All language subtitles for Money.Shot.The.Pornhub.Story.2023.1080p.NF.WEB-DL.DDP5.1.H.264-WDYM

Do you remember
the first porn you ever saw?

It was at a sleepover.
I was with a girlfriend.

And at, like, 2 a.m. or 3 a.m.
something special came on.

Here you are, Cinderella.
Don't be fooled by your stepsisters again.

It was, like,
this Mother Goose porn.

She would, like, tell you a fairy tale,
and you would see them reenacting it.

I remember either HBO or Cinemax having,
like, those late-night erotic movies,

and I remember
one of the first ones that I saw,

it was two women together,
and I'm like, "Two women can do that?"

In college,
some of my downstairs neighbors

had a whole DVD

of Julia Ann and Janine Lindemulder.

One of their classic Blondage films,
where they were using an ice dildo,

and maybe because it's all I had...

...or maybe
because it's an amazing film,

it was what I watched

and then what I thought about
for many years.

My aunt had a copy of Playgirl,
and I tore out all the pages.

And when you see something like that
that connects with you,

it makes you realize

who you are.

I mean, the sex is almost immaterial.

I was eleven,
and I went onto Pornhub,

and I wanted to be surprised,
and I really was.

The first piece of pornography
that I watched was

an eight-person geriatric gang bang.

Just what she needs.

Which did kind of set the tone

for how extreme
things could be on the Internet.

I think
what makes porn "porn" is that

you watch it expecting
to be sexually aroused in some way.

I think that's my entire definition of it.

- That's very broad.
- Yeah.

So, like, I mean, anything can be porn.

There is pressure on Ottawa and Quebec

to act tonight
after alarming allegations surface...

Pornhub is one of the most profitable
and powerful websites...

Thirty women are now suing
Pornhub's parent company, MindGeek.

The New York Times column
accused the porn site...

...of profiting off
the sexual exploitation of women.

Mastercard says they might stop...

This isn't about porn.
This is about rape.

Pornhub is not a porn site.
It's a crime scene.

So MindGeek owns Pornhub,

and I worked there
for three years in various positions.

I just Googled, actually,

"Porn scriptwriter, is that a job?"

And it was.

And MindGeek was hiring, and I applied

and I moved to Montréal.

Most people think Pornhub is the biggest
or most visited porn site on the Internet,

which in terms
of brand recognition, is true.

It's the one people talk about
when they talk about the porn industry.

But MindGeek
is a hilariously boring office space.

Gray carpet, gray cubicle,
open-concept kind of thing.

It was really just like
working at a tech company.

I think it was more appealing
to the executives

to be executives
at a very successful tech company

than a very successful porn company.

So MindGeek has
a number of adult companies.

Pornhub is its main platform.

Brazzers does production.

And there are a host of other tube sites,

like Redtube or Xtube that are owned
under the MindGeek umbrella.

MindGeek came from outside the industry.

They were really a technology platform.
They didn't produce adult content,

so they didn't have to have
any relationships with studios,

they just had to create a platform
where people could share content.

And that was the promise of Pornhub.

...watchin' Spice.

In pre-Internet porn,

you try to keep
as low a profile as possible

because you didn't want
the feds coming after you,

you didn't want people
really focusing attention on you,

you didn't want to make waves.

But Pornhub knew that if they were gonna
capture market share on a global level,

they had to make waves.

And with the Internet,
you blew that wide open.

So, when the Internet was first developed...

the only kind of pornography
was, like, ASCII art,

where somebody painstakingly
went and drew titties

out of semicolons
and periods and stuff like that,

and it would take forever to download
because bandwidth was so low.

Eventually bandwidth improved,

and that gave way
to people uploading scans

of pornographic images
and videos to share them.

Consumers learned
that they didn't have to buy

a $90 DVD and only get four scenes.

They learned that they could have

an endless amount of content
for 19.99 a month.

But the Internet was suspicious.

People were afraid that, "If I put this
on the Internet, it will be stolen."

In some cases that came true.

We started to see an evolution
of people distributing content

that they didn't have a right to.

Especially compared to the 1960s,
where porn piracy would be

leaving a porn magazine in the woods
for somebody to find, you know,

and maybe a group of six teenagers
would find it in the woods,

and you would make their day.

Tube sites like Pornhub
were very disruptive to the porn industry

in the exact same way that Pirate Bay
was disruptive to the film industry

and LimeWire was disruptive
to the music industry.

People started to expect
to get things for free very easily.

Pornhub wasn't necessarily
the one driving that,

but Pornhub absolutely
was a part of this... this movement.

In 2008, Pornhub was becoming
pretty much omnipresent.

And so, at the time, I had obviously
a very negative opinion about Pornhub

because they were the ones
that were taking away the money.

I was not pleased
with Pornhub early on.

Piracy was a massive issue,

and at the time, there wasn't a way
to monetize my own content on Pornhub.

I... I couldn't sell it on there.

It was just a game of Whac-A-Mole

getting my stolen stuff
taken down constantly.

Pornhub came out
of the fruits of three Concordia students

who, like any other university students,
apparently liked naked women.

And they started this thing off,
essentially, as a lark.

But they sold the company in 2010

to a guy named Fabian Thylmann,

and he wrapped it into his empire.

And, to his credit, Fabian knew
all about search engine optimization

to make sure that it was Pornhub
that was at the top when you searched.

Anything that has
a lot of traffic,

you can assume is really taking advantage

of search engine optimization

or the game of trying to get

your page first.

When somebody searches, like,

"big titties,"

Pornhub wants "Pornhub big titties"
to be number one

and ideally number two, number three,
number four, number five, number six.

Pornhub
fundamentally changed porn distribution

and porn production as a result.

Studios that were very used to having
certain budgets and certain returns

all of a sudden found most, if not all,
of their content disposable

and it becoming
much more of a volume game.

By 2011,
studios started to realize

that it was better to partner with them.

And in 2012, Fabian Thylmann
was suddenly giving the keynote

at a major industry conference.

I'm hoping that my openness
throughout the speech

will be beneficial to all of you,
and some will understand a bit more

of how we do things
and why we do things certain ways.

And why we're quite friendly people,
although we own tube sites.

So let's get back a bit and look at

what the industry had to face
over the past few years.

I think the industry faces
a lot of change often.

I think it's normal that we do

because we have always been more or less
at the forefront of technology.

And therefore face the negative change
and the positive change at the same time.

First time I wrote about it,
I had no idea

there was a connection
between Pornhub and MindGeek.

That one company owned the other.

MindGeek itself is basically
a data-harvesting operation.

This is a company that does exactly
what Netflix does, what Facebook does.

It gathers data on its users

to better tailor content
towards those eyeballs.

And they're extremely good at it.
In fact, better at it than Netflix

because they have that much more
to build an algorithm around.

And, of course, being able to monetize
user-generated content

with advertising was extremely profitable.

But then Thylmann
was convicted of tax evasion,

and the assets were bought
by MindGeek employees

by the name of Feras Antoon
and David Tassillo

and a guy named Bernd Bergmair,
who was an investor.

And they were very successful
in pushing Pornhub

to the very, sort of,
outer limits of mainstream acceptance.

As usual, when we need a little
emotional uplift, we know where to turn.

Pornography.

Specifically, the largest
porn site on the Internet, Pornhub.

Though many of you can probably get there
by just typing 'P' into your browser.

I found the whole movie on Pornhub.

- Uh... I don't wanna...
- I don't know what you're talking about.

It's sort of a hub for porn. Um...

They were really great
about brand recognition.

They bought billboards in Times Square
knowing they would be controversial

and knowing they could benefit from
all the earned media that comes with that.

We did a lot of collaborations
with celebrities like Kanye.

Pornhub is pop...
I mean, I think in our heads

most people could even see the colors

or hear the song.

For the last 15 years, I would say,
by far, it's the most household name.

So I had a page,
and I had, like, millions of viewers,

and I'm like, "Well, no wonder
why people are noticing me

in the train station,
when I go flying. No wonder.

