Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:01,958 --> 00:00:03,542
- Tonight, on The
Proof Is Out There.
2
00:00:03,542 --> 00:00:06,333
A special episode probing
the truth about UFOs.
3
00:00:06,333 --> 00:00:08,042
The United States
government admits
4
00:00:08,042 --> 00:00:10,417
it's baffled by
videos like this.
5
00:00:10,417 --> 00:00:14,375
- The Pentagon themselves have
listed this as unidentified.
6
00:00:14,375 --> 00:00:16,833
- [Tony] But is it
hiding a deeper secret?
7
00:00:16,833 --> 00:00:20,000
- I was informed in the
course of my official duties
8
00:00:20,000 --> 00:00:23,750
of a multi-decade
UAP crash retrieval
9
00:00:23,750 --> 00:00:25,542
and reverse engineering program.
10
00:00:25,542 --> 00:00:28,167
- And there's been a
disinformation campaign in place
11
00:00:28,167 --> 00:00:29,583
for the last 50 years.
12
00:00:29,583 --> 00:00:31,500
- [Tony] What are these
unidentified objects
13
00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:33,792
that keep turning up
near the US military?
14
00:00:33,792 --> 00:00:35,417
- This one is truly anomalous.
15
00:00:35,417 --> 00:00:38,500
- [Tony] Does this leaked
footage reveal an alien craft
16
00:00:38,500 --> 00:00:39,958
the government wants
to keep secret?
17
00:00:39,958 --> 00:00:42,083
- A helicopter or plane
is out of the question.
18
00:00:42,083 --> 00:00:43,542
- [Tony] And a new take
19
00:00:43,542 --> 00:00:46,208
on the most famous
UFO footage of all.
20
00:00:46,208 --> 00:00:48,583
- The importance of this
video cannot be overstated.
21
00:00:48,583 --> 00:00:51,042
- I'm not saying it's
aliens, but it's aliens.
22
00:00:51,042 --> 00:00:52,375
- [Tony] Prepare yourself
23
00:00:52,375 --> 00:00:55,042
for The Proof Is Out
There: The UFO Files.
24
00:00:55,042 --> 00:00:57,500
(dramatic music)
25
00:01:02,542 --> 00:01:04,000
Good evening and welcome
26
00:01:04,000 --> 00:01:07,208
to The Proof Is Out
There: The UFO Files.
27
00:01:07,208 --> 00:01:09,917
We're not talking about
science fiction here.
28
00:01:09,917 --> 00:01:13,000
UFOs have become the subject
of congressional hearings,
29
00:01:13,000 --> 00:01:16,542
government studies, and eye
popping whistleblower claims.
30
00:01:16,542 --> 00:01:19,250
The topic isn't
fringe any longer.
31
00:01:19,250 --> 00:01:21,333
We've decided to
devote an entire hour
32
00:01:21,333 --> 00:01:22,708
to the best videos and images
33
00:01:22,708 --> 00:01:27,000
of unidentified aerial
phenomena, or UAP,
34
00:01:27,000 --> 00:01:29,708
the government's
preferred term for UFOs.
35
00:01:29,708 --> 00:01:32,458
Some are recent, some go
back more than 30 years,
36
00:01:32,458 --> 00:01:35,042
and some are out of this world.
37
00:01:35,042 --> 00:01:36,542
Or are they?
38
00:01:36,542 --> 00:01:39,208
Because during these last
few months, more than ever,
39
00:01:39,208 --> 00:01:41,417
that's been the
biggest question.
40
00:01:41,417 --> 00:01:43,667
Where are these
objects coming from?
41
00:01:45,375 --> 00:01:48,125
- Maybe we're on the cusp.
42
00:01:48,125 --> 00:01:50,250
Maybe we're on the cusp
of something brand new,
43
00:01:50,250 --> 00:01:51,375
something exciting.
44
00:01:51,375 --> 00:01:52,917
- [Tony] Both the Pentagon,
45
00:01:52,917 --> 00:01:55,625
through its All Domain Anomaly
Resolution Office, or AARO,
46
00:01:55,625 --> 00:01:59,167
and NASA, through its UAP
Independent Study Group,
47
00:01:59,167 --> 00:02:02,542
say there have been 800
UAP sightings since 2022.
48
00:02:02,542 --> 00:02:06,375
Of these, up to 5%
cannot be explained away
49
00:02:06,375 --> 00:02:10,500
as aircraft, debris, birds,
or anything else we know of.
50
00:02:10,500 --> 00:02:13,750
Officially, the officials
don't know what they are.
51
00:02:13,750 --> 00:02:15,208
- Without sufficient data,
52
00:02:15,208 --> 00:02:18,167
we are unable to reach
defendable conclusions
53
00:02:18,167 --> 00:02:20,125
that meet the high
scientific standards
54
00:02:20,125 --> 00:02:21,250
we set for resolution.
55
00:02:21,250 --> 00:02:22,708
And I will not close a case
56
00:02:22,708 --> 00:02:25,250
that I cannot defend
the conclusions of.
57
00:02:25,250 --> 00:02:27,375
- Most UAP sightings
58
00:02:27,375 --> 00:02:29,917
result in very limited data
59
00:02:29,917 --> 00:02:31,875
that makes it even
more difficult
60
00:02:31,875 --> 00:02:34,750
to draw scientific conclusions
61
00:02:34,750 --> 00:02:37,375
about the nature of UAP.
62
00:02:37,375 --> 00:02:41,292
- We're seeing advanced types
of propulsion being displayed,
63
00:02:41,292 --> 00:02:44,167
but no real answers
as to what they are.
64
00:02:45,208 --> 00:02:47,208
- [Tony] Neither agency
has gone as far as saying
65
00:02:47,208 --> 00:02:49,750
these objects are
extraterrestrial,
66
00:02:49,750 --> 00:02:51,375
but one man did go that far
67
00:02:51,375 --> 00:02:53,333
and even if you
don't know his name,
68
00:02:53,333 --> 00:02:55,250
you probably heard what he said.
69
00:02:55,250 --> 00:02:58,958
- I was informed, in the
course of my official duties,
70
00:02:58,958 --> 00:03:02,083
of a multi-decade
UAP crash retrieval
71
00:03:02,083 --> 00:03:04,333
and reverse engineering program.
72
00:03:04,333 --> 00:03:05,625
- [Tony] David Grusch,
73
00:03:05,625 --> 00:03:07,208
former military
intelligence officer
74
00:03:07,208 --> 00:03:09,083
turned Pentagon whistleblower,
75
00:03:09,083 --> 00:03:11,167
came forward in June 2023,
76
00:03:11,167 --> 00:03:12,458
claiming the government
has been running
77
00:03:12,458 --> 00:03:15,542
a secret UFO crash
retrieval program
78
00:03:15,542 --> 00:03:17,750
since at least World War II.
79
00:03:17,750 --> 00:03:18,750
According to Grusch,
80
00:03:18,750 --> 00:03:21,375
the US is in possession
of downed alien craft,
81
00:03:21,375 --> 00:03:24,542
alien corpses, and the
US and other nations
82
00:03:24,542 --> 00:03:28,083
may even have some kind of
ongoing diplomatic relationship
83
00:03:28,083 --> 00:03:29,542
with aliens.
84
00:03:29,542 --> 00:03:31,708
- Do you believe our
government has made contact
85
00:03:31,708 --> 00:03:34,792
with intelligent
extraterrestrials?
86
00:03:36,250 --> 00:03:38,667
- Something I can't
discuss in public setting.
87
00:03:38,667 --> 00:03:40,375
- I believe David's
claims in the fact that
88
00:03:40,375 --> 00:03:42,792
we are covering
extraterrestrial craft
89
00:03:42,792 --> 00:03:44,750
and extraterrestrial bodies
90
00:03:44,750 --> 00:03:46,958
from the general
scientific community
91
00:03:46,958 --> 00:03:48,583
and the public at large
92
00:03:48,583 --> 00:03:50,833
and there's been a
disinformation campaign in place
93
00:03:50,833 --> 00:03:52,708
for the last 50 years.
94
00:03:52,708 --> 00:03:54,125
- [Tony] Much of what
Grusch is claiming
95
00:03:54,125 --> 00:03:55,542
has been said before.
96
00:03:55,542 --> 00:03:57,667
What makes this version
of the story special
97
00:03:57,667 --> 00:04:01,250
is who is saying it and
who he's saying it to.
98
00:04:01,250 --> 00:04:02,708
- It's very interesting
to see someone
99
00:04:02,708 --> 00:04:04,708
with such a
credentialed background
100
00:04:04,708 --> 00:04:07,375
as an intelligence
officer make these claims
101
00:04:07,375 --> 00:04:08,958
in such an official manner.
102
00:04:08,958 --> 00:04:11,583
If he was lying, he could
be held criminally liable.
103
00:04:11,583 --> 00:04:14,208
That would suggest to me that
he certainly is not lying
104
00:04:14,208 --> 00:04:15,708
about what he's saying.
105
00:04:15,708 --> 00:04:17,500
- [Tony] But while Grusch has
been making claims boldly
106
00:04:17,500 --> 00:04:19,208
and without equivocation,
107
00:04:19,208 --> 00:04:20,542
he has not presented the public
108
00:04:20,542 --> 00:04:23,833
with any physical evidence,
documents, or images
109
00:04:23,833 --> 00:04:25,042
that corroborate them.
110
00:04:25,042 --> 00:04:27,417
- Unfortunately,
just testimony alone
111
00:04:27,417 --> 00:04:31,083
is not enough to change
the public's perception.
112
00:04:31,083 --> 00:04:33,417
We need physical evidence.
113
00:04:33,417 --> 00:04:35,542
- I'm highly
skeptical of the idea
114
00:04:35,542 --> 00:04:39,542
that the US government has
any type of crashed UFOs,
115
00:04:39,542 --> 00:04:41,875
but I do find the information
that's being shared
116
00:04:41,875 --> 00:04:45,708
or relayed certainly
merits investigation.
117
00:04:45,708 --> 00:04:47,417
- [Tony] Some say
Grusch may himself
118
00:04:47,417 --> 00:04:49,292
be part of a
disinformation campaign
119
00:04:49,292 --> 00:04:51,458
to keep us talking about aliens
120
00:04:51,458 --> 00:04:53,583
instead of the
uncomfortable truth.
