All language subtitles for Cosmic Disclosure S2E13 Viewer Questions Part 1

[theme music]

>>DAVID WILCOCK: All right,
welcome to "Cosmic Disclosure."

I'm your host, David Wilcock.

I'm here with Corey Goode,
and we are discussing

the Secret Space Program.

And in this episode
I have a printout

of questions that you've
submitted in the comment

forums in the areas that we have
at the bottom of each episode.

We are reading them.

We are interested in
what you have to say,

and we do want to try to keep
this as a community discussion

and not just as something
that is relegated

to whatever I can
think of to ask him

in any particular episode.

So this is kind of a grab bag.

We're going to have a series
of different things to discuss,

and we'll see where it goes.

So Corey, welcome to the show.

>>COREY GOODE: Thank you.

>>DAVID: OK, so
the first question

we have is from banjoman1437.

When they say that our local
star cluster is emerging

into a higher vibrational
place, do they

mean that physically our
star cluster is emerging

into a part of the
galaxy where there

are inherent higher vibrations?

Or do they mean that
we are ascending

from third and fourth
densities to fifth and sixth,

which would be more of
a holographic approach

to the sense of
place and location?

>>GOODE: That was quite
a loaded question.

But what I have
discussed is yes,

from the center of the
galaxy there are constantly

a whole array of rays,
different types of energies that

are constantly
ebbing and flowing

from the center of the
galaxy that are buffeting

the Earth and the solar system.

>>DAVID: The
conventional science

says the center of the
galaxy is a black hole,

but then you can't see it.

They say, oh, it's hiding
behind that giant star

cluster in the middle.

>>GOODE: Right.

But as we know, the galaxy
is a giant torsion field.

And it has pretty
much an ecliptic plane

with part of the field,
like a north and south,

different fields turning
in different directions.

>>DAVID: Counter-rotating.

>>GOODE: Counter-rotating.

>>DAVID: Well now,
I did document

in "The Source Field" book
that there are actually

two types of stars
in the galaxy,

and that they do counter-rotate.

There's one type
that's going clockwise,

and the other type's
going counterclockwise.

And science acknowledges
that, but then

they never explain why that's
happening or what that is.

So that validates
what you're saying.

It's not like this is something
you can only hear about

in the Space Program.

>>GOODE: Right.

A lot of this information is
out there on the internet.

And we're rotating around,
inside this giant torsion

field, our solar system
and local star cluster,

as they mentioned.

And we're entering in a
different part of our galaxy,

and we have been since
at least the 1930s, that

have clouds of high density,
high energetic particles.

And when we're getting deeper
and deeper into these bands

of giant nebula-type clouds
of high energy particles

and as our stars' field
interacts with those energies,

it's bringing those
energies into the star

through its torsion
field energy field,

and that energy feeds out
through the planet's feedback

through the cosmic web
effect that we've discussed.

>>DAVID: Right.

>>GOODE: So I hope that
somewhat answers the question.

>>DAVID: Now, you also
said in the interview

that you did with
"In5D," Greg Prescott,

that the people in
the Space Program

had gone out and
sampled that cloud.

So could you tell us that
story because that has never

been put on the show?

And I was blown away
when you said that.

>>GOODE: They for
a long time had

been flying
interstellar vessels out

to do telemetry on these clouds,
the larger, more energetic ones

that we're heading towards.

And in doing so they learned
a lot about the spectrums

of them, the information
about them, and they

had some incidents of the
craft people having bad things

happening to the people.

I'm not exactly sure what
all happened to them.

>>DAVID: So they
flew into the cloud?

>>GOODE: I think the
field of the cloud, them

just being close
enough to the cloud.

They weren't shielded
like we would be on Earth

and in our solar system
with the protective fields

we have around us.

>>DAVID: I do want to point
out that NASA has openly

acknowledged that we're moving
into something they call

"local fluff," which is cloudy.

So they've acknowledged
it, but they don't ever

say that it's going
to do anything.

>>GOODE: And we've been moving
into small ribbons of it

since at least the '30s.

>>DAVID: Right.

So people get into
the energy fields,

and then they have
behavioral problems?

>>GOODE: Behavioral
and psychotic problems.

>>DAVID: Really?

>>GOODE: Right.