Sixteen million people
have seen my asshole."

Pornhub released their annual report

of the top pornographic searches
in the country.

They broke it down by state,
and the results are very interesting.

In Arkansas, for instance, the number one
most searched porn word was "divorced,"

which might be
the saddest thing I've ever heard.

Pornhub insights got
a tremendous amount of media attention.

Their big push was always
these end-of-year data numbers

where they would list
the number of videos,

the top stars, the top search terms.

"Lesbian" has now dropped down
to number three and "MILF" to number four...

It went into everybody's homes,

and it got people talking about things
that were scandalous beforehand.

I think that was one of the things
that later made Pornhub a target.

Some people don't like
that these things are not in the shadows.

- They want this stuff hidden.
- Shut it down!

And, of course,
the arguments are not new.

It's just the medium
that they're battling has changed.

Shut it down!

And so
we started to hear the drum beat

of people coming for Pornhub
from outside the industry.

It's really interesting to see,
on a very wide scale,

people trying to remove
pornography from the Internet.

It feels almost like ripping
the spine out of something, you know,

given how much
every element of the Internet

has been influenced
and led by pornography.

It... It's just creating this

absolutely, like, untenable tension

between the two industries
that... that actually exist so tight-knit.

And the people
who often get left in the dust

are primarily sex workers,

primarily performers,

and also users

trying to exist as a person
with a sex drive online.

And it just becomes
a precedent for great censorship

that we see over and over and over again,

unreasonably applied
to the most vulnerable people.

Do you consent
to how you look in the interview?

- Yes, thank you for showing me.
- I was curious.

- Cool. Do you wanna slate?
- I would.

- Rolling.
- Speeding.

Uh, Gwen interview,
series AB, common mark, marker.

My name is Gwen Adora,
and I am an adult performer,

an online content creator,
semi-influencer,

babe.

Uh, that's who I am.

I definitely identify as a sex worker.

That's not the first thing I say to people
'cause I feel like it's such a broad term.

I don't necessarily say that upfront.

But that's something I identify as,
like, politically and job-wise.

The words "porn star" or "sex worker"
doesn't really associate with my body type

for a lot of people.

So a lot of people are generally like,

"Oh! I didn't, like,
realize fat women could do porn!"

♪ I've got a perfect body ♪

♪ But sometimes I forget ♪

People assume that, like,
I'm in it for, like,

the wrong reasons.

They're like, "Oh, you're doing something
that's, you know, taboo and underground

and shouldn't be talked about,
but we'll definitely jerk off to it."

People automatically assume
I'm doing mainstream porn

just because
that's the immediate connection,

that's what people know the most of.

Um, but in reality, I'm just in my room
by myself making little videos.

Just like a YouTuber, basically.

On a typical filming day,
I would get ready,

do my makeup, set up my tripod.

And then the clothes start coming off.

Oh my God,
what a crazy night on that dance floor.

I didn't expect to be getting
that wild this vacation.

Oh my God, take a moment.

Take my shoes off.

Oh!

Hi, you!

You... You look familiar.

You're in... You were in my...

my communications class last semester.

I taught you.

So I do photography,
I do videography, I do editing.

Come on. No one is watching.

You're on vacation, get it out.

Do it.

I do marketing, PR.

Oh, do you wanna see Miss Adora's tits?

I do it all.

I basically do, like, a whole,
like, media company's jobs,

all in one person, for myself.

It's a lot. And yes, there is some
masturbating on camera sometimes.

Oh! So fucking good. Mm-hmm?

Are you gonna come
on my big fucking titties?

Actually, wait.
We're gonna do this before that.

This is my lube shooter.

Oh! There we go. Come on. Come on, baby.

Yeah, come on! Come on!

Oh fuck! Oh...

Oh my God.

So sticky.

It does add, like...
...a lot of time to the...

the process of making your own content.

But, um, the great thing about it is
I get to control the whole thing.

I can control the narrative.
Choose the scenes that I take on.

I don't have to perform
with someone I don't wanna perform with.

I get to edit it the way I want.
I get to promote it the way I want to.

I am Gwen Adora full-time.
It's my full-time job,

which is great because, you know, um,
not everyone has the same opportunities

for mainstream porn,
but yeah, anyone can do amateur.

Which is lovely.

Pornhub was a site
that I initially stayed away from.

There was a lot of free videos
that were stolen.

So I was, kind of,
on my smaller niche sites.

It wasn't until I went
to the AVN Expo in Vegas

that I was pulled aside by Jade Jordan,

who was at the Modelhub booth there.

She came up to me, and she was like,
"You need to be on Pornhub."

"You're gonna be
the next big BBW on Pornhub."

BBW is 'big beautiful woman.'
And so, I was like, "Okay, tell me more."

She gave me a good introduction to,
you know, how to monetize the site.

I had no clue
that they had Modelhub at the time,

which was the pay-per-video side
of the platform to sell them.

That's amazing.

And, tied with the traffic of Pornhub,

I was like,
"That sounds like a win-win to me."

It wasn't until XBIZ Miami,
when I met Noelle,

who was, at the time,
working in the Modelhub department.

She'd reached out through email and said,

"Hey, we want you to come
to this Modelhub dinner."

I met Gwen
through the model program.

I started with Modelhub
in talent acquisitions.

We met because I was scoping out models
on other sites that are doing really well

and being like,
"Hey, like, what about us?"

They took us all out
for food and drinks

and told us how we were doing
on the platform

and then also tips and tricks
on how to fully utilize the system.

So Modelhub is Pornhub's clip site.

It launched in 2018,

and that was really when verified models

started making money on the site.

So I put more energy into it,
and once I started doing that,

I noticed the benefits in terms of money

and in terms of following.

When I put my clips on Modelhub,

I didn't have to promote them
for them to sell

because the Pornhub traffic
that was filtering through,

because the sites were connected,
was just automatic.

Before there was such
an easy way

to monetize self-made content,

we, meaning performers,

were all at the mercy
of studio-produced porn.

But these online platforms,
like Modelhub and OnlyFans,

gave us autonomy,
power, a good bit more money.

It has made financial freedom

very easy and accessible

for so many more models.

That model of,
like, the fan subscription site

is, like, a complete game-changer.

I don't rely on income from studio shoots.

That's the reason
I was able to buy a house.

I wouldn't have been able
to reliably save up

to buy a house
from doing studio work before.

When I was shooting for a studio,
I could make roughly four grand a month.

- Just like that! Ah!
- Ooh!

With Modelhub,
I started getting well over ten grand.

Content creation has shown that
performers have always been in charge,

and they can dictate
what they want and what they don't want.

Without us, there would be no industry.

Pornhub has evolved
over the past ten or so years

to have multiple different ways
of making money

and multiple different ways
of distributing pornography.

There are a bunch of different levels
in terms of how involved you wanna be

as somebody uploading content.

But the process of uploading
a video to Pornhub is pretty similar

to uploading content
to any other platform.

You'll choose the file
that you wanna upload.

Give it a title, a description.

You can tag
the people in the video if you want.

And then a certain number of tags
for categorization within the site.

POV, BBW, big tits, creampie.

But some tags are banned
because some of the kinky stuff

is harder for them to sell
to, like, credit card processors.

In general,
people tag their videos

with as many tags as they can

so that these search engines
pick up on those terms

and show them to the consumer.

And after that, you hit 'publish.'

And then it lives on there.

Of course,
there are some categories, like "teen,"

which obviously are upsetting.

But there is a larger issue
where "teen" in pornography

doesn't necessarily refer to teenagers.

It's more in reference to a body type.

Any petite performer
would be categorized as teen.

Age doesn't necessarily play into that

as much as people think it does.

It feels like you're saying,
like, "Oh, teen." You know?

It's hard to come up
with a solution to tagging like that

that doesn't feel like
you're policing people's sexuality

that they're allowed to have
because they're a legal adult.

