All language subtitles for 1A_07

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek Download
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:00,360 --> 00:00:06,120 The next super exciting thing on our menu would  be to throw the accent light or some pool of   2 00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:12,900 light somewhere, so it adds visual interest to  the scene. I see no reason not to use our trusty   3 00:00:12,900 --> 00:00:18,900 Blender sun lamp for that. but first let's  right click in the outliner and create a new   4 00:00:18,900 --> 00:00:27,780 collection called sun_01 then Shift A,  light and add in the sun lamp. it doesn't really   5 00:00:27,780 --> 00:00:33,900 matter where we position the sun lamp within the  scene, because it shines from the infinitely far   6 00:00:33,900 --> 00:00:39,960 away point, so I'm just moving it around, so...  so it's conveniently placed in the viewport.  7 00:00:40,740 --> 00:00:44,820 what matters though is rotation, R to rotate... 8 00:00:46,860 --> 00:00:54,060 R and Z to rotate it along the Z axis which  is probably the most useful thing to do, it   9 00:00:54,060 --> 00:00:59,460 could be useful to temporarily disable all  other light sources to concentrate purely   10 00:00:59,460 --> 00:01:06,960 on the rotation of the sun lamp, yes, indeed,  I'm sure you noticed that it is also placed   11 00:01:06,960 --> 00:01:12,900 in such way to drop the shadows towards  the camera, because why not, it just works :)   12 00:01:14,340 --> 00:01:19,920 what we can do right away is warm up the  color ever so slightly so it's closer to the   13 00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:25,860 yellowish and reddish portion of the color wheel  to simulate the evening sun or something like that,   14 00:01:26,820 --> 00:01:34,020 with our key light obviously imitating the window  in this case... okay... what about the strength? by   15 00:01:34,020 --> 00:01:40,860 default the slider goes all the way to 10 and no  further, what we can do to circumvent it is just   16 00:01:40,860 --> 00:01:50,940 click and type in any value we like, for example  50 or 25... or 55 for that matter... or 100, obviously the   17 00:01:50,940 --> 00:01:57,420 sun can be a very bright light source indeed, how  far we can push it depends on our creative goals   18 00:01:57,420 --> 00:02:04,140 in the end, but I want it to pack a punch, so I  will keep it in the higher range of strength.   19 00:02:05,820 --> 00:02:13,440 and without even noticing it, we have approached  the topics of dynamic range, exposure, light ratios   20 00:02:13,440 --> 00:02:21,120 and color management. woo-hoo! :) buckle up, it will be a five  minute detour, I promise not to bore you too much   21 00:02:21,900 --> 00:02:27,660 just a little bit :) so a quick experiment,  for you imagine that our sun lamp would   22 00:02:27,660 --> 00:02:34,600 be a terrifyingly powerful light source indeed,  peaking at a whopping thousand Watts [uu-huu]   23 00:02:35,340 --> 00:02:44,760 it's a huge ball of fire after all. alright, so what?  so now it's an enormously powerful light source   24 00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:51,960 that would overpower all other light sources  within the scene, but it got blown out. what we   25 00:02:51,960 --> 00:02:58,620 can do though to offset its brightness is to go  down to the color management tab, find the exposure   26 00:02:58,620 --> 00:03:07,740 slider and offset this slider by a few stops, by  quite a lot of stops actually. so something like -6,   27 00:03:07,740 --> 00:03:14,580 it's like setting the iso much lower in the camera, or  playing with a shutter speed for that matter,   28 00:03:16,380 --> 00:03:22,140 so the sun is no longer as nuclear as it  was before, but we have practically lost   29 00:03:22,140 --> 00:03:27,600 all other light sources by killing the  overall exposure of our virtual camera.   30 00:03:28,260 --> 00:03:35,040 so this is the basic Blender relationship  between the lighting intensity and the exposure.   31 00:03:36,360 --> 00:03:41,580 but there is also the view transform to  keep in mind. switch over to the Standard   32 00:03:41,580 --> 00:03:48,180 one and these highlights will be completely  gone off the charts, clipped at white and the   33 00:03:48,180 --> 00:03:53,760 higher you push this slider the worse  it gets. it is the way it is. it's how   34 00:03:53,760 --> 00:03:59,040 the Standard view transform in Blender treats  the highlights that are about to get clipped,   35 00:03:59,040 --> 00:04:05,100 so they get clipped. the Filmic view transform  preserves much more detail especially in   36 00:04:05,100 --> 00:04:10,500 the highlights, it is much more sophisticated  if you transform, thanks to Troy Sobotka who   37 00:04:10,500 --> 00:04:17,460 has developed this view transform and the AgX,  even newer view transform as well, check it out. 38 00:04:21,600 --> 00:04:27,840 let's do a quick exposure sweep using Standard  and Filmic look, how the Standard treats really   39 00:04:27,840 --> 00:04:33,960 intense pixels and how with Filmic we can still  see some definition within the higher range   40 00:04:34,560 --> 00:04:41,640 and the loss of data within the Standard view  transform gets even more prominent at -2 and   41 00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:48,000 when we climb all the way to zero notice how the  weird yellow coloring appears within the Standard   42 00:04:48,000 --> 00:04:55,620 view transform, especially in the higher intensity  areas, it is just weird. it's not how it should be.   43 00:04:56,400 --> 00:05:04,680 the Filmic on the other hand holds very well even  at the extreme exposures such as five. the Standard   44 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:10,020 is officially wasted by now while we still can  see some detail within the Filmic transform.   45 00:05:10,680 --> 00:05:16,740 that's the difference between those two models, the  Filmic is just better, it preserves more highlights   46 00:05:16,740 --> 00:05:24,060 it is more versatile, it is more cinematic in that  sense, more... well... filmic because its compression of   47 00:05:24,060 --> 00:05:28,620 the scene referred light values and the color  gamut roughly emulates a photographic film   48 00:05:28,620 --> 00:05:36,900 aesthetic and matches our expectations from film  emultion-like media. it was a quick detour into   49 00:05:36,900 --> 00:05:42,300 the color management settings and the relationship  between exposure and the light source intensity.   50 00:05:42,300 --> 00:05:49,320 allow me to roll it back to exposure 0, the  view transform set to Filmic (that's important)   51 00:05:49,320 --> 00:05:57,660 and within the sun settings the strength should  be set back to... what it was... 55 for example which   52 00:05:57,660 --> 00:06:03,960 is still a lot of brightness, don't get me wrong,  it still extends the dynamic range by quite a bit   53 00:06:04,860 --> 00:06:11,280 and I forgot to mention we... we still keep this  light source very sharp, like it probably should   54 00:06:11,280 --> 00:06:16,320 be, it is this sneaky ray of light that passes  through the blinds or something like that   55 00:06:16,320 --> 00:06:21,420 or through the leaves and in just a moment  we will tailor it to look just like that. 7586

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.