Original subtitles

>>We are accustomed to our own technology

and find it difficult to recognize that the ancients may

have had sophisticated technology of their own.

Since the technology of the ancients is not obvious to us,

are we looking in the wrong place?

Could it be they had power systems,

but they were entirely different from ours today?

[theme music]

>>Looking at the architecture of structures from ancient Egypt

stimulates a sense of wonder.

Clearly, Egyptian monuments rival the grandeur

of our most modern buildings today.

Yet, we are taught to believe that we

are the ones with knowledge of high technology, something

the ancients could not possibly have had.

>>As long as we think that the ancients weren't

able to use high technology, then we're not looking for it.

And yet, the evidence is right in front of our eyes.

>>We find megalithic sites everywhere around the world,

but there's certain things in common

that they all seem to know, and we don't know it.

>>A lot of people are trying to figure out

why mankind built these structures out

of these huge megalithic stones.

We don't even know how to move 200, 300 ton stones very

well today, let alone 4,000 or 5,000 years ago.

>>I started looking at megalithic structures

from an electromagnetic point of view,

and sure enough, I began to find that there were these energies

there present in measurable forces.

>>Strange things happen sometimes at sacred sites,

and those are clues that the physics that we're

taught in school is not everything.

>>For thousands of years, the pyramids and the Sphinx

stood as sentinels on the open desert.

Yet, in recent years, a 20-mile wall 14-feet high

was installed around the enormous site of the Giza

Plateau.

There are about 100 armed guards patrolling the pyramids

at night.

Applications for investigative academic research,

while entertained initially, are almost all routinely refused.

Unlike in times past, tourists are now

being restricted from taking photographs

in the Egyptian museum.

The monuments of Egypt are World Heritage sites.

Why is access and legitimate scientific research

being systematically restricted?

Much of ancient Egypt remains undiscovered.

Satellite images show traces of buried structures

that are still not excavated.

In the name of protecting sites, are Egyptian authorities

preventing us from learning the truth about our ancient past?

Despite strict regulations on what kind of research

is allowed, there is still an extraordinary amount

of evidence that shows that the ancient Egyptians had knowledge

that has been lost.

>>We don't have the technology to build the pyramids now.

Not even close.

We're not the most evolved we've ever been,

and that is one of the blinders that has stopped us

from imagining that the ancients could

have been far smarter than us.

>>Hakim Awyan was raised by indigenous elders who

lived in the area of the Band of Peace.

Having preserved the ancient Souf language,

stories were passed down generation after generation.

Fragments of knowledge from the ancient past

were thus preserved.

>>If my colleagues, the scholar or

learn to say that the Egyptians had a piece of rope,

put it around a block of stone at least 60 ton weight

and pulled and pushed by animals and run on wooden blocks,

this is what the scholars are saying.

>>We may never be exactly sure how the pyramids were built.

Yet, we can begin to reconstruct our understanding

of the culture living in the Golden Age and their values.

Traditional Egyptology insists that the pyramids

were built by slaves to feed the egos of kings.

Does this fit with our emerging construct

of Egypt in a golden age?

>>There is no slavery.

All workers are willingly pyramids builder.

This is a qualified people of architecture, engineers,

and they deal with all the power like cutting stones,

transfer it, and use it.

And that is clear not only in the pyramids,

and in the temple walls, and many

places you can see that clearly.

>>There are clues throughout Egypt

that point to knowledge of high technology.

A fascinating thing occurred when a chunk of stone

recently fell off a lintel at Abydos Temple,

and controversial images resembling a helicopter

and other advanced-looking vehicles

were revealed under the stone.

It would seem that the images were covered

in the distant past when things were changing politically

in Egypt.

Nowadays, Egyptian tour guides are explicitly

instructed not to point these out to tourists.

The Egyptological explanation is that it is multiple hieroglyphs

overlapping from distant kings' inscriptions.

But, like many things in Egypt, the explanation

is still debatable.

Another controversial object that Egyptologists merely

deem impossible is the artifact commonly

known as the Baghdad Battery that

generates a mild electrical charge.

Similar ancient artifacts that match these objects

have been found in Egypt.

We can't say for certain, but it would

appear that the Egyptians documented

the existence of these artifacts as well.

Recreations of these objects have been made

and have successfully created electric current.

Also noteworthy are strange representations

of objects that resemble light bulbs found in the crypts

at Dendera.