And they were even testing these
frequencies and energy fields

that they were encountering,
and these cloud

ribbons that we're heading
into on unsuspecting people

on research vessels, and
also certain stations

that they had that they
were doing testing.

They would tell people they
were doing one thing while

secretly, unbeknownst to them,
exposing them to the energy.

>>DAVID: Very unethical stuff.

>>GOODE: Oh yeah.

>>DAVID: You had said
in the radio show

that people would
be zapped with this.

They'd create a semblance of
the energy, a simulacra of it,

in the lab and zap
people in the lab?

>>GOODE: Yeah.

>>DAVID: And what
happened to those people?

>>GOODE: It would mostly
depend on the-- it varied

on the polarity of the
person, what kind of a person

they were.

If they were one of those
soldier psychotic types,

they would have a
psychotic breakdown.

If they had underlying
mental illness problems,

they would become pronounced.

>>DAVID: To address the
rest of banjoman's question

here, why does everybody want
to skip over fourth density

and jump right to five?

We're in third now.

You don't get to
hopscotch two at a time.

Why do people say
5D all the time?

What do you think
is going on there?

>>GOODE: How do we know
how it works, to be honest?

>>DAVID: So did you hear terms
like the fourth, fifth density

in the Space Program?

>>GOODE: Yes.

>>DAVID: You did?

>>GOODE: Yeah.

We could be
transitional right now.

We could be third,
fourth density right now.

A lot of it depends
on belief systems

and that kind of a thing.

When you start talking about
what density we're going into,

how it's going to happen--
when it comes down to it,

we really don't know.

We're just going to have to ride
the ride and see what happens.

>>DAVID: So the
core of the question

was, is this sort of a
holographic thing that

doesn't matter where
you're positioned,

or is it position dependent?

And you're saying that based
on everything that you heard,

it is position dependent.

We are moving into a physical
location of fluffy energy

clouds.

>>GOODE: That is what
is occurring locally

with us right now.

>>DAVID: OK, cool.

The next one that we have is
from dumitru, D-U-M-I-T-R-U.

How will we know when these
high-energy waves are hitting

the planet?

>>GOODE: Well, like
I said, they've

been hitting the solar system
since at least the '30s.

So they're hitting.

They've been hitting.

And they come in sort
of waves or patches.

>>DAVID: Would there be an
observable solar effect,

like a solar coronal mass
ejection or solar particle

emissions-- that kind of stuff?

>>GOODE: I'm told
that there are things

that are observable from the sun
that are energetic but are not

something that you're
going to see in SOHO data.

But on the Earth,
for us, I would

suggest being a people watcher.

You're going to
feel it yourself.

People around you, you can
tell by the way they're acting.

But as a synergy
has come in, I mean,

I've seen people that
have become triggered

in different ways and
people that are showing

their polarity, showing
what they're made of,

more than any other time.

>>DAVID: And remember,
gravity was working just fine

before the apple
fell on Newton's head

and he said, oh, there
must be a force doing that.

You don't see anything
coming out of a magnet

when it's going to go stick
onto the refrigerator.

So these are energetic waves.

It's not like maybe in
his mind he was wondering

if there was some sort of
starry-looking clouds of energy

that just starts sprinkling
into the atmosphere.

>>GOODE: Well, at
some point it's

expected to be so strong
there will be like aurora

borealis, the peak of it.

>>DAVID: The big surge could
have a very detrimental effect

on the electrical grid.

>>GOODE: Right.

>>DAVID: Were there plans
within the Space Program?

Were they expecting that
electricity would not

be functioning the
way that it does now,

that machines would
have to be redone

after this shift takes place?

>>GOODE: Yes.

Some operational stuff
they plan on taking

an advantage of that time
period for several things.

>>DAVID: Right on.

We pretty much answered this.

The diffusion thing, I think,
is just a way of him saying,

is it going to look
like something or not?

And it's mostly invisible
up until the big moment.

OK, now we have susanonbay.

And this is controversial.

When the astronauts actually
landed on the moon in 1969,

didn't they see any signs
of other life on the moon

if it was so inhabited
at that time?

Did Neil Armstrong know
that something was going on,

or did he go to
his grave believing

that he was the first
man to step on the moon?