You know,
we're providing entertainment

within the legal bounds
for consenting adults

and within that buffet
of pornographic content,

that adults, if they choose to consume it,

can choose anything.

But if you let just anyone
upload anything,

you're going to get

anyone uploading anything.

And that's not okay.

Prior to December 2020,
verification was mandatory

if you wanted
to make any money on your content.

So you would have to go through
the process of submitting your ID

and getting approved.

But if you didn't care
about making money on the site,

you could just make an account
with an email address,

and you could upload whatever you wanted.

But because verification
wasn't mandatory for all,

people were still uploading content
that wasn't theirs,

and also people were uploading content

that couldn't necessarily
be traced back to somebody.

So, if something got uploaded
that was not consensual,

it's very difficult
to actually track that person down

and make sure that,
you know, this doesn't happen again.

You know, we have been wanting
strict verified-only users

from all of these tube sites
for a long time.

We don't want other garbage people

on a site
that we're putting our content on.

Many people within the company
and many, many, many performers

have been advocating
for mandatory verification for years.

And, generally, the response was,

"We're working on it.
It's happening eventually."

"Sit tight." That kind of thing.

And that was said

throughout my time there,
which was three years.

But the vast majority
of Pornhub's content was unverified.

And content is how they make money.

With the free content,

you have a lot of people
motivated by some really sick stuff.

I think I knew the name Pornhub
because it's pretty much a household name.

It's just, sort of, like,
I know what Kellogg's brand is.

Like, I just knew what it was.

And when I was at NCOSE,
I first heard the name MindGeek.

NCOSE's the National Center
on Sexual Exploitation,

and it's our mission
to expose this interweb

of sexual exploitation
and advocate for survivors.

Because it really is irrelevant
what your faith background is,

what your political beliefs are.

Everyone can be unified on this issue
that no one should be sexually exploited.

We've been researching
Pornhub and MindGeek for years,

so I had tons of research,

I had delved into how the site worked,

I had countless screenshots
of some of the more horrific things.

But the Trafficking Hub campaign
completely changed the game.

Laila Mickelwait here with an update
on the Trafficking Hub campaign.

A quick one. Um, things are moving along.

We continue to gain traction.
A lot is happening behind the scenes.

Shut it down!
Shut it down! Shut it down!

It was just
such a viral movement.

Shut it down!

It reached so many people
that we had never reached before.

Laila Mickelwait, you know,
she's just an ally in the movement,

but she had a special gift.

Today, I'm excited to announce the launch

of the Trafficking Hub
crowdfunding campaign.

I'm just gonna be honest with you
and frank about this,

we are taking on a mega corporation.

A company that's making hundreds
of millions of dollars every year.

Much of which is on the backs
of real victims.

Go to traffickinghub.com.
Sign the petition.

Together we are going to shut this down.

We have reached 500,000 signatures.

We have recently sailed past

830,000 signatures on the petition.

This is truly a global movement.

We reached two million signatures

on the petition to shut down Pornhub

and to hold its executives accountable

for complicity in the sex trafficking,

the rape, the abuse, and the assault

of men, women, and children.

In the time I've been in porn,
I've seen so many of these campaigns

come and go.

Pornhub is infested with videos

of the real rape and the trafficking
of women and children.

But Trafficking Hub was scary
because it hit a lot of people.

It really, really got a lot of traction.

Lock them up!

It's really, really frustrating
because they really often know

how to pull people in by, like,
talking about these really sad stories

of actual sex trafficking.

But those stories
have nothing to do with us as an industry.

Pornhub has become
the global epicenter

of Internet pornography.

The company makes hundreds of millions
of dollars through ad revenue,

data collection,
and premium subscriptions,

and it's blatantly enabling and profiting

from rape, sexual abuse,

and child sex trafficking.

Usually,
when I see things like that,

it's like, "Ugh! Just wait for it
to blow over," kind of thing.

But, in this case, it seemed like

it was, like, really making a big splash,

and, like, people in my personal life
were texting me, like,

"Hey, is this true?"

"Does Pornhub allow child pornography?"

And it was scary to me that, like,

people in my real life
were, like, questioning that.

All of the research
and stuff that she brought to light,

many of us
had been talking to each other about.

We tried to get the word out,
but she had a special gift

for packaging it in a way
that was so easy to understand.

And when seen on Twitter,

and someone's pointing out,
"This is a real person."

Then the victims are coming forward
and saying, "This is my video."

It shakes everyone up,

and that's what she was able to do
that no one had done before.

And certainly because
she was such a powerful advocate

on behalf of those victims coming forward

and speaking about this so eloquently,

it made room for us
to articulate that in our cases.

So we are bringing sex trafficking claims

and alleging that Pornhub knows
that there are traffickers

intentionally creating
this content for their site

or knowingly distributing
child pornography on their site.

They know that.

They're facilitating it intentionally
because they know there's a demand for it.

They're marketing it.

All because they're profiting from it.

And so, knowingly profiting
from sex trafficking

is what we believe they are liable for.

You have a 14-year-old girl saying,

"I was raped, and my rape
has been on Pornhub for years."

"I've requested it be removed,
and no one helped me."

"Not the police. Not the website."

For so long, no one has cared.

And then, finally, Pulitzer Prize-winning
journalist, Nick Kristof,

saw the Trafficking Hub campaign
and was concerned.

I spoke with him a few times and was able
to point him in the right direction.

And I think he wasn't sure
this could be as bad as it seemed.

But unfortunately, once you see the site

and once you see the evidence,
you just can't deny it.

When I started reporting this,
my hope was

that there would be
nothing to write about.

That I'd look into it and, uh...

it would turn out to be murky
or exaggerated

and that there really wasn't
a story there.

But the more I looked,

the more I felt this was something

that the public should be aware of

and that if the public were aware of it,

you know, people would not like the idea

of a major company behaving in this way.

So I reached out
to Pornhub pretty early on

to speak to the executives,

and Pornhub
was not particularly responsive.

The CEO refused to speak to me.

But the more I explored,

the more aghast I became

because I found
just too many cases of kids

whose worst moments
were preserved in amber on Pornhub

in ways that were gonna be devastating
for the rest of their lives.

It was about six months that I spent
trying to get survivors to talk about it.

This is, uh...
This is Serena, the woman I, uh...

The young woman I wrote about.

Serena Fleites was a young woman

who told me her story,
which was just devastating.

At 14, she was an eighth grader

who had a crush on a boy
who was a year older.

He asked her for a naked video,

and she sent him a naked video of herself.

He asked for another.
She sent another. Another after that.

Then kids started
looking at her and smirking.

Somebody put those videos on Pornhub.

One of them had 400,000 views.

She asked Pornhub to remove them.

Sometimes it did. Sometimes it didn't.

And when it did remove them,

then somebody else
would immediately upload it again.

And Pornhub made money off this.

They ran ads on this.

That was what drove me
to write this piece.

So in December 2020,

the New York Times ran
an op-ed by Nicholas Kristof

called "The Children of Pornhub."

I read it the morning that it came out,
and honestly, I thought,

"This is all smoke, no fire."

Um... And so,
I... I didn't think much of it at first.

"Pornhub prides itself on being
the cheery, winking face of naughty,

the website that buys
a billboard in Times Square

and provides snow plows
to clear Boston streets."

"It donates to organizations
fighting for racial equality

and offers steamy content free
to get people through Covid-19 shutdowns."

"That supposedly 'wholesome Pornhub'

attracts 3.5 billion visits a month."

"More than Netflix, Yahoo, or Amazon."

"Pornhub rakes in money from almost
three billion ad impressions a day."

"One ranking lists Pornhub

as the 10th most-visited website
in the world."

"Yet there is another side
of the company."

"Its site is infested with rape videos."

"It monetizes child rape..."

Obviously, in the ensuing days,
I was wrong.

It became a phenomenon.

The New York Times did
what The New York Times does.

They have incredible resources.

They spent an inordinate amount of time

and did a character-driven column.

It was a bombshell.

I had left Pornhub at that point,

but I still work vaguely in the industry,

so obviously, I saw the article.

