Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated:
1
00:00:07,660 --> 00:00:11,210
hello everybody Joe chicka relly here
2
00:00:11,210 --> 00:00:13,850
we're at the beautiful wonderful la
3
00:00:13,850 --> 00:00:16,369
Fabrique studios in the South of France
4
00:00:16,369 --> 00:00:18,710
we just finished a week at mix with the
5
00:00:18,710 --> 00:00:23,029
Masters fantastic just magical week with
6
00:00:23,029 --> 00:00:26,449
13 participants that that shared their
7
00:00:26,449 --> 00:00:30,380
ideas and quite quite a fun week and we
8
00:00:30,380 --> 00:00:32,720
had the beautiful and talented Rachael
9
00:00:32,720 --> 00:00:35,780
Yamagata here singing and recording a
10
00:00:35,780 --> 00:00:38,360
track with us and quite inspiring for
11
00:00:38,360 --> 00:00:41,390
everybody we have some questions from
12
00:00:41,390 --> 00:00:46,030
from the sports fans and the gear addix
13
00:00:46,030 --> 00:00:51,400
and the first question from Daniel Elba
14
00:00:51,400 --> 00:00:54,199
Daniel is asking about basically how to
15
00:00:54,199 --> 00:00:57,290
get started in the business and what the
16
00:00:57,290 --> 00:01:00,229
best way for a young engineer is whether
17
00:01:00,229 --> 00:01:02,080
he should take the traditional approach
18
00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:05,750
which is working at a major studio and
19
00:01:05,750 --> 00:01:08,240
kind of working his way up the ladder
20
00:01:08,240 --> 00:01:13,070
from gofer to assistant engineer to
21
00:01:13,070 --> 00:01:16,580
first engineer or if he should go to a
22
00:01:16,580 --> 00:01:19,850
recording school and take the approach
23
00:01:19,850 --> 00:01:22,870
of working in his own private studio
24
00:01:22,870 --> 00:01:26,600
cultivating a client base and maybe
25
00:01:26,600 --> 00:01:29,000
coming up with his own unique way of
26
00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:32,600
recording I think honestly both
27
00:01:32,600 --> 00:01:35,110
approaches work the traditional one
28
00:01:35,110 --> 00:01:37,670
unfortunately there's less and less
29
00:01:37,670 --> 00:01:41,120
opportunities there's less and less
30
00:01:41,120 --> 00:01:42,470
commercial studios
31
00:01:42,470 --> 00:01:45,680
sadly less opportunities you're going to
32
00:01:45,680 --> 00:01:47,870
have to do a lot of dirty work a lot of
33
00:01:47,870 --> 00:01:50,840
cleaning floors and coiling microphone
34
00:01:50,840 --> 00:01:54,560
cables like I did and but the positive
35
00:01:54,560 --> 00:01:57,320
thing is you can be around other
36
00:01:57,320 --> 00:02:01,700
engineers and producers and learn from
37
00:02:01,700 --> 00:02:04,010
them and that's one of the really
38
00:02:04,010 --> 00:02:07,040
amazing pluses is seeing different of
39
00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:09,560
different people work their workflows
40
00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:14,560
their style their their sounds their
41
00:02:14,560 --> 00:02:16,640
conceptualization that's really
42
00:02:16,640 --> 00:02:19,270
important that's how I learned and and
43
00:02:19,270 --> 00:02:23,290
and that was really wonderful for me now
44
00:02:23,290 --> 00:02:26,710
you can start your own studio build your
45
00:02:26,710 --> 00:02:29,530
client base and learn in your own unique
46
00:02:29,530 --> 00:02:33,120
way that's cool too you may end up
47
00:02:33,120 --> 00:02:36,340
carving a very unique and specialized
48
00:02:36,340 --> 00:02:38,290
niche for yourself could be really good
49
00:02:38,290 --> 00:02:40,540
and then later you can always go and
50
00:02:40,540 --> 00:02:43,330
work with other producers and learn from
51
00:02:43,330 --> 00:02:45,490
other producers and engineers their
52
00:02:45,490 --> 00:02:48,010
style in fact that that might even be a
53
00:02:48,010 --> 00:02:50,890
good way to do it because you'll have
54
00:02:50,890 --> 00:02:53,680
developed a lot of the basic techniques
55
00:02:53,680 --> 00:02:55,900
things that you didn't learn in school
56
00:02:55,900 --> 00:02:57,820
and then you'll be able to really
57
00:02:57,820 --> 00:03:00,460
understand other producers and engineers
58
00:03:00,460 --> 00:03:03,550
their workflow their their thought
59
00:03:03,550 --> 00:03:07,000
processes so perhaps that way can work
60
00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:09,160
too so it's really what's best for you
61
00:03:09,160 --> 00:03:11,980
it's a life decision more it is a career