Now, there's a lot of
stuff that she might not

be aware of that
others have done

to help answer that question.

But again, the focus here is
on what you know personally,

what you encountered
personally, in your days

in the Space Program and
with the Alliance now.

>>GOODE: I don't know what
these astronauts knew.

It has always been
from the beginning,

and even now, common for
astronauts to be blank slated.

>>DAVID: Really?

Even NASA astronauts
were getting blankslated?

>>GOODE: Yeah.

>>DAVID: Really?

>>GOODE: So there might be
stuff that some of them have--

>>DAVID: And for those who
don't know what blankslating is,

could you just briefly explain?

>>GOODE: They used to
do it through chemicals,

but now they can do it
electronically with fields--

affect your memory and
give you a screen memory.

>>DAVID: OK.

>>GOODE: I can't really
speak for what they remember.

>>DAVID: Well, let's toss
out a couple data points.

Number one, Neil
Armstrong totally

shunned public
appearances-- did not

want to go talk to any crowds.

There are quotes of him saying
that he felt like they were all

used, that they were duped.

He became a severe alcoholic.

He basically drank
himself to death.

And there are reports that he
saw a domed or rounded craft

on the edge of a crater when
they had the first Apollo

landing and he was the
first one to walk out there,

and that he was
basically saying,

somebody else has
been here before us.

So did you ever hear
about that in your work

on the inside, that event?

>>GOODE: Well, yeah.

I heard that the astronauts
did go up to the moon,

that they didn't pick
a good place to land.

[laughter]

It's a very diplomatically
split up piece of real estate.

They further angered people when
they smashed a command module

or something into the
moon like a missile,

and they were asked
not to come back.

[laughter]

>>DAVID: Really?

>>GOODE: That's what
I read and was told.

I don't know if all of the
landings really happened

or if they did a landing,
screwed it up so bad.

But they continued
to do fly arounds,

and there definitely were
quite a bit of photographs

and reports of what
they photographed

on the surface of the moon.

>>DAVID: Well,
there's a lot of data.

And obviously,
this is not really

your bailiwick as much as
others who have studied this,

but the astronauts
had a code apparently

that was "Santa Claus" for
extraterrestrial activity.

And they come around
the backside of the moon

and they go back
into radio range,

and then they say, ladies
and gentlemen of America,

I am happy to announce that
there is a Santa Claus.

And that was live, and it really
kind of freaked people out.

Why did he say that?

What's going on there?

>>GOODE: All astronauts have
seen something flying around

out in space.

>>DAVID: Our
director, Jay Weidner,

he is sort of the Grand
Poobah of lunar landing hoax.

And his evidence is
absolutely compelling,

that there was apparently a set
also built in which it could

appear that they were on the
moon but they really weren't.

And it appears that
the director Stanley

Kubrick was involved
with that after his work

in the movie "2001."

Did you encounter
any direct knowledge

about that, that they had the
opportunity to do a set as well

as landing on the actual moon?

>>GOODE: I know they
landed on the moon,

but I wouldn't put
it past them at all.

They do that type of
Hollywood deception kind

of stuff, even up
until present time.

It wouldn't surprise me.

>>DAVID: Well, the
insider Henry Deacon,

who has incredible amounts of
overlap with his Space Program

background as
yours, although you

seem to have experienced
aspects of it

that he never came in contact
with, he did tell me that they

built a set on Earth as well
as doing the actual moon

missions because they were
in a race with the Russians

to get to the moon.

They did not want it to fail.

They had to fake that it
succeeded, even if it did fail,

so they wouldn't lose
that publicity war.

And he also said that the
radiation was spiking so much

on the moon's surface that a lot
of the footage that they tried

to shoot out there was unusable
because the radiation would

overexpose the film.

So by having a set that
was local here on Earth,

they could conveniently mock up
what was happening out there.

So we do have insider
testimony that I've personally

had-- I've vetted out these
people's credentials--

confirming that the moon
landings did happen,

and that they were faked.

And this is one of the things
that skeptics have attacked

Jay for, which is not fair.

He's not saying that
nobody landed on the moon.

It was both.

That appears to
be what happened.

>>GOODE: I would buy that.

I would at least
look at it closely.

>>DAVID: Well, it's
the government, right?