It was everywhere.
It was shared with everyone.

Dozens of people sent it to me.

I remember seeing
this Twitter kerfuffle on my phone

and all the people
talking about this article

and then all the people responding,
saying like, "This is bullshit."

I just thought of it
as another attack.

You know, I have so many attacks,
personally, that I'm like,

"I can't take on that attack right now.
Let me handle my own stuff first."

It's a nightmare for us
because when you present

two unrelated things
as being closely related

in a paper that everyone's
going to believe,

what happens?

Well, exactly what you think would happen.
And exactly what did happen.

The public sees it,
and they are outraged

because it is outrageous,
and it is horrible,

and it is something that nobody wants.

And then they say,

"That is trash,
and we need to eliminate it."

They neglect to see that

sex work and sex trafficking
are two completely different things.

Sex work, by definition,
is done with consent,

and if it's not done with consent,
it's rape.

It's illegal, it's, um...

unethical, and that's not what we do.

"I don't see any neat solution."

"But aside from limiting immunity

so that companies
are incentivized to behave better,

here are three steps that would help."

"One. Allow only verified users
to post videos."

"Two. Prohibit downloads."

"Three. Increase moderation."

"Siri Dahl, a prominent porn star
who does business with Pornhub,

told me my three proposals are..."

"Insanely reasonable."

So Nick Kristof had contacted me

asking for an interview about Pornhub.

Ultimately, I told him everything
I know to be true that is my experience.

I'm a survivor of abuse myself,

um, which I told Nick Kristof
in our phone interview.

I... told him about my own experience
with sexual abuse,

which happened before
I was ever in the porn industry, and...

I also communicated to him,
like, one of my favorite things

about the industry that I work in
is the fact that we care about consent

and the fact that
I have full bodily autonomy at all times

in this industry.

Like, there's no question in my mind
about that, and there never has been.

One of the things
I was very clear with him about

when he read those three steps is,

"This is what people in the porn industry
have been asking for."

But if we admit
that it's a moderation problem,

then we have to admit it's a problem
that's Internet-wide, which it is.

Because there's far more instances
of child sexual abuse material

being reported on, like, Facebook
and mainstream social media

than there is on actual porn websites.

"If PayPal can suspend
cooperation with Pornhub,

so can American Express,
Mastercard, and Visa."

And when he outlined those steps,
if he had said,

"Do you think it's reasonable for Pornhub

to lose their ability
to process payments?"

I would have been like, "No."

'Cause it would be near impossible

for someone to upload illegal content

via a verified model account,

which is the only way it would have
to be uploaded for them to sell it

using the payment processing on Pornhub.

So all it does is affect my ability

and the ability of people
in my industry to make a living.

So Mastercard and Visa pulled their
processing from Pornhub.

The idea that somebody was claiming,
"Oh, children are being sold on your site

using credit cards,"

for a global brand like that, was like,

"We can't be associated with this.
We can't have a whiff of this."

So Pornhub came out
and removed a bunch of content.

Which is not to say that those videos
that they took down were non-consensual.

The vast majority of cases
they probably weren't.

But less content equals less profit.

So, the fact that
they did that when they did it,

suggests to me that
that's the nuclear option.

You get rid of this stuff
when it's absolutely necessary.

Before then, let it ride
'cause we're making money on it.

In some ways,
they took on the wrong company.

Pornhub doesn't actually sell a whole lot
of content directly on its site.

Most of the money that Pornhub made

came from banner advertising
or affiliate sales,

neither of which require
a credit card to operate on the platform.

So the people who really got hurt
were individual performers.

The small people
selling direct to the consumers

because that's where the consumers were.

Porn performers like me
depend on platforms like Pornhub to pay...

You're taking food out of people's mouths.

This is how people pay their rent
and pay their bills.

Mastercard pulling payment processing
from Pornhub is not helping one victim.

...terrified that they're gonna do this
to other sites...

...should have a right
to post online and exist online.

Please listen to us.

We need to support sex workers.
We need to...

People that are uploading
child pornography

are not content creators.

I got hired
at MindGeek in August 2019,

and I transitioned
to a role in HR in 2020.

The article came to my attention,
when I went to work "virtually" that day,

um, everybody was talking about it.

Um, and...

I just remember wondering,

"How much of it is true?"

But, um,

there was really no way for me to know.

I was pretty reliant on what
management was willing to say about it,

and it wasn't a whole lot.

All we were told was, "None of it's true."

But it's this big article
in The New York Times,

and it's very hard
to reconcile those things.

But I think what they were really
responding to was the tone of the article.

How it was so accusatory

and painting them
like they were doing it on purpose.

That was really the part that they

minded.

And that was really a shame
because I think it would have been better

in that moment to give some guidance.

But I think they were hoping that

everything was gonna
calm down and blow over.

Especially the big move
bringing down all of that content.

Suddenly everybody
was just super stressed out.

The website Pornhub
is promising to take action.

The first change includes allowing
only verified users to upload content.

Secondly, they will ban
downloading videos from the site,

and the third is to add more moderation.

So in January,
they started to make some moves

and tried to diminish
the number of people on staff.

And in February, they went
to the hearing at the Canadian Parliament.

Today's meeting is televised
and will be made available

via the House of Commons website.

Now pursuant to the motion adopted

by the committee
on Friday, December 11th, 2020,

the committee is resuming its study
on the protection of privacy

and reputation on platforms
such as Pornhub.

So the parliamentary hearings
were held in winter 2021,

looking into issues of privacy
around companies like MindGeek.

Basically, looking into MindGeek
because MindGeek's Canadian,

and "What the hell's going on?"

Good afternoon. My name is Feras Antoon.

I'm the chief executive officer
of Les Entreprises MindGeek Canada.

With me is David Tassillo,
chief operations officer,

and Corey Urman,

vice president of product management,
video-sharing platform.

As a leader in this industry,
we share the committee's concern

about the spread
of unlawful content online

and about the non-consensual sharing
of intimate images.

It goes against everything we stand for
at MindGeek and Pornhub.

So on December 14th,

80% of your content
came down from your site.

Is that correct?

Uh, I don't know about 80%,

but yes, a large portion
of unverified-user-uploaded content

was removed.

Illegal content?

No. I said unverified uploaders.

That's the... We only have content today
from verified uploaders.

The content we removed
is because we do not have...

It was uploaded by people
who were not verified.

Do you have a specific number
on the amount of content that was removed?

I would s...

It's in the ballpark
of nine to ten million.

And we're making it so that
we want everyone that uploads to our site

to basically have a...
We want to have ID on them,

so we know who they are,
so we can add further deterrents

to them doing illegal activity,
and we hope

people that are providing
adult entertainment

and any form of entertainment
for people in the world follow our lead.

Has MindGeek or any of its
at least 48 subsidiaries

ever monetized child sexual abuse
and non-consensual material?

Our standards are very clear.
We won't allow anything to do with CSAM.

We want nothing to do with non-consensual.

It is possible that people
committing crimes

are able to circumvent our systems,

similar to security on a home
or security at a bank.

You put multiple levels of security
in place and deterrents in place,

but if a criminal wants to commit a crime,
they will try and circumvent the system.

We are constantly adding new systems
and better systems

and trying to further it,

to not only deter but to stop.

This has been a constant evolution
in our company.

We were, um... had human moderation
available on our sites

when it was a word that wasn't even...
It didn't even exist.

When Facebook and any of the other
main platforms in the world never used it.

These were all things that we started.
We weren't public about it,

but these are things we did
since the beginning.

There were moderators.

I don't really know how that worked.

I know that there was

more content being uploaded onto the site,
so I actually can't talk, really.

This is really getting into
shady legal territory for me here.

- Okay.
- Um...

To start,
can you just tell me why you've decided

to share your story?

Oh, uh...

I think the company could have done more

to prevent certain things

and chose not to.

And only really changed
some things after it got in trouble.

I was a moderator.
I worked for less than two years.