62
00:03:11,980 --> 00:03:16,440
decision ok next questions from cheat -
63
00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:20,050
Alexandre and he's asking about vocals
64
00:03:20,050 --> 00:03:23,320
in a mix and how do you make them sit
65
00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:25,810
well in the mix and glue to the track
66
00:03:25,810 --> 00:03:28,630
good question and he's talking about
67
00:03:28,630 --> 00:03:31,060
pretty much in the box techniques but
68
00:03:31,060 --> 00:03:34,930
honestly what I do in the box I would do
69
00:03:34,930 --> 00:03:37,810
outside the box and first of all it
70
00:03:37,810 --> 00:03:42,209
tends to be parallel compression
71
00:03:42,209 --> 00:03:44,620
sometimes I might put a bit of a
72
00:03:44,620 --> 00:03:47,440
compressor on the insert of the vocal
73
00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:50,470
just to give it a tone keep the peaks
74
00:03:50,470 --> 00:03:53,620
under control I might do more of my
75
00:03:53,620 --> 00:03:56,410
compression in the parallel compression
76
00:03:56,410 --> 00:03:59,320
I blend that in with the normal lead
77
00:03:59,320 --> 00:04:04,510
vocal track I add 20 30% just depends
78
00:04:04,510 --> 00:04:07,120
often I'll use multiple parallel
79
00:04:07,120 --> 00:04:10,660
compressors perhaps I'll mix and match
80
00:04:10,660 --> 00:04:13,330
things one compressor because it has a
81
00:04:13,330 --> 00:04:15,580
certain sound I'll use that in the verse
82
00:04:15,580 --> 00:04:17,830
another compressor that perhaps has a
83
00:04:17,830 --> 00:04:20,470
bigger or more aggressive sound I might
84
00:04:20,470 --> 00:04:22,810
use that in the chorus could even use a
85
00:04:22,810 --> 00:04:25,419
third one for the bridge just depends on
86
00:04:25,419 --> 00:04:29,710
the song but I will definitely apply
87
00:04:29,710 --> 00:04:32,870
some sort of effects even when
88
00:04:32,870 --> 00:04:37,340
Vogel wants to remain a bit dry I'll up
89
00:04:37,340 --> 00:04:40,550
maybe put some dark delays back there
90
00:04:40,550 --> 00:04:44,210
behind it but if if you do
91
00:04:44,210 --> 00:04:48,620
rhythmic delays with lead vocal and you
92
00:04:48,620 --> 00:04:50,930
get them so they're not heard as delays
93
00:04:50,930 --> 00:04:53,750
they tend to help the vocal glue to the
94
00:04:53,750 --> 00:04:56,090
track they make it bounce a little bit
95
00:04:56,090 --> 00:04:58,220
more they give it a little bit more life
96
00:04:58,220 --> 00:05:01,070
and rhythm and help help it sit above
97
00:05:01,070 --> 00:05:03,560
all the other instruments and tracks so
98
00:05:03,560 --> 00:05:06,470
so I'll very subtly do that kind of
99
00:05:06,470 --> 00:05:08,120
stuff and it really depends on the music
100
00:05:08,120 --> 00:05:11,060
how much it's heard how bright or how
101
00:05:11,060 --> 00:05:14,570
dark those delays are perhaps the vocal
102
00:05:14,570 --> 00:05:16,820
might need a little bit of extension a
103
00:05:16,820 --> 00:05:20,900
little bit more depth I might do some
104
00:05:20,900 --> 00:05:25,370
type of dark plate or Hall whatever's
105
00:05:25,370 --> 00:05:28,160
appropriate for the music and that
106
00:05:28,160 --> 00:05:30,200
really that I have to say the music
107
00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:32,810
really determines everything I think
108
00:05:32,810 --> 00:05:35,360
you're mostly asking about pop so with
109
00:05:35,360 --> 00:05:38,510
pop the delays can be brighter the
110
00:05:38,510 --> 00:05:42,080
reverb zeni chorusing effect you might
111
00:05:42,080 --> 00:05:44,540
use sometimes even a little bit of flan
112
00:05:44,540 --> 00:05:48,800
gene helps get the vocal to to be a
113
00:05:48,800 --> 00:05:51,320
little bit more exciting and they can be
114
00:05:51,320 --> 00:05:53,360
brighter and pop music that they can be
115
00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:55,880
perhaps in rock or even rap music for
116
00:05:55,880 --> 00:05:57,620
that matter hope that answers your
117
00:05:57,620 --> 00:05:59,940
question
118
00:05:59,950 --> 00:06:05,180
Mao is asking what effects in popular
119
00:06:05,180 --> 00:06:07,760
music have surprised me lately when I
120
00:06:07,760 --> 00:06:10,520
listen to the radio I think the one
121
00:06:10,520 --> 00:06:12,980
thing that's that's pretty funny to me
122
00:06:12,980 --> 00:06:17,690
is how it's cool again to use reverb
123
00:06:17,690 --> 00:06:22,670
