corrupt minds with
filth and perversion.

Encourage people to
spy on one another.

Keep the masses in poverty
and perpetual labor.

Take possession of all true wealth,
property and (especially) gold.

Use gold to manipulate the markets,
cause depressions, etc.

Introduce a progressive tax on wealth.

Replace sound investment
with speculation.

Make long-term interest-bearing
loans to governments.

Give bad advice to
governments and everyone else.

Eventually, the Goyim will be so
angry with their governments,

because we'll blame them
for the resulting mess,

that they'll gladly have us take over.

We will then appoint a descendant of
David to be the king of the world,

and the remaining Goyim will
bow down and sing his praises.

Everyone will live in peace and
obedient order under his glorious rule.

THE JEWISH WORLD ORDER

Judaism is a plan for a world with
no countries, only one border,

one that separates
Jews from Gentiles.

Judaism's plan is a bi-level
world (the communist template),

with "God's chosen people" living in
paradise where no one has to work,

and with gentiles inexorably
trapped in a lower world

which is a hell on Earth, where we
exist as slaves, cattle for Jews.

The Jews' plan to create this bi-level
world is described in explicit detail

in the Zohar, one of the "holiest" (it's
pure evil, of course) books of Judaism.

This plan is exposed to the world in

"Jewish history, Jewish Religion,"
by Israel Shahak.

Often when there is dissent
expressed in the United States

against policies of
the Israeli government,

people here are called anti-Semitic.

What is your response to
that as an Israeli Jew?

Well, it's a trick, we always use it.

When from Europe somebody
is criticizing Israel,

then we bring out the Holocaust.

When in this country people
are criticizing Israel,

then they are anti-Semitic.

And the organization is strong,
and has a lot of money,

and the ties between Israel and
the American Jewish establishment

are very strong and they are strong
in this country, as you know.

And they have power, which is ok.

They are talented people and
they have power and money,

and the media and other things,

and their attitude is "Israel, my
country, right or wrong" identification.

And they are not ready
to hear criticism.

And it's very easy to
blame people who criticize

certain acts of the Israeli
government as anti-Semitic,

and to bring out the Holocaust,
and the suffering of the Jewish people,

and that justify everything
we do to the Palestinians.

Through the implementation of
the Federal Reserve System,

the government has become
vested in these bankers,

and they get their money
from the bankers, and so...

then they impose a tax on us,
which makes us more slaves,

and makes it more difficult
for us to survive, right?

Giving them more profits.

And now what's happened is that,
through the Federal Reserve System,

the bankers have pretty much
taken control of our government,

it doesn't matter Republican
and Democrat anymore,

because they're both the same.

Neither one of them are talking about
shutting down the Federal Reserve System,

or stopping the payment of taxes,
you know,

or any of the big issues
that face Americans.

So, I had a friend, Nick Rockefeller,
who was one of the Rockefeller family.

And he... when I was running for
governor in Nevada, he came to me,

introduced himself through an attorney,
and we became friends.

We started talking about things.
And...

I learned an awful
lot from Mr. Rockefeller.

And one of the things
that we used to talk about

was the ultimate plan of
the banking industry...

what they wanted to accomplish.

And the goals of the banking industry,
not just the Federal Reserve System,

but the private banks in Germany,
and England, and Italy,

all over the world, they all work
together, they're all central banks.

And they're all a part of
the Communist Manifesto.

Central banking is one of the major
planks of the Communist Manifesto.

You talk about America being
a capitalistic country,

but, yet, at the same time,
we have a central bank

that plans everything for us.

And the graduated income tax is another
plank of the Communist Manifesto, right?

So, right there you have two major
planks of the Communist Manifesto

that have been brought in because
of the Federal Reserve System.

So, the ultimate goal
that these people have in mind

is the goal to create
a one-world government,

run by the banking industry,
run by the bankers.

And they're doing it in sections,

the European currency, the euro,
and the European Constitution.

That's one part of it.

Now they're trying to do it in
America with the North American Union.

And they want to create a new
currency called the "amero".

And the whole agenda is to
create a one-world government

where everybody has an RFID
chip implanted in them.

All money is to be in those chips...
there'll be no more cash.

And this is given me straight
from Rockefeller himself;

this is what they want to accomplish.