They always want to
have a backup plan.

They don't want
to be embarrassed.

They didn't know if
this was going to work.

They're sending
these guys up there

with crappy technology
that was way behind what

they were actually using.

And let's not forget that
NASA, in the 1957 charter--

this is the Richard C.
Hoagland stuff now--

NASA was chartered as a defense
agency in the United States

government that could
classify information deemed

inimical to national security.

>>GOODE: All images go through
the NSA before they hit us.

>>DAVID: That I did not know.

All right, the next question
is from a user named-- well,

this is probably not his
real name-- manticore.

And here we go.

Corey, you mentioned that
the Lunar Operations Command,

or LOC, may have been started by
the Nazis during World War II.

I think it was actually
pre-World War II.

I'm curious, if they
developed the ability

to travel to the moon
during World War II,

wouldn't they have had the
technology to win the war?

Putting it differently,
how could they

have developed the technology
to travel to the moon,

or were they helped by the
Alliance or some other group?

Well, those are really
two different questions,

so let's come back
to the second one.

We'll start with
the first one, which

would be if the Nazis
developed the ability

to travel to the moon
during World War II,

wouldn't they have also had the
technology to win World War II?

>>GOODE: Well, you can
look at it two ways.

Maybe they just changed tactics,
and they did win World War II.

>>DAVID: Depending on
how you look at it.

>>GOODE: They went
to a high-tech,

instead of a blunt
force war of attrition

that they were
losing, and moving

into a horrific
technological war.

They developed high technology,
a breakaway civilization

that was mostly made up
of secret societies that

predated the Nazis
hundreds of years at least.

And these societies later
on infiltrated the West

and took over the military
industrial complex--

later on took over the
governments and the banking

anyway.

So I really don't see
how they lost in the end.

>>DAVID: Wouldn't you
also argue that if they

used this advanced technology
in the war too much,

it would tip off to
the world that they

had it, which could
then compromise

their operational security?

>>GOODE: Yes.

And they had developed
a breakaway civilization

that they were wanting
to keep secret,

and they also had an interest
in keeping things status quo,

keeping the Babylonian
money magic system in place,

being able to
manipulate the world

as it was while they had their
own breakaway civilization that

had advanced technology.

And they had high plans on
colonizing the solar system,

and they needed the
industrial might of the West.

So they found a way of making
their enemy their tool.

>>DAVID: Wouldn't you
also say that it's

almost like a magic trick, where
the magician has his hand up

here, but at the same
time he's reached

into his pocket
for the next trick?

>>GOODE: Diversion.

>>DAVID: It appears
that they lost,

but hey, they've got this
awesome base in Antarctica.

They've got this awesome
base on the moon.

They're starting to build
awesome bases on Mars.

So did they really
lose in their mind,

if they have these
platforms to work off of?

OK, so let's go to the second
part of the question then.

To put it differently,
how could they

have developed the technology
to travel to the moon,

or were they helped by the
Alliance-- which didn't really

exist at that point--
or some other group?

>>GOODE: The Germans were
brilliant and already

well ahead, and their
scientists weren't doing what

the Western scientists were.

A lot of their scientists
were from the Thule Society

and these other groups,
and they didn't rule out

the supernatural and only
stick to the quantifiable,

like Western science does.

And they were getting
better results.

Not only that, they were
doing major expeditions

because they believed
in ancient aliens

and ancient civilizations
of Earth that were advanced

and had advanced technology,
and they were looking seriously

into that past and were
finding manuscripts

that gave detailed
information on how

to reconstruct that technology.

So they were getting
pretty far on their own.

>>DAVID: Well, apparently
they didn't just

believe in inner
Earth civilizations.

They made contact with
them, which we've discussed.

>>GOODE: Right.

They were also doing quite
a bit of, a lot of people

call it channeling,
but they were

doing a lot of broadcasting
out into the cosmos,

trying to make
contact with beings.

And they did make contact
with inner Earth beings

and some of these negative
non-terrestrial beings,

and they received
help from both.

>>DAVID: Let's take
the next question.

And this is from alisback.

I would like to know where
these people came from that

are in these colonies.

Are these all the people
that were on the side of milk

cartons?

[chuckles]

>>GOODE: Most of
these people have

been on these colonies
for generations now.

