All language subtitles for MWTM Q&A #26 - Greg Wells

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional) Download
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:06,020 --> 00:00:12,929 hello I am Greg wells and we are here in 2 00:00:09,570 --> 00:00:15,900 the beautiful control room at Studio la 3 00:00:12,929 --> 00:00:17,850 Fabrique we are at the tail end of doing 4 00:00:15,900 --> 00:00:21,600 my first week here at mixed with the 5 00:00:17,850 --> 00:00:23,699 Masters which has been absolutely 6 00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:26,670 incredible and I hope they have me back 7 00:00:23,699 --> 00:00:30,810 we did kind of an interesting approach 8 00:00:26,670 --> 00:00:34,730 where I think I think it's safe to say 9 00:00:30,810 --> 00:00:37,829 that most of the Masters that come here 10 00:00:34,730 --> 00:00:40,469 will sometimes record a band or they 11 00:00:37,829 --> 00:00:43,050 will just show the mixing process that 12 00:00:40,469 --> 00:00:45,750 they do and and get into that with the 13 00:00:43,050 --> 00:00:49,379 attendees that are here we all came up 14 00:00:45,750 --> 00:00:51,989 with the idea of me showing up with an 15 00:00:49,379 --> 00:00:56,430 artist that I'm working with and some 16 00:00:51,989 --> 00:00:58,710 songwriters and we very bravely and we 17 00:00:56,430 --> 00:01:03,930 pulled it off we wrote a song from 18 00:00:58,710 --> 00:01:06,360 scratch here and then recorded it with 19 00:01:03,930 --> 00:01:09,420 me producing the recording and then I 20 00:01:06,360 --> 00:01:10,950 mixed it and then the last two days of 21 00:01:09,420 --> 00:01:13,680 the seminar have been me listening to 22 00:01:10,950 --> 00:01:15,240 the attendees work and being very 23 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:18,630 interactive with it commenting on it 24 00:01:15,240 --> 00:01:20,580 from everything from mixing elements to 25 00:01:18,630 --> 00:01:23,270 production suggestions to the 26 00:01:20,580 --> 00:01:27,270 songwriting itself and and all points 27 00:01:23,270 --> 00:01:29,100 micro and macro with that what we're 28 00:01:27,270 --> 00:01:31,650 going to do right now is we have ten 29 00:01:29,100 --> 00:01:34,439 questions that were chosen from readers 30 00:01:31,650 --> 00:01:37,890 of the amazing sound on sound magazine 31 00:01:34,439 --> 00:01:39,360 and I'm just going to launch into them 32 00:01:37,890 --> 00:01:41,549 I've had a quick kind of read through 33 00:01:39,360 --> 00:01:45,229 them and they're good questions here we 34 00:01:41,549 --> 00:01:48,299 go so question number one is from Rob 35 00:01:45,229 --> 00:01:51,420 and he asks how do you go about choosing 36 00:01:48,299 --> 00:01:53,369 a mic for a vocalist I understand that 37 00:01:51,420 --> 00:01:56,159 you try to avoid a mic that enhances the 38 00:01:53,369 --> 00:01:57,840 bad characteristics of a voice but do 39 00:01:56,159 --> 00:02:01,560 you choose a particular mic for a 40 00:01:57,840 --> 00:02:03,689 particular vibe ie rock ballad pop and 41 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:05,610 can you please explain what it means 42 00:02:03,689 --> 00:02:06,570 when someone says that a particular mic 43 00:02:05,610 --> 00:02:09,869 takes 44 00:02:06,570 --> 00:02:11,640 EQ well the vocal if you have a vocalist 45 00:02:09,869 --> 00:02:12,790 on a track for me that is the key 46 00:02:11,640 --> 00:02:15,370 instrument it is the 47 00:02:12,790 --> 00:02:18,069 the general of the army it leads the 48 00:02:15,370 --> 00:02:19,659 charge everything is there to serve the 49 00:02:18,069 --> 00:02:22,750 lead vocal and when the lead vocal 50 00:02:19,659 --> 00:02:25,930 sounds great and feels really confident 51 00:02:22,750 --> 00:02:27,670 really natural it makes everything sound 52 00:02:25,930 --> 00:02:29,970 better and I have really learned this 53 00:02:27,670 --> 00:02:35,200 one the hard way I was guilty in my 54 00:02:29,970 --> 00:02:38,859 early years of mixing and producing I'm 55 00:02:35,200 --> 00:02:40,540 such a musician I just want to hear I'm 56 00:02:38,859 --> 00:02:41,920 so what I mean by that it's like I'm 57 00:02:40,540 --> 00:02:44,140 really interested in what's the drummer 58 00:02:41,920 --> 00:02:46,450 doing what's the bass player doing 59 00:02:44,140 --> 00:02:48,970 what's that synth programming what is 60 00:02:46,450 --> 00:02:51,069 what patch is that what keyboard is that 61 00:02:48,970 --> 00:02:54,040 that I would sometimes loose focus on 62 00:02:51,069 --> 00:02:56,920 the lead vocal and at some point the 63 00:02:54,040 --> 00:02:59,650 penny dropped for me that that actually 64 00:02:56,920 --> 00:03:02,739 not only where my lead vocals not loud 65 00:02:59,650 --> 00:03:05,349 enough but everything sounded better the 66 00:03:02,739 --> 00:03:07,629 track sounds better when the lead vocal 67 00:03:05,349 --> 00:03:10,720 is on the right microphone has the right 68 00:03:07,629 --> 00:03:14,950 EQ has the right compression has 69 00:03:10,720 --> 00:03:19,930 whatever needs to speak the clearest and 70 00:03:14,950 --> 00:03:23,769 the most sort of unselfconsciously over 71 00:03:19,930 --> 00:03:25,599 the track so Mike choice is super duper 72 00:03:23,769 --> 00:03:27,819 important to me 73 00:03:25,599 --> 00:03:30,579 sometimes the best mic is one of the 74 00:03:27,819 --> 00:03:34,180 cheapest mics like a Shore 57 or 58 75 00:03:30,579 --> 00:03:38,109 those are great vocal mics the short SM 76 00:03:34,180 --> 00:03:40,359 seven is about a $400 US dollars Mike 77 00:03:38,109 --> 00:03:43,180 it's fantastic 78 00:03:40,359 --> 00:03:48,970 and at my studio I have all those mics 79 00:03:43,180 --> 00:03:51,760 and I have a beautiful 47 and a 250 80 00:03:48,970 --> 00:03:53,440 which is a cardioid 251 they're both of 81 00:03:51,760 --> 00:03:57,569 those mics our new mics made by 82 00:03:53,440 --> 00:04:01,150 Telefunken USA very much made to emulate 83 00:03:57,569 --> 00:04:02,709 the original vintage mics and and they 84 00:04:01,150 --> 00:04:04,540 have some extra ingredients in them and 85 00:04:02,709 --> 00:04:07,239 the 47 has a tube that we can't even get 86 00:04:04,540 --> 00:04:10,769 anymore there's sort of twiki versions 87 00:04:07,239 --> 00:04:14,229 that I worked on directly with them I 88 00:04:10,769 --> 00:04:15,849 find that between those two mics and a 89 00:04:14,229 --> 00:04:20,859 couple of different mic pre choices I 90 00:04:15,849 --> 00:04:22,870 have I have a lovely vintage 1073 which 91 00:04:20,859 --> 00:04:23,690 is nice and creamy and kind of rich and 92 00:04:22,870 --> 00:04:26,360 then I have 93 00:04:23,690 --> 00:04:28,280 probably my favorite mic pre is made by 94 00:04:26,360 --> 00:04:32,570 undertone audio the great Eric 95 00:04:28,280 --> 00:04:34,300 Valentine's making fantastic gear I also 96 00:04:32,570 --> 00:04:41,030 have his console I was his first 97 00:04:34,300 --> 00:04:43,520 customer as a console owner and he makes 98 00:04:41,030 --> 00:04:47,510 a mic free that is just ridiculous it's 99 00:04:43,520 --> 00:04:49,790 unbelievable it makes a single space one 100 00:04:47,510 --> 00:04:51,950 mic free with his EQ which is sort of 101 00:04:49,790 --> 00:04:53,330 just glorious crazy EQ you can do all 102 00:04:51,950 --> 00:04:56,780 kinds of things with including even 103 00:04:53,330 --> 00:04:58,790 changing the phase with EQ and then he 104 00:04:56,780 --> 00:05:00,740 makes a unit where it's just for Mike 105 00:04:58,790 --> 00:05:04,220 fries with no EQ and I have both of 106 00:05:00,740 --> 00:05:09,700 those those are big choices to make look 107 00:05:04,220 --> 00:05:09,700 what's them what's the right mic pre so 108 00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:15,440 you know microphones are very unnatural 109 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:18,320 things this whole recording process is a 110 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:23,260 very bizarre weird unnatural thing and 111 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:26,270 I'm never I'm never bored by how 112 00:05:23,260 --> 00:05:29,690 unnatural we have to get sometimes to 113 00:05:26,270 --> 00:05:31,430 make things just feel you know as 114 00:05:29,690 --> 00:05:34,060 natural as possible to let the music 115 00:05:31,430 --> 00:05:36,200 just come through the speakers so 116 00:05:34,060 --> 00:05:38,330 microphones I've never seen a microphone 117 00:05:36,200 --> 00:05:41,720 that knows how to record an S properly 118 00:05:38,330 --> 00:05:44,540 or lots of consonants there are some 119 00:05:41,720 --> 00:05:46,400 singers who