All language subtitles for 003 - Jack Joseph Puig

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional) Download
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:02,030 --> 00:00:05,220 Heights Jack Joseph quick I see here we 2 00:00:05,220 --> 00:00:07,940 have a question from chef o Hernandez 3 00:00:07,940 --> 00:00:11,219 how can you achieve maximum loudness on 4 00:00:11,219 --> 00:00:16,650 your mix using just plugins well it's 5 00:00:16,650 --> 00:00:19,140 interesting that sort of implies that 6 00:00:19,140 --> 00:00:20,610 the best way you get loudness is an 7 00:00:20,610 --> 00:00:23,610 analogue and some ways that's true some 8 00:00:23,610 --> 00:00:25,110 ways is not true that's a longer 9 00:00:25,110 --> 00:00:26,880 discussion but in terms of the analog 10 00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:28,380 portion of course with transformers when 11 00:00:28,380 --> 00:00:29,790 you push this down real hard you sort of 12 00:00:29,790 --> 00:00:33,239 kill the peaks and therefore you're able 13 00:00:33,239 --> 00:00:36,570 to get more level without the digital 14 00:00:36,570 --> 00:00:38,760 going into the red for the obvious 15 00:00:38,760 --> 00:00:44,130 reasons the plug-in loud in situation 16 00:00:44,130 --> 00:00:46,220 there's a tremendous amount of plugins 17 00:00:46,220 --> 00:00:50,160 that you can use to achieve that right 18 00:00:50,160 --> 00:00:54,989 so l3l one for instance or to route good 19 00:00:54,989 --> 00:00:58,920 examples what ends up happening is you 20 00:00:58,920 --> 00:01:01,140 know the louder you push it the harder 21 00:01:01,140 --> 00:01:02,760 you have that compressed so less peak 22 00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:04,979 information you have so really what 23 00:01:04,979 --> 00:01:06,299 we're talking about is a relationship 24 00:01:06,299 --> 00:01:09,990 between peak information relationship 25 00:01:09,990 --> 00:01:11,369 between peak information and the 26 00:01:11,369 --> 00:01:15,389 relationship between RMS the average 27 00:01:15,389 --> 00:01:18,509 level so the whole thing with the 28 00:01:18,509 --> 00:01:21,030 plugins or even in analog domain is a 29 00:01:21,030 --> 00:01:24,569 matter of actually killing some of those 30 00:01:24,569 --> 00:01:28,639 Peaks or we can call them transients and 31 00:01:28,639 --> 00:01:30,869 therefore you're able to have more room 32 00:01:30,869 --> 00:01:34,529 to lift the level up and get more of the 33 00:01:34,529 --> 00:01:37,770 rms level of course with Aquila transits 34 00:01:37,770 --> 00:01:39,990 that's when things start to sound now as 35 00:01:39,990 --> 00:01:45,719 a tacky not as aggressive and can sound 36 00:01:45,719 --> 00:01:48,810 flat here people say it sounds flat it's 37 00:01:48,810 --> 00:01:51,179 too compressed part of that is because 38 00:01:51,179 --> 00:01:53,520 you've killed the transients so it's a 39 00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:56,999 real trade-off the obsession with the 40 00:01:56,999 --> 00:02:02,479 level can also be what can kill rate mix 41 00:02:02,479 --> 00:02:04,950 obviously we're all in some ways 42 00:02:04,950 --> 00:02:06,389 obsessed with the level because whether 43 00:02:06,389 --> 00:02:08,670 we like or not the client who's 44 00:02:08,670 --> 00:02:11,250 massively educated or not will compare 45 00:02:11,250 --> 00:02:12,689 it to something else it's loud and ask 46 00:02:12,689 --> 00:02:15,000 you why it's not loud so I understand 47 00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:18,390 the pain point of wanting to to make it 48 00:02:18,390 --> 00:02:21,680 louder am I suggested again has just 49 00:02:21,680 --> 00:02:23,970 used the compressors even if it's a 50 00:02:23,970 --> 00:02:26,220 couple you put together could be two 51 00:02:26,220 --> 00:02:28,470 compressors you put together to try to 52 00:02:28,470 --> 00:02:30,630 control the pink information versus the 53 00:02:30,630 --> 00:02:33,450 RMS if you look at the meters on the Pro 54 00:02:33,450 --> 00:02:36,570 Tools you'll be able to see exactly what 55 00:02:36,570 --> 00:02:37,350 you're doing you'll see a lot more 56 00:02:37,350 --> 00:02:40,290 greens and reds and the perfect world so 57 00:02:40,290 --> 00:02:43,350 to speak as an example I say perfect 58 00:02:43,350 --> 00:02:46,020 world as an example if you had just all 59 00:02:46,020 --> 00:02:48,210 greens that would be louder than you can 60 00:02:48,210 --> 00:02:51,300 imagine if you have the Reds going along 61 00:02:51,300 --> 00:02:52,380 with the Greens we've got pick 62 00:02:52,380 --> 00:02:53,790 information it's not going to be as loud 63 00:02:53,790 --> 00:02:56,340 but to have a tach and it's going to 64 00:02:56,340 --> 00:03:01,790 breathe looks like Darryl Swart 65 00:03:01,790 --> 00:03:03,960 hopefully I've pronounced that properly 66 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:07,020 if not please excuse me how do you