whether its natural or artificial having
124
00:06:22,670 --> 00:06:25,820
grown up in the 90s and made records in
125
00:06:25,820 --> 00:06:29,780
the 90s it was not cool to use reverb
126
00:06:29,780 --> 00:06:33,230
those were dry times you were you were
127
00:06:33,230 --> 00:06:35,390
fired as an engineer if you tried to
128
00:06:35,390 --> 00:06:38,200
sneak some reverb in a rock bands mix
129
00:06:38,200 --> 00:06:42,470
dry was in even in in bigger pop records
130
00:06:42,470 --> 00:06:44,780
that you'll go back in time and they're
131
00:06:44,780 --> 00:06:47,170
definitely drier and I
132
00:06:47,170 --> 00:06:50,080
so now everybody's using reverb and it's
133
00:06:50,080 --> 00:06:51,580
cool and it's okay
134
00:06:51,580 --> 00:06:55,540
and you'll hear big giant reverberant
135
00:06:55,540 --> 00:06:59,110
records on grizzly bear and even even
136
00:06:59,110 --> 00:07:01,450
adele for that matter isn't afraid of
137
00:07:01,450 --> 00:07:05,290
using reverb so it's kind of funny to me
138
00:07:05,290 --> 00:07:08,440
how trends of effects happen and they
139
00:07:08,440 --> 00:07:11,170
come and go and you know years ago in
140
00:07:11,170 --> 00:07:14,020
the 80s everything was very processed
141
00:07:14,020 --> 00:07:17,260
and lots of delays and and unfortunately
142
00:07:17,260 --> 00:07:19,419
when you hear that music now it sounds
143
00:07:19,419 --> 00:07:22,450
very dated so I don't know let's see in
144
00:07:22,450 --> 00:07:26,140
ten years if if things sound like 2013
145
00:07:26,140 --> 00:07:30,490
we'll find out okay next question
146
00:07:30,490 --> 00:07:34,480
Ricky Tara Ferreira asks what are your
147
00:07:34,480 --> 00:07:36,970
methods of layering different vocals in
148
00:07:36,970 --> 00:07:39,640
a track that's good question there's a
149
00:07:39,640 --> 00:07:42,220
lot of different ways to do it
150
00:07:42,220 --> 00:07:44,290
I'm assuming Ricky that you're talking
151
00:07:44,290 --> 00:07:46,810
about actually recording them and if
152
00:07:46,810 --> 00:07:49,690
that's the case I'll tell you one or two
153
00:07:49,690 --> 00:07:52,240
things that I often do
154
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:55,030
perhaps if I'm doing a lead vocal then
155
00:07:55,030 --> 00:07:58,479
doubling it often I'll do the double on
156
00:07:58,479 --> 00:08:01,930
a different microphone perhaps I'll look
157
00:08:01,930 --> 00:08:04,750
for sound for the double that will
158
00:08:04,750 --> 00:08:07,240
complement the lead vocal in other words
159
00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:09,580
if the lead vocal is very bright I might
160
00:08:09,580 --> 00:08:12,010
look for the double to be very dull and
161
00:08:12,010 --> 00:08:14,400
I'll do the same with background vocals
162
00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:18,729
perhaps if I'm doing stereo background
163
00:08:18,729 --> 00:08:21,400
vocals I might do one where the singer
164
00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:23,650
is very close on the mic and one when
165
00:08:23,650 --> 00:08:26,650
they're further away especially if I'm
166
00:08:26,650 --> 00:08:30,940
doing especially if I'm doing gang
167
00:08:30,940 --> 00:08:33,820
vocals where you might do three four
168
00:08:33,820 --> 00:08:37,150
passes of group background vocals I'll
169
00:08:37,150 --> 00:08:40,200
always make sure that they are each at
170
00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:42,969
different positions in the room I'll
171
00:08:42,969 --> 00:08:45,820
switch the singers around move them
172
00:08:45,820 --> 00:08:48,370
further back off the mics anything to
173
00:08:48,370 --> 00:08:50,560
get a little bit more depth and bigness
174
00:08:50,560 --> 00:08:53,920
in the sound so it's not the exact same
175
00:08:53,920 --> 00:08:57,250
vocal sound on top of the exact same
176
00:08:57,250 --> 00:09:00,130
vocal sound I make sure that
177
00:09:00,130 --> 00:09:03,130
each track even if it's via compression
178
00:09:03,130 --> 00:09:06,760
or equalization or microphone placement
179
00:09:06,760 --> 00:09:09,400
I make sure everything's just a little
180
00:09:09,400 --> 00:09:10,930
different because I think they add up to
181
00:09:10,930 --> 00:09:13,450
a much bigger sound that way
182
00:09:13,450 --> 00:09:18,100
hope that helps question from Andrew
183
00:09:18,100 --> 00:09:22,780
Pettit Andrew asks mixing in analog or
184
00:09:22,780 --> 00:09:26,470
