Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:01,935 --> 00:00:05,872
So we've taken a look at the first
shoot so far, which was a lot of fun
2
00:00:06,39 --> 00:00:09,776
and was really focused on recreating
something pretty authentically, or at
3
00:00:09,776 --> 00:00:10,744
least to the best of our ability.
4
00:00:11,144 --> 00:00:14,581
For this one, we were looking to do
something a little bit more
5
00:00:15,715 --> 00:00:18,585
of a bigger production, a little bit
wider, a little bit more involved, and
6
00:00:18,585 --> 00:00:21,121
not rooted in something we had to
adhere to
7
00:00:21,554 --> 00:00:22,522
quite so specifically.
8
00:00:23,223 --> 00:00:27,327
So just to throw this back up on the
screen, this was the source material
9
00:00:27,560 --> 00:00:28,361
that we were working from.
10
00:00:28,428 --> 00:00:30,30
And it gave me a general idea
11
00:00:31,64 --> 00:00:33,66
of what I wanted that composition to
look like.
12
00:00:33,133 --> 00:00:36,736
You can see the bigger plane in the
foreground, the spitfire in the
13
00:00:36,736 --> 00:00:36,903
background.
14
00:00:37,470 --> 00:00:40,273
I've got someone standing on the back
of the spitfire, which I thought would
15
00:00:40,740 --> 00:00:42,976
kind of give me a little bit of visual
interest.
16
00:00:43,309 --> 00:00:46,179
Back in that corner, I've had the two
guys interacting in the foreground.
17
00:00:46,746 --> 00:00:49,449
Now, I also, for this shot, only have
18
00:00:49,783 --> 00:00:50,283
two subjects.
19
00:00:50,984 --> 00:00:54,554
And when I was looking at the
researching, the
20
00:00:55,455 --> 00:00:58,191
source kind of images for this, the
ones that I really like, with the ones
21
00:00:58,191 --> 00:00:59,793
that had like a lot of different people
in the scene.
22
00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:04,431
And so what I would do, in addition to
having the scene created over on the
23
00:01:04,431 --> 00:01:07,667
left hand side, was I actually had them
kind of like take off their hat and
24
00:01:08,201 --> 00:01:09,135
move around the scene.
25
00:01:09,235 --> 00:01:12,972
And because they're all out of focus,
they got to play multiple roles in the image.
26
00:01:14,741 --> 00:01:19,846
And so we're going to go ahead and take
a look at the intro to this and get us started.
27
00:01:21,548 --> 00:01:23,316
So we're setting up here for shoot two.
28
00:01:23,383 --> 00:01:25,919
So I want to take you through
logistically, a little bit of what's happening
29
00:01:26,186 --> 00:01:30,523
now, for the most part, the entire
approach to this particular shot is
30
00:01:30,590 --> 00:01:32,659
very similar to the first one, of the
theory behind it.
31
00:01:32,892 --> 00:01:33,393
What is motivating?
32
00:01:33,693 --> 00:01:34,94
The shot,
33
00:01:34,361 --> 00:01:35,395
really, pretty similar.
34
00:01:36,29 --> 00:01:36,963
So again, I'm using
35
00:01:37,230 --> 00:01:37,397
scrims.
36
00:01:37,697 --> 00:01:38,865
This time they're stacked
37
00:01:39,532 --> 00:01:42,68
one on top of the other to give me a
little bit more,
38
00:01:42,569 --> 00:01:45,538
a little bit more coverage for my two
subjects standing up.
39
00:01:45,772 --> 00:01:48,675
Because the light has now moved and we
have changed positions.
40
00:01:48,908 --> 00:01:51,945
So the lights a little bit more
directionally to the front, which is
41
00:01:52,12 --> 00:01:54,581
fine for hard light, but I actually
want it to be a little bit softer.
42
00:01:54,814 --> 00:01:56,149
So it matches the other image.
43
00:01:56,349 --> 00:01:58,251
Now I know that this is going to create
a few complications
44
00:01:59,319 --> 00:01:59,719
in the image.
45
00:02:00,754 --> 00:02:01,287
So
46
00:02:01,554 --> 00:02:05,458
basically, I am looking at harder
shadows across the board.