121
00:04:53,583 --> 00:04:56,417
The theory that many,
if not all of these UAPs
122
00:04:56,417 --> 00:04:58,708
are really assets
of rival militaries
123
00:04:58,708 --> 00:05:01,375
conducting reconnaissance
on our aircraft, warships,
124
00:05:01,375 --> 00:05:03,208
and nuclear bases.
125
00:05:03,208 --> 00:05:04,875
- It's possible
that this could be
126
00:05:04,875 --> 00:05:07,042
secret military technology.
127
00:05:07,042 --> 00:05:09,250
- [Tony] But until that
theory is backed up by proof,
128
00:05:09,250 --> 00:05:10,625
the best evidence we have
129
00:05:10,625 --> 00:05:12,875
is still these infinitely
intriguing videos.
130
00:05:16,875 --> 00:05:19,458
- Now, Pentagon
whistleblower David Grusch
131
00:05:19,458 --> 00:05:21,375
has claimed the US government
132
00:05:21,375 --> 00:05:23,042
is sitting on much
more UFO evidence
133
00:05:23,042 --> 00:05:25,208
than the handful of videos
134
00:05:25,208 --> 00:05:27,417
that they have
officially released.
135
00:05:27,417 --> 00:05:29,250
Even if that's the case,
136
00:05:29,250 --> 00:05:32,042
what we've seen so far
is pretty compelling.
137
00:05:32,042 --> 00:05:33,375
Like this video, that's left
138
00:05:33,375 --> 00:05:35,917
top government
investigators stumped.
139
00:05:37,208 --> 00:05:39,500
July 12th, 2022,
140
00:05:39,500 --> 00:05:41,917
at an undisclosed location
in the Middle East,
141
00:05:41,917 --> 00:05:44,583
an American MQ9 drone
observes a conversation
142
00:05:44,583 --> 00:05:48,083
between two people
on the street below.
143
00:05:48,083 --> 00:05:49,708
As they walk away from a house,
144
00:05:49,708 --> 00:05:53,167
a strange object comes into
the sensor's field of view.
145
00:05:54,167 --> 00:05:57,500
A shiny, metallic ball darts
diagonally across the frame,
146
00:05:57,500 --> 00:05:59,708
prompting the camera to
jolt away from the people
147
00:05:59,708 --> 00:06:02,500
and follow the sphere
eastward instead.
148
00:06:02,500 --> 00:06:05,375
The sphere looks to be at
least a few feet across
149
00:06:05,375 --> 00:06:06,708
and it shoots through the sky
150
00:06:06,708 --> 00:06:09,083
in what appears to
be a straight line.
151
00:06:09,083 --> 00:06:11,875
The grainy video ends with
the sphere in mid-flight
152
00:06:11,875 --> 00:06:13,667
and center frame.
153
00:06:13,667 --> 00:06:15,583
This sphere took
on greater meaning
154
00:06:15,583 --> 00:06:17,708
when AARO presented
it to the public.
155
00:06:17,708 --> 00:06:19,208
- This is essentially
all of the data
156
00:06:19,208 --> 00:06:21,708
we have associated
with this event.
157
00:06:21,708 --> 00:06:23,417
It is going to be
virtually impossible
158
00:06:23,417 --> 00:06:25,542
to fully identify that.
159
00:06:25,542 --> 00:06:26,708
- [Tony] That's right.
160
00:06:26,708 --> 00:06:28,917
Unlike other UAPs
it's looked into,
161
00:06:28,917 --> 00:06:31,667
AARO still considers
this video unresolved.
162
00:06:31,667 --> 00:06:33,375
- Kirkpatrick was tight-lipped
163
00:06:33,375 --> 00:06:35,833
about the exact
origins of this object,
164
00:06:35,833 --> 00:06:38,833
but he did acknowledge
the almost inhuman speeds
165
00:06:38,833 --> 00:06:42,500
at which it travels
and the strange design.
166
00:06:42,500 --> 00:06:45,125
He also identified
the Middle East region
167
00:06:45,125 --> 00:06:48,333
as a hotspot for UAPs.
168
00:06:48,333 --> 00:06:49,250
- [Tony] Considering
the ongoing conflicts
169
00:06:49,250 --> 00:06:51,458
in the region, we have to wonder
170
00:06:51,458 --> 00:06:53,167
if these UFOs are
related to others
171
00:06:53,167 --> 00:06:55,583
that have turned
up during wartime.
172
00:06:55,583 --> 00:06:58,042
In 1951 during the Korean War,
173
00:06:58,042 --> 00:07:00,750
a group of American GIs
stationed near Chowan
174
00:07:00,750 --> 00:07:03,125
encountered a mysterious
glowing object
175
00:07:03,125 --> 00:07:05,625
that floated to the center
of artillery explosions
176
00:07:05,625 --> 00:07:07,667
but took no damage.
177
00:07:07,667 --> 00:07:11,000
One veteran later claimed
the glowing craft pulsated
178
00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:12,208
and changed colors.
179
00:07:12,208 --> 00:07:13,417
In the following days,
180
00:07:13,417 --> 00:07:15,542
the GIs fell sick
with what some believe
181
00:07:15,542 --> 00:07:17,667
was radiation poisoning.
182
00:07:17,667 --> 00:07:20,208
Some theorized that
this unidentified craft
183
00:07:20,208 --> 00:07:23,875
and the hundreds reported
by US troops since 2021
184
00:07:23,875 --> 00:07:26,208
are attracted to
military targets.
185
00:07:26,208 --> 00:07:27,833
But why?
186
00:07:27,833 --> 00:07:31,208
- One explanation is that
they're actually alien probes
187
00:07:31,208 --> 00:07:34,333
measuring our defensive
or offensive capabilities.
188
00:07:34,333 --> 00:07:37,583
In an optimistic view,
it's possible that
189
00:07:37,583 --> 00:07:40,458
they are simply trying
to observe our behavior
190
00:07:40,458 --> 00:07:44,875
and figure out why we
are so often in conflict.
191
00:07:44,875 --> 00:07:46,458
- [Tony] Whatever the reason,
192
00:07:46,458 --> 00:07:47,708
this sphere sighting
over the Middle East
193
00:07:47,708 --> 00:07:49,917
appears to uphold the pattern.
194
00:07:52,458 --> 00:07:55,375
A Pentagon report
released in 2022
195
00:07:55,375 --> 00:07:58,875
found evidence that UFOs
can inflict injuries
196
00:07:58,875 --> 00:08:03,625
including radiation burns,
paralysis, and brain damage.
197
00:08:03,625 --> 00:08:05,333
So while Kirkpatrick's
office said
198
00:08:05,333 --> 00:08:08,500
this object wasn't
an apparent threat,
199
00:08:08,500 --> 00:08:11,208
we are inclined to
take another look.
200
00:08:11,208 --> 00:08:13,583
(tense music)
201
00:08:14,750 --> 00:08:17,875
We start by asking aviation
expert Tim McMillan,
202
00:08:17,875 --> 00:08:20,500
could this be an
advanced military drone?
203
00:08:20,500 --> 00:08:21,958
- This doesn't match
any type of technology
204
00:08:21,958 --> 00:08:23,042
that we're aware of.
205
00:08:23,042 --> 00:08:26,208
I don't see any obvious
signs of propulsion,
206
00:08:26,208 --> 00:08:27,542
I don't see any wings.
207
00:08:27,542 --> 00:08:31,375
So all the necessary components
for a typical aircraft.
208
00:08:31,375 --> 00:08:34,042
You'll notice we can see
other features in the terrain
209
00:08:34,042 --> 00:08:37,500
which is below this
object really clearly.
210
00:08:37,500 --> 00:08:39,458
So you would be able
to definitely see
211
00:08:39,458 --> 00:08:40,708
if there were wings,
212
00:08:40,708 --> 00:08:43,500
there were rotors, any
of those features on it.
213
00:08:43,500 --> 00:08:45,542
- [Tony] So it's a
spherical object in the sky
214
00:08:45,542 --> 00:08:47,875
without apparent
means of propulsion.
215
00:08:47,875 --> 00:08:49,583
Could it just be a balloon?
216
00:08:49,583 --> 00:08:51,250
- It certainly could be
a balloon of some sort.
217
00:08:51,250 --> 00:08:54,583
Particularly in the Middle East
there have been very crude,
218
00:08:54,583 --> 00:08:57,417
airborne, improvised
explosive devices,
219
00:08:57,417 --> 00:09:00,708
so you attach some
sort of explosive
220
00:09:00,708 --> 00:09:03,958
to a balloon in hopes that it
collides with the aircraft.
221
00:09:03,958 --> 00:09:06,542
The key piece of
missing evidence here
222
00:09:06,542 --> 00:09:08,625
is we would want to
know the wind direction
223
00:09:08,625 --> 00:09:09,833
and wind speed here.
224
00:09:09,833 --> 00:09:11,667
- [Tony] That info
has been redacted.
225
00:09:11,667 --> 00:09:14,167
Otherwise we could determine
whether wind is with
226
00:09:14,167 --> 00:09:15,875
or against this object
227
00:09:15,875 --> 00:09:18,708
and if it's against, then
this can be no balloon.
228
00:09:18,708 --> 00:09:21,250
- I think that's what makes
this interesting for me
229
00:09:21,250 --> 00:09:25,167
because the Pentagon has
listed this as unidentified
230
00:09:25,167 --> 00:09:28,292
but they have access
to that information,
231
00:09:28,292 --> 00:09:30,667
so they should have been
able to better narrow down
232
00:09:30,667 --> 00:09:31,958
it being a balloon.
233
00:09:31,958 --> 00:09:33,542
- [Tony] Then could
this really be
234
00:09:33,542 --> 00:09:35,708
some kind of alien probe?
235
00:09:35,708 --> 00:09:38,208
- Though this video is
definitely intriguing,
236
00:09:38,208 --> 00:09:42,458
we also don't see any real
extreme flight characteristics
237
00:09:42,458 --> 00:09:45,875
that require the
existence of aliens
238
00:09:45,875 --> 00:09:49,500
or some type of
advanced physics.
239
00:09:49,500 --> 00:09:51,083
- [Tony] That means this
UFO isn't displaying
240
00:09:51,083 --> 00:09:53,375
the hallmarks the US
military has cataloged
241
00:09:53,375 --> 00:09:55,458
on other UFOs,
242
00:09:55,458 --> 00:09:57,958
including instantaneous
acceleration,
243
00:09:57,958 --> 00:10:01,792
hypersonic velocities, cloaking,
and transmedium travel,
244
00:10:01,792 --> 00:10:04,708
the ability to fly into
and out of the water.