are fantastic singers that 120 00:05:44,540 --> 00:05:48,169 don't sound good on microphones they 121 00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:51,080 have an S that can just rip your head 122 00:05:48,169 --> 00:05:54,169 off and then there's some singers that 123 00:05:51,080 --> 00:05:56,030 are there almost like photogenic on them 124 00:05:54,169 --> 00:05:59,360 you know some people just have a quality 125 00:05:56,030 --> 00:06:01,340 on camera not me but they just kind of 126 00:05:59,360 --> 00:06:02,960 explode on Cameron they look amazing 127 00:06:01,340 --> 00:06:05,720 even sometimes more amazing than they do 128 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:08,120 in real life some singers are like that 129 00:06:05,720 --> 00:06:10,490 too on the mic there are definitely some 130 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:14,270 voices that that the microphone whatever 131 00:06:10,490 --> 00:06:19,340 microphone it is loves and all of those 132 00:06:14,270 --> 00:06:23,060 things are of the utmost importance to 133 00:06:19,340 --> 00:06:24,890 me not only because I think most people 134 00:06:23,060 --> 00:06:27,890 in the world only listen to the singer I 135 00:06:24,890 --> 00:06:29,270 don't really care what the track is 136 00:06:27,890 --> 00:06:30,860 doing with the accompaniment is doing 137 00:06:29,270 --> 00:06:33,110 the accompaniment is really secondary if 138 00:06:30,860 --> 00:06:36,510 of course there's no song without it but 139 00:06:33,110 --> 00:06:38,820 it's there to support the vocal 140 00:06:36,510 --> 00:06:41,250 how close the singer is to a microphone 141 00:06:38,820 --> 00:06:44,790 is also really important most of the 142 00:06:41,250 --> 00:06:46,500 time on modern pop music or any kind of 143 00:06:44,790 --> 00:06:48,150 modern sort of commercial music the 144 00:06:46,500 --> 00:06:51,360 singer should be pretty close to the mic 145 00:06:48,150 --> 00:06:53,280 but sometimes the difference of you know 146 00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:56,250 several centimeters a couple of inches 147 00:06:53,280 --> 00:07:00,000 makes a big difference it changes the 148 00:06:56,250 --> 00:07:02,370 vibe entirely the last part of Rob's 149 00:07:00,000 --> 00:07:03,480 question can you please explain what it 150 00:07:02,370 --> 00:07:05,400 means when someone says that a 151 00:07:03,480 --> 00:07:10,860 particular mic takes EQ well I'm not 152 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:13,770 really sure what that means because you 153 00:07:10,860 --> 00:07:15,330 know certainly all my all mics sound 154 00:07:13,770 --> 00:07:16,710 different but it's the thing that your 155 00:07:15,330 --> 00:07:19,470 miking that really sounds the most 156 00:07:16,710 --> 00:07:21,360 difference so I don't know it's really 157 00:07:19,470 --> 00:07:23,730 about the singer the source of the sound 158 00:07:21,360 --> 00:07:27,180 and whether or not EQ is going to help 159 00:07:23,730 --> 00:07:31,020 or not I would recommend recording 160 00:07:27,180 --> 00:07:31,860 vocals with some sort of high-pass 161 00:07:31,020 --> 00:07:33,240 filter in 162 00:07:31,860 --> 00:07:36,690 some people are really bold with that 163 00:07:33,240 --> 00:07:38,940 and they roll out you know like 120 164 00:07:36,690 --> 00:07:40,890 Hertz and down I like to hear all that 165 00:07:38,940 --> 00:07:43,290 stuff but I'll probably roll out 50 166 00:07:40,890 --> 00:07:44,790 Hertz and down because you don't really 167 00:07:43,290 --> 00:07:47,010 need that there's a very few singers 168 00:07:44,790 --> 00:07:52,770 word those frequencies are going to help 169 00:07:47,010 --> 00:07:54,000 I think I've covered that probably more 170 00:07:52,770 --> 00:07:57,780 than I should have I'm giving 171 00:07:54,000 --> 00:08:00,810 caffeinated answers let's go to question 172 00:07:57,780 --> 00:08:04,550 number 2 from Mika how do you treat 173 00:08:00,810 --> 00:08:09,150 drums in a mix I'm a drummer so I'm 174 00:08:04,550 --> 00:08:13,260 really sensitive to that I have been 175 00:08:09,150 --> 00:08:15,300 accused of over overdoing the drums 176 00:08:13,260 --> 00:08:17,220 having louder drums then needed but I 177 00:08:15,300 --> 00:08:18,600 think it's just my skewed perspective of 178 00:08:17,220 --> 00:08:21,810 being a drummer and just sitting at the 179 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:22,500 drum kit for decades and kind of hearing 180 00:08:21,810 --> 00:08:24,630 it that way 181 00:08:22,500 --> 00:08:28,950 I do love the excitement of loud drums 182 00:08:24,630 --> 00:08:30,960 if it's right for the song you know 183 00:08:28,950 --> 00:08:33,060 again drums are accompaniment they're 184 00:08:30,960 --> 00:08:37,410 also the foundation of the whole house 185 00:08:33,060 --> 00:08:38,970 that you're building the drums sound 186 00:08:37,410 --> 00:08:40,440 when you get the drum sounds right and 187 00:08:38,970 --> 00:08:42,599 the vocal sounds right 188 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:44,940 first of all goal but then drums are 189 00:08:42,599 --> 00:08:47,310 right next that just below the vocal in 190 00:08:44,940 --> 00:08:49,860 terms of importance to me when you get 191 00:08:47,310 --> 00:08:50,279 drum sounds right then you're kind of 192 00:08:49,860 --> 00:08:52,139 off to the 193 00:08:50,279 --> 00:08:57,689 and then everything it's much easier to 194 00:08:52,139 --> 00:09:00,060 build out from there so there are many 195 00:08:57,689 --> 00:09:02,339 many many many choices you can make with 196 00:09:00,060 --> 00:09:05,040 drums there's such loud instruments even 197 00:09:02,339 --> 00:09:06,839 when you play them quietly so there's a 198 00:09:05,040 --> 00:09:13,139 lot of information being output room 199 00:09:06,839 --> 00:09:15,329 mics can do a lot for a drum sound you 200 00:09:13,139 --> 00:09:19,290 know there's the we did an amazing thing 201 00:09:15,329 --> 00:09:21,740 here one of the attendees man who is a 202 00:09:19,290 --> 00:09:24,860 great engineer and he was helping me 203 00:09:21,740 --> 00:09:27,149 record the song that we wrote here and 204 00:09:24,860 --> 00:09:31,709 he did something I've never seen anybody 205 00:09:27,149 --> 00:09:35,100 do he miked the snare bottom in stereo 206 00:09:31,709 --> 00:09:37,649 with two mics so if this is like here's 207 00:09:35,100 --> 00:09:39,449 the snare drum and the kick is there he 208 00:09:37,649 --> 00:09:41,730 made sure that they were both mics were 209 00:09:39,449 --> 00:09:42,749 the same distance from the kick drum so 210 00:09:41,730 --> 00:09:45,329 that we're not going to get some crazy 211 00:09:42,749 --> 00:09:47,879 phase issue with the kick and I thought 212 00:09:45,329 --> 00:09:49,829 that's a little eccentric but then I 213 00:09:47,879 --> 00:09:52,889 heard it and it was really beautiful 214 00:09:49,829 --> 00:09:54,240 turning up the stereo bottom had us look 215 00:09:52,889 --> 00:09:56,689 makes me want to make the top of the 216 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:59,220 snare in stereo as well pretty cool 217 00:09:56,689 --> 00:10:02,540 there's lots of experimenting you can do 218 00:09:59,220 --> 00:10:06,990 sometimes the best drum sound is one mic 219 00:10:02,540 --> 00:10:08,910 with a bunch of compression I think that 220 00:10:06,990 --> 00:10:11,129 Micah's question was more about mixing 221 00:10:08,910 --> 00:10:13,050 well it says mix oh I I know it was but 222 00:10:11,129 --> 00:10:15,990 you know the way that you capture the 223 00:10:13,050 --> 00:10:20,250 drums really informs how with the 224 00:10:15,990 --> 00:10:21,540 choices you can make in mix land the 225 00:10:20,250 --> 00:10:23,490 last thing I'll say about recording 226 00:10:21,540 --> 00:10:25,769 drums at my studio in Los Angeles that 227 00:10:23,490 --> 00:10:28,050 we have a think about 14 mics on the 228 00:10:25,769 --> 00:10:30,029 drums that doesn't mean we use all of 229 00:10:28,050 --> 00:10:34,529 them you can still go down to one or 230 00:10:30,029 --> 00:10:36,420 three or whatever combo but it's there 231 00:10:34,529 --> 00:10:41,189 as an option I like to collect stuff 232 00:10:36,420 --> 00:10:42,509 like kind of like you know like it's 233 00:10:41,189 --> 00:10:44,309 like the Hubble telescope like you'll 234 00:10:42,509 --> 00:10:46,889 want to see everything and then I can 235 00:10:44,309 --> 00:10:48,059 choose to do with each element what I 236 00:10:46,889 --> 00:10:51,389 want to do with it but I want to make 237 00:10:48,059 --> 00:10:55,589 sure I've got it in the best way so mix 