47
00:02:05,625 --> 00:02:07,794
I've got hard shadows on the ground
because of the scrim.
48
00:02:08,328 --> 00:02:12,499
And this is something that I'm actually
going to have to remove a little bit in
49
00:02:12,499 --> 00:02:12,999
post production.
50
00:02:13,233 --> 00:02:15,669
It's going to be a little bit tricky on
that particular
51
00:02:16,336 --> 00:02:16,503
idea.
52
00:02:16,903 --> 00:02:20,440
But I do need to spend some time
softing those shadows a little bit if I
53
00:02:20,440 --> 00:02:22,709
want to get something that feels very
similar.
54
00:02:23,677 --> 00:02:24,477
Also,
55
00:02:25,145 --> 00:02:26,546
the light is now not
56
00:02:27,80 --> 00:02:28,348
totally separate from the scrims.
57
00:02:28,648 --> 00:02:30,517
I'm shooting through the scrimps again.
58
00:02:30,583 --> 00:02:33,153
This is about creating light that's
already motivated by reality.
59
00:02:33,553 --> 00:02:36,356
But by putting a light through the
scrim and making it a little bit more
60
00:02:36,423 --> 00:02:39,225
powerful, it kind of works the light
that is already there, but it becomes
61
00:02:40,593 --> 00:02:43,530
the background, becomes a little bit
more dramatic because we're able to
62
00:02:43,530 --> 00:02:45,265
overpower it a little bit.
63
00:02:45,699 --> 00:02:50,904
I am still shooting on my three stop Nd
with a polarizer, so it allows me to
64
00:02:50,904 --> 00:02:51,705
shoot at a pretty low aperture,
65
00:02:52,839 --> 00:02:54,841
along with my relatively so slow
shutterspeaches.
66
00:02:55,308 --> 00:02:56,576
I'm shooting again at 28.
67
00:02:57,377 --> 00:03:00,313
I'm going to be like 1125th of a second
in iso 100.
68
00:03:00,747 --> 00:03:03,717
The lens choice for this particular
image is a little bit different from
69
00:03:03,717 --> 00:03:04,184
the first one.
70
00:03:04,351 --> 00:03:07,954
In the first one, we shot with a ninety
mill lens, somewhat similar to 72
71
00:03:08,254 --> 00:03:09,556
millimeter on a full frame.
72
00:03:10,357 --> 00:03:14,194
And that gave us a significant amount
of compression between the subject and
73
00:03:14,260 --> 00:03:17,630
the background, put the background
really out of focus and kept the
74
00:03:17,630 --> 00:03:18,765
perspective pretty consistent.
75
00:03:19,399 --> 00:03:24,37
Here we've switched to a 55 mill lens,
which is about a forty mill equivalent
76
00:03:24,437 --> 00:03:25,71
on a full frame.
77
00:03:25,138 --> 00:03:28,274
So if you think about it, it's somewhat
similar to about a medium length, 5050
78
00:03:28,975 --> 00:03:30,243
millimeter lens, and a full frame,
79
00:03:30,410 --> 00:03:30,977
more or less.
80
00:03:31,778 --> 00:03:34,414
And so what that's going to do is it's
going to give me a little bit of
81
00:03:34,414 --> 00:03:36,916
distance between my foreground, mid
ground, and background.
82
00:03:37,150 --> 00:03:39,52
And so we're creating a little bit more
83
00:03:39,386 --> 00:03:40,587
depth with this composition.
84
00:03:40,987 --> 00:03:42,989
The bomber is taking the left side of
the frame.
85
00:03:43,456 --> 00:03:47,160
The spitfire is now in the back and
it's kind of creating converging lines
86
00:03:47,293 --> 00:03:47,560
of perspective.
87
00:03:48,28 --> 00:03:51,698
So the bomber, on the one hand, is
going to poke in the left side of the
88
00:03:51,698 --> 00:03:55,1
frame and camera, and the spitfire is
going to kind of go in the back, and
89
00:03:55,1 --> 00:03:56,503
it's a little bit of a zigzag of
composition.
90
00:03:57,137 --> 00:03:59,305
Helps us showcase a little bit of
depth.
91
00:03:59,773 --> 00:04:04,411
I am still on this lens, running my and
d filter with a three stop Nd with a
92
00:04:04,411 --> 00:04:04,577
polarizer.