mixing in the box or hybrid mixing I'm
185
00:09:26,470 --> 00:09:29,200
assuming he means via summing and some
186
00:09:29,200 --> 00:09:33,640
console which do you prefer and why well
187
00:09:33,640 --> 00:09:38,350
I grew up with analog tape and mixing on
188
00:09:38,350 --> 00:09:40,570
analog consoles so that's the most
189
00:09:40,570 --> 00:09:44,250
familiar to me I'm the most fluid at it
190
00:09:44,250 --> 00:09:47,740
it's sort of part of my being so that
191
00:09:47,740 --> 00:09:49,980
would probably be the easiest and most
192
00:09:49,980 --> 00:09:52,690
favorite way for me however there are
193
00:09:52,690 --> 00:09:55,440
obvious advantages of mixing in the Box
194
00:09:55,440 --> 00:09:59,140
primarily recall these days
195
00:09:59,140 --> 00:10:01,600
record companies want multiple different
196
00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:05,470
versions of songs for an hour approval
197
00:10:05,470 --> 00:10:09,040
manager approval European market versus
198
00:10:09,040 --> 00:10:12,160
Asian market so having the ability to
199
00:10:12,160 --> 00:10:16,000
quickly recall mixes is a fantastic
200
00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:20,230
thing hybrid mixing meaning I'm sure he
201
00:10:20,230 --> 00:10:24,550
means via summing boxes where you do a
202
00:10:24,550 --> 00:10:27,610
lot of mixing in Pro Tools and then some
203
00:10:27,610 --> 00:10:29,920
through the desk is great I think it's a
204
00:10:29,920 --> 00:10:33,400
great way to get the advantages of in
205
00:10:33,400 --> 00:10:37,060
the Box mixing but to get the quality of
206
00:10:37,060 --> 00:10:41,200
an analog console so given a lot of the
207
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:43,020
needs of things these days
208
00:10:43,020 --> 00:10:47,040
hybrid mixing can be the best way to go
209
00:10:47,040 --> 00:10:49,870
the good thing about analog mixing is
210
00:10:49,870 --> 00:10:54,220
that usually every time you recall it
211
00:10:54,220 --> 00:10:56,500
it's a little bit different so it's
212
00:10:56,500 --> 00:10:58,990
almost like a painter he's never going
213
00:10:58,990 --> 00:11:01,780
to paint the same mix twice so sometimes
214
00:11:01,780 --> 00:11:03,220
you come up with things that you
215
00:11:03,220 --> 00:11:06,010
actually beat the original and are
216
00:11:06,010 --> 00:11:09,070
indeed better where sometimes when
217
00:11:09,070 --> 00:11:10,900
you're in the box I find that you just
218
00:11:10,900 --> 00:11:13,270
repeat yourself maybe you turn that
219
00:11:13,270 --> 00:11:13,870
guitar up
220
00:11:13,870 --> 00:11:16,240
a little bit but ultimately it's it's
221
00:11:16,240 --> 00:11:18,580
the same mix so they both have their
222
00:11:18,580 --> 00:11:22,380
advantages hope that answer isn't Andrew
223
00:11:22,380 --> 00:11:26,470
okay Andrew Gentilly asks a very tricky
224
00:11:26,470 --> 00:11:29,650
question here yes what my position is on
225
00:11:29,650 --> 00:11:33,279
mixing loud and do I find myself mixing
226
00:11:33,279 --> 00:11:35,740
louder than I was in the past perhaps
227
00:11:35,740 --> 00:11:37,779
and they also asked an interesting
228
00:11:37,779 --> 00:11:40,510
question about mastering if it's really
229
00:11:40,510 --> 00:11:43,510
really necessary these days in the fact
230
00:11:43,510 --> 00:11:45,400
that we're not necessarily always doing
231
00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:48,430
vinyl or CD and we're delivering files
232
00:11:48,430 --> 00:11:52,960
direct to iTunes or whoever so he's
233
00:11:52,960 --> 00:11:55,990
asking if mastering is necessary my my
234
00:11:55,990 --> 00:11:59,680
feeling on on deliberately mixing loud
235
00:11:59,680 --> 00:12:04,089
and pushing digital levels and trying to
236
00:12:04,089 --> 00:12:07,450
outdo somebody else on the radio to me
237
00:12:07,450 --> 00:12:12,279
it's it's not my favorite way of working
238
00:12:12,279 --> 00:12:15,130
it's not something I believe in I think
239
00:12:15,130 --> 00:12:18,940
you make the best most musical record
240
00:12:18,940 --> 00:12:21,880
possible you don't worry about loudness
241
00:12:21,880 --> 00:12:24,339
because every single radio station is
242
00:12:24,339 --> 00:12:26,770
going to sound different and sometimes
243
00:12:26,770 --> 00:12:29,110
if you try liberabit ly to push the
244
00:12:29,110 --> 00:12:31,600
level when it finally gets out there on
245
00:12:31,600 --> 00:12:34,270