There was no natural light inside these underground

crypts, but we see no soot from torches or oil lamps,

the only lights we know the ancients used.

Could the ancient Egyptians have had

their own source of electrical power?

If nothing else, the ancients had to cut, move, and lift

massive stone blocks that would challenge our engineers today.

What was their secret?

We automatically assume that ancient structures

are for ceremonial and religious purposes.

Maybe the pyramids served a completely different function

than previously imagined.

>>There's been lots of speculation

about what the pyramids were actually built for.

The most accepted notion is that they were tombs.

>>Much more complicated situation

with the Great Pyramid than most people understand

or most people believe, including a lot

of Egyptologists who see it simply

as a tomb for the Pharoah Khufu.

>>That idea is childish for the following reason.

I mean, it's obvious.

We don't find mummies in the pyramids.

>>And, of course, not finding a single mummy

in any of the pyramids doesn't seem

to deter the people who think that that's what they were for.

>>Yes, there's something that's sometimes

referred to as a stone sarcophagus,

or coffer in it, a beautiful granite structure.

But that doesn't prove definitively in my mind

that it was ever actually used for a tomb.

It may have been used for many other purposes.

>>Pyramids were built not as a tomb.

There are some pyramids built in a different construction,

like the one in Saqqara, Step Pyramid, that is tomb.

>>Look at the obvious difference in construction

between the Step Pyramid and the Great Pyramid.

The difference in style of construction

would logically indicate they were

built in different time frames.

The buildings we know to be tombs,

like the Step Pyramid at Saqqara and the flat-topped mastabas

also at Saqqara, are very different

from the smooth-sided pyramids at Giza and Dahshur.

Typically in Egypt, older constructions

are built of larger stones, new constructions

are built of smaller stones.

Also in archaeology, older structures are deeper,

newer structures are found closer to the surface.

Every other tomb that has been found

is highly decorated with names of the occupant.

The inside of these pyramids seems solely functional

and not decorative at all.

>>But if we stop all together and say, OK,

if they weren't tombs, what were they?

>>What are the biggest structures

that modern man builds on the planet?

The biggest, most awe-inspiring structures we create

are hydroelectric dams.

Why are we willing to invest such awe-inspiring amounts

of labor and effort in constructing those?

Because we know we're going to get a very valuable

physical return in the form of electricity.

And by comparison, I wonder if the ancient megalith builders

weren't willing to invest such staggering amounts of resources

by even smaller populations because they knew that they

could get something very physical and worthwhile

back from it.

>>People are fascinated by Egyptian monuments,

and some report the energy is palpable at these sites.

Is it possible to confirm this energy

through scientific means?

>>What I've been finding the last 20 years of research,

is a lot of experiments have been

done that show that there's a certain type of energy that

does not exist in our current science.

It's unknown to our current science.

We call it subtle energy.

>>This is a whole new trend of thought

in looking at ancient structures that maybe the ancients

understood subtle energies.

>>So this appears to be a technology that

may have existed in megalithic societies.

You know, these-- these societies

that built things out of big stones.

>>It makes sense that you could motivate an entire population

to invest so heavily in building these structures, I think.

And I don't mean to say by any means

that this is the only purpose of the megaliths,

but I think it's pretty clear that it's at least one

of the primary, or one of the important purposes

for building these structures.

We find megalithic sites everywhere around the world,

and there-- there's a tendency to make circles

or certain types of formations.

>>Megalithic sites occur all over the world.

Is their placement random?

Or does the location of these sites

reveal yet another hidden layer of ancient knowledge?

>>One thing I found looking at different megalithic structures

over a few continents in numerous places

around the world, overwhelmingly, these places,

the pyramids, the Stonehenges, et cetera of the world

were placed on ground where an unusual type of geology

naturally concentrates the regular daily natural

electromagnetic fluctuations that occur everywhere

on the Earth each day.

>>You go into England, for example, the ley lines that

cross England, the Michael line, which is hundreds of miles long

that crosses England, that carries

this energy along that line.

>>It will therefore generate electric currents

in the land, called telluric currents

in the straight geological sense of that word,

and those occur everywhere on the planet.

>>But we know that this ley energy, this subtle energy

passes along these lines.

>>There are certain special types of geology

that will magnify those several fold.

And that's where we found the megalith builders preferred

to put their-- their monuments.

>>And typically where the lines cross,

where you get more than one line intersecting,

temples were often built.