And all money will be in your chips.

And so, instead of having cash,
any time you have money in your chip,

they can take out whatever they want
to take out whenever they want to.

If they say
"you owe us this much money in taxes,"

they just deduct it out of your chip,
digitally.

- Total control.
- Total control.

And, if you're like me or you, and
you're protesting what they're doing,

they can just turn off your chip.
And you have nothing.

You can't buy food...
you can't do anything.

It's total control of the people.

And that chip's connected to a database
that has your purchasing records,

- what you do...
- Everything! Everything is in there, you know.

And so, they want a one-world
government, controlled by them,

everybody being chipped,
all your money in those chips,

and they control the chips! And they
control people and you become a slave,

you become a serf to these people.

That's their goal,
that's their intentions.

All of what we can see happening in
the world is part of greater plans

called the Agenda 21,
Agenda 2030 and Vision 2050.

These are the United Nations plans

to depopulate the planet from
7.5 billion down to 500 million

and then rule humanity under a communist
one-world government in the year 2030.

This is what the globalists want.

A world government will give
the globalists absolute control

over all of the world's
resources and population.

Out of these troubled
times our fifth objective �

a new world order � can emerge and today
that new world is struggling to be born.

A world quite different
from the one we've known,

a world where rule of law
supplants the rule of the jungle.

The opportunity to forge for
ourselves and for future generations,

a new world order, a world where the
rule of law, not the law of the jungle,

governs the conduct of nations.

When we are successful �
and we will be � we have a real chance

at this new world order, an order
in which a credible United Nations

can use its peacekeeping role

to fulfill the promise and
vision of the U.N.'s founders.

What is at stake is more
than one small country.

It is a big idea,
a new world order,

where diverse nations are
drawn together in common cause

to achieve the universal
aspirations of mankind.

And that's why I wanted
to speak to you today

about the new world
taking shape around us,

about the prospects for a new
world order now within our reach.

In the coming weeks, I'll be talking
in some detail about the possibility

of a new world order
emerging after the Cold War,

but today I want to discuss
another aspect of that order.

You see,
as the Cold War drew to an end

we saw the possibilities of a new
order in which nations work together.

It refers to new ways of working with
other nations to deter aggression

and to achieve stability.

As old threats recede,
new threats emerge.

The quest for the New World
Order is in part a challenge

to keep the dangers
of disorder at bay.

We must build on the
successes of Desert Storm

to give new shape and momentum
to this new world order.

Only when this
transformation is complete

will we be able to take full measure
of the opportunities presented

by this new and
involving world order.

AGENDA
2030

But it is the awareness itself
that will drive the change.

And one of the ways it
will drive the change

is through global governance
and global agreements.

Now, much has been said by the
Secretary of State and others

about a new world order,
about a defining moment in history.

I have no doubt about the
potential of this moment

to be defining in terms of history,

but that definition could be
negative as well as positive.

And how negative or positive
it will be will depend

on what kind of new world
order we really create.

Never before has a new world
order had to be assembled

from so many different perceptions,
or on so global a scale.

The great seal of the United States.

And that great seal of the
United States has on it:

Novus Ordo Seclorum,

a new order for the centuries,
for the ages, forever.

There is a chance for the
President of the United States

to use this disaster to carry out what
his father, a phrase his father used

I think only once and hasn't been used
since, and that is the New World Order.

During the conflict
with Saddam Hussein ???

he kept talking about
New World Order.

And then President Bush,
at the end of that war (?)

describing that New World Order and
what America's role is going to be in it.

turned out he gave one of those
addresses ?? something else

This present window of opportunity,
during which a truly peaceful

and interdependent world
order might be built,

will not be here or
open for too long.

It's past the point of talking.

We know historically that
the global governance...

sort of agenda to these
issues is very hard to try�

with all the best intentions,
it's very hard to actually activate.

We're seeing that right now,

we're seeing a lot of fragmentation
going on in Copenhagen.

A lot of different agendas
pulling in different directions.

These measures are enacted. We continue
to move forward with the G20 process.

We will have the kind
of global government,

governance that is necessary

to ensure the stability
and transparency of markets

in a way that gives us the benefits

of the globalized market economy
without the enormous risks that...