deal 67 00:03:07,020 --> 00:03:08,820 with the hi-hat bleed when needing to 68 00:03:08,820 --> 00:03:12,870 boost high n on snare but short gate 69 00:03:12,870 --> 00:03:17,160 takes away from snare tone snare tone of 70 00:03:17,160 --> 00:03:18,600 course goes away with the short gate 71 00:03:18,600 --> 00:03:20,070 because you're taking the length of the 72 00:03:20,070 --> 00:03:21,959 note away and that's where the tone 73 00:03:21,959 --> 00:03:25,620 resides right so if this snare is real 74 00:03:25,620 --> 00:03:27,810 tightly good you only had to kick left 75 00:03:27,810 --> 00:03:32,100 so therefore is no tone what I do is I 76 00:03:32,100 --> 00:03:33,989 go ahead and take care of that high 77 00:03:33,989 --> 00:03:37,770 bleed by gating tightly and I either get 78 00:03:37,770 --> 00:03:40,050 the tone from one or two places the 79 00:03:40,050 --> 00:03:45,530 obvious one samples that I stick in or I 80 00:03:45,530 --> 00:03:48,780 sidechain the snare or I should say 81 00:03:48,780 --> 00:03:50,010 actually a better way to put it really 82 00:03:50,010 --> 00:03:52,320 is to take the to take the snare and 83 00:03:52,320 --> 00:03:55,200 duplicate it so it's identical right and 84 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,380 add a tremendous amount of bottom almost 85 00:03:58,380 --> 00:04:01,290 so much bottom it could be as much as 10 86 00:04:01,290 --> 00:04:03,840 or 12 at somewhere between a hundred and 87 00:04:03,840 --> 00:04:06,030 two hundred and fifty Hertz anywhere in 88 00:04:06,030 --> 00:04:08,250 there and I would put like a stupid 89 00:04:08,250 --> 00:04:10,440 amount of that low bottom in where if 90 00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:11,910 you were living listen to it by itself 91 00:04:11,910 --> 00:04:13,440 you'd be like that's absolutely useless 92 00:04:13,440 --> 00:04:15,300 and why is the snare drums like a bass 93 00:04:15,300 --> 00:04:18,600 drum right but if you sneak that 94 00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:20,609 underneath the other one where now 95 00:04:20,609 --> 00:04:22,590 you've got the attack because you've 96 00:04:22,590 --> 00:04:24,450 gated it very tightly and now you're 97 00:04:24,450 --> 00:04:26,190 adding that low bottom in there it 98 00:04:26,190 --> 00:04:27,720 starts to feel like there's a lot of 99 00:04:27,720 --> 00:04:28,540 low-end 100 00:04:28,540 --> 00:04:32,830 of course that your EQ insulting up the 101 00:04:32,830 --> 00:04:34,810 hi-hat level of course you got to be 102 00:04:34,810 --> 00:04:36,490 careful between the bass drum and that 103 00:04:36,490 --> 00:04:38,800 new channel I just described because now 104 00:04:38,800 --> 00:04:40,210 the phase relationship between those two 105 00:04:40,210 --> 00:04:42,550 really matter so make sure the phase is 106 00:04:42,550 --> 00:04:45,130 not an issue with you're adding so much 107 00:04:45,130 --> 00:04:46,870 bottom on the snare that's cancelling 108 00:04:46,870 --> 00:04:49,270 the bass drum so be very careful check 109 00:04:49,270 --> 00:04:52,420 that phase but again add all that low 110 00:04:52,420 --> 00:04:54,790 bottom the ear will think that you've 111 00:04:54,790 --> 00:04:56,560 added tone because it'll hear the link 112 00:04:56,560 --> 00:05:00,250 to the note the Q on the equalizer the 113 00:05:00,250 --> 00:05:02,020 fit mosquito is very important so this 114 00:05:02,020 --> 00:05:02,880 is on to tubby 115 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:06,700 right it's not to broaden where it 116 00:05:06,700 --> 00:05:08,380 sounds sloppy and loose you want to be 117 00:05:08,380 --> 00:05:11,950 tight is the backbeat so unfortunately 118 00:05:11,950 --> 00:05:13,540 you have to use your ears your ears are 119 00:05:13,540 --> 00:05:16,510 the best tool you can ever have when 120 00:05:16,510 --> 00:05:19,750 you're making decisions like that does 121 00:05:19,750 --> 00:05:21,940 your choice of monitors really matter or 122 00:05:21,940 --> 00:05:25,270 is it on how comfortable and how you 123 00:05:25,270 --> 00:05:28,570 adapted you are to your monitors if so 124 00:05:28,570 --> 00:05:30,940 what's your favorite monitor speakers 125 00:05:30,940 --> 00:05:34,900 are like headphones like a t-shirt like 126 00:05:34,900 --> 00:05:37,390 a shirt like earmuffs it's what you feel 127 00:05:37,390 --> 00:05:38,860 comfortable with and what you connect 128 00:05:38,860 --> 00:05:41,910 with you know I've had people make 129 00:05:41,910 --> 00:05:44,740 amazing records that I've mixed that I 130 00:05:44,740 --> 00:05:47,290 was very impressed with the tonality and 131 00:05:47,290 --> 00:05:51,130 the EQ scape of what they did I wanted 132 00:05:51,130 --> 00:05:52,960 to find out that they maybe did in a 133 00:05:52,960 --> 00:05:54,100 pair of speakers that I would never even 134 00:05:54,100 --> 00:05:57,390 consider using or maybe I even dislike 135 00:05:57,390 --> 00:06:01,720 so I get asked