Some of the moderation happened in Canada.

Most of it happened in Cyprus.

When I worked there,
there was a little over 30 moderators.

Every moderator had to review,
um, 700 videos per day,

but it was expected for us to do more.

Each of these moderators
were tasked with viewing

800 to 1,000 videos per eight-hour shift.

And that's impossible.

So, of course, they were fast-forwarding,
skipping through.

No sound, which is key because sometimes

the women and... or children
in the video are crying, yelling,

saying, "No," saying, "Stop,"
and they're not catching any of that.

We were scrubbing
through videos as fast as we could.

Even if we thought
that we were being diligent with our work,

we would still miss a few videos
every now and then.

They proudly boasted
that every single video is reviewed.

But, to put it in perspective,

Pornhub has traffic similar
to these big social media websites.

Ninth, you know, most-trafficked website
in the world, conservatively.

Facebook had 15,000 moderators,

and that was for a site
that isn't primarily centered

around sexually explicit content, right?

And they still have 15,000 moderators who,
we find out, are very overwhelmed.

I can't really tell
from a video the age of somebody.

It's a really hard thing to determine
if a 17 year old is more than 18.

They could be 14 or they could be 19.

Basically, we would just guess,

then my manager would decide
if the video would be

taken down for good
or if it will go live again.

The rules constantly changed.

When you're operating a business
like a pornography website,

you just have to have incredibly stringent
compliance, content moderation,

and user restrictions involved in that.

I can't overstate that enough,
especially when it's an online business.

So NCMEC is a private,
nonprofit organization.

We have a very basic mission,
which is to help find missing children,

reduce child sexual exploitation,
and prevent child victimization.

We've a lot of companies
and nonprofit organizations

that report to us.

So a survivor very well might be
working with an organization

and say, "My image, my video,
is here, on Pornhub, on another website."

And we would facilitate that nonprofit
making a report on that incident

on behalf of the client or survivor
that they're working with.

So a survivor came to us
with what happened to her.

She went on a date
with someone who was much older.

She was a minor.

He drugged and raped her and filmed her.

And the next thing you know,
the video is on Pornhub.

She requested multiple times
over the years to have it removed.

But the whistleblower we spoke to

actually said that they would have
a backlog of, like, six months.

We have thousands
of take-down requests.

We don't really go through them in time.

Many videos that
should have been taken down

stayed up for months.

So there is a US law
that requires online companies

that are defined
as an electronic service provider

to report apparent
child pornography to NCMEC

when they become
aware of it on their platform.

There are over 1400 companies
registered with NCMEC.

From Microsoft, to Facebook, to Google,
to Dropbox, to Snapchat, to Twitter,

all of these companies
are registered with NCMEC.

And MindGeek registered
to report to NCMEC in March 2020.

But the reporting statute
only applies to US companies.

So international companies
have no obligation to register with NCMEC,

to report child sexual abuse, uh, material

to our CyberTipline or to have
any involvement with us whatsoever.

What Pornhub would do
when NCMEC would request a takedown is...

In any other circumstance,
if child pornography was on a website,

and the website was alerted,
and they took it down,

and you tried to go to that link,
to that exact web address,

it either wouldn't be there or it'd say,
"Page doesn't exist" or "Error."

For Pornhub,
you would see the entire page.

The video would just be disabled,
and it would have a message that says,

"Video is removed
at the request of NCMEC."

But all the metadata would be there.

So you would see the title, the history
of all the comments over the years,

you'd see how many views it had,
and you would see related videos.

So, "Oh, you were searching
for this young, abused teen video?"

"Well, unfortunately,
this was removed by NCMEC,

but don't worry,
we have all of these similar videos."

And so, not only
would they keep people on their site,

but that would still be generating data
and hits on all those terms and keywords.

So they lost nothing
in terms of SEO by removing that.

So they're actually still profiting
from this known child pornography

even when they disable the video.

And all the while,
it's being distributed to the masses,

never to be removed again.

Because that's the truth.

Once this is on the Internet,
it's almost impossible to remove.

These websites face no accountability,
no requirements.

They are not motivated to remove content,

and so even if
you get some websites to remove,

others are going to distribute it.

Serena, thank you so much for being
willing to come to our committee

and to tell your story.

Uh, we'll start with you.

I... I had messaged Pornhub
to get the video taken down.

I pretended to be my mother.

And I said, "Hey, this is my daughter.
She's only 14 now."

"Uh, this is child pornography.
Please take this down."

And they, you know, they wrote...
It took like a week or two to respond,

and then once they finally responded,
they're like, "Okay, we'll take it down."

And then proceeded
to wait another two weeks

before they finally did take it down.

And, um, doing my research,
I was told that, uh,

that they had a system in place

that when a video was labeled
as "child pornography" on their site,

that it was, like, flagged and tagged

and that it could
no longer be re-uploaded.

Um, but of course, that wasn't true

because a week after
it had been taken down,

it had been re-uploaded again.

And it'd always be uploaded
over and over and over again.

No matter how many times
I got it taken down,

it'd be right back up again.

So that was the whole reason
I ended up reaching out to Mike.

Thank you. Um... I'll just introduce myself
briefly to the committee.

My name is Michael Bowe.

Uh, I'm a partner in Manhattan
at the law firm of Brown Rudnick.

More than 30 women
have filed a lawsuit against Pornhub.

The women are accusing the adult website

of running a "criminal enterprise"
and exploiting them for profit.

Lawyer Michael Bowe
represents the women taking on MindGeek.

He spent the past year
building a civil case against the company,

citing racketeering laws

ordinarily reserved for mobsters
and drug gangs.

This is an organization
that deals with legitimate porn,

of which there is a...
You can make a fortune.

Uh, but that wasn't enough.

They incorporated into that business

child porn, trafficked porn,
rape videos... To make money.

So today, we sued the owners of MindGeek,
and we sued the executives.

And if executives like that
end up going to jail,

and end up having to pay big judgments,

that will make a big difference.

So our goal
is to incentivize the adult industry

to only sell legitimate product.

Is this a moment
of reckoning for the online porn industry?

This industry is going to get cleaned up.

Hello, Mike Bowe.

Hello. Hello.

And did they get taken down,
or are they still up there?

We'll call you back within the week.

- Another one?
- Yeah. It's a tough one. It's a mother.

You know, this advocate Laila Mickelwait,
who was like a one-woman wrecking crew,

it was her and a Twitter feed.

Shut it down!

She just started
tweeting stuff out and, you know,

she was this force of nature.

We worked with her a little bit.

We did our own investigation.

And we put together a case.

"Monsanto of porn."

"MindGeek's racketeering enterprise."

"It's just like The Sopranos."

"Appropriately dubbed,
'The Monsanto of Porn, '

MindGeek is a classic criminal enterprise

carried out through
wide-ranging criminal activities,

including but not limited to..."

"...human trafficking,
child pornography,

criminal copyright piracy..."

"...Internet hacking,
stalking, and doxing..."

"...blackmail and extortion,
mail and wire fraud, embezzlement..."

"...bank and creditor fraud,
tax evasion, and money laundering."

"The company's top management

and shadowy international financiers
and their investors are the..."

"...'bosses' of this enterprise
and, together with their 'capos, '

run its rackets and schemes."

It's a racketeering case.

So if you think about The Sopranos.
You know, you have a boss who's in charge,

but he doesn't go out
and do the dirty work,

he's just the boss, and he's got capos,

and they got soldiers, and there's just,
sort of, other people who...

and the people who do the dirty work
really aren't the boss,

but everyone kicks up to the boss.

And so, here you have MindGeek

that has this amalgam of people
who work for them,

contract for them,
they're performers, or they're writers,

they do work together.

And you're able to prove
they do their business

through these racketeering activities,
then everybody who's in the enterprise

is equally culpable.

"Over the course of the next year,
MindGeek's press relations

and social media organization

would aggressively disseminate
gross disinformation."