>>These are called conductivity discontinuities, which

sounds highly technical, but it's merely

the place where one area of ground that has a good ability

to conduct electricity meets another area of ground that

has a lesser ability to conduct these natural electric

currents.

>>The Chinese had the same tradition.

They called them dragon lines.

It was illegal for a commoner to be buried on such a line.

A king had to be buried on such a line.

They put the palaces there.

There's a whole series of sacred sites.

They're always built on lines like this.

>>I want to say in this area about the location of temple.

You have to have a symbols appear on the ground.

When it's seen, then this is the place where people naturally

come to get more healthy energy from that spot.

You know, energy perhaps from the Earth.

>>And it appears as though they were attempting

to control the flow of this energy

and use it for their own purposes.

>>The key hours, unfortunately, are the predawn hours.

If you really want to study this,

you've got to get up at 3:00 and get out there very fast.

That's because the-- the energy that's

involved in these sites that's really fueling most of it

originates with the daily changes in the Earth's

geomagnetic field.

Its strongest during the day, weakest at night.

And in the hours leading up to dawn,

the weaker field lines now come roaring

back to closer to full strength very quick.

It's the most dramatic time in terms

of change of magnetic strengths per hour,

it's the most dramatic time of the day.

And wherever you have a changing magnetic field occurring,

you are generating electric current

in anything present that will conduct electricity.

It's a simple principle of physics known as induction,

and it's a universal.

>>Normally in everyday life, we don't ever

see large concentrations of this energy.

Normally it'll show up at the mountaintops, at sacred sites.

You'll feel a certain calm, a certain peace.

Sometimes people in those places report mystical experiences.

They'll see into some other dimension.

OK, they'll see into some other time.

The Chinese have known about this for a long time,

and they call it Chi.

The Hindus in their ancient texts call it prana.

And the Yogis, with the maintain of range and tradition, use it.

It affects a-- a variety of different processes,

electricity, magnetism has a strong effect on that.

So it modifies all the other laws of physics.

When you look back on how sacred sites were chosen

and buildings like the pyramids were-- were constructed,

the suspicion arises that they understood

quite a bit more about this stuff than we do.

And they may have been using it in their engineering.

>>Then, the megalith builders designed these structures

and then built them in such a way as

to further concentrate those energies.

So they definitely seem to have known what they were doing.

>>We are not used to things built out

of stone being high technology.

It is clear that several different kinds

of stone from a variety of sources

were used to construct Egyptian monuments.

Did the distinct qualities of the stone

serve a special purpose?

>>What I do find fascinating is that the core of the pyramids,

at least at Giza, are made out of one type of limestone.

Now, it is the limestone that was closest,

but it also happens to be the type that's called dolomite

because it's got a high magnesium content.

And because of that metal content, that kind of limestone

conducts electricity pretty well.

And then they chose to sheath the pyramid in the wider Tura

limestone, which granted it's wider

and it's prettier and all that; but it's also

has almost zero magnesium content.

And therefore, it's a much poorer conductor

of electricity.

It's closer to a pure calcium carbonate,

which is what all limestone is.

And pure calcium carbonate conducts electricity

much more poorly than dolomite does.

It's interesting to me that those outer stones

were the ones that they cut so precisely

that all these thousands of years later

you still can't get a razor blade between them.

Because basically, what we've got here

is we've got a situation with a highly electrically conductive

core of those pyramids wrapped in what is effectively

a very effective insulator.

Why the granite in the passageways, you know?

And so, of course, I'm thinking from an electrical point

of view and a physical point of view,

is there anything special about granite?

And yeah, there is.

Granite is slightly radioactive and it

will ionize, or electrify, the air.

It releases radon gas, which is radioactive.

>>Granite is a transmission stone.

It's not dead stone, it's alive.

>>So, you have these sealed shafts with granite linings

and I wonder if it wasn't designed

to keep an electrical charge present in those shafts.

They were built exactly like, if you will, an insulated wire.

Only more so, because you've got all the charge

in the ground, that's spread across the base,

concentrated all the way up into this tiny spot at the top.

>>We find similarities in three different constructions.

The one at Giza, Valley Temple, and one at Abydos,

and another one abroad in England,

the Stonehenge, the same material

being constructed with, and same way, and same technique.

But the construction there, it's built in addition

to have the water because it's water bed-- it's a huge water

bed and it's still working, still producing water.