238 00:10:51,389 --> 00:10:59,339 wise it really is so dependent on the 239 00:10:55,589 --> 00:11:00,809 track and there is no there is no one 240 00:10:59,339 --> 00:11:02,949 answer for that I think you have to be 241 00:11:00,809 --> 00:11:06,509 very sensitive to what serves 242 00:11:02,949 --> 00:11:11,109 the song and the singer the most 243 00:11:06,509 --> 00:11:12,220 sometimes sometimes quiet drums are the 244 00:11:11,109 --> 00:11:14,350 way to go sometimes 245 00:11:12,220 --> 00:11:16,449 super aggro drums are the way to go 246 00:11:14,350 --> 00:11:20,799 sometimes loads of room mics are the way 247 00:11:16,449 --> 00:11:25,869 sometimes Jackson five dry is the best 248 00:11:20,799 --> 00:11:29,290 sound you know sometimes there's drum 249 00:11:25,869 --> 00:11:32,410 replacement using I like to use trigger 250 00:11:29,290 --> 00:11:34,529 by Steven slave that thing is just solid 251 00:11:32,410 --> 00:11:36,999 it sounds amazing it's easy to use and 252 00:11:34,529 --> 00:11:38,230 you can use his samples you can use 253 00:11:36,999 --> 00:11:41,889 whatever samples you want to put in 254 00:11:38,230 --> 00:11:43,869 there and that's a big help and it's 255 00:11:41,889 --> 00:11:45,489 certainly a lot of the big mix engineers 256 00:11:43,869 --> 00:11:46,899 all do that I'm not sure that they all 257 00:11:45,489 --> 00:11:48,459 talked about it but I know I know for a 258 00:11:46,899 --> 00:11:53,889 fact that pretty much all of them are 259 00:11:48,459 --> 00:11:56,910 adding drum samples to mixes and I know 260 00:11:53,889 --> 00:12:01,389 that to mention Eric Valentine again he 261 00:11:56,910 --> 00:12:03,850 will do that but but it's usually quite 262 00:12:01,389 --> 00:12:07,749 supplementary and he has a way of just 263 00:12:03,850 --> 00:12:09,730 attacking the the drums and doing all 264 00:12:07,749 --> 00:12:11,169 kinds of things with the actual snare 265 00:12:09,730 --> 00:12:12,939 drum of the actual kick drum where it 266 00:12:11,169 --> 00:12:15,669 kind of almost turns it into the 267 00:12:12,939 --> 00:12:19,389 consistency of having a sample in the 268 00:12:15,669 --> 00:12:22,029 mix it's it's really interesting there's 269 00:12:19,389 --> 00:12:24,999 so many ways to go about it but you have 270 00:12:22,029 --> 00:12:27,489 to be sensitive to what serve the song 271 00:12:24,999 --> 00:12:30,879 we're all here to you know we're all in 272 00:12:27,489 --> 00:12:33,249 total servitude to what's best for the 273 00:12:30,879 --> 00:12:38,679 the thing that we're trying to make not 274 00:12:33,249 --> 00:12:41,049 suck through the speakers okay question 275 00:12:38,679 --> 00:12:44,259 number three this is from Anton reading 276 00:12:41,049 --> 00:12:48,759 the literature on mixing audio semantics 277 00:12:44,259 --> 00:12:51,549 terms like box mud and air are often 278 00:12:48,759 --> 00:12:53,829 used but often have vague descriptions 279 00:12:51,549 --> 00:12:56,559 or in fact are contradicted by other 280 00:12:53,829 --> 00:12:58,389 authors how do you correlate the 281 00:12:56,559 --> 00:13:02,529 objective characteristics of the sound 282 00:12:58,389 --> 00:13:05,799 with the subjective descriptors what do 283 00:13:02,529 --> 00:13:07,449 these three terms mean for you so you 284 00:13:05,799 --> 00:13:11,439 know the one that I hate the most is 285 00:13:07,449 --> 00:13:13,300 warm going for that warm sound like what 286 00:13:11,439 --> 00:13:15,620 does that mean 287 00:13:13,300 --> 00:13:18,230 especially with your in the world of 288 00:13:15,620 --> 00:13:19,580 hi-fi home audio then when people start 289 00:13:18,230 --> 00:13:21,470 talking about warm that usually means 290 00:13:19,580 --> 00:13:26,620 they have no idea what they're listening 291 00:13:21,470 --> 00:13:28,580 for maybe they're deaf I don't know but 292 00:13:26,620 --> 00:13:30,470 you know it's different for everybody 293 00:13:28,580 --> 00:13:33,770 like I will say all that sounds like a 294 00:13:30,470 --> 00:13:35,810 record but there's no you know there's 295 00:13:33,770 --> 00:13:38,060 no objective definition of what that is 296 00:13:35,810 --> 00:13:41,540 it means something to me doesn't it's 297 00:13:38,060 --> 00:13:46,790 not necessarily the same thing to anyone 298 00:13:41,540 --> 00:13:49,460 else I certainly know what err implies 299 00:13:46,790 --> 00:13:53,839 you know it's not not low frequencies it 300 00:13:49,460 --> 00:13:56,830 means hello up there so probably you 301 00:13:53,839 --> 00:13:59,810 know anything above like 15k and up 302 00:13:56,830 --> 00:14:01,970 maybe 12 K and up that's sort of like 303 00:13:59,810 --> 00:14:06,490 the tip tip tip top of what we're able 304 00:14:01,970 --> 00:14:09,320 to hear I think men stop hearing around 305 00:14:06,490 --> 00:14:11,779 19,000 20,000 vibrations per second 306 00:14:09,320 --> 00:14:17,330 kilohertz and women can typically hear a 307 00:14:11,779 --> 00:14:19,580 little bit higher 21k 22 K of course 308 00:14:17,330 --> 00:14:21,860 sound continues way above what we're 309 00:14:19,580 --> 00:14:24,320 able to hear and I feel like we can 310 00:14:21,860 --> 00:14:25,910 perceive that somehow but when I really 311 00:14:24,320 --> 00:14:28,310 like hearing it was more like you're 312 00:14:25,910 --> 00:14:31,720 feeling it somehow so that's air air is 313 00:14:28,310 --> 00:14:33,950 nice it's very easy to overcook too much 314 00:14:31,720 --> 00:14:35,930 high-end information there's there's 315 00:14:33,950 --> 00:14:37,790 something that I used to do that all the 316 00:14:35,930 --> 00:14:39,860 time when I was younger I would use oral 317 00:14:37,790 --> 00:14:41,510 exciters and I loved the fact that it 318 00:14:39,860 --> 00:14:43,400 sounded really pristine really clear on 319 00:14:41,510 --> 00:14:46,760 top that was exciting for me because I 320 00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:48,350 grew up uh you know in a small town in 321 00:14:46,760 --> 00:14:50,510 Canada where we didn't really have any 322 00:14:48,350 --> 00:14:51,860 great Mike's a great gear I mean nobody 323 00:14:50,510 --> 00:14:55,040 was recording anything was just live 324 00:14:51,860 --> 00:14:56,900 bands and I was I spent most of my teens 325 00:14:55,040 --> 00:14:58,850 playing a kind of a broken drum set 326 00:14:56,900 --> 00:15:04,790 terrible guitars and everything sounded 327 00:14:58,850 --> 00:15:11,690 very boxy muddy and no air and cold not 328 00:15:04,790 --> 00:15:14,330 warm we were cold in Canada but um so I 329 00:15:11,690 --> 00:15:17,029 did it I became obsessed with like kind 330 00:15:14,330 --> 00:15:19,000 of super high fidelity and and when I 331 00:15:17,029 --> 00:15:21,650 listened back to that stuff I was just 332 00:15:19,000 --> 00:15:26,000 totally over blowing the top end so 333 00:15:21,650 --> 00:15:27,920 there is a way to have things be present 334 00:15:26,000 --> 00:15:30,230 and create that feeling of air on top 335 00:15:27,920 --> 00:15:32,960 without actually cranking a bunch of 336 00:15:30,230 --> 00:15:34,160 super high-end you got to really be 337 00:15:32,960 --> 00:15:35,750 careful with that it's just like cooking 338 00:15:34,160 --> 00:15:38,000 you just don't you know salt is nice 339 00:15:35,750 --> 00:15:40,610 when you over salt the food nobody can 340 00:15:38,000 --> 00:15:42,020 eat it the high frequencies are 341 00:15:40,610 --> 00:15:43,100 definitely like that you got to do it to 342 00:15:42,020 --> 00:15:46,790 taste you got to find the right balance 343 00:15:43,100 --> 00:15:49,850 and there are different types of salt so 344 00:15:46,790 --> 00:15:54,040 box I think box just means boxy like 345 00:15:49,850 --> 00:15:57,860 kind of usually lower mids sort of ugly 346 00:15:54,040 --> 00:16:00,620 frequencies I know I was hanging out 347 00:15:57,860 --> 00:16:04,910 with Michael Brauer in New York at the 348 00:16:00,620 --> 00:16:07,190 AES show last fall and he was telling me 349 00:16:04,910 --> 00:16:09,560 the studio that he started at in New 350 00:16:07,190 --> 00:16:12,140 York that they you know was that it was 351 00:16:09,560 --> 00:16:14,780 the disco era and there were a lot of 352 00:16:12,140 --> 00:16:17,810 dance records being made and pretty much 353 00:16:14,780 --> 00:16:20,660 every engineer would just cut 300 Hertz 354 00:16:17,810 --> 00:16:22,370 out of the mix to begin with it was the 355 00:16:20,660 --> 00:16:25,160 first thing they do just take it out of 356 00:16:22,370 --> 00:16:29,660 almost everything and that's definitely 357 00:16:25,160 --> 00:16:31,250 in the area code of boxiness to me again 358 00:16:29,660 --> 