... people, they were bombed
and I was just target like them

and as elected president official
in charge of their protection,

I couldn't do anything about it,
but the point here is

it's not about me,
it's about the idea of freedom.

It's about the future
of the whole region.

It's about the future (?) of
Europe and a new world order.

The transatlantic partnership was never
just the foundation about security.

It was the foundation
of our way of life.

It was forged in experience of the
most bitter and anguished kind.

Out of it came a new Europe,
a new world order,

a new consensus as to how life
should and could be lived.

The pieces are in flux,
soon they will settle again.

Before they do,
let us reorder this world around us.

I think the new world order
is emerging and with it

the foundations of a new and progressive
era of international cooperation.

We have resolved that from today

we will together manage the
process of globalization

to secure responsibility
from all and fairness to all.

And we have agreed that in doing so

we will build a more sustainable and
more open and a fairer global society.

...realizes what I
believe is our destiny

of success in this new world order.

So, in conclusion, ladies and gentlemen,
a new world is emerging.

It is a new world order
with significantly different

and radically new challenges...

Maybe some people dreamt of at
the conference back in Bournemouth

when it looked as if
maybe history would end,

that Liberal democracy would triumph,

that free market economics
would slowly progress

and we would have a new world order...

Ted, what do you think America's place
in the new world order should be?

It's always been seen
as the global policeman.

But as you said before, it's hard to
see with all these military conflicts

where the winner and loser lies.
What should America be doing?

I think the global policeman
should be the United Nations.

What sort of financial deal
should Obama be seeking to strike

when he travels to China next month?

You know,
I think this would be the time,

because you really need to bring China
into the creation of a New World Order.

Financial World Order.

What do you think the most
important thing is for Barack Obama?

Obviously you are here to talk about

the anniversary for US-China
diplomatic relations

but if you had to say this
is going to be the country,

or the conflict or the place that
would define the Obama administration,

what would it be?

The President-elect is coming
into office at a moment

when there are upheavals in many
parts of the world simultaneously.

You have India-Pakistan.
You have a jihadist movement.

So he can't really say that it's one
problem, that is the most important one.

But he can give new impetus
to American foreign policy,

partly because the ascension of him
is so extraordinary and admirable.

I think his task will be to develop
an overall strategy for America

in this period, when really a
"New World Order" can be created.

It's a great opportunity.
It isn't such a crisis.

There's a need for a new world order,

but it has different characteristics

in different parts of the world.

The affirmative task we have now is
to actually create a new world order,

because the global
order is changing again.

And the institutions of the
world that worked so well

in the post-World War II era for
decades they need to be strengthened.

So, let's leave them something
to think about as they go home.

Let them go home and say

"Mr. Soros said here are three
things we can do, simply." One?

Well, deal with the mortgage problem.

Reduce foreclosures.

Recapitalize the banks.

And then work on a better world order

where we work together
to resolve problems

that confront humanity
like global warming.

At its core,
Agenda 21 is about control.

Control over land, natural
resources and entire populations.

It seeks to control the air by
regulation of carbon emissions,

the ground by
'sustainable development'

and the sea through
environmental regulations.

Officially stated, Agenda 21 is

"A comprehensive plan of action to be
taken globally, nationally and locally

by organizations of the United
Nations system, governments

and major groups in every area in which
human impacts on the environment."

Because being human will always
have an impact on the environment

Agenda 21 paves the way for
extraordinary UN control.

When you boil it down, there are
nine basic tenets of Agenda 21:

Move citizens off private
land and into urban housing

Create vast wilderness spaces
inhabited by large carnivores.

Eliminate cars and create
"walkable" cities.

Support chosen private
businesses with public funds for

"sustainable development."

Make policy decisions that favor the
'greater good' over individuals.

Drastically reduce the
use of power, water,

and anything else that creates
"carbon pollution."

Use bureaucracies to
make sweeping decisions

outside of democratic processes.

Increase taxes, fees and regulations.

And finally,

implement policies meant to
incentivize a reduced population.

The world today has 6.8 billion people.
That's headed up to about 9 billion.

Now, if we do a really great job
on new vaccines, health care,

reproductive health services, we
could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.

Controlling our every
impact on the environment

means controlling every
aspect of our lives.

