All language subtitles for 301 Comparison test-subtitle-en

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian Download
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:00,510 --> 00:00:05,360 In this video we're talking about how to use the comparison test for Convergence to say whether a series 2 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:07,040 converges or diverges. 3 00:00:07,250 --> 00:00:09,450 So first of all let's look at the comparison test. 4 00:00:09,560 --> 00:00:15,780 What it tells us is that if we have two series that are similar we'll call them a seven and B seven 5 00:00:16,160 --> 00:00:18,610 and if both of those series are always positive. 6 00:00:18,620 --> 00:00:21,280 So they're both always greater than zero. 7 00:00:21,380 --> 00:00:28,130 And if a 7 is always smaller than B 7 or B 7 is always larger than A. 8 00:00:28,490 --> 00:00:30,390 Then we can draw two conclusions. 9 00:00:30,530 --> 00:00:36,380 One we can say that if B 7 is convergent if we can show that piece of and converges then we can prove 10 00:00:36,380 --> 00:00:38,640 that a seben also converges. 11 00:00:38,810 --> 00:00:44,780 Or if we can prove that A7 diverges then we can also show that B-7 diverges. 12 00:00:44,810 --> 00:00:47,780 We can't draw conclusions if it's the other way around. 13 00:00:47,780 --> 00:00:54,730 In other words if we have this arrangement where a seben is smaller than B 7 if we can show that a 7 14 00:00:54,730 --> 00:00:59,750 converges it doesn't let us prove that B-7 also converges. 15 00:00:59,750 --> 00:01:02,810 And similarly if we can show that B-7 diverges. 16 00:01:02,810 --> 00:01:06,340 It doesn't let us conclude that a Subhan also diverges. 17 00:01:06,500 --> 00:01:08,680 In those cases the test is inconclusive. 18 00:01:08,690 --> 00:01:10,760 We can't do anything with that. 19 00:01:10,760 --> 00:01:16,550 So if we want to illustrate that graphically we can come down to these graphs here and what they show 20 00:01:16,670 --> 00:01:23,330 is that if we have a B sub n this here is the first conclusion we can draw here. 21 00:01:23,690 --> 00:01:28,970 And this is going to represent the second conclusion that we can come to use in the comparison series. 22 00:01:28,970 --> 00:01:35,750 So for this first conclusion if B-7 converges than A7 also converges Well we know A7 has to be smaller 23 00:01:35,750 --> 00:01:37,970 than B-7 but they're both always positive. 24 00:01:37,970 --> 00:01:40,120 So we have to stay above the x axis. 25 00:01:40,250 --> 00:01:45,860 So if B is convergent in other words if it looks something like this it's converging down toward the 26 00:01:45,860 --> 00:01:46,940 x axis. 27 00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:55,910 If a 7 has to be underneath B 7 but above the x axis then of course b 7 is going to force a seben to 28 00:01:55,910 --> 00:01:57,750 also converge. 29 00:01:57,920 --> 00:02:04,760 If A7 was divergent it would come up this way and cross B seben And we'll that's not possible because 30 00:02:04,910 --> 00:02:07,680 a subset has to be less than B 7. 31 00:02:07,700 --> 00:02:11,930 So of B-7 Convergys it's going to force a 7 to also converge. 32 00:02:11,930 --> 00:02:18,380 And then for this second conclusion here we know that if a 7 diverges obviously B-7 has to be larger 33 00:02:18,380 --> 00:02:19,400 than A-7. 34 00:02:19,400 --> 00:02:28,490 In other words it has to stay above A-7 which means A7 is going to force be 7 to also diverge if B-7 35 00:02:28,630 --> 00:02:29,450 converge. 36 00:02:29,570 --> 00:02:36,170 It would come down this way cross the graph of A7 and we know that that's not possible because B-7 always 37 00:02:36,170 --> 00:02:39,710 has to be larger than a 7. 38 00:02:39,710 --> 00:02:44,600 So how does this help us if we want to use calculus to determine the convergence or divergence of A 39 00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:45,210 Series. 40 00:02:45,320 --> 00:02:49,460 Well in this particular problem we've been given this series from N equals 1 to infinity. 41 00:02:49,460 --> 00:02:53,080 The square root of N divided by quantity and squared plus. 42 00:02:53,090 --> 00:02:59,360 And so first of all what we want to recognize is that we have this series here squared of an over and 43 00:02:59,360 --> 00:03:06,650 squared plus and this series could be a seben or it could be B-7 it depends on the comparison series 44 00:03:06,650 --> 00:03:12,050 they were able to find because the comparison series we find might always be larger than the series 45 00:03:12,170 --> 00:03:15,090 or it might always be smaller than this series. 46 00:03:15,170 --> 00:03:22,930 We just want to find a comparison series that is consistently larger than or smaller than this series. 