the radio the radio compressors can be
246
00:12:34,270 --> 00:12:37,750
pretty evil boxes and usually the
247
00:12:37,750 --> 00:12:40,209
loudest thing tends to get compressed
248
00:12:40,209 --> 00:12:42,910
even more so if you're compressing your
249
00:12:42,910 --> 00:12:45,510
mix is hard to make them sound loud
250
00:12:45,510 --> 00:12:47,800
chances are they're going to start to
251
00:12:47,800 --> 00:12:50,170
sound smaller compared to things that
252
00:12:50,170 --> 00:12:54,339
are more honest and organic and I also
253
00:12:54,339 --> 00:12:57,820
feel it's your your job it's your duty
254
00:12:57,820 --> 00:13:01,150
to the artist to make a record that will
255
00:13:01,150 --> 00:13:04,089
stand the test of time and even though
256
00:13:04,089 --> 00:13:06,520
over the past years
257
00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:10,240
mixing loud was a trend I think that
258
00:13:10,240 --> 00:13:12,310
artists might not want to listen to that
259
00:13:12,310 --> 00:13:14,980
record in five years or ten years time
260
00:13:14,980 --> 00:13:17,800
so I would hate to do anything that
261
00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:21,400
would compromise the artists long-term
262
00:13:21,400 --> 00:13:24,520
career so I would prefer to make a great
263
00:13:24,520 --> 00:13:25,790
sounding record and then
264
00:13:25,790 --> 00:13:28,220
worried about the levels when it comes
265
00:13:28,220 --> 00:13:29,060
to the radio
266
00:13:29,060 --> 00:13:31,640
I think mastering is really really
267
00:13:31,640 --> 00:13:33,980
necessary because everybody needs an
268
00:13:33,980 --> 00:13:36,920
objective year a band hires a producer
269
00:13:36,920 --> 00:13:39,260
because they want an objective year a
270
00:13:39,260 --> 00:13:42,200
producer needs an A&R man because he
271
00:13:42,200 --> 00:13:44,180
needs an objective year and I think the
272
00:13:44,180 --> 00:13:47,270
mastering engineer is the engineer or
273
00:13:47,270 --> 00:13:50,770
the mixers objective year and sometimes
274
00:13:50,770 --> 00:13:53,690
it's what he doesn't do to it and
275
00:13:53,690 --> 00:13:56,570
sometimes it's the things he adds to it
276
00:13:56,570 --> 00:14:00,680
so I trust my mastering engineers I give
277
00:14:00,680 --> 00:14:03,890
them a lot of freedom I I hope that they
278
00:14:03,890 --> 00:14:06,650
will look at my work and find the one
279
00:14:06,650 --> 00:14:09,830
little thing that I missed that they can
280
00:14:09,830 --> 00:14:12,140
add to it that'll help make it out
281
00:14:12,140 --> 00:14:15,710
well-rounded musical mix so I'm always
282
00:14:15,710 --> 00:14:18,230
in favor of using trusted and great
283
00:14:18,230 --> 00:14:20,060
mastering engineers I think it's
284
00:14:20,060 --> 00:14:22,250
something that no artist should ever
285
00:14:22,250 --> 00:14:26,210
skimp on okay Joel Davis this question
286
00:14:26,210 --> 00:14:29,210
is what was my approach when working
287
00:14:29,210 --> 00:14:32,060
with Jason Mraz on the song the woman I
288
00:14:32,060 --> 00:14:36,470
love interesting question Jason wanted
289
00:14:36,470 --> 00:14:39,770
to do something where we showcased great
290
00:14:39,770 --> 00:14:42,500
musicians great arrangers great
291
00:14:42,500 --> 00:14:44,930
recording and and we're really sensitive
292
00:14:44,930 --> 00:14:48,890
to the song and we all listened and
293
00:14:48,890 --> 00:14:51,200
loved to those we all listened and love
294
00:14:51,200 --> 00:14:53,500
those classic albums that were done in
295
00:14:53,500 --> 00:14:57,410
Muscle Shoals with Paul Simon and Aretha
296
00:14:57,410 --> 00:15:01,520
Franklin and dire straits where the the
297
00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:03,710
musicians were really a part of the
298
00:15:03,710 --> 00:15:06,830
record and you you heard virtuosity and
299
00:15:06,830 --> 00:15:09,440
you heard tasteful playing and it wasn't
300
00:15:09,440 --> 00:15:12,020
about layering lots of tracks it was
301
00:15:12,020 --> 00:15:15,350
really about honest organic parts and
302
00:15:15,350 --> 00:15:18,350
the chemistry of the the musicians in
303
00:15:18,350 --> 00:15:20,750
the room so with that particular song I
304
00:15:20,750 --> 00:15:22,670
can say I think we were very much
305
00:15:22,670 --> 00:15:27,950
thinking of a 70s Muscle Shoals almost
306
00:15:27,950 --> 00:15:32,570
blue-eyed soul version of the song and I
307
00:15:32,570 --> 00:15:34,880