245
00:10:04,708 --> 00:10:06,917
Nor does it convince McMillan
246
00:10:06,917 --> 00:10:10,583
that UFOs are particularly
interested in human conflict.
247
00:10:10,583 --> 00:10:12,042
- There are more pilots
248
00:10:12,042 --> 00:10:14,917
being perceptive of their
surroundings in a war zone.
249
00:10:14,917 --> 00:10:16,333
So I think it gives us that idea
250
00:10:16,333 --> 00:10:20,792
that perhaps UFOs are
interested in human conflict
251
00:10:20,792 --> 00:10:22,750
when in fact, what it is
252
00:10:22,750 --> 00:10:24,792
is we're paying more
attention to the skies
253
00:10:24,792 --> 00:10:26,667
during human conflict.
254
00:10:26,667 --> 00:10:29,000
(tense music)
255
00:10:30,708 --> 00:10:34,292
- Our verdict, we're
calling this a possible UFO.
256
00:10:34,292 --> 00:10:38,250
On one hand it has no wings
or obvious propulsion,
257
00:10:38,250 --> 00:10:40,375
which is very UFO like.
258
00:10:40,375 --> 00:10:44,208
There is a chance it's a
balloon pushed by a stiff wind.
259
00:10:44,208 --> 00:10:46,625
But you'd think AARO
would know that by now.
260
00:10:46,625 --> 00:10:48,833
If we get more information,
we'll let you know.
261
00:10:51,292 --> 00:10:52,833
But you'd think AARO
would know that by noback, .
262
00:10:52,833 --> 00:10:54,875
We are going to
continue our UFO special
263
00:10:54,875 --> 00:10:58,708
with input from one of the
biggest names in ufology.
264
00:10:58,708 --> 00:11:02,250
In recent years, freelance
filmmaker Jeremy Corbell
265
00:11:02,250 --> 00:11:03,667
has built a reputation
266
00:11:03,667 --> 00:11:06,167
for releasing
sensational UFO videos
267
00:11:06,167 --> 00:11:09,208
allegedly leaked by
members of the military.
268
00:11:09,208 --> 00:11:11,083
The videos have made
headlines worldwide
269
00:11:11,083 --> 00:11:14,292
and tonight, we're gonna
look at some of his latest
270
00:11:14,292 --> 00:11:16,000
and hear from the man himself.
271
00:11:18,542 --> 00:11:20,708
On the morning of
April 16th, 2016,
272
00:11:20,708 --> 00:11:23,875
an American MC12
reconnaissance plane
273
00:11:23,875 --> 00:11:28,167
soars over Mosul, Iraq at
the time under ISIS control.
274
00:11:28,167 --> 00:11:29,875
Its primary objective
275
00:11:29,875 --> 00:11:31,917
is to observe what's
happening on the ground,
276
00:11:31,917 --> 00:11:36,458
but today it captures something
highly unusual in the air.
277
00:11:36,458 --> 00:11:38,375
This frame pulled
from the footage
278
00:11:38,375 --> 00:11:41,375
reveals a metallic looking
ball flying over a city street.
279
00:11:41,375 --> 00:11:44,458
The object reportedly moves
alongside the spy plane
280
00:11:44,458 --> 00:11:46,042
without dropping in altitude,
281
00:11:46,042 --> 00:11:49,750
traveling in a lateral
direction from south to north.
282
00:11:49,750 --> 00:11:54,125
It would take seven years,
but on January 24th, 2023,
283
00:11:54,125 --> 00:11:56,708
Jeremy and his
co-host George Knapp
284
00:11:56,708 --> 00:11:58,542
obtained and released
this shocking image
285
00:11:58,542 --> 00:12:01,333
to the American public
for the first time
286
00:12:01,333 --> 00:12:03,417
on their podcast, "Weaponized".
287
00:12:03,417 --> 00:12:05,042
- The Mosul orb
is the first time
288
00:12:05,042 --> 00:12:08,042
we have a verified,
bonafide image
289
00:12:08,042 --> 00:12:11,875
filmed by our military
over a conflict zone
290
00:12:11,875 --> 00:12:14,250
that shows a UAP.
291
00:12:14,250 --> 00:12:18,542
It raised a lot of interest
within our intelligence agencies
292
00:12:18,542 --> 00:12:20,625
and Department of Defense
293
00:12:20,625 --> 00:12:22,333
because they could
see that it was
294
00:12:22,333 --> 00:12:24,125
under intelligent control.
295
00:12:24,125 --> 00:12:27,625
- [Tony] A few months
later on March 6th, 2023,
296
00:12:27,625 --> 00:12:29,708
Jeremy reveals six
more intriguing images
297
00:12:29,708 --> 00:12:31,333
also shot in Iraq
298
00:12:31,333 --> 00:12:34,750
on a thermal camera set
to display heat as white
299
00:12:34,750 --> 00:12:36,542
and cooler objects in black.
300
00:12:36,542 --> 00:12:38,792
- We labeled it the
Baghdad Phantom.
301
00:12:38,792 --> 00:12:41,917
We have seen it
described as cylindrical
302
00:12:41,917 --> 00:12:44,667
and under intelligent
control and controlled flight
303
00:12:44,667 --> 00:12:47,375
with a stable lateral direction.
304
00:12:47,375 --> 00:12:52,167
And it's designated UAP by
our Department of Defense.
305
00:12:52,167 --> 00:12:54,000
- [Tony] Again, is
it possible that
306
00:12:54,000 --> 00:12:56,875
some airborne power has an
interest in our military?
307
00:12:56,875 --> 00:12:59,208
And if that's the case,
is it alien or human?
308
00:12:59,208 --> 00:13:02,083
- Some people online are
claiming that this is
309
00:13:02,083 --> 00:13:04,125
proof of non-human intelligences
310
00:13:04,125 --> 00:13:06,792
operating within Iraqi airspace.
311
00:13:06,792 --> 00:13:08,875
One other theory is that
312
00:13:08,875 --> 00:13:12,750
these objects are potentially
some foreign adversary,
313
00:13:12,750 --> 00:13:14,333
such as China or Russia,
314
00:13:14,333 --> 00:13:16,875
that is operating
some sort of vehicle
315
00:13:16,875 --> 00:13:20,000
or weapon system inside Iraq.
316
00:13:22,375 --> 00:13:25,667
- Jeremy says intelligently
controlled UAPs
317
00:13:25,667 --> 00:13:28,125
are picked up by
radar, seen by pilots,
318
00:13:28,125 --> 00:13:31,583
and engaged by our
military on a daily basis.
319
00:13:31,583 --> 00:13:33,542
He argues that there's no reason
320
00:13:33,542 --> 00:13:36,875
this information should be
kept from the American public
321
00:13:36,875 --> 00:13:39,583
and he believes the potential
for misidentification
322
00:13:39,583 --> 00:13:43,250
in these incidents could have
devastating consequences.
323
00:13:43,250 --> 00:13:47,542
So, let's turn to the experts
to assess the threat level.
324
00:13:47,542 --> 00:13:49,792
(tense music)
325
00:13:51,708 --> 00:13:53,708
First off, aviation
expert Tim McMillan
326
00:13:53,708 --> 00:13:55,667
examines the image of the sphere
327
00:13:55,667 --> 00:13:58,083
taken by a spy plane over Mosul.
328
00:13:58,083 --> 00:13:59,375
- You can actually see
329
00:13:59,375 --> 00:14:01,792
this object has three
dimensional shape,
330
00:14:01,792 --> 00:14:03,708
so this appears to be airborne.
331
00:14:03,708 --> 00:14:06,375
I don't see any obvious
signs of propulsion.
332
00:14:06,375 --> 00:14:09,042
We don't see rotors,
we don't see wings,
333
00:14:09,042 --> 00:14:12,250
and so it really
limits us to a balloon
334
00:14:12,250 --> 00:14:14,375
is the only thing, given
that size and shape,
335
00:14:14,375 --> 00:14:16,083
that it could possibly be.
336
00:14:17,083 --> 00:14:19,042
- Astronomer and video effects
designer Marc D'Antonio
337
00:14:19,042 --> 00:14:23,417
thinks he knows exactly
what kind of balloon it is.
338
00:14:23,417 --> 00:14:25,875
- One of the earthly
possibilities for this
339
00:14:25,875 --> 00:14:28,833
is that we're looking
at a weather balloon
340
00:14:28,833 --> 00:14:31,625
that's got a payload
that we can't see.
341
00:14:31,625 --> 00:14:32,792
- [Tony] But
according to records,
342
00:14:32,792 --> 00:14:34,042
aerial winds at the time
343
00:14:34,042 --> 00:14:37,167
would've been pushing
against this object.
344
00:14:37,167 --> 00:14:39,083
Plus, McMillan sees evidence
presented in the video
345
00:14:39,083 --> 00:14:42,292
that bursts D'Antonio's
weather balloon theory
346
00:14:42,292 --> 00:14:44,375
once and for all.
347
00:14:44,375 --> 00:14:47,125
- Because of the information
that's displayed,
348
00:14:47,125 --> 00:14:49,042
we know at what altitude
349
00:14:49,042 --> 00:14:53,333
the actual drone that's
filming this is at, 26,000 feet
350
00:14:53,333 --> 00:14:55,458
and that would be
substantially lower
351
00:14:55,458 --> 00:14:58,083
than most weather balloons
are gonna be flying.
352
00:14:58,083 --> 00:15:00,583
- [Tony] Weather balloons
typically reach altitudes
353
00:15:00,583 --> 00:15:04,167
between 60,000 and 105,000 feet.
354
00:15:04,167 --> 00:15:06,708
And what about the
Baghdad Phantom?
355
00:15:06,708 --> 00:15:10,500
Could this cylindrical UFO
be a plane or even a drone?
356
00:15:10,500 --> 00:15:13,500
- I don't see any parts
that automatically suggest
357
00:15:13,500 --> 00:15:15,833
that it is a drone,
358
00:15:15,833 --> 00:15:18,833
so I don't see any wings
or control surfaces.
359
00:15:18,833 --> 00:15:21,500
So it's certainly not
a drone or aircraft.
360
00:15:21,500 --> 00:15:22,708
- [Tony] McMillan thinks
361
00:15:22,708 --> 00:15:24,417
he may be zeroing
in on the target,
362
00:15:24,417 --> 00:15:27,542
but just when he thinks he's
getting hotter, things go cold.