>>In Egypt, you do have a similar situation to England

in that you have limestone aquifers under the monuments.

>>An aquifer is an underground layer

of porous water-bearing rock.

Water flows through the aquifers as rainfall.

Or when rivers and lakes flood, the water drains into them.

>>And movement of water through limestone or chalk aquifers

is known to produce electrical charge

by two different processes that are self-reinforcing.

And I've personally measured this for a week

at a stretch at Solsbury Hill in England, for example.

Right before and after thunderstorms

as the water is sinking into the ground,

we measured the increase in ground current,

the change in the magnetic field as that happened, et cetera.

And in Egypt, you had the Nile crashing, you know,

dropping every year and then flooding again.

And that movement of water up and down through the layers

of limestone would generate electrical charge.

Flowing water generates a-- at least a mild electrical charge,

which means it generates an electric current, which

means it generates a magnetic field as well.

So if you were looking to give an electrical charge

a little boost to say a mound or something like that,

it makes a lot of sense to have at a minimum running water.

And, in fact, at Tiwanaku on the south shore of Lake Titicaca,

their biggest monument, the Akapana Pyramid,

was terraced in such a way as to have the water come down

in waterfalls that alternated outside the pyramid,

inside the pyramid.

But that kind of falling water generates

enough electric charge that one of the common school physics

experiments is you can in your own sink at home,

if you can divide the stream of water coming out of your faucet

into two separate streams, you can take a little LED indicator

light and put it between the streams

and it'll generate enough electricity that maybe every 20

seconds or so the-- the light bulb will come on.

And then the question is, did some

of those layers of limestone run up to the Giza Plateau?

And they did, and they did come up

to the surface underneath where some of the pyramids

are located.

The idea would be that-- that it would be the rising and falling

of the Nile that would produce this electric ground

current by moving through the different layers

of the limestone aquifer.

And when there was a dip, say, in that supply,

maybe that's when the ionized air in the granite shafts

and galleries could help keep the process going, if you will.

I tend to wonder if the electrified shafts might not

have been able to act in a similar fashion

to your car battery when you come to a stoplight.

Normally, your battery is not being

used when you're driving your car,

the alternator provides all the juice.

But when you stop and that alternator

is turning very weakly, that's when you want the battery there

to keep everything going so your engine doesn't cut out.

So you've got this concentration of negative charge

from the ground at the peak of the pyramid or mound,

and a concentration of positive charge above it.

And if those two become strong enough,

you can start to get brush discharge, which

would mean it would glow like a ball lightning for example.

It's a theory.

>>Why in the Great Pyramid is there no frescoes,

there's nothing, no decorations at all.

Now, some people have proposed the idea

that the pyramids are actually energy machines.

And so, I liken this to the fact,

like, you wouldn't put a decoration inside your oven.

>>I was talking with a woman who had

spent some time in the Great Pyramid,

and her comment was, it felt like I was in a machine.

She said it was not like this, oh, it's a wonderful shrine.

She said it felt very functional.

In fact, she made a comment that I actually

think is probably right on.

She said, I felt as if I wouldn't

have wanted to be in here when it was running.

>>Invisible, subtle energy occurs around us all the time

and is measurable by science.

>>We had noticed a lot of people showing us

photographs from megalithic sites

that disproportionately often seemed

to have these balls of light in there, usually flash photos.

>>Orbs are often written off as dust or other particles

in the air.

But that does not change the fact

that they seem to occur more often

in particular places at particular times.

>>At Tikal, at the top of the most energetic pyramid that we

found down there, uh, we took a lot of flash photos

during the course of our eight-hour stakeouts,

which would run from roughly 3:00 AM till 11:00 AM.

And on the pyramids that were electrically dead,

that had no juice, nothing going on,

which were the big fancy ones, but the most recently

built ones, uh, there-- we would take photos and find out

eventually when they were developed

no orbs, no glowing balls of light.

But on the oldest pyramid down there,

where we did work and got all kinds of results,

that was 1,200 years older than the big fancier ones,

in that case, the-- the photography we got back

from our own simple flash cameras,

uh, they were literally choking the screen with these balls

at the period at which the air was

highest in electrical charge.

And on that-- the strongest day down there,

I was recording electrical charge higher

than I've recorded even in thunderstorms back home.