00:16:33,650 again it depends on the source it 359 00:16:31,250 --> 00:16:38,870 depends on what you're cutting the EQ 360 00:16:33,650 --> 00:16:40,550 out of yeah you know and then sometimes 361 00:16:38,870 --> 00:16:43,850 that's the very frequency you want to 362 00:16:40,550 --> 00:16:46,040 boost 300 Hertz 400 Hertz on a female 363 00:16:43,850 --> 00:16:48,470 vocal is a nice thing to turn up if you 364 00:16:46,040 --> 00:16:51,339 want it to feel a little rounder a 365 00:16:48,470 --> 00:16:53,600 little fatter in tone down there 366 00:16:51,339 --> 00:16:55,970 typically that's a dangerous frequency 367 00:16:53,600 --> 00:16:58,100 to turn up and gives you sort of that 368 00:16:55,970 --> 00:17:00,350 box down power on a female vocal it can 369 00:16:58,100 --> 00:17:04,069 be the very thing that makes it just sit 370 00:17:00,350 --> 00:17:07,819 perfectly in the track mud I guess mud 371 00:17:04,069 --> 00:17:09,380 means the opposite of air and bass 372 00:17:07,819 --> 00:17:13,490 frequencies are a funny thing you know 373 00:17:09,380 --> 00:17:17,560 bass in particular you can it's nice to 374 00:17:13,490 --> 00:17:21,079 have a big round fat low you know 375 00:17:17,560 --> 00:17:23,600 sonorous bass it can also be really 376 00:17:21,079 --> 00:17:26,300 boring can also really weigh a track 377 00:17:23,600 --> 00:17:29,540 down like in my own way I feel like I 378 00:17:26,300 --> 00:17:31,430 understand why Prince often would not 379 00:17:29,540 --> 00:17:33,230 have bass in his songs I mean he was an 380 00:17:31,430 --> 00:17:36,290 amazing bass player and he was a fan of 381 00:17:33,230 --> 00:17:37,700 amazing bass players but sometimes 382 00:17:36,290 --> 00:17:39,450 there's no bass in a prince track and 383 00:17:37,700 --> 00:17:41,100 it's super funky 384 00:17:39,450 --> 00:17:42,570 you know the song kiss is a perfect 385 00:17:41,100 --> 00:17:45,210 example of that there's no Becks 386 00:17:42,570 --> 00:17:48,570 just a crazy big drumbeat the bass drum 387 00:17:45,210 --> 00:17:52,740 is the bass in that song I think and 388 00:17:48,570 --> 00:17:55,649 low-end in general I really marvel at 389 00:17:52,740 --> 00:17:58,049 how someone like chris lord-alge ii or 390 00:17:55,649 --> 00:18:00,299 in a different way serving gaining of 391 00:17:58,049 --> 00:18:03,799 how they get their tracks to feel really 392 00:18:00,299 --> 00:18:06,960 full on the bottom and quite bottome 393 00:18:03,799 --> 00:18:09,210 sounding but if you look at it on some 394 00:18:06,960 --> 00:18:14,399 sort of analyzer there's not a lot going 395 00:18:09,210 --> 00:18:16,440 on below I don't know 60 Hertz 80 Hertz 396 00:18:14,399 --> 00:18:19,260 sometimes it feels low Andy but it's 397 00:18:16,440 --> 00:18:21,720 actually not same is true in Skrillex 398 00:18:19,260 --> 00:18:24,419 track sometimes with the bottom it feels 399 00:18:21,720 --> 00:18:26,909 huge but if you're talking like really 400 00:18:24,419 --> 00:18:29,340 really really low frequencies they're 401 00:18:26,909 --> 00:18:30,960 not there and I think that that actually 402 00:18:29,340 --> 00:18:33,240 somehow makes it feel bigger on the 403 00:18:30,960 --> 00:18:34,380 bottom it's counterintuitive sounding 404 00:18:33,240 --> 00:18:38,340 but it's fascinating 405 00:18:34,380 --> 00:18:39,539 so again it's all balances I encourage 406 00:18:38,340 --> 00:18:41,880 everybody to everybody through 407 00:18:39,539 --> 00:18:45,980 experiment a lot I certainly have I 408 00:18:41,880 --> 00:18:49,549 continue to every day it's humbling how 409 00:18:45,980 --> 00:18:52,649 how much there is to learn and how every 410 00:18:49,549 --> 00:18:54,990 song and every mix and every experience 411 00:18:52,649 --> 00:18:56,549 in the studio is case-specific it's 412 00:18:54,990 --> 00:18:58,200 they're all different even in the middle 413 00:18:56,549 --> 00:19:00,960 of the same album the same singer or the 414 00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:05,840 same band the approach is almost never 415 00:19:00,960 --> 00:19:08,610 the same anyway let's let's move on 416 00:19:05,840 --> 00:19:11,340 question number four Ahmet do you have a 417 00:19:08,610 --> 00:19:14,899 working routine while mixing do you take 418 00:19:11,340 --> 00:19:19,370 breaks or work start to finish I 419 00:19:14,899 --> 00:19:25,350 definitely like to kind of dive in and 420 00:19:19,370 --> 00:19:28,289 attack things pretty quickly and without 421 00:19:25,350 --> 00:19:31,950 much thinking involved and then I like 422 00:19:28,289 --> 00:19:33,659 to take a little break and that can be 423 00:19:31,950 --> 00:19:36,659 just turning the speaker's up and 424 00:19:33,659 --> 00:19:38,250 leaving the room and listening from down 425 00:19:36,659 --> 00:19:41,159 the hallway or listening from another 426 00:19:38,250 --> 00:19:43,320 room you know the thing that immediately 427 00:19:41,159 --> 00:19:44,760 evaporates and I've said this before and 428 00:19:43,320 --> 00:19:48,600 do in other interviews the thing that 429 00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:50,070 evaporates fast is your objectivity and 430 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:53,250 if anybody doesn't know what I mean by 431 00:19:50,070 --> 00:19:56,280 that it's being able to hear the 432 00:19:53,250 --> 00:19:58,320 music like someone who's never heard it 433 00:19:56,280 --> 00:19:59,730 before which of course is what that's 434 00:19:58,320 --> 00:20:02,520 who we're making the music for we're not 435 00:19:59,730 --> 00:20:04,500 making it for us we know what's going on 436 00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:05,940 we've lived with the track we've been 437 00:20:04,500 --> 00:20:07,320 working on its we're not going to buy 438 00:20:05,940 --> 00:20:09,870 the record I mean we might but we'll buy 439 00:20:07,320 --> 00:20:11,460 one coffee or two copies at most this is 440 00:20:09,870 --> 00:20:13,500 for people that have never heard it 441 00:20:11,460 --> 00:20:15,390 people that probably don't know anything 442 00:20:13,500 --> 00:20:17,580 about music they just know if they like 443 00:20:15,390 --> 00:20:18,720 something or not but they'd like a song 444 00:20:17,580 --> 00:20:20,550 if they like a singer if they like a 445 00:20:18,720 --> 00:20:23,870 line of the lyric that can be enough to 446 00:20:20,550 --> 00:20:27,300 hook somebody in to a thing so 447 00:20:23,870 --> 00:20:29,250 objectivity I think like them you know 448 00:20:27,300 --> 00:20:32,760 once you hear something more than five 449 00:20:29,250 --> 00:20:35,160 times that perspective really just sort 450 00:20:32,760 --> 00:20:37,170 of gets drunk and you can't you know you 451 00:20:35,160 --> 00:20:40,410 kind of like you still have to keep 452 00:20:37,170 --> 00:20:46,050 working but so anything I can do to kind 453 00:20:40,410 --> 00:20:48,060 of trick myself into feeling like it's 454 00:20:46,050 --> 00:20:51,630 not my song or it's not my mix or not my 455 00:20:48,060 --> 00:20:55,800 production is really helpful taking 456 00:20:51,630 --> 00:20:57,840 breaks is huge listening to other stuff 457 00:20:55,800 --> 00:21:01,680 too this is something I really advocate 458 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:05,520 and the great engineering producer Jack 459 00:21:01,680 --> 00:21:08,940 Joseph Puig told me several years ago 460 00:21:05,520 --> 00:21:12,150 that he makes a playlist of his favorite 461 00:21:08,940 --> 00:21:14,100 sounding mixes and while he's mixing 462 00:21:12,150 --> 00:21:16,920 whatever he's been hired to mix he will 463 00:21:14,100 --> 00:21:18,660 go to that playlist and you know switch 464 00:21:16,920 --> 00:21:20,580 the input and through the speakers he's 465 00:21:18,660 --> 00:21:22,380 hearing other people's mixes from 466 00:21:20,580 --> 00:21:25,410 records that he really adores and loves 467 00:21:22,380 --> 00:21:29,310 and then he'll go back to his mix and 468 00:21:25,410 --> 00:21:31,520 that can be a real quick 469 00:21:29,310 --> 00:21:35,430 you know bucket of water in the face of 470 00:21:31,520 --> 00:21:38,070 objectivity I sometimes I forget to do 471 00:21:35,430 --> 00:21:40,140 it but almost all the time I do it I've 472 00:21:38,070 --> 00:21:41,490 been doing it for years now in the 473 00:21:40,140 --> 00:21:43,860 beginning the first couple years it was 474 00:21:41,490 --> 00:21:47,160 so humbling just I was so far off the 475 00:21:43,860 --> 00:21:49,050 mark in terms of the way other records 476 00:21:47,160 --> 00:21:50,400 were balanced and and I like stuff in 477 00:21:49,050 --> 00:21:54,290 