think if there was a theme for the album
308
00:15:34,880 --> 00:15:38,120
it might be to incorporate those real
309
00:15:38,120 --> 00:15:39,230
honest
310
00:15:39,230 --> 00:15:39,680
L
311
00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:42,740
of great songwriting great singing and
312
00:15:42,740 --> 00:15:44,990
great musicianship and not a lot of
313
00:15:44,990 --> 00:15:48,430
trickery so we have a question here from
314
00:15:48,430 --> 00:15:52,640
Daniel Bruns a little tricky question
315
00:15:52,640 --> 00:15:55,339
and I might surprise him with my answer
316
00:15:55,339 --> 00:15:58,160
here he asked when I sit down to mix a
317
00:15:58,160 --> 00:16:01,640
song rock or alternative what instrument
318
00:16:01,640 --> 00:16:04,459
do I start with and they also asked what
319
00:16:04,459 --> 00:16:08,600
are some of my go-to gear or starting
320
00:16:08,600 --> 00:16:12,860
points from the mix the tricky point is
321
00:16:12,860 --> 00:16:14,959
I don't start with one instrument I
322
00:16:14,959 --> 00:16:18,459
start with everything I put the whole
323
00:16:18,459 --> 00:16:21,860
mix in I get myself a great rough
324
00:16:21,860 --> 00:16:24,890
balance before I do any compression or
325
00:16:24,890 --> 00:16:28,490
EQ or anything I put every single fader
326
00:16:28,490 --> 00:16:32,120
up make it sound like a song and then
327
00:16:32,120 --> 00:16:34,670
I'll sit back take a listen and go okay
328
00:16:34,670 --> 00:16:36,560
perhaps the drums need a little
329
00:16:36,560 --> 00:16:38,870
adjustment a bass needs to be more
330
00:16:38,870 --> 00:16:42,200
powerful drums need a little bit more
331
00:16:42,200 --> 00:16:45,500
Sparkle a little bit more snap the vocal
332
00:16:45,500 --> 00:16:47,360
needs some effects to glue it to the
333
00:16:47,360 --> 00:16:50,240
track and then I might break the mix
334
00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:52,250
down a little bit but I'm not going to
335
00:16:52,250 --> 00:16:55,010
use a solo button I'm going to maybe
336
00:16:55,010 --> 00:16:57,950
take the vocal out and start to work on
337
00:16:57,950 --> 00:16:59,870
the drums with everything else in there
338
00:16:59,870 --> 00:17:03,350
the way I look at a mix is it's a it's a
339
00:17:03,350 --> 00:17:05,959
house and you build it and build it and
340
00:17:05,959 --> 00:17:09,260
build it but you don't necessarily start
341
00:17:09,260 --> 00:17:11,270
with the second floor and expect the
342
00:17:11,270 --> 00:17:13,370
third floor is going to work with the
343
00:17:13,370 --> 00:17:17,870
foundation so I like to kind of start
344
00:17:17,870 --> 00:17:19,939
with it all together and put the pieces
345
00:17:19,939 --> 00:17:25,100
together like a painting and very rarely
346
00:17:25,100 --> 00:17:27,650
will I solo an instrument maybe I'm
347
00:17:27,650 --> 00:17:30,500
having problems with it I will because I
348
00:17:30,500 --> 00:17:32,870
think it's about how each element works
349
00:17:32,870 --> 00:17:35,660
together and not necessarily what they
350
00:17:35,660 --> 00:17:39,400
sound like unto themselves and solo so
351
00:17:39,400 --> 00:17:43,220
it's it's all about the entire mix all
352
00:17:43,220 --> 00:17:47,150
faders up and then in terms of what gear
353
00:17:47,150 --> 00:17:50,690
I go to you know I have my favorites but
354
00:17:50,690 --> 00:17:53,059
but every kind of
355
00:17:53,059 --> 00:17:55,490
very kind of music requires different
356
00:17:55,490 --> 00:17:59,419
gear Daniel's asking specifically about
357
00:17:59,419 --> 00:18:02,120
rock and alternative so if that's the
358
00:18:02,120 --> 00:18:05,710
case I would want gear that has
359
00:18:05,710 --> 00:18:10,399
character and power and attitude so I
360
00:18:10,399 --> 00:18:14,389
would certainly use API EQs Neve modules
361
00:18:14,389 --> 00:18:17,779
for low-end I would use Universal Audio
362
00:18:17,779 --> 00:18:21,850
compressors for thickness and power
363
00:18:21,850 --> 00:18:25,100
might use my Chandler compressors for
364
00:18:25,100 --> 00:18:29,119
effects I love my Chandler curve bender
365
00:18:29,119 --> 00:18:31,759
I use that on the stereo buss especially
366
00:18:31,759 --> 00:18:34,009
for rock music because just a little
367
00:18:34,009 --> 00:18:36,639
tiny bit of it really adds a lot of
368
00:18:36,639 --> 00:18:39,700
aggression and energy to the sound
369
00:18:39,700 --> 00:18:44,090
lately I'm hooked on the Clara phonic EQ
370