363
00:15:27,542 --> 00:15:29,375
- My first impression is that
364
00:15:29,375 --> 00:15:33,292
we're looking at, likely, a
surface to surface missile.
365
00:15:33,292 --> 00:15:35,250
This particular video
was filmed in Iraq
366
00:15:35,250 --> 00:15:40,042
and so there's a lot
of rocket attacks.
367
00:15:40,042 --> 00:15:45,083
However, the fact that
the object is black,
368
00:15:45,083 --> 00:15:47,667
meaning it's cooler than
the ambient air around it,
369
00:15:47,667 --> 00:15:51,542
is inconsistent with
anything that I've ever seen
370
00:15:51,542 --> 00:15:55,250
when filming missiles with
an IR system like this.
371
00:15:55,250 --> 00:15:56,708
- [Tony] But
D'Antonio thinks
372
00:15:56,708 --> 00:15:58,500
he may have an answer to
how a missile could display
373
00:15:58,500 --> 00:16:01,958
such a surprisingly
cold heat signature.
374
00:16:01,958 --> 00:16:04,500
- If this is really
black as cold,
375
00:16:04,500 --> 00:16:07,375
the temperature difference
doesn't have to be a whole lot
376
00:16:07,375 --> 00:16:09,292
and if this is flying over Iraq,
377
00:16:09,292 --> 00:16:12,417
it's possible that the
ground is 130 degrees
378
00:16:12,417 --> 00:16:17,333
and this object here, it's
possible it could be 90 degrees
379
00:16:17,333 --> 00:16:20,125
and look as different as that.
380
00:16:20,125 --> 00:16:21,375
- [Tony] So what
about the notion
381
00:16:21,375 --> 00:16:23,417
that we're dealing
with genuine UFOs
382
00:16:23,417 --> 00:16:25,667
in both the case
of the Mosul Orb
383
00:16:25,667 --> 00:16:27,833
and the Baghdad Phantom?
384
00:16:27,833 --> 00:16:29,333
D'Antonio doesn't see it.
385
00:16:29,333 --> 00:16:31,542
- The fact that we know of other
objects that are human made
386
00:16:31,542 --> 00:16:34,208
that look like this,
it's a stretch to say
387
00:16:34,208 --> 00:16:36,417
that they're unidentified
flying objects.
388
00:16:36,417 --> 00:16:39,000
They're probably
human made objects,
389
00:16:39,000 --> 00:16:41,375
possibly a weather balloon
390
00:16:41,375 --> 00:16:44,875
and very likely a
missile in this case.
391
00:16:44,875 --> 00:16:47,333
- [Tony] McMillan
respectfully disagrees.
392
00:16:47,333 --> 00:16:50,167
- The objects in both
images are unknown.
393
00:16:50,167 --> 00:16:54,542
I cannot give you a concrete
explanation for what they are,
394
00:16:54,542 --> 00:16:57,000
but potentially with
more information,
395
00:16:57,000 --> 00:17:00,042
we could arrive at a
more firm conclusion.
396
00:17:00,042 --> 00:17:02,333
(tense music)
397
00:17:03,792 --> 00:17:06,208
- Our verdict? Split decision.
398
00:17:06,208 --> 00:17:09,292
We're calling the Mosul
Orb a genuine UFO.
399
00:17:09,292 --> 00:17:12,292
It's flying too low to
be a weather balloon.
400
00:17:12,292 --> 00:17:15,042
We're going with D'Antonio
on the Baghdad Phantom.
401
00:17:15,042 --> 00:17:17,333
It's most likely a missile.
402
00:17:17,333 --> 00:17:18,583
Still, we can't say for sure,
403
00:17:18,583 --> 00:17:20,875
since Jeremy claims
the government refuses
404
00:17:20,875 --> 00:17:23,042
to release the complete video
405
00:17:23,042 --> 00:17:27,292
that these images
were taken from.
406
00:17:27,292 --> 00:17:30,375
to release the completFO invesn
407
00:17:30,375 --> 00:17:33,667
with another video
released by the Pentagon
408
00:17:33,667 --> 00:17:35,375
that instantly made headlines.
409
00:17:35,375 --> 00:17:37,375
So far, we've been
focusing on UAPs
410
00:17:37,375 --> 00:17:40,625
captured by our military in the
Middle East, but of course,
411
00:17:40,625 --> 00:17:43,958
the US has airborne
assets all over the globe
412
00:17:43,958 --> 00:17:47,917
and believers say this next
remarkable piece of footage
413
00:17:47,917 --> 00:17:50,625
is proof that aliens do too.
414
00:17:51,750 --> 00:17:53,375
January 15th, 2023,
415
00:17:53,375 --> 00:17:56,292
an undisclosed location
in South Asia.
416
00:17:56,292 --> 00:17:59,625
A remotely piloted
Air Force MQ9 drone
417
00:17:59,625 --> 00:18:03,333
closely monitors
another MQ9 in the skies
418
00:18:03,333 --> 00:18:04,833
via infrared cameras.
419
00:18:04,833 --> 00:18:08,125
It seems like a routine
reconnaissance mission until...
420
00:18:11,208 --> 00:18:13,042
Four seconds into the clip,
421
00:18:13,042 --> 00:18:16,250
an oblong object flies
past the other MQ9
422
00:18:16,250 --> 00:18:18,208
in an apparent near miss.
423
00:18:19,125 --> 00:18:21,375
And take a closer look at this.
424
00:18:21,375 --> 00:18:24,417
The UFO seems to leave
an atmospheric wake
425
00:18:24,417 --> 00:18:28,625
as its zips across the
sensors field of view
426
00:18:28,625 --> 00:18:30,000
right through here.
427
00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:32,167
Now that could be fuel exhaust
428
00:18:32,167 --> 00:18:34,750
or perhaps even a disturbance
in the air pressure.
429
00:18:34,750 --> 00:18:36,375
One thing's for sure,
430
00:18:36,375 --> 00:18:38,667
it doesn't look anything
like this drone.
431
00:18:40,000 --> 00:18:41,333
Writer Amy Teitel says
432
00:18:41,333 --> 00:18:43,208
that despite the
video's public release,
433
00:18:43,208 --> 00:18:45,708
much still remains unknown.
434
00:18:45,708 --> 00:18:47,375
- This video came out
435
00:18:47,375 --> 00:18:51,000
as part of a congressional
hearing in April of 2023.
436
00:18:51,000 --> 00:18:53,500
So we know that it
is a real video.
437
00:18:53,500 --> 00:18:55,833
We don't know any
other details though.
438
00:18:55,833 --> 00:18:59,167
- [Tony] What we do know is
like the Middle East UFO video,
439
00:18:59,167 --> 00:19:00,625
this footage also earned a place
440
00:19:00,625 --> 00:19:02,333
in Dr. Sean Kirkpatrick's
presentation
441
00:19:02,333 --> 00:19:04,792
to the Senate's Armed
Services Committee.
442
00:19:04,792 --> 00:19:07,375
- This one everyone thought
was truly anomalous,
443
00:19:07,375 --> 00:19:10,542
but this is the kind of data
that we have to work with
444
00:19:10,542 --> 00:19:13,250
and the type of analysis
that we have to do,
445
00:19:13,250 --> 00:19:14,708
which can be quite extensive
446
00:19:14,708 --> 00:19:18,042
when you have to pull
these apart frame by frame.
447
00:19:18,042 --> 00:19:19,542
- [Tony] Dr.
Kirkpatrick told Congress
448
00:19:19,542 --> 00:19:23,667
that out of the 650 UAP
reports under AARO review,
449
00:19:23,667 --> 00:19:26,750
this one caught their attention
because of its odd shape.
450
00:19:26,750 --> 00:19:28,417
- [Amy] It doesn't
have obvious wings,
451
00:19:28,417 --> 00:19:29,625
it doesn't have a tail,
452
00:19:29,625 --> 00:19:31,625
it doesn't have an
obvious propulsion source.
453
00:19:31,625 --> 00:19:34,542
- [Tony] In other words,
it has the makings of a UFO.
454
00:19:36,583 --> 00:19:38,167
According to AARO,
455
00:19:38,167 --> 00:19:41,083
most of the UAP incidents
reported to them
456
00:19:41,083 --> 00:19:45,000
occurred between 15 to
25,000 feet in altitude,
457
00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:47,417
which is controlled
military airspace.
458
00:19:47,417 --> 00:19:49,208
AARO subscribes to the theory
459
00:19:49,208 --> 00:19:51,542
that unresolved
sightings are more likely
460
00:19:51,542 --> 00:19:53,458
the work of US adversaries,
461
00:19:53,458 --> 00:19:55,750
not extraterrestrial
intelligence.
462
00:19:55,750 --> 00:19:58,125
Will our experts reach
the same conclusion
463
00:19:58,125 --> 00:19:59,958
with this footage?
464
00:19:59,958 --> 00:20:02,250
(tense music)
465
00:20:04,292 --> 00:20:07,292
Could this be an object
sent by a foreign power?
466
00:20:07,292 --> 00:20:10,042
The lack of information
has Tim McMillan unsure.
467
00:20:10,042 --> 00:20:13,417
- Some key pieces of information
that would be contained normally
468
00:20:13,417 --> 00:20:16,833
on the heads up
display of the drone,
469
00:20:16,833 --> 00:20:19,458
critically, the date, the time,
470
00:20:19,458 --> 00:20:21,333
and location would
help us narrow down
471
00:20:21,333 --> 00:20:23,208
exactly where this is.
472
00:20:23,208 --> 00:20:25,125
- [Tony] But that
very lack of information
473
00:20:25,125 --> 00:20:26,167
might tell us something
474
00:20:26,167 --> 00:20:27,833
about the nature
of this mission.
475
00:20:27,833 --> 00:20:31,375
- Could this be related
to a classified mission?
476
00:20:31,375 --> 00:20:32,917
In this case, probably not.
477
00:20:32,917 --> 00:20:36,125
And the reason I say that is
that this long endurance drone
478
00:20:36,125 --> 00:20:39,542
typically will fly
just by itself.
479
00:20:39,542 --> 00:20:41,125
It doesn't need a support drone.
480
00:20:41,125 --> 00:20:42,667
- [Tony] To McMillan,
481
00:20:42,667 --> 00:20:44,667
the fact that there are
two drones operating here,
482
00:20:44,667 --> 00:20:46,917
one in the footage, the
other doing the recording,
483
00:20:46,917 --> 00:20:49,375
means this is probably
just a training mission.