47 00:03:22,940 --> 00:03:25,000 So how do we go about finding compar. series. 48 00:03:25,010 --> 00:03:30,470 Well when we have a rational function like this a fraction one of the easiest ways to do it is look 49 00:03:30,470 --> 00:03:36,020 at the term in the numerator that has the greatest effect on the numerator and the term in the denominator 50 00:03:36,030 --> 00:03:38,260 that has the greatest effect on the denominator. 51 00:03:38,390 --> 00:03:44,070 And just take those two terms put them into a new Fraction for the comparison series. 52 00:03:44,120 --> 00:03:50,020 So obviously in this case there's only one term in the numerator so we'll go ahead and take that term. 53 00:03:50,270 --> 00:03:54,890 And in the denominator at the end squared is going to have a greater effect on the denominator than 54 00:03:54,890 --> 00:03:59,690 just the end of the first because higher degree terms always have a greater effect than lower degree 55 00:03:59,690 --> 00:04:00,110 terms. 56 00:04:00,110 --> 00:04:02,500 So let's just take the and squared. 57 00:04:02,810 --> 00:04:07,110 We know that the square root of N is the same as any of the 1 1/2 power. 58 00:04:07,130 --> 00:04:11,200 So we can rewrite this as end of the one half divided by and squared. 59 00:04:11,570 --> 00:04:17,210 And then because we just have ended the one half in the numerator and we have end squared in the denominator 60 00:04:17,390 --> 00:04:21,350 we can say two minus one half is three halves. 61 00:04:21,350 --> 00:04:26,590 And so then we simplify what we end up with is 1 over and two the three halves. 62 00:04:26,780 --> 00:04:30,630 So this here is a potential comparison series. 63 00:04:30,650 --> 00:04:34,130 It's a similar but simplified version of our original series. 64 00:04:34,130 --> 00:04:39,320 So what we want to do now is test both of these series to see whether we can show that one is always 65 00:04:39,320 --> 00:04:40,930 going to be greater than the other. 66 00:04:40,940 --> 00:04:46,120 So let's take here squared of an over and squared plus an. 67 00:04:46,370 --> 00:04:55,250 And we'll take one over and to the three halves and what we'll do is we'll plug in a few values and 68 00:04:55,250 --> 00:04:57,170 we'll see how these series compare. 69 00:04:57,260 --> 00:05:05,560 So four and equals one 4 9 and 16 which we'll use because they're easy to find the square root of. 70 00:05:05,800 --> 00:05:10,660 We'll plug these into the original series and the comparison series so plugging unequals one into the 71 00:05:10,660 --> 00:05:11,880 original series. 72 00:05:11,890 --> 00:05:17,000 We're going to get one squared is one divided by one plus one is two. 73 00:05:17,140 --> 00:05:21,910 So we end up with one half pleading for the original series we end up with the square to four which 74 00:05:21,910 --> 00:05:29,130 is two divided by 16 plus four is twenty two over 20 gives us 1 over 10. 75 00:05:29,140 --> 00:05:36,160 Plugging 9 into the original series we get 3 divided by 81 plus nine or ninety three over 90 is going 76 00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:47,800 to be one over 30 and then plugging in 16 we get 4 divided by 16 square 256 plus 16 is 272 4 divided 77 00:05:47,800 --> 00:05:52,280 by 272 is 1 over sixty eight. 78 00:05:52,360 --> 00:05:55,130 If we plug the same values into the comparison series. 79 00:05:55,180 --> 00:06:01,090 Keep in mind that the comparison series 1 over end of the three halves we could rewrite that as one 80 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:07,930 over and to the one half which is the square root of N and then raised to the third power because we 81 00:06:07,930 --> 00:06:13,540 have ended the one half and then race to the third thats one half times three or three halves. 82 00:06:13,570 --> 00:06:19,670 So when we plug in these values one for nine and 16 we can just take the square root then cube the result 83 00:06:19,820 --> 00:06:21,250 and that will be the denominator. 84 00:06:21,340 --> 00:06:29,200 So plugging in any was one we're gonna get square to 1 is 1 1 cubed is 1 1 divided by 1 is 1 plugging 85 00:06:29,200 --> 00:06:29,840 in four. 86 00:06:29,860 --> 00:06:32,650 We're going to get square to 4 has 2 cubed is 8. 87 00:06:32,680 --> 00:06:36,130 So we end up with 1 over 8 plugging in 9. 88 00:06:36,160 --> 00:06:44,890 We get three and then cubed is 27 so 1 over 27 and plugging in 16 we get 4 cubed is 64 so we end up 89 00:06:44,890 --> 00:06:47,140 with 1 over 64. 90 00:06:47,290 --> 00:06:52,060 So the first thing we notice when we look at these terms is that all of the terms of the series are 91 00:06:52,060 --> 00:06:54,120 always going to be positive. 92 00:06:54,130 --> 00:06:56,950 We plugged in N equals 1 4 9 16. 