93
00:04:05,311 --> 00:04:09,82
That's helping me gauge what the
reflections on top of the glass look
94
00:04:09,149 --> 00:04:09,716
like a little bit.
95
00:04:09,716 --> 00:04:12,919
I can temper that and make that look
exactly how I want.
96
00:04:13,153 --> 00:04:16,489
And a polarizer went on is also going
to give me a little bit more blue to
97
00:04:16,489 --> 00:04:16,823
the sky.
98
00:04:17,390 --> 00:04:20,860
And because this particular sky is
99
00:04:21,394 --> 00:04:26,266
pretty, without pretty much no clouds,
the little bit of extra blue helps it
100
00:04:26,599 --> 00:04:29,135
retain a little bit of something
visual, so it just doesn't look
101
00:04:29,135 --> 00:04:30,36
completely washed out.
102
00:04:30,103 --> 00:04:31,671
So I have that going for it as well.
103
00:04:32,105 --> 00:04:33,473
So I've got the scrims in place.
104
00:04:33,640 --> 00:04:36,810
Obviously, they are needing to be
supported and held up.
105
00:04:36,810 --> 00:04:37,544
It's a little bit precarious.
106
00:04:38,11 --> 00:04:42,349
We're at this particular point, almost
holding up giant sails when they're
107
00:04:42,349 --> 00:04:43,216
sideways like this.
108
00:04:43,616 --> 00:04:47,687
So what I'm trying to sort out is
making sure the height of my octabox is correct.
109
00:04:47,854 --> 00:04:49,456
Too high, it's going to scull out the
eyes.
110
00:04:49,789 --> 00:04:52,826
So I'm trying to make it a little bit
lower and balance it to my subjects.
111
00:04:53,393 --> 00:04:55,295
They are going to be on the left side
of the frame.
112
00:04:55,395 --> 00:04:58,898
We're going to have them interacting,
shaking hands, and then in the
113
00:04:58,898 --> 00:05:00,900
background, we're going to add in one
of them.
114
00:05:00,900 --> 00:05:03,536
We're going to have them do double duty
and stand on the spitfire in the back
115
00:05:03,636 --> 00:05:06,106
they're going to be at a focus, you're
not going to be able to see it, but
116
00:05:06,106 --> 00:05:07,707
it's going to give us a little bit of
extra depth.
117
00:05:07,874 --> 00:05:12,445
And we can utilize the fact that we are
using only two people to achieve the
118
00:05:12,512 --> 00:05:13,446
roles of three.
119
00:05:15,782 --> 00:05:18,251
All right, so let's take a look at what
that lighting diagram
120
00:05:19,552 --> 00:05:20,120
looks like.
121
00:05:20,520 --> 00:05:21,488
So I have my two subjects.
122
00:05:21,688 --> 00:05:25,458
This is obviously just a small section
of what you're about to see in terms of
123
00:05:25,458 --> 00:05:27,627
the overall scene, but it's what I have
to light.
124
00:05:28,94 --> 00:05:28,995
So I've got the two guys.
125
00:05:29,529 --> 00:05:32,265
They are interacting with each other in
my frame.
126
00:05:32,832 --> 00:05:33,933
They are
127
00:05:34,668 --> 00:05:36,336
blocked from the sun by scribs.
128
00:05:36,569 --> 00:05:37,704
And I've had to stack these.
129
00:05:37,937 --> 00:05:39,205
And this is a little bit
130
00:05:39,639 --> 00:05:42,842
precarious, because remember, I said we
generally wanted to make them flat.
131
00:05:43,209 --> 00:05:45,378
Well, we couldn't because of the angle
of the sun.
132
00:05:45,478 --> 00:05:46,913
They were hitting them pretty straight
on.
133
00:05:47,147 --> 00:05:48,14
So they are
134
00:05:48,515 --> 00:05:52,752
really heavily anchored, and made sure
that someone is standing with them so
135
00:05:52,752 --> 00:05:53,753
they don't blow away.
136
00:05:54,654 --> 00:05:56,356
Now to soften that light.
137
00:05:56,356 --> 00:05:57,791
But give it a little bit more of a
punch.