484
00:20:49,375 --> 00:20:51,250
So we turned to Rich Hoffman
485
00:20:51,250 --> 00:20:54,292
of the Scientific Coalition
for UAP Studies to ask
486
00:20:54,292 --> 00:20:57,000
could this simply
be a passing plane?
487
00:20:57,000 --> 00:20:58,458
- I looked at it frame by frame
488
00:20:58,458 --> 00:21:02,833
and you see what looks like
an aircraft tail and wings
489
00:21:02,833 --> 00:21:05,583
and the fact that it's
flying consistently
490
00:21:05,583 --> 00:21:07,583
in the same direction, that
it went by rather quick,
491
00:21:07,583 --> 00:21:10,042
it has the appearance
of an airplane.
492
00:21:10,042 --> 00:21:11,708
- [Tony] But
McMillan isn't so sure.
493
00:21:11,708 --> 00:21:14,375
- You wanna look for signs
of a propulsion system,
494
00:21:14,375 --> 00:21:16,792
so exhaust from a jet
engine, that type of thing.
495
00:21:16,792 --> 00:21:19,583
We don't necessarily
see that with this,
496
00:21:19,583 --> 00:21:23,042
although we, we can see
this interesting trail.
497
00:21:23,042 --> 00:21:24,708
However, that is
actually an artifact
498
00:21:24,708 --> 00:21:28,208
of the multi aperture
camera system.
499
00:21:28,208 --> 00:21:29,958
So you're talking
about camera systems
500
00:21:29,958 --> 00:21:32,875
that have hundreds of lenses
501
00:21:32,875 --> 00:21:35,583
with hundreds of
independent sensor systems
502
00:21:35,583 --> 00:21:38,417
that form one
fluid picture here,
503
00:21:38,417 --> 00:21:40,375
but that can create ghosting
504
00:21:40,375 --> 00:21:42,375
that appears like
a trail behind it
505
00:21:42,375 --> 00:21:44,583
when in actuality,
what we're seeing
506
00:21:44,583 --> 00:21:47,375
is the overlaying of all
of the different images
507
00:21:47,375 --> 00:21:50,208
from those hundreds of
different camera lenses.
508
00:21:50,208 --> 00:21:52,542
- [Tony] Then could
this be another drone?
509
00:21:52,542 --> 00:21:54,667
- If it's similar to
an aircraft design,
510
00:21:54,667 --> 00:21:57,542
much like the MQ9 Reaper,
it could be that as well.
511
00:21:57,542 --> 00:21:59,042
- Certainly, it could be.
512
00:21:59,042 --> 00:22:00,708
It could be a lot of things.
513
00:22:00,708 --> 00:22:03,458
There's just not enough
information there.
514
00:22:03,458 --> 00:22:05,875
- [Tony] Well, then
we have to ask,
515
00:22:05,875 --> 00:22:07,500
could it be a UFO?
516
00:22:07,500 --> 00:22:09,500
- You're trying to
deduce what you can
517
00:22:09,500 --> 00:22:11,458
from just a short little clip,
518
00:22:11,458 --> 00:22:14,542
but it flew in a straight
line, consistent speed.
519
00:22:14,542 --> 00:22:17,125
The last hypothesis I
would've ever gone with
520
00:22:17,125 --> 00:22:18,875
would've been
extraterrestrial craft.
521
00:22:18,875 --> 00:22:21,000
The first and the most
predominant hypothesis
522
00:22:21,000 --> 00:22:24,542
are that it's an aircraft
that you can't make out.
523
00:22:24,542 --> 00:22:26,583
- McMillan says
that the Pentagon,
524
00:22:26,583 --> 00:22:28,708
with that redacted
information at its disposal,
525
00:22:28,708 --> 00:22:31,625
came to a conclusion
consistent with Hoffman's.
526
00:22:31,625 --> 00:22:33,083
- The Pentagon was provided with
527
00:22:33,083 --> 00:22:35,958
the date and time and
location and all of that,
528
00:22:35,958 --> 00:22:38,708
and they were able to determine,
529
00:22:38,708 --> 00:22:40,417
without a doubt that
what we're seeing here
530
00:22:40,417 --> 00:22:44,500
is actually the rear end
of a commercial plane
531
00:22:44,500 --> 00:22:48,875
that is actually flying
away from the two drones.
532
00:22:48,875 --> 00:22:52,375
And so, the movement that we
see is actually the movement
533
00:22:52,375 --> 00:22:54,958
that's being caused by the
drone itself in flight.
534
00:22:54,958 --> 00:22:57,000
(tense music)
535
00:22:58,792 --> 00:23:02,125
- We have to agree with the
experts at AARO for this one.
536
00:23:02,125 --> 00:23:04,625
Our verdict is a plane.
537
00:23:04,625 --> 00:23:06,833
While many UFO believers express
538
00:23:06,833 --> 00:23:09,625
disappointment that
AARO seemed to downplay
539
00:23:09,625 --> 00:23:12,458
truly anomalous phenomena
during the hearing,
540
00:23:12,458 --> 00:23:14,458
other groups applauded this
541
00:23:14,458 --> 00:23:19,958
public release of
factual UAP data.
542
00:23:19,958 --> 00:23:23,042
Files.
543
00:23:23,042 --> 00:23:25,583
So far, we've been
looking at UFO footage
544
00:23:25,583 --> 00:23:28,167
captured by US forces
in foreign countries,
545
00:23:28,167 --> 00:23:32,708
but of course, there are plenty
of homegrown sightings too.
546
00:23:32,708 --> 00:23:35,208
One UFO researcher
has a series of clips
547
00:23:35,208 --> 00:23:39,917
that indicate a pattern of
UFOs near the US Mexico border.
548
00:23:39,917 --> 00:23:43,292
We've investigated one before
and now there's yet another.
549
00:23:43,292 --> 00:23:45,000
Take a look.
550
00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:49,042
February 3rd, 2020,
south of Tucson, Arizona
551
00:23:49,042 --> 00:23:51,500
at approximately 2100 hours,
552
00:23:51,500 --> 00:23:55,583
a border patrol fleer camera
scans a residential area.
553
00:23:55,583 --> 00:23:58,625
Houses and cacti
populate the frame.
554
00:23:58,625 --> 00:24:02,417
When suddenly a strange
white object appears.
555
00:24:03,292 --> 00:24:04,708
It glides across the screen
556
00:24:04,708 --> 00:24:07,125
with an almost
humanoid silhouette
557
00:24:07,125 --> 00:24:10,542
passing over a long stretch of
desert and even some cattle.
558
00:24:10,542 --> 00:24:12,708
It maintains both a
consistent elevation
559
00:24:12,708 --> 00:24:15,042
and that bright white color.
560
00:24:15,042 --> 00:24:17,375
The video is one of several
shot by US authorities
561
00:24:17,375 --> 00:24:20,708
and leaked to UFO
Investigator Andy Marshal.
562
00:24:20,708 --> 00:24:22,542
- The footage was
leaked to me by
563
00:24:22,542 --> 00:24:25,208
Department of Homeland
Security agent.
564
00:24:25,208 --> 00:24:27,833
He wished to remain anonymous.
565
00:24:27,833 --> 00:24:32,042
He knew what was captured in
these videos were anomalous
566
00:24:32,042 --> 00:24:34,708
and that he had to get
the videos out somehow
567
00:24:34,708 --> 00:24:36,958
to show the world that
these things are real.
568
00:24:36,958 --> 00:24:40,833
- Andy dubs the video La Bruja,
Spanish for "the witch",
569
00:24:40,833 --> 00:24:44,792
because it looks like a witch
sitting upright on a broomstick.
570
00:24:44,792 --> 00:24:47,375
Longtime FLIR
technician David Falch
571
00:24:47,375 --> 00:24:49,125
says that to understand
the thermal footage,
572
00:24:49,125 --> 00:24:51,708
you first need to know
that in this case,
573
00:24:51,708 --> 00:24:55,833
the camera is set to display
white as cold and black as hot.
574
00:24:55,833 --> 00:24:57,750
- What you're seeing
is a white object
575
00:24:57,750 --> 00:24:59,875
and a black hot scene.
576
00:24:59,875 --> 00:25:03,875
So, this being white
means it's ice cold.
577
00:25:03,875 --> 00:25:05,875
You don't see anything
like that in the sky.
578
00:25:05,875 --> 00:25:08,042
You see birds, you see aircraft,
579
00:25:08,042 --> 00:25:11,250
everything is putting on
a warm thermal signature.
580
00:25:11,250 --> 00:25:12,792
There's nothing out
there in the sky
581
00:25:12,792 --> 00:25:14,708
that's got a cold
thermal signature.
582
00:25:14,708 --> 00:25:16,917
- Nothing that we know of,
583
00:25:16,917 --> 00:25:19,500
but Andy can think of a
similar unknown object
584
00:25:19,500 --> 00:25:21,375
spotted around Tucson,
585
00:25:21,375 --> 00:25:23,875
which came to be known
as the rubber duck.
586
00:25:23,875 --> 00:25:28,000
- The rubber duck incident
took place November 23rd, 2019
587
00:25:29,083 --> 00:25:33,042
and it was shot from
a reconnaissance plane
588
00:25:33,042 --> 00:25:34,375
and as they were
overlooking the landscape,
589
00:25:34,375 --> 00:25:36,708
an object came into view
590
00:25:37,833 --> 00:25:40,708
and they recorded it
for up to 40 minutes.
591
00:25:40,708 --> 00:25:43,667
That object that was
captured in that footage
592
00:25:43,667 --> 00:25:46,292
is almost identical to the
one captured in La Bruja,
593
00:25:46,292 --> 00:25:48,625
the shape, the fact that
it was emitting zero heat.
594
00:25:48,625 --> 00:25:50,500
- [Tony] In 2021,
595
00:25:50,500 --> 00:25:52,583
Andy helped leak the
rubber duck footage,
596
00:25:52,583 --> 00:25:54,875
so called because it
looks like a rubber duck.
597
00:25:54,875 --> 00:25:57,250
Here on Proof, we
declared it a genuine UFO
598
00:25:57,250 --> 00:25:58,667
and a recent paper
599
00:25:58,667 --> 00:26:00,542
from the Scientific
Coalition of UAP studies,
600
00:26:00,542 --> 00:26:02,958
or SCU, concurred.