00:18:44,090 --> 00:18:47,809
that seems to be a beautiful EQ to use
371
00:18:47,809 --> 00:18:50,929
for the overall stereo bus even just a
372
00:18:50,929 --> 00:18:54,590
crack of it somehow helps guitar rock it
373
00:18:54,590 --> 00:18:58,669
helps the guitars and bass and organ or
374
00:18:58,669 --> 00:19:00,830
whatever's in there just come forward
375
00:19:00,830 --> 00:19:03,710
and outside the speakers so maybe the
376
00:19:03,710 --> 00:19:08,240
Clara phonic is my my new piece of gear
377
00:19:08,240 --> 00:19:12,470
for for 2013 that might be my one of my
378
00:19:12,470 --> 00:19:14,990
favorites I love my shadow hills
379
00:19:14,990 --> 00:19:19,429
compressor the listened grove compressor
380
00:19:19,429 --> 00:19:21,470
is great there's lots of good gear
381
00:19:21,470 --> 00:19:23,720
that's out there that I really truly
382
00:19:23,720 --> 00:19:27,289
love but in terms of mixing rock music
383
00:19:27,289 --> 00:19:30,159
those are some of the go-to things
384
00:19:30,159 --> 00:19:32,990
there's a question here from Ray Ketchum
385
00:19:32,990 --> 00:19:35,330
I think I know you Ray it's a funny
386
00:19:35,330 --> 00:19:38,570
question you asked basically about what
387
00:19:38,570 --> 00:19:43,909
have I discovered new in 2013 well
388
00:19:43,909 --> 00:19:46,970
certainly a lot of new music but I'm
389
00:19:46,970 --> 00:19:49,249
sure your questions about gear because
390
00:19:49,249 --> 00:19:51,139
everybody's question is usually about
391
00:19:51,139 --> 00:19:54,289
cure okay so some of my favorite pieces
392
00:19:54,289 --> 00:19:57,860
of this year have been the shadow hills
393
00:19:57,860 --> 00:20:01,119
mastering compressor the shadow hills
394
00:20:01,119 --> 00:20:06,110
you a mastering compressor plug-in a lot
395
00:20:06,110 --> 00:20:06,919
of the UA
396
00:20:06,919 --> 00:20:09,529
plugins are fantastic I used my
397
00:20:09,529 --> 00:20:11,869
satellite everywhere I go that's a
398
00:20:11,869 --> 00:20:15,470
fantastic box I like the new listen
399
00:20:15,470 --> 00:20:17,749
Grove compressor it's a sort of
400
00:20:17,749 --> 00:20:20,450
emulation of the old Altech for thirty
401
00:20:20,450 --> 00:20:23,269
Six's those are fantastic
402
00:20:23,269 --> 00:20:27,350
I used my Chandler stompboxes all the
403
00:20:27,350 --> 00:20:28,580
time
404
00:20:28,580 --> 00:20:31,039
there there guitar distortion pedals
405
00:20:31,039 --> 00:20:33,169
that just have a beautiful and unique
406
00:20:33,169 --> 00:20:38,269
tone my Clarisonic stereo EQ has become
407
00:20:38,269 --> 00:20:42,409
my go-to buss EQ it just does something
408
00:20:42,409 --> 00:20:45,440
that no other equalizer does
409
00:20:45,440 --> 00:20:49,220
oh boy in terms of microphones there's a
410
00:20:49,220 --> 00:20:52,039
lot of great things out there I was just
411
00:20:52,039 --> 00:20:54,700
able to hear the new Audio Technica
412
00:20:54,700 --> 00:20:57,350
rectangular diaphragm mic and I'm sorry
413
00:20:57,350 --> 00:20:58,730
with the numbers I've forgotten the
414
00:20:58,730 --> 00:21:02,210
number but the new Audio Technica mic is
415
00:21:02,210 --> 00:21:05,210
very very unique sounding very open and
416
00:21:05,210 --> 00:21:08,289
clear and natural and has a way of
417
00:21:08,289 --> 00:21:11,989
almost removing the glass from the wall
418
00:21:11,989 --> 00:21:14,149
the other thing I'm hooked on these days
419
00:21:14,149 --> 00:21:17,570
are the new mic pre e cues from
420
00:21:17,570 --> 00:21:21,309
undertone audio they sound unlike
421
00:21:21,309 --> 00:21:23,869
anything that you could ever hear there
422
00:21:23,869 --> 00:21:26,720
are a combination of a thick retro sound
423
00:21:26,720 --> 00:21:30,289
but a very fast modern sound they're
424
00:21:30,289 --> 00:21:32,600
very sophisticated in terms of the
425
00:21:32,600 --> 00:21:36,080
equalizer and the mic pre has a tone
426
00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:40,999
that everything sounds outside the
427
00:21:40,999 --> 00:21:43,489
speaker's everything sounds more present
428
00:21:43,489 --> 00:21:45,409
than all your other instruments there
429
00:21:45,409 --> 00:21:48,139
it's quite a unique box that Eric
430
00:21:48,139 --> 00:21:52,340
Valentine's built Peter is asking a
431
00:21:52,340 --> 00:21:55,100
question about how far do I take my
432
00:21:55,100 --> 00:21:57,590
mixes how close do I get them to the
433
00:21:57,590 --> 00:22:00,169
finished product what do I do in terms