We don't know what orbs are, but we-- our personal guess

is that they're balls of ionized or electrified air

that will tend to hang together.

Uh, a good analogy would be ball lightening,

where it's simply so electrified that the molecules are

excited enough to glow.

>>Other evidence shows that there

is energy occurring naturally everywhere

on the planet that our science knows about, but seems

to ignore.

Nikola Tesla sought to provide the world with free wireless

electricity for everybody on Earth.

He discovered that electricity occurred naturally

throughout the Earth's atmosphere and ground,

the telluric currents in the ground

that John Burke discussed and the electricity

present in the ionosphere and the atmosphere, which

is ionized by the sun.

He also created and developed ways to harness those energies.

>>Tesla.

Who teach Nikola Tesla to get to that power of electricity?

And he-- he-- he-- he didn't invent it, it's already there,

but he know how to use it.

And not only that, he did not take an advantage

like Mr. Edison.

>>Tesla wanted to harness the natural energy that

exists everywhere on Earth and make it free to the public.

Edison endeavored to produce and distribute electricity

by creating a regulated monopoly for profit.

>>He become rich, and the people more light into their home.

So Nikola Tesla, he's the one think

of how to use this energy.

>>Between 1901 and 1917, the Tesla Tower

was built on Long Island as a wireless broadcasting

system for telephone and electrical signals.

Interestingly, it was constructed on an aquifer

with descending passageways and tunnels beneath it.

At the time, few understood how it worked.

Tesla's funding was ultimately dropped by JP Morgan

because Tesla wanted the wireless electricity

to be free, and therefore, JP Morgan couldn't make a profit.

So even though Tesla's genius was seen by many,

he was still driven into obscurity.

The energy to create free wireless energy

has always existed on our planet, and still exists today.

>>And it's not only energy on our planet that's plenty.

The rivers are flow by energy.

A tsunami is energy.

Frequencies are energy.

If we have the electricity now, it's based on explosion energy.

Now, the sound energy based on technology

different from the explosion energy,

and it's known as implosion energy.

>>This energy was not the kind of energy

that we have that pollutes.

It was a completely passive energy that had no by-products.

>>The energy we use today is generated by combustion

and is non-renewable.

It is called explosion energy and leaves

exhaust and pollution.

>>Our system all over the planet today

is based on the explosion energy.

That's why the petrol is so expensive.

>>In contrast, implosion energy like solar panels and wind

power, is clean and renewable.

We are beginning to realize that we need sustainable energy.

>>Implosion energy, very simple.

All what you need is the beam of the sun on a running water.

Not just running in a straight line, but in a zig-zag.

And that-- you'll find all the tunnels

are in a zig-zag form for such a purpose.

>>In addition to the limestone aquifers

underneath the pyramids, there is

evidence of a network of man-made tunnels.

>>As a boy, when I'm living in my house, which

is a few hundred yards away from the nose

of what we call the Sphinx, this was my playing yard.

And I know the tunnels.

I walked in these tunnels.

I swim in these tunnels.

I crawled in these tunnels.

And I know that this is one way of creating energy.

Now, this is costs nothing.

I mean, all what you need is a beam

of the sun reaching the running water underneath the tunnel,

and you can see that there are many openings in each tunnel

to admit this beam-- sunbeam reach the water.

And when it does, then the energy is there.

Energy is not just to run your car,

it's run the people, feed the people.

>>If the pyramid fields of the Band of Peace

and the network of underground tunnels are still there,

why don't they generate energy the way they used to?

>>In the condition of the pyramids

now, stripped of those smooth insulating outer casings,

it's going to leak electrical air about

as well as a car radiator radiates heat.

I mean, it's almost perfectly designed to weaken that.

And yet still, you get these reports of people

like Siemens, who was one of the pioneers of electricity,

and in-- he was an Englishman.

There's even a unit of electrical,

I believe, resistance named after him, called the Siemens.

He was on top of the Great Pyramid,

I think during the 1880s, and they

began to notice that when his Arab guide stood up and spread

his fingers, they'd hear a ringing.

And, um, when he closed them, you wouldn't.

And he stood up, and I guess he could

sense the literal electricity in the air, and on the spot,

he improvised an instant Leyden jar, which

is one of the earliest things they used

to use to store electric charge.

And he did it by opening a wine bottle, wetting some newspaper,

wrapping the wet newspaper around the glass wine bottle

and holding the wine bottle up above his head

until sparks started to issue from the wine bottle.