601
00:26:02,958 --> 00:26:04,708
Falch, who contributed
to the paper,
602
00:26:04,708 --> 00:26:06,875
can attest to the
in-depth analysis
603
00:26:06,875 --> 00:26:08,667
which led to that conclusion.
604
00:26:08,667 --> 00:26:10,167
- The paper investigated
605
00:26:10,167 --> 00:26:13,042
the characteristics
of the rubber duck,
606
00:26:13,042 --> 00:26:15,292
what the approximate
temperature was,
607
00:26:15,292 --> 00:26:20,167
the speed of the aircraft, the
trajectory, the fight path.
608
00:26:20,167 --> 00:26:22,250
- [Tony] The paper found
the rubber duck anomalous
609
00:26:22,250 --> 00:26:23,875
in three respects.
610
00:26:23,875 --> 00:26:25,458
It's white cold temperature,
611
00:26:25,458 --> 00:26:28,167
it's odd shape, and its speed,
612
00:26:28,167 --> 00:26:29,250
especially that it flew
613
00:26:29,250 --> 00:26:30,792
against the wind,
614
00:26:30,792 --> 00:26:31,792
meaning it could not
615
00:26:31,792 --> 00:26:33,208
have been a balloon.
616
00:26:33,208 --> 00:26:35,042
- All these things combined
617
00:26:35,042 --> 00:26:37,375
to come up to this
big conclusion of,
618
00:26:37,375 --> 00:26:39,583
they didn't know
what it was either.
619
00:26:39,583 --> 00:26:40,667
- [Tony] So, is La Bruja
620
00:26:40,667 --> 00:26:42,958
related to the
famed rubber duck?
621
00:26:42,958 --> 00:26:46,750
- They're both ice cold, not
having any signs of propulsion,
622
00:26:46,750 --> 00:26:48,708
not changing thermal signature,
623
00:26:48,708 --> 00:26:51,667
looking like they're
on a linear travel.
624
00:26:51,667 --> 00:26:53,167
It doesn't make any sense.
625
00:26:57,292 --> 00:27:00,583
- Now because we're talking
about the US Mexico border,
626
00:27:00,583 --> 00:27:03,000
we have to consider
whether both these objects
627
00:27:03,000 --> 00:27:06,667
were aerial devices
used to smuggle drugs.
628
00:27:06,667 --> 00:27:10,250
After all, border patrol
agents recently saw 21 cases
629
00:27:10,250 --> 00:27:14,375
of drone infiltration along
the San Diego Mexico border
630
00:27:14,375 --> 00:27:16,667
in a 13 month period.
631
00:27:16,667 --> 00:27:19,458
But that's just one
possible explanation.
632
00:27:19,458 --> 00:27:21,292
Let's see what our experts say.
633
00:27:21,292 --> 00:27:23,333
(tense music)
634
00:27:24,667 --> 00:27:27,042
We first ask SCU
President Rich Hoffman
635
00:27:27,042 --> 00:27:30,125
if there is any way
this could be a bird.
636
00:27:30,125 --> 00:27:31,583
- Even in infrared,
637
00:27:31,583 --> 00:27:33,750
you can make out
a lot of details
638
00:27:33,750 --> 00:27:35,250
that are pretty remarkable.
639
00:27:35,250 --> 00:27:37,875
You'd be able to tell that
it was a bird or not a bird.
640
00:27:37,875 --> 00:27:40,083
There's no flapping and
birds aren't cold like this.
641
00:27:40,083 --> 00:27:42,708
In thermal, a bird
will appear dark.
642
00:27:42,708 --> 00:27:45,000
- [Tony] And as we did with
the rubber duck footage,
643
00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:48,042
we have to consider if this
could just be a balloon.
644
00:27:48,042 --> 00:27:51,500
In this case, the wind
actually supports the theory.
645
00:27:51,500 --> 00:27:54,875
Falch estimates that the FLIR
camera is pointed southwest,
646
00:27:54,875 --> 00:27:57,167
meaning La Bruja
is headed southeast
647
00:27:57,167 --> 00:28:00,000
and the weather data in Tucson
at the time of the sighting
648
00:28:00,000 --> 00:28:02,750
shows a light breeze from
the west northwest.
649
00:28:02,750 --> 00:28:05,917
But Hoffman says it
doesn't look quite right.
650
00:28:06,875 --> 00:28:08,542
- Some party
balloons, for example,
651
00:28:08,542 --> 00:28:10,708
like latex, will be see-through.
652
00:28:10,708 --> 00:28:15,750
A mylar balloon will reflect
the heat from the ground
653
00:28:15,750 --> 00:28:18,250
and so, it wouldn't be
completely white like this.
654
00:28:18,250 --> 00:28:19,583
- [Tony] So could this be
655
00:28:19,583 --> 00:28:21,542
some type of
conventional aircraft?
656
00:28:21,542 --> 00:28:22,875
Falch doesn't think so.
657
00:28:22,875 --> 00:28:25,125
- A helicopter or plane
is out of the question
658
00:28:25,125 --> 00:28:29,875
because this FLIR is
just looking around,
659
00:28:29,875 --> 00:28:31,375
kind of almost at
a ground level.
660
00:28:31,375 --> 00:28:33,250
So if it was an aircraft,
661
00:28:33,250 --> 00:28:37,125
it would have to be
extremely small in size
662
00:28:37,125 --> 00:28:38,583
and it's not emitting
any type of heat,
663
00:28:38,583 --> 00:28:40,625
so it's obviously
easy to rule out
664
00:28:40,625 --> 00:28:42,500
that it's no type of aircraft.
665
00:28:42,500 --> 00:28:46,083
- If it has to be low flying,
then could it be a drone?
666
00:28:46,083 --> 00:28:48,875
- You would see
stop go movements
667
00:28:48,875 --> 00:28:51,583
that would kind of
sway the object,
668
00:28:51,583 --> 00:28:53,417
you don't see that in La Bruja.
669
00:28:53,417 --> 00:28:58,583
And how the signature
looks compared to a drone,
670
00:28:58,583 --> 00:29:00,250
you would see a
difference from the heat
671
00:29:00,250 --> 00:29:04,583
in the thermal signature
generated from the engines.
672
00:29:04,583 --> 00:29:06,875
- [Tony] So is
this really a UFO?
673
00:29:06,875 --> 00:29:09,625
- Bottom line is, you've
got an unusual shape here
674
00:29:09,625 --> 00:29:13,333
and I haven't been able to
put this to anything rational.
675
00:29:13,333 --> 00:29:14,750
It just doesn't match up.
676
00:29:14,750 --> 00:29:16,208
So it's unknown to me.
677
00:29:16,208 --> 00:29:19,667
I can't begin to
classify it at all.
678
00:29:19,667 --> 00:29:22,000
(tense music)
679
00:29:23,292 --> 00:29:25,917
- Our verdict, like
the SCU's conclusion
680
00:29:25,917 --> 00:29:27,250
with the rubber duck,
681
00:29:27,250 --> 00:29:31,500
we also think La Bruja
is a genuine UFO.
682
00:29:31,500 --> 00:29:34,750
If you're interested in
reading the SCU's full analysis
683
00:29:34,750 --> 00:29:36,917
of the rubber duck incident,
684
00:29:36,917 --> 00:29:38,708
feel free to visit the
organization's website,
685
00:29:38,708 --> 00:29:41,500
at explorescu.org.
686
00:29:41,500 --> 00:29:43,208
No words yet on whether La Bruja
687
00:29:43,208 --> 00:29:47,917
will be given the
same treatment.
688
00:29:47,917 --> 00:29:48,417
No words yet on whetherc music)a
689
00:29:49,125 --> 00:29:52,500
- What's the best UFO
photograph ever taken?
690
00:29:52,500 --> 00:29:55,042
That's depends on whom you ask.
691
00:29:55,042 --> 00:29:57,000
But we're about to show you
one of the leading candidates
692
00:29:57,000 --> 00:30:00,750
and this one was kept hidden
for more than 30 years.
693
00:30:00,750 --> 00:30:03,042
August 4th, 1990,
694
00:30:03,042 --> 00:30:05,708
two hotel employees
are on a walk
695
00:30:05,708 --> 00:30:08,125
in the Scottish
Highlands near Calvine.
696
00:30:08,125 --> 00:30:11,500
Mid hike, they allegedly
noticed something in the sky.
697
00:30:11,500 --> 00:30:15,208
Overhead, the men see a
massive, diamond shaped UFO
698
00:30:15,208 --> 00:30:17,083
accompanied by a military plane.
699
00:30:17,083 --> 00:30:19,292
One of them snaps a photo.
700
00:30:19,292 --> 00:30:22,000
The object is clear,
it has four sides
701
00:30:22,000 --> 00:30:23,458
and a horizontal division
702
00:30:23,458 --> 00:30:26,167
between an illuminated
top and a shadowed bottom,
703
00:30:26,167 --> 00:30:28,792
like a three-dimensional
object illuminated by the sun.
704
00:30:28,792 --> 00:30:30,250
After about 10 minutes,
705
00:30:30,250 --> 00:30:33,417
the diamond allegedly shoots
straight up into the sky.
706
00:30:33,417 --> 00:30:34,750
Writer Amy Teitel says
707
00:30:34,750 --> 00:30:37,875
little is known about
this diamond shaped UFO.
708
00:30:37,875 --> 00:30:40,875
- The Clavine photo is a
very classic UFO image.
709
00:30:40,875 --> 00:30:43,250
It doesn't give us
a lot of details,
710
00:30:43,250 --> 00:30:45,500
we can't tell from the
image how fast it's going,
711
00:30:45,500 --> 00:30:46,792
what it's doing.
712
00:30:46,792 --> 00:30:48,958
- [Tony] And it's
not just unidentified,
713
00:30:48,958 --> 00:30:51,750
it's state certified
unidentified.
714
00:30:51,750 --> 00:30:54,125
Nick Pope, a former
UFO investigator
715
00:30:54,125 --> 00:30:55,792
for Britain's
Ministry of Defense.
716
00:30:55,792 --> 00:30:58,792
says the MOD thought
the photo genuine.
717
00:30:58,792 --> 00:31:01,042
However, despite
widespread speculation
718
00:31:01,042 --> 00:31:03,708
that the object's origins
are extraterrestrial,
719
00:31:03,708 --> 00:31:05,250
Teitel notes that
the Calvine UFO
720
00:31:05,250 --> 00:31:07,750
might not be
interstellar at all.