What we eat, how we travel,
where we live, how we live,

But NO is still an option.

Let me say one thing about choice.
There is no real choice.

They say freedom of choice.
You're given an illusion of choice.

Americans are meant to feel free by
the exercise of meaningless choices.

And we will make America great again!

And when we do,
America will be greater than ever.

But here in America, where is supposed
to be free choice, there's less choice.

If Americans ever
come to the conclusion

that there's not much difference
between Republican and Democrats,

and they never include alternative
choices in the coverage,

the Americans really aren't
exposed to a true choice,

so we really have to fight.

Former CIA operative, head of the Bin
Laden tracking unit, Michael Scheuer.

Michael,
both the British and the United States,

I have, reportedly, made
it very clear to Israel

they would prefer that there
be no military action taken.

What are your thoughts?

Well, we're, at least in the
United States, we're pretty helpless.

If the Israelis attack Iran;

the power of AIPAC in the lobby here,
they own the Congress,

will lead to our support for
whatever the Israelis do, I think.

Well, every candidate for Congress
at that time had a pledge.

They were given a pledge to sign.

And I was new on the scene and so,

the pledge had Jerusalem
as the capital city...

The eternal capital of the
Jewish people, Jerusalem.

the military superiority of Israel...

American Congress people
have to sign this pledge?

Yes, you sign the pledge.
If you don't sign the pledge,

you do not get money...
So, for example,

it was almost like a water torture
for me. My parents observed this.

I would get a call and the person on
the other end of the phone would say

"I want to do a fundraiser for you."

And then we would get into the planning,
I would get really excited,

because, of course, you have to have
money in order to run a campaign.

And then two weeks,
three weeks into the planning

they would say
"did you sign the pledge?"

and then I would say
"no, I didn't sign the pledge."

And then my fundraiser
would go kaput.

I am saying this to you right now.

Israel gets approximately

15 billion dollars a year
from the American taxpayers.

That 15 billion is 30,000 dollars
for every man, woman, and child.

People in my district are
losing their pension benefits.

And I can't understand this why no one
in Congress is raising their voice.

And the reason is very simple.

This may be you don't wanna hear,
I don't know.

And I certainly don't want
to hurt you on your show.

You have one of the best.
You're fair.

But I believe that Israel
has a powerful stranglehold

on the American government.

They control both members of the House -
the House and the Senate.

They have us involved in wars in
which we have little or no interest.

Our children are coming
back in body bags.

Our nation is bankrupt
over these wars.

And if you open your mouth,
you get targeted.

If they don't beat you at the poll,
they'll put you in prison.

They're controlling much
of our foreign policy.

They're influencing much
of our domestic policy.

Wolfowitz, as Undersecretary of Defense,
manipulated

president Bush number
2 back into Iraq.

They pushed definitely to try and get
Bush before he left to move into Iran.

We're conducting expansionist policy of
Israel and everybody's afraid to say it.

They control much of the media,

they control much of the
commerce of the country

and they control powerfully
both bodies of the Congress.

They own the Congress.

Are you an anti-Semite?

No, I'm not and that's exactly what
they're going to say and I expect that.

What I am is an American and, you see,
I think America comes first.

And we have a one-sided
foreign policy in the Mideast

and we've alienated Arabs
who have no way of fighting,

so what they've done,
and I predicted this on the House floor,

is they would export violence
to America. And they have.

They have no other way to fight.

Greta, I'm saying this:

America is in danger.

If America doesn't take back their
government without foreign influence...

I went into the State
Department Near East section,

and found there was not
one single Palestinian,

not one single Muslim, religious...

Saudi, you know, Jordanian...

not one Christian protestant,
not one Roman Catholic.

Not one plain old American,
whatever, from Cornpoke.

Every single person in
all of those offices

were either Zionist,
Israelis, whatever.

And they had pictures all over the
walls of Israel, Israel, Israel.

They had magazines, 'Israel Today',
you know, I was given a copy of one.

And there were yarmulkes, you know, and
the Israeli writing, in other words...

And I asked one of the women,

after having gone through about, you
know, 4 or 5 of these offices,

I said... because I was
pretending to want to know

where the Palestinian office was.

She said "well, we handle all of that."