the playlist that's really different I 478 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:57,290 mean I call it mixed reality playlist 479 00:21:54,290 --> 00:22:02,700 there is everything from spikes tents 480 00:21:57,290 --> 00:22:06,530 brilliant mix of a song called hella 481 00:22:02,700 --> 00:22:09,950 good from no Doubt's Rocksteady record 482 00:22:06,530 --> 00:22:13,400 fantastic fantastic mix very humbling 483 00:22:09,950 --> 00:22:15,980 mix thank you spike for making me feel 484 00:22:13,400 --> 00:22:17,360 like I don't know what I'm doing and and 485 00:22:15,980 --> 00:22:20,510 then I have like you know 486 00:22:17,360 --> 00:22:24,560 Public Enemies track nine-one-one is a 487 00:22:20,510 --> 00:22:26,750 joke Terminator X did the most brilliant 488 00:22:24,560 --> 00:22:31,610 tracks still does the most brilliant 489 00:22:26,750 --> 00:22:34,850 tracks to you know rich cos these mix of 490 00:22:31,610 --> 00:22:38,210 get gone from Fiona apples second album 491 00:22:34,850 --> 00:22:41,000 when the pawn has a super long title all 492 00:22:38,210 --> 00:22:43,760 kinds of stuff you know a chris 493 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:44,420 lord-alge ease mix of American Idiot by 494 00:22:43,760 --> 00:22:47,840 Green Day 495 00:22:44,420 --> 00:22:52,340 absolutely stunning jaw-dropping crazy 496 00:22:47,840 --> 00:22:53,810 mix you know all kinds of stuff and so I 497 00:22:52,340 --> 00:22:55,280 will listen to that and they all sound 498 00:22:53,810 --> 00:22:57,050 different from each other and they have 499 00:22:55,280 --> 00:22:58,610 different framings and different 500 00:22:57,050 --> 00:23:00,080 perspectives and different takes on what 501 00:22:58,610 --> 00:23:02,600 the bottom end means and how bright 502 00:23:00,080 --> 00:23:07,430 things are and how dark things are but 503 00:23:02,600 --> 00:23:08,090 it really helps a lot so I think more 504 00:23:07,430 --> 00:23:11,720 than anything 505 00:23:08,090 --> 00:23:17,570 making your own mix reality playlist is 506 00:23:11,720 --> 00:23:20,270 like a PhD in in in the way record sound 507 00:23:17,570 --> 00:23:22,070 it is unbelievably you learn so fast 508 00:23:20,270 --> 00:23:23,360 especially when you go back and compared 509 00:23:22,070 --> 00:23:25,730 to what the thing you're working on and 510 00:23:23,360 --> 00:23:29,420 then go back to the playlist and listen 511 00:23:25,730 --> 00:23:30,860 to other things it doesn't have to be 512 00:23:29,420 --> 00:23:32,510 the same genre that you're working it's 513 00:23:30,860 --> 00:23:34,250 nice to listen to like something else I 514 00:23:32,510 --> 00:23:36,980 have on my playlist is Roberta flacks 515 00:23:34,250 --> 00:23:39,590 killing me softly which was done in the 516 00:23:36,980 --> 00:23:41,080 70s and it really sounds like it but 517 00:23:39,590 --> 00:23:44,420 it's kind of a perfect record and 518 00:23:41,080 --> 00:23:46,280 there's you can just learn gobs of stuff 519 00:23:44,420 --> 00:23:48,920 from listening to great work done by 520 00:23:46,280 --> 00:23:51,080 other people that more than anything I 521 00:23:48,920 --> 00:23:53,330 think will help everybody with their 522 00:23:51,080 --> 00:23:56,470 mixing jobs question number five Vaughn 523 00:23:53,330 --> 00:23:59,720 how do you layer multiple guitars 524 00:23:56,470 --> 00:24:01,880 meaning pan and EQ and if you record a 525 00:23:59,720 --> 00:24:03,380 guitar amp with multiple microphones how 526 00:24:01,880 --> 00:24:07,280 do you blend those two mics 527 00:24:03,380 --> 00:24:09,260 until you get the right tone you know 528 00:24:07,280 --> 00:24:16,010 again sometimes the best guitar sound is 529 00:24:09,260 --> 00:24:17,910 just one guitar with one mic depending 530 00:24:16,010 --> 00:24:20,970 on the song if you're doing 531 00:24:17,910 --> 00:24:23,850 kind of a more polished rock thing or 532 00:24:20,970 --> 00:24:25,860 like a real heavy kind of rock thing 533 00:24:23,850 --> 00:24:28,710 there's nothing sounds like double 534 00:24:25,860 --> 00:24:30,660 guitars and something I learned from the 535 00:24:28,710 --> 00:24:33,330 amazing Terry date when we were working 536 00:24:30,660 --> 00:24:35,460 with the Deftones in the early 2000s 537 00:24:33,330 --> 00:24:37,440 he's a big fan of three guitars so he'll 538 00:24:35,460 --> 00:24:40,410 do double track guitars right and left 539 00:24:37,440 --> 00:24:42,330 and then he'll do a third one that he 540 00:24:40,410 --> 00:24:43,679 talks up the middle not quite as loud as 541 00:24:42,330 --> 00:24:47,010 the ones on right and left but it's 542 00:24:43,679 --> 00:24:48,150 there I know that Bob Rock does a very 543 00:24:47,010 --> 00:24:52,039 similar thing and he calls that the 544 00:24:48,150 --> 00:24:55,289 thickener the third one you know on 545 00:24:52,039 --> 00:24:59,549 other types of songs that is overkill 546 00:24:55,289 --> 00:25:01,169 that would be too much so and then in 547 00:24:59,549 --> 00:25:03,630 terms of panning like if it's sort of a 548 00:25:01,169 --> 00:25:05,000 Deftones vibe if it's like you know kind 549 00:25:03,630 --> 00:25:08,460 of heavy 550 00:25:05,000 --> 00:25:10,700 just like wall of guitar then I like 551 00:25:08,460 --> 00:25:14,190 pretty hard left and right panning 552 00:25:10,700 --> 00:25:16,020 probably a hundred percent and or you 553 00:25:14,190 --> 00:25:19,530 know sometimes it's more like 80 85 554 00:25:16,020 --> 00:25:21,809 percent I usually don't pan any 555 00:25:19,530 --> 00:25:24,600 instruments hard left and right I like 556 00:25:21,809 --> 00:25:26,549 to feel like I'm listening to a 557 00:25:24,600 --> 00:25:29,100 performance from a stage that's in front 558 00:25:26,549 --> 00:25:30,480 of me it's just my particular the way I 559 00:25:29,100 --> 00:25:33,809 like to perceive music coming out of 560 00:25:30,480 --> 00:25:35,520 speakers but for like a heavy rock thing 561 00:25:33,809 --> 00:25:37,169 hard left-right sounds amazing 562 00:25:35,520 --> 00:25:39,480 especially with a third track kind of 563 00:25:37,169 --> 00:25:42,840 tucked in the middle and then in terms 564 00:25:39,480 --> 00:25:44,460 of you know microphone blending I have 565 00:25:42,840 --> 00:25:46,770 to I know some people put three 566 00:25:44,460 --> 00:25:50,150 sometimes four mics on a cabinet you got 567 00:25:46,770 --> 00:25:52,350 to be really careful with phase issues I 568 00:25:50,150 --> 00:25:56,159 think it makes sense to make the same 569 00:25:52,350 --> 00:25:58,260 speaker so that eliminates some phase 570 00:25:56,159 --> 00:26:00,030 issues you can at least tell that your 571 00:25:58,260 --> 00:26:02,130 mics are the exact same distance or 572 00:26:00,030 --> 00:26:03,360 almost the exact same distance virtually 573 00:26:02,130 --> 00:26:08,070 the same distance from the from the 574 00:26:03,360 --> 00:26:09,780 speaker I have a fifty seven can't go 575 00:26:08,070 --> 00:26:11,970 wrong with a shirt fifty seven which 576 00:26:09,780 --> 00:26:14,480 sounds great sometimes it's a bit too 577 00:26:11,970 --> 00:26:17,340 bright and I the other mic is a Royer 578 00:26:14,480 --> 00:26:22,440 121 which is just a gorgeous sounding 579 00:26:17,340 --> 00:26:24,150 ribbon mic it's brilliant on guitar it's 580 00:26:22,440 --> 00:26:25,679 just it's just an amazing thing it does 581 00:26:24,150 --> 00:26:27,510 something completely different from the 582 00:26:25,679 --> 00:26:29,280 57 and they're very complementary to 583 00:26:27,510 --> 00:26:31,350 each other they really blend beautifully 584 00:26:29,280 --> 00:26:33,210 I'm always 585 00:26:31,350 --> 00:26:36,750 tweaking the balance between the two 586 00:26:33,210 --> 00:26:40,320 always on every take it changes the tone 587 00:26:36,750 --> 00:26:41,580 pretty dramatically and and it you know 588 00:26:40,320 --> 00:26:43,290 like I keep saying with almost 589 00:26:41,580 --> 00:26:45,090 everything it's really about the song 590 00:26:43,290 --> 00:26:47,880 and what and so I will audition I'll 591 00:26:45,090 --> 00:26:48,840 play along to the song I think that's 592 00:26:47,880 --> 00:26:50,850 very important when you're trying to get 593 00:26:48,840 --> 00:26:52,680 a sound you can do with drums too like 594 00:26:50,850 --> 00:26:55,230 don't just get a drum sound if you have 595 00:26:52,680 --> 00:26:56,730 something that you can play too you can 596 00:26:55,230 --> 00:26:58,440 even just stay on input you don't have 597 00:26:56,730 --> 00:27:01,350 to record it you can also record it but 598 00:26:58,440 --> 00:27:04,470 get the sound while you're listening to 599 00:27:01,350 --> 00:27:05,880 the thing you're going to play to if you 600 00:27:04,470 --> 00:27:08,520 have that option that's that's really 601 00:27:05,880 --> 00:27:10,980 helpful because sometimes something that 602 00:27:08,520 --> 00:27:12,690 sounds fantastic in the room by the time 603 00:27:10,980 --> 00:27:14,760 it makes it into the track that you're 604 00:27:12,690 --> 00:27:17,730 doing it doesn't speak the same way 605 00:27:14,760 --> 00:27:21,630 through through the speakers 606 00:27:17,730 --> 00:27:24,000 I think it gives you sort of an 607 00:27:21,630 --> 00:27:26,700 objectivity again to use that word about 608 00:27:24,000 --> 00:27:28,020 what is the right town for it don't 609 00:27:26,700 --> 00:27:32,070 don't just kind of pull it out of the 610 00:27:28,020 --> 00:27:34,740 blue and like I said at the beginning of 611 00:27:32,070 --> 00:27:36,150 this answer really the right amp the 612 00:27:34,740 --> 00:27:39,000 right guitar part the right guitar 613 00:27:36,150 --> 00:27:41,670 player through one amp and one mic can 614 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:46,790 be just as good if not better than 615 00:27:41,670 --> 00:27:50,700 anything okay that's a halfway point 616 00:27:46,790 --> 00:27:53,850 everyone take a little breather question 617 00:27:50,700 --> 00:27:57,600 number six from Miguel I heard you like 618 00:27:53,850 --> 00:28:00,090 to put a pull Tech EQ p1a on your master 619 00:27:57,600 --> 00:28:05,180 buss if so how do you set it to create 620 00:28:00,090 --> 00:28:08,790 the sound you want so I am a huge fan of 621 00:28:05,180 --> 00:28:12,330 Steve Jackson's recreation of pole 622 00:28:08,790 --> 00:28:14,700 technique use he he he's just done 623 00:28:12,330 --> 00:28:16,530 amazing work for years concocting this 624 00:28:14,700 --> 00:28:19,920 thing he got to know I forget his name 625 00:28:16,530 --> 00:28:22,260 right now was Eugene's Jean the guy that 626 00:28:19,920 --> 00:28:25,860 started pole Tech who I believe recently 627 00:28:22,260 --> 00:28:29,100 passed away but Steve bought the name 628 00:28:25,860 --> 00:28:30,510 and was completely faithful to the 629 00:28:29,100 --> 00:28:32,820 original design of full ticket queues 630 00:28:30,510 --> 00:28:34,470 and I I was a studio musician for other 631 00:28:32,820 --> 00:28:35,880 record producers all through the 90s and 632 00:28:34,470 --> 00:28:37,860 I really got to know pull Tech's in 633 00:28:35,880 --> 00:28:42,900 studios and they do a thing that nothing 634 00:28:37,860 --> 00:28:44,850 else does that I've ever heard and I was 635 00:28:42,900 --> 00:28:46,770 ready to buy 636 00:28:44,850 --> 00:28:49,500 one vintage one and that's right around 637 00:28:46,770 --> 00:28:51,900 when Steve first went public with his 638 00:28:49,500 --> 00:28:55,230 first EQ p1a I think that was the model 639 00:28:51,900 --> 00:28:56,640 he had at first and I've used a few of 640 00:28:55,230 --> 00:29:00,270 his different things over the years and 641 00:28:56,640 --> 00:29:02,640 then I settled on these two mastering 642 00:29:00,270 --> 00:29:06,090 versions of EQ p1 I swear there stepped 643 00:29:02,640 --> 00:29:08,790 and that was on my mix bus for several 644 00:29:06,090 --> 00:29:11,070 years I still have them I don't have 645 00:29:08,790 --> 00:29:12,960 them on the mix bus anymore I use them 646 00:29:11,070 --> 00:29:16,080 on tracking for all kinds of things from 647 00:29:12,960 --> 00:29:21,180 vocals to bass to kick drum to they're 648 00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:24,570 just magic Holy Grail crazy eq's what I 649 00:29:21,180 --> 00:29:28,560 have on the mix bus now is something 650 00:29:24,570 --> 00:29:32,190 that sends to my ear almost exactly like 651 00:29:28,560 --> 00:29:34,140 the pull technique use and it is an 652 00:29:32,190 --> 00:29:37,230 analog EQ but it is digitally controlled 653 00:29:34,140 --> 00:29:40,380 it's called the better maker and it's so 654 00:29:37,230 --> 00:29:42,540 convenient for me because I don't work 655 00:29:40,380 --> 00:29:44,610 long hours and I don't work on the 656 00:29:42,540 --> 00:29:47,940 weekends because I have 10,000 kids and 657 00:29:44,610 --> 00:29:50,880 I want to be there and to be dad the 658 00:29:47,940 --> 00:29:52,410 better maker the settings are saved in 659 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:54,930 my Pro Tools session so I open the 660 00:29:52,410 --> 00:29:56,820 session I hear the little click and boom 661 00:29:54,930 --> 00:29:59,520 everything is there not only does it 662 00:29:56,820 --> 00:30:02,040 have a pull technique you section it 663 00:29:59,520 --> 00:30:03,570 also has two other eq's that are just 664 00:30:02,040 --> 00:30:05,760 kind of regular accused you can put 665 00:30:03,570 --> 00:30:07,620 across whatever you want to do and it 666 00:30:05,760 --> 00:30:09,660 also has the best high-pass filter I 667 00:30:07,620 --> 00:30:13,290 think I've ever heard it's really 668 00:30:09,660 --> 00:30:15,110 versatile it's a pretty amazing unit I 669 00:30:13,290 --> 00:30:18,690 think it's called the two three two 670 00:30:15,110 --> 00:30:21,270 something I love it and and I love those 671 00:30:18,690 --> 00:30:23,820 pull text too but in terms of the speed 672 00:30:21,270 --> 00:30:25,530 kind of a new hybrid version which is 673 00:30:23,820 --> 00:30:29,760 what the better maker is was better for 674 00:30:25,530 --> 00:30:33,300 me on the mix buss more for practical 675 00:30:29,760 --> 00:30:35,700 reasons than anything but my favorite 676 00:30:33,300 --> 00:30:41,340 setting on a pull technique you 677 00:30:35,700 --> 00:30:44,370 especially for mix buss is 20 Hertz on 678 00:30:41,340 --> 00:30:48,150 the bottom and sometimes that's kind of 679 00:30:44,370 --> 00:30:51,750 a sharp sharp EQ or a more broad it 680 00:30:48,150 --> 00:30:53,580 depends and then the attenuation which 681 00:30:51,750 --> 00:30:55,670 I'm still not quite exactly sure how 682 00:30:53,580 --> 00:30:57,840 that works but I know it scoops out 683 00:30:55,670 --> 00:30:58,320 something it scoops that something kind 684 00:30:57,840 --> 00:31:01,049 of creates 685 00:30:58,320 --> 00:31:05,070 pays for a bigger bottom so I turn it up 686 00:31:01,049 --> 00:31:08,399 20 Hertz probably like 3 dB which is 687 00:31:05,070 --> 00:31:13,080 maybe more than most people would do it 688 00:31:08,399 --> 00:31:15,899 I know CLA likes to do it 2 DB 3 DB is 689 00:31:13,080 --> 00:31:18,330 quite fun sometimes I go to 4 and a 690 00:31:15,899 --> 00:31:20,399 little bit of attenuation and it takes 691 00:31:18,330 --> 00:31:23,450 out some of the wolf enos of the bottom 692 00:31:20,399 --> 00:31:27,690 you just get this like gorgeous sexy 693 00:31:23,450 --> 00:31:29,940 just crazy impact down low makes the 694 00:31:27,690 --> 00:31:33,179 kick drum sound incredible same with the 695 00:31:29,940 --> 00:31:36,330 bass and then on top I usually don't 696 00:31:33,179 --> 00:31:40,460 intend u8 at all and I will boost it 697 00:31:36,330 --> 00:31:44,370 depends sometimes it sounds really cool 698 00:31:40,460 --> 00:31:47,279 you know if you're on a shelf to go 5k 699 00:31:44,370 --> 00:31:49,620 and boost that boost everything above 700 00:31:47,279 --> 00:31:51,029 that again depending on the source 701 00:31:49,620 --> 00:31:54,960 depending on the song that's going 702 00:31:51,029 --> 00:31:56,909 through it typically you know what is 703 00:31:54,960 --> 00:31:58,320 the top frequency on that Mikey I think 704 00:31:56,909 --> 00:32:01,169 it's 16 okay 705 00:31:58,320 --> 00:32:04,110 maybe boosting that as a shelf it's just 706 00:32:01,169 --> 00:32:09,720 incredible we'll talk about air it's 707 00:32:04,110 --> 00:32:12,629 just magic sounding and if I was using 708 00:32:09,720 --> 00:32:14,070 the original pull Tex on the bus then if 709 00:32:12,629 --> 00:32:18,149 I needed any kind of mid-range stuff I 710 00:32:14,070 --> 00:32:20,279 would probably do that in the box but 711 00:32:18,149 --> 00:32:22,679 there glorious eq's and I highly 712 00:32:20,279 --> 00:32:25,230 recommend if you can to have at least 713 00:32:22,679 --> 00:32:27,889 one in your arsenal because it does 714 00:32:25,230 --> 00:32:32,759 something that really nothing else does 715 00:32:27,889 --> 00:32:34,230 question number seven Mota's how many 716 00:32:32,759 --> 00:32:36,809 instruments should I have playing 717 00:32:34,230 --> 00:32:38,730 together at the same time I'm looking 718 00:32:36,809 --> 00:32:41,460 for tips for a good arrangement 719 00:32:38,730 --> 00:32:45,889 especially those behind a lead vocal so 