this question all the 136 00:06:01,720 --> 00:06:04,750 time from actually regular people as 137 00:06:04,750 --> 00:06:06,040 well as you know very well educated 138 00:06:06,040 --> 00:06:08,830 people and I honestly have to say that 139 00:06:08,830 --> 00:06:09,640 you just gotta listen to different 140 00:06:09,640 --> 00:06:11,530 speakers and find them one that fits 141 00:06:11,530 --> 00:06:13,630 your ear you know maybe you have ears a 142 00:06:13,630 --> 00:06:15,700 very sensitive to brightness so 143 00:06:15,700 --> 00:06:16,540 obviously you don't want something 144 00:06:16,540 --> 00:06:19,450 that's real bright and vice versa you 145 00:06:19,450 --> 00:06:20,890 know wherever the situation might be I 146 00:06:20,890 --> 00:06:24,160 know the gentleman 1032 is I use a lot 147 00:06:24,160 --> 00:06:25,990 I'm very comfortable with those always 148 00:06:25,990 --> 00:06:28,960 have been and it stands of course we all 149 00:06:28,960 --> 00:06:32,020 use its standard at least at this points 150 00:06:32,020 --> 00:06:33,730 almost going in but still kind of a 151 00:06:33,730 --> 00:06:38,380 standard and after that it's different 152 00:06:38,380 --> 00:06:39,520 kinds of speakers I've used over the 153 00:06:39,520 --> 00:06:42,250 years I've used krrk I've used JBL's 154 00:06:42,250 --> 00:06:43,450 you know I've used all kinds of stuff my 155 00:06:43,450 --> 00:06:44,890 philosophy is you should be able to make 156 00:06:44,890 --> 00:06:47,560 it on anything and with a quick listen 157 00:06:47,560 --> 00:06:51,040 you can put up iTunes and just go down 158 00:06:51,040 --> 00:06:54,880 15 20 songs get a feel for how those 159 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:57,100 speakers work and then maybe play a few 160 00:06:57,100 --> 00:06:58,240 things that you really know well that 161 00:06:58,240 --> 00:06:59,950 you're comfortable with but you know 162 00:06:59,950 --> 00:07:02,320 actually what they sound like and adjust 163 00:07:02,320 --> 00:07:04,690 your ears and of course test-pilot 164 00:07:04,690 --> 00:07:06,820 take a few mixes make a few balances 165 00:07:06,820 --> 00:07:08,050 don't spend a lot of time just kind of 166 00:07:08,050 --> 00:07:11,620 do it quick and listen to it and listen 167 00:07:11,620 --> 00:07:12,820 to it and see what it feels like in a 168 00:07:12,820 --> 00:07:14,430 few other different places 169 00:07:14,430 --> 00:07:18,370 looks like rama how do you make vocal 170 00:07:18,370 --> 00:07:20,530 sounds so smooth an area at the same 171 00:07:20,530 --> 00:07:23,560 time total function of mid range a very 172 00:07:23,560 --> 00:07:27,820 very very high level skill set the 173 00:07:27,820 --> 00:07:30,250 attitude and the character in the mood 174 00:07:30,250 --> 00:07:34,270 of instruments resigned in the mid range 175 00:07:34,270 --> 00:07:37,570 they do not live in the high end they do 176 00:07:37,570 --> 00:07:39,669 not live in the way way way extreme low 177 00:07:39,669 --> 00:07:42,970 end they live in the mid range that is 178 00:07:42,970 --> 00:07:45,120 where you hear the crack in the voice 179 00:07:45,120 --> 00:07:49,120 the ring in the snare a rattle in the 180 00:07:49,120 --> 00:07:51,160 guitar string the kick against acoustic 181 00:07:51,160 --> 00:07:53,080 guitar strings the finger and the qatar 182 00:07:53,080 --> 00:07:57,010 strings rattle on the bass it all lives 183 00:07:57,010 --> 00:08:01,630 in that mid-range piano c3 middle a all 184 00:08:01,630 --> 00:08:02,820 that 185 00:08:02,820 --> 00:08:05,740 excuse-me middle c all that is right in 186 00:08:05,740 --> 00:08:07,750 the mid-range and that's where the 187 00:08:07,750 --> 00:08:10,540 character relocked resides so if you 188 00:08:10,540 --> 00:08:12,190 scoop some of the mid-range out you can 189 00:08:12,190 --> 00:08:13,450 sometimes get a voice that might be a 190 00:08:13,450 --> 00:08:16,360 little too Monroe G or you can and 191 00:08:16,360 --> 00:08:17,560 that's dangerous again because that's 192 00:08:17,560 --> 00:08:19,720 very important somebody's almost a no-no 193 00:08:19,720 --> 00:08:21,640 so you'll be very very careful kind of 194 00:08:21,640 --> 00:08:22,960 wish in some ways that didn't say that 195 00:08:22,960 --> 00:08:24,280 because I don't want people to go crazy 196 00:08:24,280 --> 00:08:27,370 with the mid-range what I've done the 197 00:08:27,370 --> 00:08:31,419 lots of times is used compressors that 198 00:08:31,419 --> 00:08:35,380 have allocated EQ within them right so I 199 00:08:35,380 --> 00:08:38,020 see one would be an example there's lots 200 00:08:38,020 --> 00:08:41,110 of different ones like that and I can 201 00:08:41,110 --> 00:08:42,599 sometimes just have the compressor 202 00:08:42,599 --> 00:08:44,800 carefully on Peaks dip out that 203 00:08:44,800 --> 00:08:47,230 mid-range which allows the top and the 204 00:08:47,230 --> 00:08:49,510 bottom to sound louder compare the 205 00:08:49,510 --> 00:08:50,890 