93 00:06:57,040 --> 00:07:03,580 But if we continued plugging in N equals 25 and equals 36 or any value of n b is remember end starts 94 00:07:03,580 --> 00:07:08,170 at 1 and then we're just counting up so it's always going to be a positive value of n. 95 00:07:08,380 --> 00:07:13,660 So any positive value that we plug in we're always going to get a positive result for the term of the 96 00:07:13,660 --> 00:07:14,650 original series. 97 00:07:14,800 --> 00:07:19,630 And we're always going to get a positive result for the term of the comparison series which means both 98 00:07:19,630 --> 00:07:22,770 of these series are always going to be positive. 99 00:07:22,990 --> 00:07:27,910 Furthermore if we compare the terms of the two series together we can see that one half is less than 100 00:07:27,910 --> 00:07:28,480 one. 101 00:07:28,660 --> 00:07:36,700 One tenth is less than 1 8 1 30th is less than 1 over 27 and 1 over 68 is less than 1 over 64. 102 00:07:36,700 --> 00:07:42,940 In other words the terms of the original series are always going to be less than the terms of the comparison 103 00:07:42,940 --> 00:07:48,090 series since we want to meet this condition here for the comparison test. 104 00:07:48,100 --> 00:07:52,330 We've already shown that both of the series are positive so that meets this condition here that they 105 00:07:52,330 --> 00:07:54,550 both have to be greater than or equal to zero. 106 00:07:54,550 --> 00:07:58,350 We show that the original series was always less than the comparison series. 107 00:07:58,360 --> 00:08:03,050 So what that means is that we want this series to be the original series. 108 00:08:03,160 --> 00:08:09,910 We want this series to be the comparison series because our original series is less than the original 109 00:08:09,910 --> 00:08:11,170 series B 7. 110 00:08:11,500 --> 00:08:17,110 If we had found that the opposite was true if these terms were switched and the original series was 111 00:08:17,110 --> 00:08:23,630 always greater than the comparison series then we would want to call the Original Series B 7. 112 00:08:23,770 --> 00:08:26,100 And the comparison series a sedan. 113 00:08:26,110 --> 00:08:29,850 So just identify which terms are always smaller than the other. 114 00:08:29,920 --> 00:08:35,620 And then in your inequality here label which series should be which because a sideband is not always 115 00:08:35,620 --> 00:08:37,180 going to be the original series. 116 00:08:37,180 --> 00:08:39,560 It could be the original or comparison series. 117 00:08:39,790 --> 00:08:44,770 But in this case since the original series is always less than the comparison series we'll call the 118 00:08:44,770 --> 00:08:49,840 original series a Subban so will say the original series is a Sabahan. 119 00:08:49,840 --> 00:08:56,530 That means our comparison series then is going to be equal to when we can write this comparison series 120 00:08:56,560 --> 00:08:59,770 as some from unequals One to Infinity. 121 00:08:59,770 --> 00:09:04,780 The same as the original one since we started counting from inkwells 1 and we know that this is one 122 00:09:04,870 --> 00:09:11,580 over and two the three halves know what the comparison test we're always looking to draw a conclusion 123 00:09:11,610 --> 00:09:14,420 about the comparison series first. 124 00:09:14,430 --> 00:09:21,690 So since the comparison series is be Subhan that means we're hoping to draw conclusion one because conclusion 125 00:09:21,690 --> 00:09:24,320 one starts with the comparison series. 126 00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:30,750 So then so we're saying if B-7 converges then also converge is what we're hoping is that we can show 127 00:09:30,750 --> 00:09:32,470 that B-7 converges. 128 00:09:32,580 --> 00:09:36,290 So we look at B-7 and what we recognize is that it's a series. 129 00:09:36,300 --> 00:09:40,800 Remember a piece series is a series in the form one over and to the P.. 130 00:09:40,950 --> 00:09:51,150 If P is greater than one then this peace series converges and in our case P is equal to three halves 131 00:09:51,390 --> 00:09:54,140 and three halves is greater than 1. 132 00:09:54,150 --> 00:10:02,400 So what we can say is that B Subban Convergys by the pre-series test and then by the comparison test 133 00:10:02,760 --> 00:10:06,740 since we show that a seben and B Sabahan both greater than or equal to zero. 134 00:10:06,750 --> 00:10:13,090 Always that A7 was always going to be less than or equal to the comparison series piece had been. 135 00:10:13,290 --> 00:10:22,600 And since we showed that B-7 converges we can conclude by the comparison tests that sub also converges. 136 00:10:22,710 --> 00:10:27,880 And that's how you use the comparison test to say whether a series converges or diverges. 15285

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.