There were, what
we've talked about,

the brain drain that occurred
across the world, where they

took scientists, engineers--
people from all everything

that you would need to have a
new society colony-- offered

them positions, and in
some cases, just took them.

There were a couple waves.

>>DAVID: Well,
Peterson's data was

that it started in the 1950s
and that in those early years,

'50s and '60s, it amounted
to 60 million people,

and that they cherry-picked
the best and the brightest

scientific minds from all the
different nations of the world,

and these people were just
told they were going abroad.

And they also seemed
to preferentially pick

people who had very few
friends or social interactions.

You'd have to write a bunch
of postcards before you went,

and then they'd send
them out over an interval

of several years'
time so that people

got the sense that you
were gradually fading out

of contact with them.

>>GOODE: Right.

And this brain drain
happened in waves.

>>DAVID: Right.

>>GOODE: And not
only that, there

were people that
in Common Era that

were just being approached and
told, hey, we've got this job.

It's a great honor
to be offered this.

You can help save the
world-- either that,

or that something's about
to happen to the planet.

You can save your
family by moving

to one of these colonies.

Here's kind of like a
brochure kind of thing.

It looks like "The Jetsons."

It looks wonderful, utopic.

But when they arrive there, it's
a totally different reality.

>>DAVID: Well, if people have
seen the Mars colony inspection

episodes, remember
where that guy asked you

where you were from who
was up at the colony.

You said Texas, and why was
that so shocking to them?

>>GOODE: Well,
because that colony

had been told that the world
had suffered a cataclysm,

and the surface
was not survivable.

And not only did I
say I was from Texas,

but I had a sunburn,
and I smelled like aloe,

and I didn't smell right.

I didn't smell like someone
that had lived on a colony

or lived on a vessel
or out in space.

I smelled totally
foreign to them.

>>DAVID: To get to the other
part of the question then,

he's kind of digging
for, are these people

that are going missing--
are they being abducted?

Are they dying?

But all these missing
people each year

that are showing up
on the milk cartons,

are there people being
pulled into the Space

Program that way, where it's
involuntary conscription

and abduction, and then they
just get stuck up there?

>>GOODE: That is occurring.

Also, we've discussed the
more disturbing aspect

of approximately a
million people going

missing on the Earth every year
that are used in interstellar

slave trade system
that is pretty

disturbing that our own
people are taking part in.

>>DAVID: Somebody might
want me to ask this, which

we haven't quite gotten to--
are they also recruiting people

now?

Are they pulling people
out of the military?

>>GOODE: They're still
recruiting people

from the military.

>>DAVID: But there
are still people

getting pulled in now, both
on this sort of captive level

as well as on an official
invitation level?

>>GOODE: Right, a lot of people
in the Air Force and Navy

are being invited, even in some
of these 20-and-back programs.

>>DAVID: Right.

OK, cool.

Now we've got sylviepollard.

Is it possible to still
see suns-- i.e., stars--

when you're out in space
away from any atmospheres

of a planet or a biosphere?

>>GOODE: Yes, just like our
satellites that are telescopes

are able to see stars.

Yeah, you can see stars.

>>DAVID: I guess what
she's referring to is

that there was some
speculation, maybe

in the alternative community,
that the atmosphere was

actually causing
stars to be visible,

and that the visible
light only activated

when it hit atmosphere.

So that's not actually the case?

>>GOODE: No.

>>DAVID: OK.

OK, mikepatterson2,
if the replicators

can make gold, silver,
or $100 bills, then

what is the point
of mining asteroids,

mining the moon, et cetera?

Well, they've got a replicator
called the Federal Reserve,

right?

They can make as many
$100 bills as they want.

>>GOODE: They've got different
types of replicators.

They've got the food replicators
and material replicators.

>>DAVID: OK.

>>GOODE: And the
material replicators

can replicate small
amounts of minerals

and different types
of things like that.

And even if you wanted
to, a complex thing

like a $100 bill, if
you wanted to have

a $100 bill in your
pocket during a time

when you don't need money.

But it is not really
feasible to replicate

large amounts of cubic tons of
these not just gold but of all

these different minerals that
they need to then take and put

through the process
of creating all

these different technologies
that they trade and sell

to other secret space
programs and societies.