mid-range on those notes where it might 206 00:08:50,890 --> 00:08:52,060 be a little too shrinking 207 00:08:52,060 --> 00:08:54,160 the first thing I discussed of course 208 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:55,959 would be more justice or overall EQ 209 00:08:55,959 --> 00:08:58,030 maybe it was recorded on microphone that 210 00:08:58,030 --> 00:09:00,160 kind of pushed the mid-range or the room 211 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:02,680 was a little too good ranging over the 212 00:09:02,680 --> 00:09:05,709 console is adding a mid-range reproach 213 00:09:05,709 --> 00:09:06,910 whistles at a mid-range you don't like 214 00:09:06,910 --> 00:09:08,800 then you can go through and carefully 215 00:09:08,800 --> 00:09:11,680 soundscape it but be very careful if you 216 00:09:11,680 --> 00:09:14,410 take too much that mid-range out I'm 217 00:09:14,410 --> 00:09:15,940 gonna be painting too much that 218 00:09:15,940 --> 00:09:19,240 mid-range out the vocal won't sound like 219 00:09:19,240 --> 00:09:21,580 it's really pushing out the attitude 220 00:09:21,580 --> 00:09:24,490 needs to it'll sound now too smooth and 221 00:09:24,490 --> 00:09:27,070 too Airy so it's very dangerous the the 222 00:09:27,070 --> 00:09:30,459 top end when it says Airy generally a 223 00:09:30,459 --> 00:09:32,260 function once you get the mid-range 224 00:09:32,260 --> 00:09:34,510 right definitely a function of EQ so 225 00:09:34,510 --> 00:09:37,060 lots of equalizers you can add 1520 K 226 00:09:37,060 --> 00:09:40,180 stuff to get that air but then you get 227 00:09:40,180 --> 00:09:42,160 into a sibilant issue so it becomes a 228 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:45,070 very high skill technique frankly of 229 00:09:45,070 --> 00:09:48,339 finding the right de-essing that's not 230 00:09:48,339 --> 00:09:49,900 allowing the high end to be too much but 231 00:09:49,900 --> 00:09:51,760 the air is kind of open up the top but 232 00:09:51,760 --> 00:09:53,230 then getting the mid-range carved out 233 00:09:53,230 --> 00:09:54,640 and making sure there's not too much 234 00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:57,790 bottom that's making you perceive that 235 00:09:57,790 --> 00:10:01,690 it's not Airy but the low mid range you 236 00:10:01,690 --> 00:10:03,550 want to be very careful with as well you 237 00:10:03,550 --> 00:10:05,950 know anywhere from a my opinion from 250 238 00:10:05,950 --> 00:10:10,900 to 2k very digits area make sure that 239 00:10:10,900 --> 00:10:12,250 you don't roll out too much at lower 240 00:10:12,250 --> 00:10:14,140 bottom so you don't lose the chest so 241 00:10:14,140 --> 00:10:15,250 that when you put the vocal in the 242 00:10:15,250 --> 00:10:17,800 record that is competing the bass Tom's 243 00:10:17,800 --> 00:10:19,150 all these different things that live in 244 00:10:19,150 --> 00:10:22,900 those areas are not you're not you've 245 00:10:22,900 --> 00:10:24,459 carved out so much that now the vocal 246 00:10:24,459 --> 00:10:25,990 sounds kind of thin and then supported 247 00:10:25,990 --> 00:10:28,330 so sometimes those judgments you got to 248 00:10:28,330 --> 00:10:32,260 make once you once you you know really 249 00:10:32,260 --> 00:10:34,000 focused in and you've made those changes 250 00:10:34,000 --> 00:10:36,430 and get to kind of focus back out and go 251 00:10:36,430 --> 00:10:37,510 like well what does it feel like in the 252 00:10:37,510 --> 00:10:39,190 record did I go too far or not far 253 00:10:39,190 --> 00:10:43,940 enough mr. caylor 254 00:10:43,940 --> 00:10:46,279 what's the process you use to create 255 00:10:46,279 --> 00:10:48,920 full warm buttery vocals that seem to 256 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:51,350 surround you well I think we kind of 257 00:10:51,350 --> 00:10:52,550 touch a little bit on that was last 258 00:10:52,550 --> 00:10:53,990 question the full warm of course is that 259 00:10:53,990 --> 00:10:56,630 lower mid-range area and the buttery is 260 00:10:56,630 --> 00:10:57,800 to do the function of the mid-range 261 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:00,170 versus the top in and the surround you 262 00:11:00,170 --> 00:11:01,790 then comes in two different coursing 263 00:11:01,790 --> 00:11:04,490 that you can use at different delays you 264 00:11:04,490 --> 00:11:06,770 can use different reverbs you can use 265 00:11:06,770 --> 00:11:08,330 you know a short review can be very 266 00:11:08,330 --> 00:11:10,700 disguisey to make something feel like 267 00:11:10,700 --> 00:11:12,170 it's kind of buttering warm and by the 268 00:11:12,170 --> 00:11:13,640 way you can EQ all those things on the 269 00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:16,310 return right so it doesn't mean you have 270 00:11:16,310 --> 00:11:18,080 to send something real warm you can send 271 00:11:18,080 --> 00:11:19,370 something that's been carved out the way 272 