We handle all of that.

And this is the State Department, the...

Near East, the part that handles Israel,
Jordan, all of these...

- Egypt.
- Yeah, the Near East section. Yeah.

- It was just totally dominated by...
- Totally.

- Israeli?
- Totally.

And at that time, the spokesman,

I can't remember his name,
he was a Zionist,

the spokesman for the
whole State Department.

I have the high privilege
and distinct honor

of presenting to you the
prime minister of Israel,

his Excellency Benjamin Netanyahu.

All bought and paid for

Boxer Tyson Fury: The world has gone mad.

There is no morals, there is no
loyalty, there is no... Nothing.

Everyone just do what he can,
listen to the government,

follow everybody like sheep,
be brainwashed

by all the Zionist Jewish people.
They own all the banks,

all papers, all the TV stations.

Be brainwashed by it all.

At a 1991 closed-door meeting
of fellow internationalists,

billionaire and former CFR
chairman David Rockefeller
ROCKEFELLER'S 1991 LEAKED SPEECH

praised his media allies.
WILL GIVE YOU CHILLS

But his confidence that his words would
not leave the room was later broken.

"We are grateful to The Washington Post,
The New York Times, Time magazine

and other great publications whose
directors have attended our meetings

and respected their promises of
discretion for almost 40 years.

It would have been impossible for
us to develop our plan for the world

if we had been subject to the
bright lights of publicity.

But the world is now
more sophisticated

and prepared to march
towards a world government."

These men aim to create a world system
of financial control in private hands,

able to dominate the political
system of each country

and the economy of
the world as a whole.

In short,
they seek total and quiet control

of the entire world.

But we have to put our
money where our mouths are.

OBAMA GIVES FINAL ADDRESS TO UNITED NATIONS

And we can only realize the promise
of this institution's founding,

to replace the ravages
of war with cooperation,

if powerful nations like
my own accept constraints.

Sometimes, I'm criticized
in my own country

for professing a belief in international
norms and multilateral institutions.

But I am convinced that,
in the long run,

giving up some freedom of action,

not giving up our ability to protect
ourselves or pursue our core interests,

but binding ourselves
to international rules,

over the long term,
enhances our security.

The best way to control the opposition
is to lead it ourselves. Vladimi Lenin

Out of all the groups,
the most important one by a mile

was the English Defence League,
British Freedom Party,

that was a serious, systematic,
hugely funded effort,

by a section of the ruling elite,
by this Zionist neocon clique,

to dominate, to simply take over
nationalism and turn it into their tool,

to encourage the white working-class
to go and fight their wars,

and so that,
when the banking collapse comes,

people are looking in the wrong
direction instead of the real culprits.

This party, we were approached,
I was approached,

we were offered money
from the United States

and all they wanted was two things.

They only wanted us to
concentrate on Islam

� and I yield to no one in my criticism �
of Islam and grooming.

I put my neck on the line,

many of you have put your
neck on the line as well,

but it's not the only problem.

And they wanted us
only to focus on that,

and that only came
with one other thing.

They wanted us to drop our
criticism of the banking system.

Those were the only two things
we had to concentrate on;

talking about Muslims and
we had to drop our criticism

of the international banking system.

1984 is, I believe,
a quite terrifying masterpiece.

So terrifying, in fact, I don't think
I should like to read another like it.

I am not absolutely
dissatisfied with it.

I think it is a good idea, but the
execution would have been better,

if I had not been under the
influence of TB when I wrote it.

You once claimed that you have an
ability to face unpleasant facts.

Is that what you demonstrated in 1984

by drawing an accurate
portrait of the future?

I think that allowing for the
book being after all a parody,

something like 1984
could actually happen.

This is the direction the world
is going in at the present time.

In our world,
there will be no emotions except

fear, rage, triumph,
and self-abasement.

The sex instinct will be eradicated.

There will be no loyalty,
except loyalty to the party.

But always there will be
the intoxication of power.

Always at every moment,
there will be the thrill of victory,

the sensation of trampling
on an enemy who is helpless.

If you want a picture of the future,

imagine a boot stamping
on a human face forever.

The moral to be drawn from this
dangerous nightmare situation

is a simple one:

don't let it happen.

It depends on you.