And at that point, his Arab guide

started calling-- accusing him of things like witchcraft.

They got into a physical struggle,

and he accidentally touched one of the guides

with the charged wine bottle and it knocked the man

to the ground and unconscious for a short period, after which

they took off down the pyramid.

But there was, in other words, a professional scientist

familiar with electricity in its rudimentary but accurate forms

sensing exactly that, even in this ruined condition

that the pyramid's in today, yeah.

>>If you come to the Egyptian Museum,

there is an item over there known as the Schist Disc found

by Dr. Walter Emery, and he said,

or he think that this could be a vase for a lotus flower.

No.

>>The Schist Disc was founded at Saqqara in a burial chamber

that no one is allowed to visit.

Other goods found in the chamber were simple ropes, pottery,

and grains.

The disc shows clear evidence of sophisticated technology

in the way it was built, and it seems out

of context with the rest of the grave goods.

Is this the original context for this artifact?

Or is it possible that it has had

a long journey over the last several millennia

and this just happened to be its final resting place?

Look at this hollow stone tube.

It looks as though the Schist Disc could fit over it.

It would take sophisticated instruments

to shape the tube so precisely.

How did they do it?

>>To cut the stone, this is by a sonic cut

with no metal instruments like a bronze chisel or this, no.

It's another stone and this other stone,

it's hard, hardest stone you can find, which is the diamond.

>>There are pieces of stone lying around

that show concave shapes that actually

have the machine tooling marks on it.

The evidence of the high technology

is right in front of us.

>>Look again at these quartz objects.

Aside from their unique and amazing shapes,

could they have had another purpose?

Today, quartz crystal is used as the basis

of all kinds of modern technology.

It is most commonly used in crystal oscillators.

Technology uses oscillating frequencies from tiny quartz

crystals that vibrate at certain speeds

with a signature vibration for each device.

AM-FM radios, CDs, and DVDs, computer processors,

and ethernet rely on quartz crystals.

Could it be that the ancients were

tapping into this technology and using it

on a much larger scale in a way we can only begin to imagine?

Of course, we can't say for certain,

but based on what we've seen, we can theorize.

Energy can be created and manipulated in many ways.

It is the lifeblood of a civilization,

and therefore, an important resource.

>>In Egypt, there are 67 constructions all

along the Nile like sails.

And for those who has the eye, they

can tell from the shape of that construction, the straight form

of angles that is a pyramid or a construction for energy,

a plant for energy.

That's what you have.

>>A theory that's always struck me,

that they were intended actually to somehow

or another spiritualize a whole civilization.

In other words, to provide a widespread high level of energy

that people needed because the descending age was upon them.

>>And I believe what the pyramid and other cert-- certain other

structures were constructed for was to basically act

as a kind of-- the equivalent of a street light.

You know, if you're in a neighborhood that's maybe

not the nicest neighborhood and, you know,

it gets dark at night, you like to have bright lights go on.

And that's effectively what the Great Pyramid was.

Now, these were not lights that illuminated it

so that people could see where they were going.

It was basically a device, a generator for, if you will,

broadcasting and transmitting throughout the planetary

structure a type of field which uplifted the entire humanity.

>>And maybe those pyramids were built in some sense or another

to, to stay the decline.

Let's call them, in some sense or another,

spiritual granaries, designed to somehow store

an emotional or spiritual or psychological

or some sort of energy that was needed to keep people

from becoming the total barbarians

that they subsequently became.

>>We had the ability to basically prop up humanity

for a while using this system, but what we saw

was the-- the street light eventually went out.

>>The original knowledge got lost,

and the later builders were building them out of ego.

They were monuments to the king, if you will.

But they were no longer engines that

could help feed their people.

>>Catastrophes around the world damaged or, if you will,

decommissioned some of these sites.

So some of them went offline, just like a power plant

going offline.

>>I tend to wonder if the few people who

knew the secrets to the energy connection with those pyramids

didn't die off.

If it was a thin chain of, for example,

a shaman to his apprentice, and if the wrong people get killed

at the right time, that chain is broken,

that knowledge gets lost.

>>As long as we think we are more advanced than we've ever

been, we are blind to technology based on subtle energies.

>>It's not fair also.

It's not fair to deny what you can see and touch

by your own hand.

This is only the technique, and we have that technique still,

but nobody wants to listen!

[theme music]