00:11:19,370 --> 00:11:21,140 you want it to and then in the return 273 00:11:21,140 --> 00:11:24,589 add some lower middle or bottom that 274 00:11:24,589 --> 00:11:26,480 makes you feel like it feels buttery 275 00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:28,399 warm and corrupt the mid-range little 276 00:11:28,399 --> 00:11:30,410 farther because it is the return on that 277 00:11:30,410 --> 00:11:33,290 course or that delay that usually kind 278 00:11:33,290 --> 00:11:36,160 of works very well for me Sebastian 279 00:11:36,160 --> 00:11:38,990 where do you think the future of music 280 00:11:38,990 --> 00:11:43,270 industry is going good or bad place 281 00:11:43,270 --> 00:11:46,120 obviously an extremely long discussion 282 00:11:46,120 --> 00:11:51,260 not not one minute answer so I think the 283 00:11:51,260 --> 00:11:53,290 simplest answer I can give you is 284 00:11:53,290 --> 00:11:57,260 obviously we now our part are now living 285 00:11:57,260 --> 00:12:00,650 in the digital revolution and it's been 286 00:12:00,650 --> 00:12:03,230 an absolute renaissance 287 00:12:03,230 --> 00:12:05,180 in terms of how people consume music 288 00:12:05,180 --> 00:12:08,360 listen to music by music and you know 289 00:12:08,360 --> 00:12:10,520 obviously the the YouTube component has 290 00:12:10,520 --> 00:12:11,600 got a lot of people listening to it 291 00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:12,890 because they want the visual as well as 292 00:12:12,890 --> 00:12:17,360 the auto audio but I think that as some 293 00:12:17,360 --> 00:12:20,540 of the smarter business brains start to 294 00:12:20,540 --> 00:12:21,980 come into our business and they start to 295 00:12:21,980 --> 00:12:23,390 realize there's that there's the 296 00:12:23,390 --> 00:12:26,300 potential to make money and those kind 297 00:12:26,300 --> 00:12:29,839 of minds help harness the digital 298 00:12:29,839 --> 00:12:32,959 revenue that is possible the truth is we 299 00:12:32,959 --> 00:12:34,700 could end up with more money than we 300 00:12:34,700 --> 00:12:37,220 know what to do with we're just not 301 00:12:37,220 --> 00:12:38,770 there yet we're in that place where 302 00:12:38,770 --> 00:12:41,450 we've moved from an analog world and 303 00:12:41,450 --> 00:12:43,520 we're moving into a digital world and 304 00:12:43,520 --> 00:12:46,390 not everybody knows exactly how to 305 00:12:46,390 --> 00:12:49,220 harness that how to deal with the 306 00:12:49,220 --> 00:12:52,370 finance of what it could be but imagine 307 00:12:52,370 --> 00:12:54,890 a world where all the digital domains 308 00:12:54,890 --> 00:12:57,329 start to have to pay a price or a tax 309 00:12:57,329 --> 00:12:59,670 or people's consciousness that to 310 00:12:59,670 --> 00:13:01,439 understand that just taking something is 311 00:13:01,439 --> 00:13:03,179 not cool and they need to like either 312 00:13:03,179 --> 00:13:06,809 subscribe to subscription base listening 313 00:13:06,809 --> 00:13:09,420 music or another River those Amazon I 314 00:13:09,420 --> 00:13:11,160 tune where they pay for it you know if 315 00:13:11,160 --> 00:13:13,319 that all starts to become part of the 316 00:13:13,319 --> 00:13:16,259 consciousness of pop culture and digital 317 00:13:16,259 --> 00:13:20,160 starts to get its ability to have a toll 318 00:13:20,160 --> 00:13:21,509 bridge of lack a barrier description 319 00:13:21,509 --> 00:13:23,730 we'll call it we would know to do the 320 00:13:23,730 --> 00:13:30,149 money so that's my hope Jesse do you mix 321 00:13:30,149 --> 00:13:32,100 with EQ compression or other processing 322 00:13:32,100 --> 00:13:34,079 them tube as if so which you must 323 00:13:34,079 --> 00:13:36,600 plug-in you tend to use thanks well 324 00:13:36,600 --> 00:13:38,459 obviously I definitely use compression 325 00:13:38,459 --> 00:13:41,160 on stereo buss and EQ compression for me 326 00:13:41,160 --> 00:13:44,670 is not level it never has been and I've 327 00:13:44,670 --> 00:13:46,199 said this a million times in a million 328 00:13:46,199 --> 00:13:48,089 different places I'm sure some of you 329 00:13:48,089 --> 00:13:49,619 that maybe have come across something of 330 00:13:49,619 --> 00:13:52,110 mine probably read it or seen it edit 331 00:13:52,110 --> 00:13:54,329 nauseam but I think that's because I 332 00:13:54,329 --> 00:13:56,670 hate the fact that a lot of people view 333 00:13:56,670 --> 00:13:58,819 compression as just getting it up loud 334 00:13:58,819 --> 00:14:00,899 compression as I've said a million times 335 00:14:00,899 --> 00:14:04,350 is the most musical piece of equipment 336 00:14:04,350 --> 00:14:06,119 we get to work with it's the only thing 337 00:14:06,119 --> 00:14:09,480 that changes time it has an actual time 338 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:11,759 constant component where I can make 339 00:14:11,759 --> 00:14:13,439 something feel late and early and move 340 00:14:13,439 --> 00:14:16,049 