>>DAVID: One of the insiders
from Dr. Steven Greer's

original disclosure
project, "The 39 Witnesses,"

was a guy who talked
about particalization.

And that was the
term that he was

told that they used for
this replicator technology.

And the use of that term
implies that you are essentially

molecularly assembling.

You're assembling
at a quantum level.

Is that why you're saying
that, other than small amounts,

it starts to become nonfeasible?

>>GOODE: It's not practical.

I mean, if you need 3,000
metric tons of palladium

for a certain part
and it's in a meteor,

with the technology they
have, automated technology,

they can go take it out
and then just transport it

to where it's needed.

When the material
replicators-- you're

going to be producing
very small amounts.

It's just an industrial--

>>DAVID: Well, you seem
to understand that.

But I don't know if we do.

Why are there only
small amounts?

Where is it drawing from to
create matter, first of all?

Do you have to put in
some kind of base material

similar to like in
"Back to the Future,"

where they were dumping
banana peels into the core

of the car, that kind of thing?

>>GOODE: No.

It's creating matter out of
energy, just like our sun.

Our sun is a giant replicator.

It's taking energy
that's coming at it from

not only within the cosmic
web but from the cosmos,

and that energy is
interacting with its field

and it is creating base
minerals and chemicals that

are coming out of it.

>>DAVID: Like the expanding
Earth hypothesis, where

you can take away the oceans
and shrink the continents down

and they all fit together
into a globe that's only 55%

of its current size?

>>GOODE: The sun is producing
steam, which is water.

>>DAVID: Right.

>>GOODE: How does it?

The sun is producing
steam, which becomes water?

I mean, the sun is
a giant replicator.

And it's taking background
energy of the cosmos,

and it's converting
it into matter.

So it's converting energy into
matter is all this is doing.

>>DAVID: Somebody would counter,
well then, why couldn't you

just build a bigger replicator?

And if you make it
large enough, then you

should be able to generate
large amounts of material

quickly and easily.

>>GOODE: You can produce
larger replicators,

I'm sure, to produce larger
amounts of materials.

But it has just been
more practical for them

for the long-term to
mine the asteroid belt.

It's something they've been
doing for a very long time.

It's been very lucrative.

It's paid for itself.

It's done
autonomously, remotely.

Only a few people have to be
at one of these mining stations

to manage all of the
remote equipment,

and it's transported
where it needs to go.

>>DAVID: Well, I want
to bring up something

that Jacob also said that was
relevant to this question,

the Space Program insider
who I was in contact

with for several years.

He said that you can make
gold in a replicator,

but part of what the Draco
really want with the gold

is that there are actually
some 200 properties of gold

and how they can
use it for all kinds

of weird advanced
technology, including healing

stuff and other
stuff, and that where

the gold forms on the Earth
has a tremendous effect

on its energetic properties
and what you can use it for,

that it is literally impregnated
with the energy of the Earth's

grid.

And you do not get
that type of stuff

if you make it in a replicator.

Have you heard anything
about energetic properties

of materials where the natural
stuff is better than the stuff

you can make in the replicator?

>>GOODE: I've heard that
the gold and minerals

that were mined in
the asteroid belt

had the exact same energetic
properties of that of Earth.

But I had not heard that
type of information.

>>DAVID: OK.

So the next question we
have is from camareneo.

So if there are all
these different types

of human extraterrestrials, then
are they all in a conference

room with you?

And if so, I wonder
how they are all

able to breathe the same air.

>>GOODE: All of these
different groups,

I'm sure, breathe
different types of air

of different environments.

But these groups are not
flying from another star

system for these meetings.

They have embassies on our
planet and in our solar system.

So they, I would imagine,
are acclimated here

or have some sort of high
technological workaround

for it.

At one meeting, when there were
new beings that we didn't even

know were here, there
were aquatic-type beings

that you would think
breathe only underwater that

were present.

Is there anything further,
or are we at the end?

>>DAVID: We're at
the end, and that's

your questions for Corey Goode
here on "Cosmic Disclosure."

>>GOODE: I enjoyed
answering the questions.

>>DAVID: Yeah.

This has been fun.

And as always, we
thank you for watching.

[theme music]