"This campaign included
numerous MindGeek Pornhub models,

including Gwen Adora
and its brand ambassador, Asa Akira,

who were instructed
via direct messages on Pornhub's website

and provided with talking points
to disseminate MindGeek's disinformation."

"In return for participating
in this disinformation campaign,

these agents of MindGeek were rewarded
with supplemental compensation

and better promotion
on the MindGeek platform."

What is this?

Absolute bullshit.

That's... That is

absolute lies.

All of it.

That is a portion of the racketeering
lawsuit against Pornhub.

And...
why are you named in it?

Good question.

Um, I was a model
who was vocal to the press

and on my own social media

about the misinformation

that the organization
who has compiled this is trying to spread.

So I was named,

saying that my information
was misinformation.

I was not hired
by Pornhub to defend them.

When I spoke to the media,
I was worried that Pornhub

wasn't gonna be h... happy with that.

Like, I didn't know if they'd be okay
with me, like, going off on my own

and, like, saying what I needed to say.

"Social media optimization, SMO,

was also an integral part
of its enterprise."

"As part of this SMO, MindGeek used
its extensive control and influence

over all aspects of the new
online porn industry that it dominated

to mount powerful
public messaging campaigns

when it felt it necessary."

"This network included
public interest non-for-profits

like the Free Speech Coalition,

which received substantial support
from MindGeek

and was called by the industry
and MindGeek insiders its 'lobbying arm.'"

MindGeek is a significant contributing
member of the Free Speech Coalition,

but prior to the Pornhub article,
I'd never spoken to anybody

from MindGeek's communications team.
I didn't know who they were.

It's one thing to say,
"Oh, we have evidence,"

or "This thing happened,
and this is an example of what it meant."

But as far as I can tell,
the only existence of these claims

are actually in the lawsuit.

Most of it is hearsay
and secondhand information

or something that's not sourced at all.

They're just making endless claims.

"The enterprise's
paramount focus on secrecy

was reflected in the Bro Club's obsession
with suspected snitches."

"This ubiquitous 'Bro Club' term included,

not only those
who they suspected of speaking

outside the MindGeek organization,

but also those who spoke up
or objected internally."

"Even a suspicion
by a single Bro Club member

that an individual was a snitch
would not merely block their advancement

but ultimately result in them
being pushed out of the company entirely."

"Such individuals would either
be frozen out and elect to leave,

be set up to fail in staged assignments,

or simply be told that there was
a consensus that they should be let go

without any explanation as to why

or on whose word."

- Well, this I can really relate to.
- Uh...

I got the sense
that they smelled a snitch in me.

But I also think that I had...

if I hadn't been treated
the way that I had,

that I probably
wouldn't be sitting here talking to you.

Obviously, having non-consensual material

uploaded onto a huge platform
is a violence in and of itself,

and I would never say otherwise
because that is truly

a horrifying thing on its own.

But these accusations
push all these performers,

and even me, like an ex-employee,

to feel like we have to defend it.

Because I know that Pornhub is being used
as shorthand for the entire porn industry.

And I... And I do wanna defend
the porn industry

because I know that criticisms

ultimately end up
hurting performers the most.

So, when people say,

"Oh, well all these performers
are coming to the defense of Pornhub."

It's like, "Of course,"

because people are saying
that it's The Sopranos.

Like, what are you...
what are we supposed to say to that?

Of course that's ridiculous.

Miss Mickelwait, I... I... um...

S... Stuff with this committee,
new stuff happens every day,

stuff I've never, ever seen before
in the history of the committees

that I've been on for many, many years.

We got a letter today from...
Let's see, who did we get a letter from?

Feras Antoon and David Tassillo
wrote us a letter,

a personal letter about you.

Um, warning us that, uh, well, it's weird,

it's... it's about you, but then it's about
someone named Benjamin Nolot,

uh, who, uh,
they say is against legal pornography.

"Mr. Nolot is against same-sex marriage
and women's reproductive rights."

Um, anyways...

D'you have anything to say
about this letter we received

from the heads of MindGeek?

That's standard procedure
for them.

You know, the response of MindGeek
has been, uh, you know,

really inexcusable.

They have sought to call advocates,
who are speaking out about this, "liars."

They've called me personally
a liar many times.

That I was intentionally misleading.

Um, you know, they have harassed.

Instead of taking responsibility,
what they've done,

you know, for the past year
and beyond, is try to attack,

try to quiet, and to silence

those who are telling the truth
about their site,

and that is unacceptable.

And you say this is a case
of, um, them gaslighting you?

Absolutely. Absolutely.

So Laila Mickelwait was
the director of abolition at Exodus Cry.

Abolition in terms of, "I want to abolish
the sex trade industry and pornography."

Exodus Cry is an anti-trafficking
organization

founded by Benjamin Nolot,
an Evangelical preacher.

And its goal is to end sex work entirely.

They make documentaries about
the decline of American sexual culture.

Better show your fucking bags! Whoo!

To say that
fundamental Christian beliefs

are not at the root
of Exodus Cry's mandate

is just not accurate.

Shut it down!

And it's also masking
where they're coming from

because it's pushing
this far-right Christian mandate

under this guise of "liberal,
save the women, save the children"

language, and it's been very effective.

NCOSE is another
anti-trafficking organization.

It's the latest iteration
of Morality in Media,

a faith-based organization
that goes back to the early '60s,

when they wanted to remove,
you know, smut, broadly defined,

from the public sphere.

Around 2015, they recalibrated,

and they rebranded themselves as

The National Center
on Sexual Exploitation,

and what they argued was,

"We are now fighting
sex trafficking and exploitation."

"Their new name
seems to have been chosen to,

one, borrow legitimacy from the unrelated

but sound-alike National Center
for Missing and Exploited Children,

a respected secular organization
with no anti-porn agenda."

"And the ploy worked."

"While mentions of morality in the media

often highlight
their religious background,

the same organization under the name NCOSE

is now routinely quoted
by mainstream journalists

without disclosing their origins,
agendas, or extremist views

about what constitutes
'hardcore pornography.'"

And just so the public knows,

Sports Illustrated to them

is hardcore pornography,

along with Cosmopolitan.

NCOSE releases
a "Dirty Dozen List" every year,

which is their top offenders
for what they call "exploitation."

The problem is that NCOSE believes
that all sexual content is exploitation,

and they believe
that pornography fuels sex trafficking.

Who is this, like, "they," you know? Uh...

Individuals who, you know, are worried

and who feel like their livelihoods
are threatened, I mean, I...

You know, I wish they knew
that I actually care about them.

That I think they've been exploited,
and that, of course,

I, like, think they're real people,
and I don't want them to be hurt.

I have absolutely no hard feelings
for them. So the fact that they might

think something about us
that isn't true doesn't bother me,

except that I just, you know,
I wish they knew the truth.

The interesting thing
about NCOSE and Exodus Cry

is that they don't provide exit services.

But if you want people
to exit the sex industry,

if you think that pornography is immoral

and exploitative,
and you don't think people should do it,

and you think that people are coerced
into doing it because they need the money,

well, help them with the money.

The blame really resides on Pornhub.

If MindGeek and Pornhub
hadn't completely destroyed

the market for individual creators

to create their own content
freely from their control,

then they wouldn't be
so dependent on MindGeek.

I can understand
why they would be frustrated,

but the reason that they're having
to cling to this horrific entity

is because they have made it...
That entity has made it so.

It's made them dependent on them
so that they will stick up for them.

General public opinion
about pornography,

ultimately does not harm

Pornhub executives' pockets.
It just doesn't.

What increasingly
negative media around porn hurts

is porn performers, who are very
publicly involved in the porn industry.

They can't just
leave the office and go home.

They can't just quit their job.
Get a different job.

You know, they're very publicly
involved in this in a way that,

if you've been doing it for a while,
is very difficult to erase fully.

And I've seen many, many, many times

the direct result
of this kind of broad strokes criticism

and who it affects,
and it's not who it should.

You know, you are quite successful.
How much do you make?

I'm sorry. You want me
to tell the panel how much I make?