434
00:22:00,169 --> 00:22:03,049
of compression EQ how much do I leave
435
00:22:03,049 --> 00:22:05,809
for the mastering engineer he says he's
436
00:22:05,809 --> 00:22:08,230
been disappointed in the past when he
437
00:22:08,230 --> 00:22:10,970
lets the mastering engineer do all the
438
00:22:10,970 --> 00:22:13,340
work Peter I trust my mastering
439
00:22:13,340 --> 00:22:16,279
engineers I am fortunate and I've worked
440
00:22:16,279 --> 00:22:19,489
with Bob Ludwig and Ted Jensen and Greg
441
00:22:19,489 --> 00:22:20,720
kalbi and
442
00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:23,150
Emily Lazar and Gavin Larson and some of
443
00:22:23,150 --> 00:22:25,970
the great ones and they consistently
444
00:22:25,970 --> 00:22:30,440
always do good work so I never process
445
00:22:30,440 --> 00:22:34,730
my last step of the mix too far I trust
446
00:22:34,730 --> 00:22:38,929
them I let them do their job I will do
447
00:22:38,929 --> 00:22:42,950
some stereo buss compression in EQ but I
448
00:22:42,950 --> 00:22:46,220
always do very very minimum because I
449
00:22:46,220 --> 00:22:49,450
want to preserve the dynamics but I want
450
00:22:49,450 --> 00:22:53,150
aggression and I want glue that a final
451
00:22:53,150 --> 00:22:55,900
compression will give you I don't
452
00:22:55,900 --> 00:22:59,059
finalize them normalize them anything
453
00:22:59,059 --> 00:23:01,760
eyes them I leave that to the mastering
454
00:23:01,760 --> 00:23:05,390
engineer so if I'm doing stereo buss
455
00:23:05,390 --> 00:23:09,909
compression with a Alan smart C 2 or a
456
00:23:09,909 --> 00:23:13,309
Chandler or a shadow Hills I'm only
457
00:23:13,309 --> 00:23:16,370
doing a couple of DB at the very very
458
00:23:16,370 --> 00:23:20,360
most and in terms of buss EQ if I'm
459
00:23:20,360 --> 00:23:24,530
doing any it's 1 DB on the bottom 1 DB
460
00:23:24,530 --> 00:23:27,500
on the top and that's about it I'm very
461
00:23:27,500 --> 00:23:30,620
very gentle with it and I always feel
462
00:23:30,620 --> 00:23:33,200
that a good mastering engineer is going
463
00:23:33,200 --> 00:23:36,260
to objectively hear your mix and be able
464
00:23:36,260 --> 00:23:39,440
to finalize it that's what he's there
465
00:23:39,440 --> 00:23:39,860
for
466
00:23:39,860 --> 00:23:42,110
so I would say to trust your mastering
467
00:23:42,110 --> 00:23:45,530
engineers and hopefully you have to you
468
00:23:45,530 --> 00:23:49,370
know one thing I do sorry Peter one
469
00:23:49,370 --> 00:23:52,340
thing I do is I've studied mastering
470
00:23:52,340 --> 00:23:54,650
engineers and I listened to their
471
00:23:54,650 --> 00:23:57,049
records and their sounds if you will and
472
00:23:57,049 --> 00:23:59,770
I try to choose a mastering engineer
473
00:23:59,770 --> 00:24:03,650
based on things he's done in the past in
474
00:24:03,650 --> 00:24:06,710
other words if I'm mixing a very heavy
475
00:24:06,710 --> 00:24:10,610
guitar oriented rock band one thing I'll
476
00:24:10,610 --> 00:24:13,220
do is listen to other records in that
477
00:24:13,220 --> 00:24:16,490
genre and I'll happen to see oh look at
478
00:24:16,490 --> 00:24:16,909
this
479
00:24:16,909 --> 00:24:20,270
Greg Kelby or Ted Jensen mastered all
480
00:24:20,270 --> 00:24:22,039
these records and I like the sound of
481
00:24:22,039 --> 00:24:24,140
all these records they have something in
482
00:24:24,140 --> 00:24:24,679
common
483
00:24:24,679 --> 00:24:27,740
and then I'll perhaps choose that
484
00:24:27,740 --> 00:24:30,110
mastering engineer for that kind of
485
00:24:30,110 --> 00:24:30,679
music
486
00:24:30,679 --> 00:24:34,120
perhaps if I'm doing something very warm
487
00:24:34,120 --> 00:24:38,120
organic and tasty and simple and I want
488
00:24:38,120 --> 00:24:41,000
air and openness or a jazz record
489
00:24:41,000 --> 00:24:44,000
perhaps I might see that Oh Bob Ludwig
490
00:24:44,000 --> 00:24:46,100
did all my favorite records in that
491
00:24:46,100 --> 00:24:48,710
genre so I'll choose Bob Ludwig and
492
00:24:48,710 --> 00:24:51,320
there's many many other younger
493
00:24:51,320 --> 00:24:53,330
mastering engineers that are coming up
494
00:24:53,330 --> 00:24:56,029
and doing great work so there's plenty
495
00:24:56,029 --> 00:24:58,490
of people to choose from and sorry you
496
00:24:58,490 --> 00:24:59,700
had a bad time in the past
497
00:24:59,700 --> 00:25:09,029
[Music]35742
Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.