around and wheeze and have a life that 341 00:14:16,049 --> 00:14:18,059 feels like it's error --air that i have 342 00:14:18,059 --> 00:14:20,100 a life work feels like it's moving in a 343 00:14:20,100 --> 00:14:23,819 beautiful way so that's right is the 344 00:14:23,819 --> 00:14:25,559 compression of stereo buss is I try to 345 00:14:25,559 --> 00:14:28,559 find something that is making the mix 346 00:14:28,559 --> 00:14:31,429 you know breathe and move and not feel 347 00:14:31,429 --> 00:14:34,139 one-dimensional but multiple dimensions 348 00:14:34,139 --> 00:14:35,369 to it because it's feeling like it's 349 00:14:35,369 --> 00:14:38,189 coming and going I've tried everything 350 00:14:38,189 --> 00:14:40,169 on the stereo bus I've tried every plug 351 00:14:40,169 --> 00:14:42,839 in avi analog Hardware piece you could 352 00:14:42,839 --> 00:14:45,269 imagine literally everything you could 353 00:14:45,269 --> 00:14:45,809 ever imagine 354 00:14:45,809 --> 00:14:49,919 I've tried it and I find myself you know 355 00:14:49,919 --> 00:14:51,299 obviously lots of times I'm going back 356 00:14:51,299 --> 00:14:52,889 to the standards you know the SSL 357 00:14:52,889 --> 00:14:54,959 obviously gets used a tremendous amount 358 00:14:54,959 --> 00:14:56,999 and some of the needs get used a 359 00:14:56,999 --> 00:15:01,009 tremendous amount but the plugins in the 360 00:15:01,009 --> 00:15:03,439 computer in protools 361 00:15:03,439 --> 00:15:06,380 that particular DAW 362 00:15:06,380 --> 00:15:08,990 I think a lot I think the you know l1 363 00:15:08,990 --> 00:15:14,060 and the l3 316 I mean there's a bunch of 364 00:15:14,060 --> 00:15:16,250 them that really sound cool UA has a 365 00:15:16,250 --> 00:15:18,620 couple things that are great you just 366 00:15:18,620 --> 00:15:19,490 have to just try it 367 00:15:19,490 --> 00:15:22,730 I honestly there's to me no go to if you 368 00:15:22,730 --> 00:15:24,350 want to go to I'm just going to say use 369 00:15:24,350 --> 00:15:28,820 SSL go to that'll work kind of never let 370 00:15:28,820 --> 00:15:31,279 you down but I don't know that that's 371 00:15:31,279 --> 00:15:34,850 always the best creative choice it's the 372 00:15:34,850 --> 00:15:37,790 safe choice it's going to work probably 373 00:15:37,790 --> 00:15:40,070 80% of the records have it on it but not 374 00:15:40,070 --> 00:15:41,260 necessarily creative choice and I'm 375 00:15:41,260 --> 00:15:44,149 always really liking to choose and try 376 00:15:44,149 --> 00:15:45,980 to find something creative because 377 00:15:45,980 --> 00:15:48,170 that's just how I hear things and then 378 00:15:48,170 --> 00:15:51,709 the EQ of course is is your choice again 379 00:15:51,709 --> 00:15:55,070 I like EQ after the compression probably 380 00:15:55,070 --> 00:15:56,060 eight out of ten times 381 00:15:56,060 --> 00:15:57,890 I don't like pushing the EQ into the 382 00:15:57,890 --> 00:15:59,300 compression unless I want that kind of 383 00:15:59,300 --> 00:16:01,610 an effect and I don't want to 384 00:16:01,610 --> 00:16:03,649 necessarily lose the EQ curve I'm adding 385 00:16:03,649 --> 00:16:05,000 because the compressor obviously is 386 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:06,860 going to react to those frequencies that 387 00:16:06,860 --> 00:16:10,310 are pushing or taking out EQ on the bus 388 00:16:10,310 --> 00:16:11,810 you have to find something that you like 389 00:16:11,810 --> 00:16:15,920 without a shadow of a doubt all the 390 00:16:15,920 --> 00:16:17,420 plugins have a sound so you're 391 00:16:17,420 --> 00:16:20,750 identifying not just the sonic curve but 392 00:16:20,750 --> 00:16:23,870 you're also identifying the EQ choice in 393 00:16:23,870 --> 00:16:26,510 terms of how it sounds you know 394 00:16:26,510 --> 00:16:28,130 obviously am i this is my personal 395 00:16:28,130 --> 00:16:28,610 opinion 396 00:16:28,610 --> 00:16:30,770 you know first is like a focus right 397 00:16:30,770 --> 00:16:33,079 would have a certain sound sometime 398 00:16:33,079 --> 00:16:35,930 let's focus right plug-in or you can try 399 00:16:35,930 --> 00:16:38,540 the model 1073 that would have a sound 400 00:16:38,540 --> 00:16:41,180 you could throw in SSL channel strip 401 00:16:41,180 --> 00:16:43,130 that would have a sound without doing 402 00:16:43,130 --> 00:16:44,420 anything just going through it it's 403 00:16:44,420 --> 00:16:46,730 going to have a sound and you have to 404 00:16:46,730 --> 00:16:47,899 listen to it you know is this record 405 00:16:47,899 --> 00:16:50,120 real acoustic and beautiful maybe I want 406 00:16:50,120 --> 00:16:52,640 something like a Neve modeling maybe I 407 00:16:52,640 --> 00:16:55,250 want a couple quick texts you know that 408 00:16:55,250 --> 00:16:57,010 are very soft and pretty and beautiful 409 00:16:57,010 --> 00:16:59,690 maybe they'll put the band rule far and 410 00:16:59,690 --> 00:17:02,329 open the 15k the bandwidth and you know 411 