138
00:05:58,191 --> 00:05:58,992
That five foot octabox
139
00:06:00,26 --> 00:06:01,127
is behind it,
140
00:06:01,561 --> 00:06:01,861
which basically
141
00:06:03,229 --> 00:06:06,499
reinforces the direction of the overall
light, so it's not competing.
142
00:06:06,900 --> 00:06:10,170
It's meant to feel a little bit
natural, but the light itself is going
143
00:06:10,170 --> 00:06:13,640
to be quite a bit more flattering than
what that hard, direct sunlight would
144
00:06:13,640 --> 00:06:13,940
have been.
145
00:06:14,274 --> 00:06:17,377
And so that's kind of the reason for
putting that over on the left hand
146
00:06:17,477 --> 00:06:17,644
side.
147
00:06:18,11 --> 00:06:21,948
So basically the sun and the octabox
are coming from the same direction, but
148
00:06:21,948 --> 00:06:24,951
the octabox is a little bit more
powerful relative
149
00:06:25,218 --> 00:06:29,122
to what the subject's light would be,
naturally with those scribbs in place.
150
00:06:29,789 --> 00:06:31,191
So that's what the lighting looks like.
151
00:06:31,991 --> 00:06:33,126
And
152
00:06:33,860 --> 00:06:34,828
I believe we have a question.
153
00:06:35,228 --> 00:06:35,528
Yeah.
154
00:06:36,429 --> 00:06:38,865
So when you're taking multiple shots,
155
00:06:40,266 --> 00:06:43,536
in composing multiple shots, are you
thinking about a narrative or
156
00:06:43,536 --> 00:06:47,40
continuity between the shots, or is it
ok if they end up looking really
157
00:06:47,941 --> 00:06:48,108
different?
158
00:06:48,575 --> 00:06:51,945
I mean, it totally depends on what the
purpose of the set of images is meant
159
00:06:52,12 --> 00:06:52,278
to be.
160
00:06:52,912 --> 00:06:56,182
Because we were in this one location, I
was aiming for cohesion.
161
00:06:57,450 --> 00:06:58,752
I wanted them to look similar.
162
00:06:59,552 --> 00:07:03,390
And I had spent quite a bit of time in
the development process last night
163
00:07:03,456 --> 00:07:06,359
messing around with it, because I
wanted to
164
00:07:08,94 --> 00:07:11,31
make an image that was backlit, almost
165
00:07:11,531 --> 00:07:11,865
more or less
166
00:07:13,66 --> 00:07:13,700
something that's frontlit.
167
00:07:14,100 --> 00:07:17,404
And so it took me a little bit of time
and effort to play with those
168
00:07:17,704 --> 00:07:20,273
contrasting tonal values a little bit
to match it up.
169
00:07:21,641 --> 00:07:23,43
Secondarily to that,
170
00:07:23,777 --> 00:07:28,181
the color of everything that's in the
image is a lot different.
171
00:07:28,415 --> 00:07:30,583
So in the first image, I went a little
bit more traditionally,
172
00:07:32,118 --> 00:07:36,823
Rf, where there's a lot more blues in
the frame, whereas this one uses a lot
173
00:07:36,890 --> 00:07:37,857
more yellows and greens.
174
00:07:38,658 --> 00:07:44,97
And so I also wanted to play a bit with
tempering that color to balance it out.
175
00:07:44,197 --> 00:07:48,201
So I took the opportunity to make it
seem like they were a series of images,
176
00:07:48,501 --> 00:07:51,705
even though they're both very different
Scenes, they at least feel close.
177
00:07:52,105 --> 00:07:53,139
Because I wanted some cohesion.
178
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:55,642
I can present them together and say,
hey, look at this project.
179
00:07:55,942 --> 00:07:56,176
I shot
180
00:07:57,310 --> 00:07:57,477
versus.
181
00:07:57,711 --> 00:08:01,781
Hey, these couples of singular images
that don't really connect to anything
182
00:08:02,115 --> 00:08:02,816
one way or the other.
183
00:08:03,49 --> 00:08:04,517
There's no rule that says you have to.
184
00:08:04,984 --> 00:08:07,687
I just think it's a little bit more
impactful when it's presented as
185
00:08:08,188 --> 00:08:10,90
something bigger than one frame.
16177
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.