721
00:31:07,750 --> 00:31:09,250
- It's possible that
the Calvine photograph
722
00:31:09,250 --> 00:31:11,875
is actually secret
military equipment.
723
00:31:11,875 --> 00:31:14,542
- [Tony] In fact, rumors
at the time of this sighting
724
00:31:14,542 --> 00:31:15,875
support that theory.
725
00:31:15,875 --> 00:31:17,917
- There have been rumors
of the US Air Force
726
00:31:17,917 --> 00:31:20,625
testing of reconnaissance
aircraft called Aurora
727
00:31:20,625 --> 00:31:21,917
in Scotland.
728
00:31:21,917 --> 00:31:23,875
- [Tony] The rumor
top secret aircraft
729
00:31:23,875 --> 00:31:26,750
was purportedly 110
feet long, 60 feet wide
730
00:31:26,750 --> 00:31:29,792
and capable of
speeds up to Mach 8.
731
00:31:29,792 --> 00:31:31,458
- There were sightings
of this aircraft
732
00:31:31,458 --> 00:31:33,292
said to be a black
triangular vehicle
733
00:31:33,292 --> 00:31:36,542
in the late 1980s
and early 1990s.
734
00:31:36,542 --> 00:31:40,083
- [Tony] So, was the Calvin
incident one of those sightings?
735
00:31:41,875 --> 00:31:44,542
If you believe Nick
Pope, even the UK's
736
00:31:44,542 --> 00:31:47,875
Ministry of Defense
considered the possibility
737
00:31:47,875 --> 00:31:49,500
that the Calvine UFO
738
00:31:49,500 --> 00:31:52,333
might have been the
rumored Aurora aircraft.
739
00:31:52,333 --> 00:31:55,375
However, the MOD
itself remains mum
740
00:31:55,375 --> 00:31:57,625
of what it thinks
the photo depicts.
741
00:31:57,625 --> 00:31:59,000
So what is it?
742
00:31:59,000 --> 00:32:00,833
Time to ask our experts.
743
00:32:00,833 --> 00:32:03,125
(tense music)
744
00:32:04,542 --> 00:32:07,375
First, is this photo even real?
745
00:32:07,375 --> 00:32:10,375
Forensic video analyst Michael
Primeau says it's hard to say
746
00:32:10,375 --> 00:32:13,000
because the negatives
have been lost.
747
00:32:13,000 --> 00:32:15,042
It's only because of
journalist David Clark
748
00:32:15,042 --> 00:32:18,042
that this print
recently came to light.
749
00:32:18,042 --> 00:32:20,083
- Dr. Clark actually
tracked it down
750
00:32:20,083 --> 00:32:25,083
by finding a former RAF press
officer named Craig Lindsay,
751
00:32:25,083 --> 00:32:27,083
who had an original copy
of it still preserved.
752
00:32:27,083 --> 00:32:29,042
- [Tony] Unfortunately, a copy
753
00:32:29,042 --> 00:32:31,917
doesn't make a strong
case for authentication.
754
00:32:31,917 --> 00:32:33,458
- We don't have the
original evidence.
755
00:32:33,458 --> 00:32:35,000
We have a version
that was printed
756
00:32:35,000 --> 00:32:38,167
and then surfaced
several years after.
757
00:32:38,167 --> 00:32:39,708
But the photo
definitely looks real.
758
00:32:39,708 --> 00:32:43,417
No abnormalities in the
physical aspects of the scene.
759
00:32:43,417 --> 00:32:46,083
- [Tony] So we ask our skeptical
science writer, Mick West,
760
00:32:46,083 --> 00:32:49,125
could this be the
rumored Aurora aircraft?
761
00:32:49,125 --> 00:32:51,625
- No actual Aurora
craft has ever emerged.
762
00:32:51,625 --> 00:32:54,333
And even the artist renderings
of the Aurora craft,
763
00:32:54,333 --> 00:32:56,292
they don't really
look like this.
764
00:32:56,292 --> 00:32:58,375
This doesn't look like
an aerodynamic craft.
765
00:32:58,375 --> 00:33:00,708
There's no real visible exhaust.
766
00:33:00,708 --> 00:33:02,667
There's no control surfaces.
767
00:33:02,667 --> 00:33:05,583
It just looks like a weird
diamond shaped thing.
768
00:33:05,583 --> 00:33:07,542
- [Tony] If it doesn't
look aerodynamic,
769
00:33:07,542 --> 00:33:10,542
is there a chance it's
not even in the air?
770
00:33:10,542 --> 00:33:12,875
Astrophotographer Andrew
McCarthy thinks so.
771
00:33:12,875 --> 00:33:16,333
- The key piece of
evidence is the fence.
772
00:33:16,333 --> 00:33:18,083
Fence posts, if
installed vertically,
773
00:33:18,083 --> 00:33:20,750
actually give us
a vanishing point.
774
00:33:20,750 --> 00:33:23,667
Now, if they were looking up
as they claim to have been
775
00:33:23,667 --> 00:33:25,458
when they took that
photo, the fence posts
776
00:33:25,458 --> 00:33:27,875
would've converged in
an upwards direction,
777
00:33:27,875 --> 00:33:29,250
not a downwards direction.
778
00:33:29,250 --> 00:33:30,917
And if it was pointed down,
779
00:33:30,917 --> 00:33:34,042
then we are not looking
up into the sky at all.
780
00:33:34,042 --> 00:33:35,458
- [Tony] So what
are we looking at?
781
00:33:35,458 --> 00:33:37,458
- I think we're
looking at an object
782
00:33:37,458 --> 00:33:39,208
that's reflecting
in a body of water.
783
00:33:39,208 --> 00:33:41,500
- [Tony] Imagine you're
looking out at a lake,
784
00:33:41,500 --> 00:33:43,917
a large triangular boulder
juts out of the water
785
00:33:43,917 --> 00:33:46,417
and casts a perfect
reflection beneath it.
786
00:33:46,417 --> 00:33:49,125
Looks a lot like the
Calvine photo, right?
787
00:33:49,125 --> 00:33:51,333
But West isn't so sure.
788
00:33:51,333 --> 00:33:53,500
- So I think it's
somewhat implausible
789
00:33:53,500 --> 00:33:56,708
that you would get a such
a mirror-like, still pool
790
00:33:56,708 --> 00:33:59,167
up in the Scottish highlands.
791
00:33:59,167 --> 00:34:01,750
I tried recreating this in
my pool in the backyard,
792
00:34:01,750 --> 00:34:05,125
which is very sheltered and
it's a very small body of water,
793
00:34:05,125 --> 00:34:06,875
and I had to do it
early in the morning
794
00:34:06,875 --> 00:34:08,333
before there was any wind.
795
00:34:08,333 --> 00:34:10,000
So it's very difficult to do.
796
00:34:10,000 --> 00:34:12,042
- [Tony] Instead, West suggests
797
00:34:12,042 --> 00:34:13,917
we recalibrate our
sense of scale.
798
00:34:13,917 --> 00:34:16,000
- We don't actually
know how far away it is.
799
00:34:16,000 --> 00:34:18,042
What if it was only
say two feet away?
800
00:34:18,042 --> 00:34:20,250
Then it could be
very small indeed.
801
00:34:20,250 --> 00:34:21,875
And that kind of brings
us to the other way
802
00:34:21,875 --> 00:34:24,167
we can fake images
just using a model.
803
00:34:24,167 --> 00:34:26,542
I did a few tests outside,
804
00:34:27,708 --> 00:34:30,958
just simply dangling the
object from the tree.
805
00:34:30,958 --> 00:34:35,250
And so I think it's very easy
806
00:34:35,250 --> 00:34:38,292
to have simulated this photo,
807
00:34:38,292 --> 00:34:42,042
using just a simple model
hanging from this tree.
808
00:34:44,667 --> 00:34:46,708
(tense music)
809
00:34:48,875 --> 00:34:50,542
- Our verdict?
810
00:34:50,542 --> 00:34:53,667
We're tempted to
call this one a hoax,
811
00:34:53,667 --> 00:34:55,667
considering both West
and McCarthy proved
812
00:34:55,667 --> 00:34:58,083
that it could be faked.
813
00:34:58,083 --> 00:34:59,542
But the British
Ministry of Defense
814
00:34:59,542 --> 00:35:01,500
has reportedly
investigated the image
815
00:35:01,500 --> 00:35:03,958
and has not declared it a phony.
816
00:35:03,958 --> 00:35:05,500
So for now,
817
00:35:05,500 --> 00:35:08,958
we have to say this remains
an unidentified object,
818
00:35:08,958 --> 00:35:11,208
but we're not
gonna call it a UFO
819
00:35:11,208 --> 00:35:16,250
because we're not even
positive it's actually flying.
820
00:35:16,250 --> 00:35:16,292
but we're not
gonna call it a UFO
)
821
00:35:17,583 --> 00:35:19,375
- Finally tonight, we want
to talk about what's become
822
00:35:19,375 --> 00:35:22,958
one of the most famous
UFO encounters ever.
823
00:35:22,958 --> 00:35:25,917
The 2004 Nimitz Tic Tac UFO.
824
00:35:25,917 --> 00:35:27,958
The US government
still considers this
825
00:35:27,958 --> 00:35:31,250
an official, unresolved UAP.
826
00:35:31,250 --> 00:35:34,042
But recently, our in-house
skeptic Mick West
827
00:35:34,042 --> 00:35:36,708
says he came up with
an explanation for it.
828
00:35:36,708 --> 00:35:40,292
So how will the
debunker's theory hold up?
829
00:35:40,292 --> 00:35:42,750
Many of you already
know this by heart.
830
00:35:42,750 --> 00:35:46,917
It's November 14th, 2004,
off the coast of San Diego.
831
00:35:46,917 --> 00:35:48,333
The aircraft carrier USS Nimitz
832
00:35:48,333 --> 00:35:50,542
is leading its strike
group on practice maneuvers
833
00:35:50,542 --> 00:35:53,542
when something strange occurs.
834
00:35:53,542 --> 00:35:55,917
While radar is indicating an
unknown object in the air,
835
00:35:55,917 --> 00:35:59,125
Lieutenant Chad Underwood
seeks out the anomalous object
836
00:35:59,125 --> 00:36:01,542
and manages to take a video.
837
00:36:01,542 --> 00:36:06,042
What he captures on camera
changes ufology forever.