Yeah. What's your... What's your salary?
What's your income last year?

Well, obviously,
this is a very private matter

that I would not like to share
with the committee. Uh...

Uh, I get paid fairly, like any other CEO
of a... of a... of a company.

Right. Okay.
How much worldwide gross profit

did your company make last year?
And how much the year prior?

That's public knowledge.

I... I don't have exact numbers, but, uh...

You don't know how much
your company made last year?

Mr. Dong. Mr. Dong.
I know how much our company made.

This is a private company,
and I don't understand the relevance

of what a private company makes
has to do with...

- D'you file taxes?
- Of course we do.

It's been reported... It's been reported
in the 460 million range last year.

Is that... Is that somewhere close?

Uh, I have to go back and check.

Uh, I find that very interesting

that you consider
your financial information

to be private and, uh, confidential,

um, in view of the business
that you're in, uh,

but Mr. Antoon, it has been reported
that you are building a sprawling mansion

in the north end of Montréal,

that you and your wife
own two other large properties in Québec,

including a compound in the Laurentians,

and that you drive a Lamborghini Urus.

Are these assets yours

or are they owned by MindGeek

or one of the related companies?

I don't understand how what I own
is relevant to this committee.

And number two, I don't think it's illegal
to own a house or a property.

I don't own anything in the Laurentians.
If you look at media reports...

I'm asking if it's owned by yourself
or by MindGeek? Or by a company?

Depending which property
you're talking about, but no,

MindGeek does not own any property.

A new home being built
by one of the executives

of the company that owns Pornhub
has been the target of arson.

Realtor Joseph Montanaro,
who listed the home last week

for almost $20 million,
confirmed it is Feras Antoon's mansion.

The house was controversial
even before it was built, and now this.

It was spring 2021.

Antoon was building a house.

Sort of in Montréal.

Massive spread.
And got into a little bit of trouble

'cause he cut down a bunch of trees
he wasn't supposed to.

And then, lo and behold, it caught fire.

There was not much house left
at the end of it.

At first, I was like,
"It sounds like something from a movie."

It was an enormous fire,
like, a raging fire.

I have no idea
what kind of person it takes...

...to do something like that.

As far as I know,

there's never been any movement
as to who exactly did it.

I'd heard everything from, you know,
a couple of kids who happened upon

a really nice house
that would look good going up into flames,

to people realizing
that he was living there

because it was very public.

And this happened
all at the time when MindGeek itself

was, uh, certainly in the headlines
for the wrong reasons.

There are lots of people
who don't like the adult industry,

and there's lots of good reasons
for people to stay out of the spotlight.

A good example is Feras Antoon.

His name was public if you knew
where to search, but he wasn't out front.

When his name was exposed,
when a member of committee in Parliament

talked about the neighborhood
he lived in, you know,

shortly thereafter,
the house was burned down.

There's tons of stigma
around the adult business.

There's plenty of reasons
why you would not use a real name.

- How did you pick your name?
- Don't you know anything?

It's my first pet's name
and the street I grew up on.

So, since, like, Pornhub just lost
their payment processing ability,

most of my work
is coming from OnlyFans these days.

And everything about my workday

is centered around making sure that
that stays as reliable as possible.

And one of the more,
like, fun things that I do on OnlyFans

is I offer dick ratings.

I started doing it because
I got a ton of requests from guys, like,

"Hey, would you rate my dick?"

And I was like, "Excuse me? You want me
to look at your dick and then rate it?"

Aw.

The thing that I sell the most
are video dick ratings,

and so this is me
just literally filming myself on my phone.

I never look at their actual dick pic

until the moment
that I'm filming the rating video.

All right, first wiener of the day.

Hello there!
Um, I don't know your real name,

but I hope you're having
a good day so far.

I've got your dick pic
pulled up in front of me,

and, um, you have a nice-looking dick.

Like, I can't get a great sense of,
like, scale from this.

I think it looks like it's about average,
maybe slightly smaller than average,

but then, like, probably average girth
or maybe even bigger than average girth.

You've got a great dick. It's ample-sized.

It looks like a very nice,
well-taken-care-of dick.

I can tell that you've put
some effort into your grooming.

It looks very well moisturized.

It's, like, reminiscent
of a really big banana.

It looks like you have
a pretty good-sized dick

from what I can tell here,

and you definitely have,
like, super-prominent veins.

It looks like it's a good size,

and I can tell that you are circumcised

and that you have nice balls.

And, you know, that's enough
for me to feel very confident

in giving you a 7 out of 10,

and I hope that
you're happy with that rating.

7.5 out of 10.

So, excellent job.

Your rating is a solid

and quite above average 8 out of 10.

I hope that you are
super happy with that rating.

Thank you so much for being a fan,
and I hope you have

a great rest of your night,
and I'll talk to you soon in my DMs.

Operating a pornography website,
like any other social media website,

is almost like operating
a firecracker factory

and not banning smoking.

You're creating an explosive situation

for the most vulnerable members
of our population.

The bulk of Pornhub's content
was probably completely legal,

but they operate on this razor's edge,

and that's where the tremendous
danger zone for any adult site is.

So the biggest law out there right now
is the Communications Decency Act,

Section 230.

And that really just provides

that if you are
an interactive services provider,

you are not responsible in any way
for what gets published on your website.

230 has become
a complete shield of protection

for really egregious criminal activity

that even when people
are being sex trafficked,

sold, horrifically abused online,

these websites
just throw up their hands and say,

"Someone else put that on my site.
That's not my problem."

Unfortunately,
they've been very successful.

But when court after court
was denying these claims

on behalf of sex trafficking victims,
Congress responded.

They passed FOSTA-SESTA,

which is Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act
and Stop Enabling Sex Trafficking Act,

and they said 230 was never intended

to shield those who are knowingly
profiting off sex trafficking.

After FOSTA-SESTA,
there were lots of platforms that said,

"We don't wanna be responsible for this."

So you saw Craigslist
take down its personal ads

and Reddit take down
its sex work subreddit.

Because if something was missed,
if somebody was trafficked,

if somebody was actually underage,

then suddenly
they could be prosecuted, right?

And not just the owner of the platform

but the employees at the platform.

And so, there was a general silencing.

We will not be deleted!

Sex workers in general
were deplatformed across the Internet.

FOSTA-SESTA kills!

Sex workers
had to go back into situations

that are not necessarily
as safe as it was working online.

There's just crazy
amounts of numbers that, like,

33% had to go back
and face domestic violence

or go back to their pimp
and, like, 72% of us lost our income.

Lost a lot of our income.

Had our income jeopardized or censored.
Had our accounts shut down.

Not only did it make it unsafe,

it made child traffickers harder to find.

That's what that law did.
That law's still in place right now.

I was in
a Pornhub general meeting,

and the CEO said,

"What's 'SESTA-FOSTA'?"

Which was really
obviously infuriating for me,

given that they have made
their fortunes off of sex workers

and clearly did not bother to give

one ounce of interest
into their well-being.

SESTA-FOSTA really made a dent

on how sex workers
were able to market themselves online

and has influenced more censorship

on platforms like Twitter and Instagram.

It used to be a lot easier
to get new fans via social media,

but after FOSTA-SESTA was passed,

the shadowbanning got so bad
that I can't even really reliably

tell my fans that I'm on the Internet
via those websites.

I have a couple Instagram accounts.
It's very common, I have backup accounts.

But my main account, with the most number
of followers, is shadowbanned.

So no one can find me
by searching my name.

Like, if you search "Siri Dahl,"
I don't come up.

You have to know my entire username,
type it in as it appears, and hit enter,

and then it will show you my profile.

There's no way for anyone
who doesn't already follow me on Instagram

to ever discover my profile.

They must already know
that I'm on there and be following me.

And it is totally expected that
if I post a photo of me, like, in a bikini

or, like, in a tank top and a skirt,

like, anything that, like,
a non sex-worker could post on Instagram

and it would be fine, like, if I post it,
it gets flagged as soliciting.