00:17:02,329 --> 00:17:03,579 really open up make it sound beautiful 412 00:17:03,579 --> 00:17:06,050 or maybe it's a rock record where I want 413 00:17:06,050 --> 00:17:08,179 to be more aggressive you know I might 414 00:17:08,179 --> 00:17:10,520 use an SSL channel strip go for the 415 00:17:10,520 --> 00:17:12,709 three k 7'k that really pushes the 416 00:17:12,709 --> 00:17:16,040 record out hardcore you really got to 417 00:17:16,040 --> 00:17:17,600 use your ears you know what's difficult 418 00:17:17,600 --> 00:17:19,579 over the years is constantly trying to 419 00:17:19,579 --> 00:17:19,800 come 420 00:17:19,800 --> 00:17:22,280 people that there's not a go to and 421 00:17:22,280 --> 00:17:25,680 experimentation is your best friend the 422 00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:27,810 next question is from Martin Messi 423 00:17:27,810 --> 00:17:30,990 you are known for using a lot of vintage 424 00:17:30,990 --> 00:17:34,800 analog gear and using a lot of it for 425 00:17:34,800 --> 00:17:37,620 parallel compression and or other types 426 00:17:37,620 --> 00:17:41,280 of parallel treatment view have worked 427 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:43,380 in Pro Tools with plugins can you share 428 00:17:43,380 --> 00:17:45,420 with us some of your choices of plugins 429 00:17:45,420 --> 00:17:49,770 and their uses I been working in Pro 430 00:17:49,770 --> 00:17:53,700 Tools extremely extremely excessively in 431 00:17:53,700 --> 00:17:55,560 the last six years 432 00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:58,530 and in the last two years a tremendous 433 00:17:58,530 --> 00:18:00,240 amount and I'd actually say more 434 00:18:00,240 --> 00:18:05,070 improved tools in an analog and analog 435 00:18:05,070 --> 00:18:08,550 of course is fantastic I love all my 436 00:18:08,550 --> 00:18:11,460 plugins I love all my analog gear I 437 00:18:11,460 --> 00:18:14,850 still think that most of us not all of 438 00:18:14,850 --> 00:18:16,740 us but most of us are still doing a 439 00:18:16,740 --> 00:18:19,380 hybrid between the two we're not totally 440 00:18:19,380 --> 00:18:21,240 ready to let go of the full amount of 441 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:22,320 the analog because there's things that 442 00:18:22,320 --> 00:18:24,750 it does that Digital hasn't got to yet 443 00:18:24,750 --> 00:18:27,060 the modelling the digital world of 444 00:18:27,060 --> 00:18:28,260 course is getting better better better 445 00:18:28,260 --> 00:18:29,820 and better and better in some cases I 446 00:18:29,820 --> 00:18:32,790 think it's really like fantastic and as 447 00:18:32,790 --> 00:18:35,400 usable as hard workpiece in some cases 448 00:18:35,400 --> 00:18:38,280 they can get it so in the courses the 449 00:18:38,280 --> 00:18:39,390 cases where they didn't get it I would 450 00:18:39,390 --> 00:18:41,910 use it and that's obvious 451 00:18:41,910 --> 00:18:45,210 different types of plugins it says here 452 00:18:45,210 --> 00:18:46,380 that you can share on some of your 453 00:18:46,380 --> 00:18:48,240 choice trace some so I guess you want me 454 00:18:48,240 --> 00:18:50,940 to share some of my choice of plugins 455 00:18:50,940 --> 00:18:58,080 and their uses I one of my favorite 456 00:18:58,080 --> 00:19:03,360 plugins is audio tracks it's one of 457 00:19:03,360 --> 00:19:05,820 those compressors that really like a 458 00:19:05,820 --> 00:19:08,520 fairchild wheezes and moves in a way i 459 00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:10,740 really like you know it's got a light to 460 00:19:10,740 --> 00:19:13,740 it and I think it's great on overheads 461 00:19:13,740 --> 00:19:17,250 I've had it great on room mics sometimes 462 00:19:17,250 --> 00:19:19,980 on bass not too much too much success 463 00:19:19,980 --> 00:19:23,160 with guitar some of the EMI stuff is 464 00:19:23,160 --> 00:19:25,230 really great for guitar in terms of 465 00:19:25,230 --> 00:19:28,110 compression and even the EMI EQ stuff is 466 00:19:28,110 --> 00:19:30,310 really pretty stunning 467 00:19:30,310 --> 00:19:33,220 for guitar/vocals I find myself using a 468 00:19:33,220 --> 00:19:36,400 lot of the poor child and obviously not 469 00:19:36,400 --> 00:19:38,890 because I designed it and it's not my 470 00:19:38,890 --> 00:19:39,480 piece 471 00:19:39,480 --> 00:19:42,660 I've always liked Fairchild periods so 472 00:19:42,660 --> 00:19:45,310 I'm very comfortable with saying 473 00:19:45,310 --> 00:19:47,050 publicly that I think it's an incredible 474 00:19:47,050 --> 00:19:49,890 closed rendition in some ways better 475 00:19:49,890 --> 00:19:54,190 than even the analog piece and I've had 476 00:19:54,190 --> 00:19:56,380 maybe thirty five pair child's on my 477 00:19:56,380 --> 00:19:59,350 hands over the years it's excellent 478 00:19:59,350 --> 00:20:00,940 you'll find lots of times you can just 479 00:20:00,940 --> 00:20:02,290 put on the vocal turn it on you don't 