838
00:36:06,042 --> 00:36:07,875
The infrared camera
picks up a white,
839
00:36:07,875 --> 00:36:09,375
almost star-shaped blob
840
00:36:09,375 --> 00:36:13,500
hovering at an altitude of
about 15,000 to 24,000 feet.
841
00:36:13,500 --> 00:36:16,417
It has a bright white center,
meaning the object is hot
842
00:36:16,417 --> 00:36:18,458
and several gray
spikes coming out of it
843
00:36:18,458 --> 00:36:20,083
representing the
dispersion of heat.
844
00:36:20,083 --> 00:36:22,458
The camera then switches
off its infrared setting
845
00:36:22,458 --> 00:36:25,417
and we see the object as a solid
black disc in the distance.
846
00:36:25,417 --> 00:36:26,792
The craft appears to rotate,
847
00:36:26,792 --> 00:36:29,500
now resembling more
of a tic-tac shape.
848
00:36:29,500 --> 00:36:31,625
Finally, the object subtly
shoots off the screen
849
00:36:31,625 --> 00:36:35,375
at stunning speed to the
amazement of the pilots.
850
00:36:35,375 --> 00:36:37,208
- They claim that it
was performing in ways
851
00:36:37,208 --> 00:36:38,625
that were definitely anomalous.
852
00:36:38,625 --> 00:36:41,250
For something that had
no propellers, no rotors,
853
00:36:41,250 --> 00:36:43,333
it had no exhaust plumes,
it had no surfaces
854
00:36:43,333 --> 00:36:44,833
that could generate lift,
855
00:36:44,833 --> 00:36:47,542
and to them, it seemed
intelligently controlled.
856
00:36:47,542 --> 00:36:50,167
The importance of this
video in the UFO circles
857
00:36:50,167 --> 00:36:52,083
cannot be overstated.
858
00:36:52,083 --> 00:36:54,458
It is continuously brought up
859
00:36:54,458 --> 00:36:57,167
at government hearings
concerning UFOs.
860
00:36:57,167 --> 00:36:58,542
It's brought up in
front of the Senate,
861
00:36:58,542 --> 00:36:59,958
it's brought up in
front of Congress.
862
00:36:59,958 --> 00:37:02,792
It's been brought up literally
to the president himself.
863
00:37:03,792 --> 00:37:07,375
- As we said earlier, AARO
has reported that to date,
864
00:37:07,375 --> 00:37:09,833
it's found no proof
of alien technology.
865
00:37:09,833 --> 00:37:13,417
So does that mean the Nimitz
Tic Tac can be explained?
866
00:37:13,417 --> 00:37:15,667
Science writer Mick
West thinks so,
867
00:37:15,667 --> 00:37:18,333
but he's not the only
one with an opinion.
868
00:37:18,333 --> 00:37:20,583
(tense music)
869
00:37:21,958 --> 00:37:26,250
First, Mick tackles the tic-tac
seemingly extreme speed.
870
00:37:26,250 --> 00:37:27,792
- There's two
points in this video
871
00:37:27,792 --> 00:37:30,292
where the object
appears to demonstrate
872
00:37:30,292 --> 00:37:32,125
amazing acceleration,
873
00:37:32,125 --> 00:37:35,250
and the first one comes where
it appears to shoot off screen
874
00:37:35,250 --> 00:37:36,708
very, very rapidly.
875
00:37:36,708 --> 00:37:39,250
But that coincides, as
to most of the movements,
876
00:37:39,250 --> 00:37:41,208
with a camera change.
877
00:37:41,208 --> 00:37:42,958
- [Tony] Watch as
the sensor's zoom level
878
00:37:42,958 --> 00:37:47,208
abruptly doubles during one of
the object's quickest movements.
879
00:37:47,208 --> 00:37:49,667
- So even though it looks like
it's moving very, very fast,
880
00:37:49,667 --> 00:37:51,417
all it is is the camera moving
881
00:37:51,417 --> 00:37:53,833
from one magnification
to another.
882
00:37:53,833 --> 00:37:55,875
- [Tony] However,
physicist Matthew Szydagis
883
00:37:55,875 --> 00:37:57,500
thinks otherwise.
884
00:37:57,500 --> 00:38:00,042
- With the testimony of
Lieutenant Chad Underwood,
885
00:38:00,042 --> 00:38:01,667
who actually took the video,
886
00:38:01,667 --> 00:38:03,250
we are actually seeing an object
887
00:38:03,250 --> 00:38:05,667
that produced such
a high acceleration
888
00:38:05,667 --> 00:38:08,417
that it broke the targeting lock
889
00:38:08,417 --> 00:38:12,458
of our multi-million
dollar system
890
00:38:12,458 --> 00:38:15,917
that should not be able
to lose lock so easily.
891
00:38:15,917 --> 00:38:18,625
- [Tony] In fact, a peer
reviewed publication
892
00:38:18,625 --> 00:38:20,375
authored by a
colleague of Szydagis's
893
00:38:20,375 --> 00:38:23,125
suggests that the
accelerations we're seeing here
894
00:38:23,125 --> 00:38:27,583
are far beyond the capabilities
of any known human aircraft.
895
00:38:27,583 --> 00:38:29,875
- Professor Kevin Knuth at
the University of Albany
896
00:38:29,875 --> 00:38:34,208
reviewed the video and found
that the most probable solution
897
00:38:34,208 --> 00:38:37,958
to the motion we see
involves accelerations
898
00:38:37,958 --> 00:38:42,917
of at least 70 G, which would
rip the engines off a plane.
899
00:38:42,917 --> 00:38:45,583
- [Tony] Still, Mick West
wonders if this whole thing
900
00:38:45,583 --> 00:38:47,458
might just be a case
of misidentification.
901
00:38:47,458 --> 00:38:49,208
- I first thought
that it might be
902
00:38:49,208 --> 00:38:50,542
a nearby commercial airplane
903
00:38:50,542 --> 00:38:52,583
because these training
ranges are actually adjacent
904
00:38:52,583 --> 00:38:54,500
to commercial traffic routes.
905
00:38:54,500 --> 00:38:57,875
But a bigger jet would have two
hotspots where the wings are
906
00:38:57,875 --> 00:38:59,250
so I think it's
probably more likely
907
00:38:59,250 --> 00:39:00,792
to be something smaller.
908
00:39:00,792 --> 00:39:03,917
Something smaller actually
fits the angles and the sizes
909
00:39:03,917 --> 00:39:07,167
and the position of the
engines in the infrared.
910
00:39:07,167 --> 00:39:10,750
It fits with something much
more like an F18 plane.
911
00:39:10,750 --> 00:39:13,583
- [Tony] West says it's the
infrared that gives it away.
912
00:39:13,583 --> 00:39:15,625
- You can see a little hotspot
913
00:39:15,625 --> 00:39:17,542
on the right side of the plane
914
00:39:17,542 --> 00:39:20,625
would correspond to the
engines of a small jet.
915
00:39:20,625 --> 00:39:23,208
- [Tony] But again,
Szydagis disagrees.
916
00:39:23,208 --> 00:39:26,167
- There is no FAA
or ADS-B record
917
00:39:26,167 --> 00:39:29,292
of an airplane at
this day and time
918
00:39:29,292 --> 00:39:32,042
because this was a
military exercise area
919
00:39:32,042 --> 00:39:33,208
in the first place.
920
00:39:33,208 --> 00:39:35,917
We have evidence
from multiple sources
921
00:39:35,917 --> 00:39:38,417
corroborating from
the US government,
922
00:39:38,417 --> 00:39:41,958
saying that the military
exercise was canceled.
923
00:39:41,958 --> 00:39:45,292
That means there weren't
other F18s in the air
924
00:39:45,292 --> 00:39:47,125
during the tic-tac encounter.
925
00:39:47,125 --> 00:39:49,500
So we can conclusively rule out
926
00:39:49,500 --> 00:39:52,208
without even arguing about
acceleration or speed,
927
00:39:52,208 --> 00:39:54,542
that this is not an F18.
928
00:39:54,542 --> 00:39:56,417
- [Tony] So, where do we land?
929
00:39:56,417 --> 00:39:57,667
Szydagis is convinced.
930
00:39:57,667 --> 00:40:00,500
- I think we're looking
at a genuine UFO.
931
00:40:00,500 --> 00:40:02,500
I think it's very telling
932
00:40:02,500 --> 00:40:05,542
that the speeds and
accelerations measured are
933
00:40:05,542 --> 00:40:07,417
abnormally high
934
00:40:07,417 --> 00:40:09,250
in a way that
would point towards
935
00:40:09,250 --> 00:40:11,083
some sort of advanced craft
936
00:40:11,083 --> 00:40:13,917
not constructed by human beings.
937
00:40:13,917 --> 00:40:16,917
- [Tony] Mick West
remains unconvinced.
938
00:40:16,917 --> 00:40:18,250
- This is all consistent
939
00:40:18,250 --> 00:40:19,583
with something like
a distant plane.
940
00:40:19,583 --> 00:40:21,917
I don't think it's a genuine UFO
941
00:40:21,917 --> 00:40:23,792
in that it doesn't
actually demonstrate
942
00:40:23,792 --> 00:40:25,917
any real anomalous properties,
943
00:40:25,917 --> 00:40:28,792
which is something
you want from a UFO.
944
00:40:28,792 --> 00:40:30,875
(tense music)
945
00:40:32,292 --> 00:40:33,625
- Our verdict?
946
00:40:33,625 --> 00:40:36,833
The Nimitz Tic Tac
remains a genuine UFO.
947
00:40:36,833 --> 00:40:38,583
Mick West brings up
some interesting points,
948
00:40:38,583 --> 00:40:41,375
but the preponderance
of evidence,
949
00:40:41,375 --> 00:40:44,417
notably the testimony
of multiple Navy pilots,
950
00:40:44,417 --> 00:40:47,417
still points to
something inexplicable.
951
00:40:47,417 --> 00:40:49,958
And as we've seen tonight
with other footage,
952
00:40:49,958 --> 00:40:52,417
this UFO is not alone.
953
00:40:52,417 --> 00:40:53,708
That's our show
for this evening.
954
00:40:53,708 --> 00:40:56,958
The great UFO question
continues to build momentum.
955
00:40:56,958 --> 00:40:59,542
So if you see
something in the sky,
956
00:40:59,542 --> 00:41:01,542
keep those cameras rolling.
957
00:41:01,542 --> 00:41:03,917
(dramatic music)
71821
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.