Even if I don't put a caption
that says anything on there.

And it's not just social media.

The financial institutions
have a really impressive amount of power

over the porn industry,
to a degree that most

consumers of porn do not realize.

There's just a whole
really long laundry list

of terminology that you cannot use.

And some of it is very sensical.

A lot of it is words that
would imply any type of lack of consent.

But a lot of it is very queer phobic.
Like "fisting."

"Fisting" is not allowed. I cannot put
the word "fisting" on OnlyFans.

"Pegging" is not allowed.

It's just because
some executive at Mastercard

has a fear of things in his butt.

This increased censorship online

means that these models
have to rely again on studios,

on bigger platforms like Pornhub,
on management

to grow their audience.

If I didn't have
the stable income from OnlyFans,

I would be put back in a place
where I might have to consider

accepting shoot requests from companies
that I haven't worked for before,

that I maybe don't trust,
or I question their,

you know, their set environment.

And so, after seeing
the fallout of Pornhub

having their payment processing
capabilities banned, like...

I think me and just about
everyone I know in the industry

immediately was like, "Oh no."

"OnlyFans."

OnlyFans is a website,
which is basically built on sex,

and models and performers
have been able to charge for nude imagery.

Well, now the group says,
as of 1st October,

they are phasing out
sexually explicit content.

So after Visa and Mastercard

stopped working with Pornhub,

Mastercard came out with new regulations.

And basically it said,

"If you're going to be an adult site
that processes with us,

any piece of content that is on your site,

whether you create it
or a user uploads it,

needs to have this chain of paperwork."

Which, for the adult industry,
was something we already did.

But the regulations
that Mastercard put out were quite vague.

OnlyFans founder says, "Unfair."

Banks gave him no choice but to ban porn.

Immediately, I went into
crisis management mode

because I was like, "I don't know
where my money is gonna be coming

from one month from now."

They know that fans of OnlyFans
are only fans of one thing, right?

They have tried to model themselves
as something other,

but everybody knows
OnlyFans is a porn site. Period.

When OnlyFans got shut down,
sex workers were prepared.

- Hello.
- Hey, can you hear me?

- I can.
- That's great.

You know, we had spent months
talking with them about Section 230.

We'd spent months talking with them
about banking discrimination

and the censorship powers
of the credit card companies.

So, when OnlyFans happened,
people were ready to speak out.

Even though
a massive percentage of their platform

is made up of sex workers
and sexual content,

they almost decided
that eliminating all of that

would be more profitable
than eliminating credit card processing.

I think that if it had played out
like it played out with Pornhub,

OnlyFans wouldn't have been able
to switch back.

OnlyFans doing
a total one-eighty,

scrapping plans to ban
sexually explicit material.

The decision coming less than a week
after its original announcement.

They completely did a one-eighty and said,

"Never mind.
We're not banning adult content."

"We've suspended that rule."

Which is like,

"Okay." "That's good."

"Uh, that was a big scare.
I'm very relieved."

"But also, what the hell?"

The direct conflation
of sex trafficking and sexual exploitation

with pornography harms everybody involved.

It harms people who are looking
to consume porn in a healthy way.

And it opens up the possibility
for porn to be non-consensual,

which should not be the case.

- Hello!
- Hey, stranger.

- How are you?
- Good.

Good to see you.
Welcome to the set.

In order for it
to be pornography,

it has to be consensual.

Otherwise, it is documentation
of sexual abuse, and that's what it is.

There's no such thing
as non-consensual sex. It is rape.

There is no such thing
as non-consensual pornography.

It is rape.

Hi! Hello!

Pornography is pornography

and that has to inherently imply consent...

This is nice.

...100% of the time.

Could we take a series
that is a hot series

and can we just kind of Trojan horse
some important points of influence

into that story so that
when people watch it, they think,

"Oh man, I watched this really hot scene."

But the fact that the characters
talked about consent beforehand,

could that not be,
like, the best form of foreplay?

Is that... Does that not make
the sex so much hotter?

Welcome back to The Yes List.
We are at sequence three. Take nine.

Soft sticks. Marker.

Action.

Well, I think first I would like to tell
both of you what I'm into.

- Okay.
- Let's hear it.

I'm totally fine
with spanking or slapping,

but, um, just a little more gentle
if it's anywhere other than on my ass.

Sure.

I actually like it if I just get
a little bit of, like, a face slap.

If... If it comes...

to you in the moment, you know.

I want you to want it.

So if you want it,
we'll give it to you.

- Mm-hmm.
- Mm-hmm. Ooh! Mm-hmm.

What about you guys?

I love good sensual making out.

Um...

What about you, Wolf? What do you like?

- Mmm. You mind helping her with that?
- Keep talking.

- Okay, I got a little distracted there.
- I'm just getting hot.

That's okay. Me too.

I like this outfit.

Um...

I love kissing. I love touching.
I love my neck being played with.

Mm-hmm? Mm!

Um, I don't like to be choked.

I do like to be choked by the way.
I forgot to say that earlier.

- You do.
- I do.

- Okay.
- Mm-hmm.

- But I will not choke... No one chokes Wolf.
- No choking. No... No slapping.

If the attack on porn

continues on the path
that it's currently on, it's like...

It's not just an attack on porn,
it's an attack on women's sexuality,

it's an attack on queer sexuality,

it's an attack on people
being able to express themselves openly,

uh, especially online.

I know it's a dark demon,

our industry, but I don't think
it's as dark as they portray it.

And no one that's judging me
for what I'm doing for work

was there for me when I had my bad days.

Oh my God, I'm so excited.

- The big moment.
- Yes!

If it wasn't for porn,
like, I probably wouldn't be alive.

Thank you. Thank you.

- Cheers to Gwen!
- To Gwen!

Thank you.

I think a lot of people who were calling
for the downfall of Pornhub

didn't really realize what that meant.

I think they just wanted
the website deleted, and they thought,

"Whoo, check mark. Like, this is great.
We did it. We got rid of this material."

While I do agree that Pornhub
did not do a good enough job

of helping those victims,

the illegal content exists
on every website.

So if we are saying that
all the websites should go down,

like, that's not stopping
the videos from happening.

That's not fixing the issues.

That's just gonna keep happening
on different websites.

So it's an exhausting fight
because, realistically,

those people don't care about
the... the victims.

They just care about
getting the porn industry

to be as small as possible.
They don't want us thriving.

And now, the winners
of the 4th annual Pornhub Award.

Top BBW Performer.

Gwen Adora.

We live our lives every day
knowing that we can't do whatever we want.

My free speech and my freedom
ends where your nose begins, right?

I can't punch you in the face
because I want to,

and we understand that
in the physical world.

We need to apply that
to the Internet world.

There needs to be a carve-out
for child sexual abuse material,

the images, and the videos,

the 70,000 a day
that we get reported to NCMEC.

But at its root,
this is an Internet problem.

The fact that companies can,

with impunity,
decide not to regulate content,

can decide not to undertake
voluntary measures,

can decide not to take
customer complaints about content,

and can simply allow
this content to proliferate, right now,

with no legal ability by anybody
to seek any change in that.

And that's the Internet.
That's not Pornhub.

Can I watch you guys kiss first?

- Want us to kiss first?
- Yeah.

Fuck!

There are plenty of cultural fields
around pornography and sex

that might lead someone to say,
"You know what? This isn't my battle."

What people don't realize

is porn is traditionally
the canary in the coalmine of free speech.

And so, anytime there is a crime,
anytime a bad actor uses a platform,

it's incumbent on that platform
to look and say,

"How can we prevent this in the future?
What other things can we do?"

Oh my God.

Whoo!

It shouldn't be that we need
to shut down all communication

to prevent any crime
from ever possibly happening

because that ends a sort of free society.

Bling!

And that is officially a cut!

Well, let's have everybody take a minute.

It's been, you know,
it's been a... it's been a... a grind,

so let's have some food.

Yes.

Oh yeah.
Absolutely, guys. Thank you.