480 00:20:02,290 --> 00:20:04,660 even have to do anything and it sounds 481 00:20:04,660 --> 00:20:06,340 amazing 482 00:20:06,340 --> 00:20:08,290 so those are a few ideas I guess we 483 00:20:08,290 --> 00:20:09,910 consider really to be honest we could go 484 00:20:09,910 --> 00:20:12,220 through hours and hours of it so weird 485 00:20:12,220 --> 00:20:14,200 thing this question because I find them 486 00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:15,220 people ask me what's your favorite 487 00:20:15,220 --> 00:20:17,620 record or favorite artist I always go 488 00:20:17,620 --> 00:20:21,190 kind of get stuck because when I think 489 00:20:21,190 --> 00:20:23,140 about it's like I don't know it's my 490 00:20:23,140 --> 00:20:24,490 favorite artists is my favorite record 491 00:20:24,490 --> 00:20:26,590 like I have lots of things I like feel 492 00:20:26,590 --> 00:20:27,790 like about the plugins you know probably 493 00:20:27,790 --> 00:20:28,990 if we were a little more relaxed I had a 494 00:20:28,990 --> 00:20:31,180 little more time and start talking 495 00:20:31,180 --> 00:20:33,130 between the two of us for instance I 496 00:20:33,130 --> 00:20:34,870 would start sharing like what about this 497 00:20:34,870 --> 00:20:36,220 plugin or about that plugin but those 498 00:20:36,220 --> 00:20:41,230 are some little quick ideas Josh do you 499 00:20:41,230 --> 00:20:44,200 work to set deadlines do you set a date 500 00:20:44,200 --> 00:20:46,930 time and finish the mix when that time 501 00:20:46,930 --> 00:20:48,700 comes do you find this effective way of 502 00:20:48,700 --> 00:20:50,890 keeping objectivity over the mix and if 503 00:20:50,890 --> 00:20:54,510 not what strategies do you use another 504 00:20:54,510 --> 00:20:56,650 fairly in-depth question a lot of 505 00:20:56,650 --> 00:20:58,450 different ways the answer I'll say this 506 00:20:58,450 --> 00:21:02,230 art if we look at records as art it's 507 00:21:02,230 --> 00:21:05,890 never finished it we could spend days 508 00:21:05,890 --> 00:21:09,850 tweaking changing things and never be 509 00:21:09,850 --> 00:21:12,310 100% happy or always feel like we could 510 00:21:12,310 --> 00:21:13,210 make something better 511 00:21:13,210 --> 00:21:17,200 so with art just one day or the record 512 00:21:17,200 --> 00:21:18,880 we'll call it one day just stops you 513 00:21:18,880 --> 00:21:20,230 just finish you finish because there's 514 00:21:20,230 --> 00:21:21,640 no money finish because it's a deadline 515 00:21:21,640 --> 00:21:23,320 you finish for whatever reason people 516 00:21:23,320 --> 00:21:24,880 are tired of it whatever it is you 517 00:21:24,880 --> 00:21:28,810 finish so I think setting a date and the 518 00:21:28,810 --> 00:21:31,090 time to finish is important I think it's 519 00:21:31,090 --> 00:21:33,780 really good for arrangements for 520 00:21:33,780 --> 00:21:36,880 production for recording for mixing all 521 00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:38,800 of us as artistic people can just keep 522 00:21:38,800 --> 00:21:40,600 going on and on and and and really 523 00:21:40,600 --> 00:21:42,570 getting different perspectives and 524 00:21:42,570 --> 00:21:45,090 of course we can pass it up but lots of 525 00:21:45,090 --> 00:21:46,440 times we can make it a lot better at 526 00:21:46,440 --> 00:21:50,159 least I like to think that and keeping 527 00:21:50,159 --> 00:21:53,519 the objectivity of the mix is really 528 00:21:53,519 --> 00:21:56,549 keeping a close pull sand look at 529 00:21:56,549 --> 00:21:57,929 yourself as you're working when you 530 00:21:57,929 --> 00:21:59,429 start to become tired of it or you feel 531 00:21:59,429 --> 00:22:00,809 like you're on a rescue mission or you 532 00:22:00,809 --> 00:22:01,769 feel like you gotta do different things 533 00:22:01,769 --> 00:22:03,779 because it's not feeding you probably 534 00:22:03,779 --> 00:22:06,450 time to stop work on another song work 535 00:22:06,450 --> 00:22:07,980 on another three songs come back come 536 00:22:07,980 --> 00:22:09,509 back the next day quit go have coffee 537 00:22:09,509 --> 00:22:11,909 get on the phone whatever it is you 538 00:22:11,909 --> 00:22:14,309 remind off it and come back to it that 539 00:22:14,309 --> 00:22:15,840 will give you objectivity without a 540 00:22:15,840 --> 00:22:17,309 shout-out even listening to some other 541 00:22:17,309 --> 00:22:18,809 mixes listen to some of the music just 542 00:22:18,809 --> 00:22:21,870 something to get your mind off of the 543 00:22:21,870 --> 00:22:23,700 insane focus you have sometimes when 544 00:22:23,700 --> 00:22:26,460 you're mixing a song and since there if 545 00:22:26,460 --> 00:22:28,259 not what strategies do you use I kind of 546 00:22:28,259 --> 00:22:30,450 just covered that so that'd be my answer 547 00:22:30,450 --> 00:22:33,130 to you Josh 548 00:22:33,140 --> 00:22:36,970 yes she loves me39642

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.