720 00:32:41,460 --> 00:32:48,720 I understand the intent of the question 721 00:32:45,889 --> 00:32:50,970 it's it's all about the song like I have 722 00:32:48,720 --> 00:32:53,669 no idea is unfortunately is the answer 723 00:32:50,970 --> 00:32:55,710 if it's a you know if it's if it's a 724 00:32:53,669 --> 00:32:57,120 ballad if it's a slow song and it's a 725 00:32:55,710 --> 00:32:59,009 sensitive thing you probably don't want 726 00:32:57,120 --> 00:33:05,100 a lot of instruments maybe it's you know 727 00:32:59,009 --> 00:33:07,559 a couple of things this is all about you 728 00:33:05,100 --> 00:33:09,440 know salting your food to taste - 729 00:33:07,559 --> 00:33:12,080 whatever it tastes right to you 730 00:33:09,440 --> 00:33:14,679 I'm a real fan of experimenting if you 731 00:33:12,080 --> 00:33:18,830 have the time to do it so you can try 732 00:33:14,679 --> 00:33:21,379 you know I recommend this have your 733 00:33:18,830 --> 00:33:22,970 singer sing as early as possible this is 734 00:33:21,379 --> 00:33:26,210 what I try to do in the studio I will 735 00:33:22,970 --> 00:33:27,559 you know play like a Wurlitzer kind of 736 00:33:26,210 --> 00:33:29,779 piano roll will do like a simple guitar 737 00:33:27,559 --> 00:33:31,519 to a click track anything harmonic with 738 00:33:29,779 --> 00:33:33,830 a little bit of rhythm that the singer 739 00:33:31,519 --> 00:33:36,350 can give me a scratch vocal on and as 740 00:33:33,830 --> 00:33:38,120 soon as I have that I might tune it a 741 00:33:36,350 --> 00:33:41,090 little bit I might make it sort of mixi 742 00:33:38,120 --> 00:33:45,289 sounding so it behaves like a vocal on a 743 00:33:41,090 --> 00:33:47,690 record and then you can do whatever you 744 00:33:45,289 --> 00:33:49,519 want you can you can change the backdrop 745 00:33:47,690 --> 00:33:51,980 to a rainy day you can make it look like 746 00:33:49,519 --> 00:33:54,289 you're in the desert it's it's option 747 00:33:51,980 --> 00:33:56,240 anxiety at that point and you can 748 00:33:54,289 --> 00:33:58,730 experiment you can do all kinds of stuff 749 00:33:56,240 --> 00:34:01,340 you can throw the kitchen sink at it you 750 00:33:58,730 --> 00:34:03,649 can have it be at a 440 sine wave you 751 00:34:01,340 --> 00:34:05,149 could click whatever you want to do and 752 00:34:03,649 --> 00:34:08,899 then you'll know because I really 753 00:34:05,149 --> 00:34:10,159 believe and to me it's been proven time 754 00:34:08,899 --> 00:34:11,869 and time and time again that the 755 00:34:10,159 --> 00:34:14,659 speakers are really the thing that 756 00:34:11,869 --> 00:34:16,399 produced the record you can talk about 757 00:34:14,659 --> 00:34:18,470 music you can talk about ideas people 758 00:34:16,399 --> 00:34:22,310 often do of course I catch myself doing 759 00:34:18,470 --> 00:34:24,050 it a lot but until you try something and 760 00:34:22,310 --> 00:34:26,720 you hear it through the speakers no one 761 00:34:24,050 --> 00:34:28,520 really knows and I'm I'm often surprised 762 00:34:26,720 --> 00:34:30,589 at how something I thought wasn't going 763 00:34:28,520 --> 00:34:32,030 to work does work really well through 764 00:34:30,589 --> 00:34:34,970 the speakers and then the opposite can 765 00:34:32,030 --> 00:34:36,230 happen too I'm convinced this is the 766 00:34:34,970 --> 00:34:37,819 right thing and I hear it's like that 767 00:34:36,230 --> 00:34:39,859 doesn't really do what I thought it was 768 00:34:37,819 --> 00:34:42,200 going to do you have to stay open to 769 00:34:39,859 --> 00:34:44,510 recognizing the best idea I will often 770 00:34:42,200 --> 00:34:45,800 suggest something whether it's the 771 00:34:44,510 --> 00:34:48,169 accompaniment to a vocal like this 772 00:34:45,800 --> 00:34:48,829 question is asking or but you know the 773 00:34:48,169 --> 00:34:53,629 right 774 00:34:48,829 --> 00:34:55,760 what are anything and and it is my idea 775 00:34:53,629 --> 00:34:57,560 so it's inevitable that there's some 776 00:34:55,760 --> 00:35:00,770 kind of ego attachment to the fact that 777 00:34:57,560 --> 00:35:02,119 that's my idea that I put forth but if 778 00:35:00,770 --> 00:35:03,980 somebody suggests something that I think 779 00:35:02,119 --> 00:35:05,869 is a better idea I really like I'm open 780 00:35:03,980 --> 00:35:08,630 to whatever it serves it I don't need it 781 00:35:05,869 --> 00:35:12,440 to be my idea maybe my saying something 782 00:35:08,630 --> 00:35:15,290 spurred on the best idea coming into the 783 00:35:12,440 --> 00:35:17,510 sandbox that we're in but it doesn't 784 00:35:15,290 --> 00:35:19,460 have to be my idea so I everyone should 785 00:35:17,510 --> 00:35:22,280 you know if you can try to stay open to 786 00:35:19,460 --> 00:35:23,270 what is best for the music and so that 787 00:35:22,280 --> 00:35:26,780 you know addressing your 788 00:35:23,270 --> 00:35:31,550 question like the best arrangement to me 789 00:35:26,780 --> 00:35:37,150 is usually the least amount of stuff 790 00:35:31,550 --> 00:35:37,150 going on where the vocal feels supported 791 00:35:37,420 --> 00:35:46,400 hugged protected like it's you know it's 792 00:35:44,780 --> 00:35:49,400 kind of like the lead actor in a theater 793 00:35:46,400 --> 00:35:53,510 play you want the backdrop to to really 794 00:35:49,400 --> 00:35:56,120 support whatever is going on there 2,000 795 00:35:53,510 --> 00:35:58,610 years ago in Greece the origins of live 796 00:35:56,120 --> 00:36:02,690 theatre not that I was there I mean I'm 797 00:35:58,610 --> 00:36:05,420 old enough that old the the actors would 798 00:36:02,690 --> 00:36:07,850 be in the middle of stage and there 799 00:36:05,420 --> 00:36:09,650 would be a narrator on one side the 800 00:36:07,850 --> 00:36:11,960 stage reading kind of from the script 801 00:36:09,650 --> 00:36:13,790 and then there was a choir behind 802 00:36:11,960 --> 00:36:17,150 everybody that was the backdrop of the 803 00:36:13,790 --> 00:36:21,440 stage and the choir the chorus the Greek 804 00:36:17,150 --> 00:36:25,580 chorus would you know echo what had just 805 00:36:21,440 --> 00:36:26,810 happened they would kind of recap you 806 00:36:25,580 --> 00:36:29,150 know the last couple minutes or 807 00:36:26,810 --> 00:36:31,250 sometimes I think they would foreshadow 808 00:36:29,150 --> 00:36:33,350 what's about to happen 809 00:36:31,250 --> 00:36:34,970 Shakespeare would do that with whether 810 00:36:33,350 --> 00:36:37,280 in the term for that which I love is 811 00:36:34,970 --> 00:36:41,000 pathetic fallacy I don't know why I'm 812 00:36:37,280 --> 00:36:43,460 talking about this right now but I'm 813 00:36:41,000 --> 00:36:46,160 completely off the plot however I hope 814 00:36:43,460 --> 00:36:48,050 you're being entertained I am it's 815 00:36:46,160 --> 00:36:51,440 really down to whatever's right for the 816 00:36:48,050 --> 00:36:53,600 story that's being told and who the 817 00:36:51,440 --> 00:36:55,520 storyteller is and how it comes out of 818 00:36:53,600 --> 00:36:57,590 them you got to support that you can't 819 00:36:55,520 --> 00:36:58,910 get in the way of it if you do I don't 820 00:36:57,590 --> 00:37:00,710 think you're doing your job it's all 821 00:36:58,910 --> 00:37:03,950 about accompaniment accompaniment 822 00:37:00,710 --> 00:37:07,750 support support support and and then the 823 00:37:03,950 --> 00:37:10,040 ironically the better that the singer is 824 00:37:07,750 --> 00:37:15,020 at telling the story the better the 825 00:37:10,040 --> 00:37:17,870 accompaniment sounds okay 826 00:37:15,020 --> 00:37:21,980 question number eight from Steven what 827 00:37:17,870 --> 00:37:23,540 does good sound quality mean to you well 828 00:37:21,980 --> 00:37:29,690 I definitely know what bad sound quality 829 00:37:23,540 --> 00:37:33,770 is I think we all do but when things 830 00:37:29,690 --> 00:37:35,450 sound really good and and good it's sort 831 00:37:33,770 --> 00:37:37,150 of a very wide-ranging term let's change 832 00:37:35,450 --> 00:37:38,650 that to great sound quality 833 00:37:37,150 --> 00:37:41,020 because I think that's really the intent 834 00:37:38,650 --> 00:37:43,180 behind this question what would is great 835 00:37:41,020 --> 00:37:45,430 sound mean to me the quality of great 836 00:37:43,180 --> 00:37:50,069 sound you know when you're watching a 837 00:37:45,430 --> 00:37:53,079 movie and it's a really great movie and 838 00:37:50,069 --> 00:37:57,549 at some point like maybe 40 minutes in 839 00:37:53,079 --> 00:37:59,829 or earlier you completely forget that 840 00:37:57,549 --> 00:38:01,720 you're watching a movie and you're just 841 00:37:59,829 --> 00:38:03,880 in the experience of whatever is 842 00:38:01,720 --> 00:38:07,420 happening and you feel them all you care 843 00:38:03,880 --> 00:38:09,250 about the characters and that's the 844 00:38:07,420 --> 00:38:11,170 movie version of great sound qualities 845 00:38:09,250 --> 00:38:12,819 but I want music to do that to me I want 846 00:38:11,170 --> 00:38:15,309 to forget that I'm listening to a song I 847 00:38:12,819 --> 00:38:16,720 don't want to notice the kick drum I 848 00:38:15,309 --> 00:38:18,039 don't want to think about what kind of 849 00:38:16,720 --> 00:38:19,990 microphone this I don't want I don't 850 00:38:18,039 --> 00:38:24,720 care who wrote it I don't care where it 851 00:38:19,990 --> 00:38:27,190 was recorded I want to be lost in it and 852 00:38:24,720 --> 00:38:30,190 almost in a dreamlike state you know 853 00:38:27,190 --> 00:38:33,839 letting the music really get into me let 854 00:38:30,190 --> 00:38:36,309 me feel stuff so that is when I think 855 00:38:33,839 --> 00:38:39,579 things are sounding great oh and what is 856 00:38:36,309 --> 00:38:42,520 the thing that really dictates whether 857 00:38:39,579 --> 00:38:44,049 things sound great it is not EQ not 858 00:38:42,520 --> 00:38:47,260 compression it's not any mixed 859 00:38:44,049 --> 00:38:50,230 techniques it's not whether you're in 860 00:38:47,260 --> 00:38:53,109 the box or on this gorgeous console 861 00:38:50,230 --> 00:38:58,180 behind me or in your bedroom or on Mars 862 00:38:53,109 --> 00:39:00,940 it is the quality of the song that's 863 00:38:58,180 --> 00:39:04,990 what sounds good or great or terrible or 864 00:39:00,940 --> 00:39:07,210 bad or boxy or whatever you know when 865 00:39:04,990 --> 00:39:09,970 the song is when the script of the movie 866 00:39:07,210 --> 00:39:12,789 is great I think it's really hard to 867 00:39:09,970 --> 00:39:15,069 make a bad movie if you have an amazing 868 00:39:12,789 --> 00:39:16,510 script and then the opposite of course 869 00:39:15,069 --> 00:39:19,299 is you can have the biggest budget in 870 00:39:16,510 --> 00:39:21,839 the world the hottest director you know 871 00:39:19,299 --> 00:39:24,819 the best actors if the script is kind of 872 00:39:21,839 --> 00:39:27,190 broken you just cannot make a great 873 00:39:24,819 --> 00:39:30,160 movie you can't do it it is impossible 874 00:39:27,190 --> 00:39:32,319 so things that sound best are the best 875 00:39:30,160 --> 00:39:35,890 compositions they're the best songs the 876 00:39:32,319 --> 00:39:38,740 sound of the record is really in the 877 00:39:35,890 --> 00:39:40,690 writing of it and that can't be that 878 00:39:38,740 --> 00:39:42,190 can't be underestimated that's more than 879 00:39:40,690 --> 00:39:46,119 anything why I try to become a 880 00:39:42,190 --> 00:39:48,220 songwriter I remember playing on studio 881 00:39:46,119 --> 00:39:49,390 sessions in Los Angeles in the 1990s 882 00:39:48,220 --> 00:39:50,350 with you know I'd be in the room 883 00:39:49,390 --> 00:39:53,140 sometimes with the world 884 00:39:50,350 --> 00:39:56,770 best musicians like really intimidating 885 00:39:53,140 --> 00:39:58,390 killer team you know super famous people 886 00:39:56,770 --> 00:40:03,790 that I grew up worshiping I still do 887 00:39:58,390 --> 00:40:06,490 great producer great studios and if it 888 00:40:03,790 --> 00:40:08,110 was going well and if we got if we were 889 00:40:06,490 --> 00:40:11,260 tracking live and we got the song and 890 00:40:08,110 --> 00:40:13,090 one or two three takes nobody ever said 891 00:40:11,260 --> 00:40:15,310 well that's a really great song nobody 892 00:40:13,090 --> 00:40:17,590 ever commented on the song they would 893 00:40:15,310 --> 00:40:19,960 say oh nice strum Phil or whatever nice 894 00:40:17,590 --> 00:40:22,660 this that but it was in hindsight it was 895 00:40:19,960 --> 00:40:25,090 always because the song was great and 896 00:40:22,660 --> 00:40:27,400 it's sort of sort of to a degree 897 00:40:25,090 --> 00:40:29,260 recorded itself if we ever had the 898 00:40:27,400 --> 00:40:31,060 opposite app and we were like twelve 899 00:40:29,260 --> 00:40:33,400 takes in and it's just we're stuck and 900 00:40:31,060 --> 00:40:35,080 we know it's not right everything would 901 00:40:33,400 --> 00:40:37,060 get blamed I mean we were you know we 902 00:40:35,080 --> 00:40:39,070 people would quietly whisper we got the 903 00:40:37,060 --> 00:40:40,510 wrong producer or worth you know right 904 00:40:39,070 --> 00:40:42,580 the wrong studio this is the wrong 905 00:40:40,510 --> 00:40:44,590 consoles we've got it's the wrong kick 906 00:40:42,580 --> 00:40:46,950 drum that's the wrong coffee it's the 907 00:40:44,590 --> 00:40:49,000 wrong whatever it was pretty much always 908 00:40:46,950 --> 00:40:50,740 something wrong with the song and 909 00:40:49,000 --> 00:40:52,150 sometimes songs will have sections that 910 00:40:50,740 --> 00:40:58,270 work really well and there'll be a 911 00:40:52,150 --> 00:41:00,880 problem area like a big road bump and it 912 00:40:58,270 --> 00:41:03,340 affects the whole thing it's really down 913 00:41:00,880 --> 00:41:06,100 to the writing and that is what sounds 914 00:41:03,340 --> 00:41:07,570 best and I humbly advise and you don't 915 00:41:06,100 --> 00:41:10,480 let anybody tell you otherwise because 916 00:41:07,570 --> 00:41:12,250 they're wrong it's the composition it's 917 00:41:10,480 --> 00:41:13,900 the quality of the script that's what 918 00:41:12,250 --> 00:41:16,960 sounds the best of course everything 919 00:41:13,900 --> 00:41:18,820 else is super important I mean I you 920 00:41:16,960 --> 00:41:20,800 know there is there's a particular 921 00:41:18,820 --> 00:41:23,470 guitar cable that I like to use that 922 00:41:20,800 --> 00:41:25,000 again Eric Valentine makes and it is the 923 00:41:23,470 --> 00:41:28,060 best guitar cable you can change the 924 00:41:25,000 --> 00:41:31,000 impedance on it yeah that makes a 925 00:41:28,060 --> 00:41:33,880 massive difference yes I record on 926 00:41:31,000 --> 00:41:37,780 microphones that cost almost as much as 927 00:41:33,880 --> 00:41:39,700 a car but you can use all of that gear 928 00:41:37,780 --> 00:41:43,840 you can be in a gorgeous facility like 929 00:41:39,700 --> 00:41:45,330 this if the song is broken you can 930 00:41:43,840 --> 00:41:46,960 you're not going to make a good record 931 00:41:45,330 --> 00:41:48,600 definitely not going to make a great 932 00:41:46,960 --> 00:41:52,720 record you maybe will make a good one 933 00:41:48,600 --> 00:41:56,140 it's in the writing okay question number 934 00:41:52,720 --> 00:41:59,440 nine Vincent how do you get such a good 935 00:41:56,140 --> 00:42:01,950 bass sound do you combine the DI with an 936 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:06,930 amp what Mike do you use 937 00:42:01,950 --> 00:42:10,349 I love bass I love bass synth I love 938 00:42:06,930 --> 00:42:13,020 tubas I love petals on a pipe organ I 939 00:42:10,349 --> 00:42:15,750 love mogh Taurus petals 940 00:42:13,020 --> 00:42:17,760 I love low notes they're just they're 941 00:42:15,750 --> 00:42:20,220 amazing fun and it's really fun to play 942 00:42:17,760 --> 00:42:22,020 bass guitar through a great sounding amp 943 00:42:20,220 --> 00:42:26,700 on a great song there's no feeling like 944 00:42:22,020 --> 00:42:32,250 it it's really wild and I play a lot of 945 00:42:26,700 --> 00:42:34,440 bass in the studio so a few times I had 946 00:42:32,250 --> 00:42:36,690 I've had some other bass amps throughout 947 00:42:34,440 --> 00:42:38,579 the years and they were cool but a 948 00:42:36,690 --> 00:42:43,020 couple times I would rent an ampeg 949 00:42:38,579 --> 00:42:44,730 classic amp egghead and an 810 cabinet 950 00:42:43,020 --> 00:42:46,650 and every time I did I just thought 951 00:42:44,730 --> 00:42:49,440 that's it that's the bass amp that's the 952 00:42:46,650 --> 00:42:52,260 one I wish I had and then finally I just 953 00:42:49,440 --> 00:42:54,390 committed and had enough money in the 954 00:42:52,260 --> 00:42:58,260 bank where I could get a reissue of the 955 00:42:54,390 --> 00:43:00,720 ampeg classic head and I instead of an 956 00:42:58,260 --> 00:43:02,910 810 cabinet I got a 410 cabinet I just 957 00:43:00,720 --> 00:43:04,710 figured it would eat up less space in my 958 00:43:02,910 --> 00:43:07,710 studio and I'm on a microphone it sounds 959 00:43:04,710 --> 00:43:11,880 pretty much the same so that's what I 960 00:43:07,710 --> 00:43:15,260 use we have two microphones on the bass 961 00:43:11,880 --> 00:43:20,970 cabinet we also take the DI the direct 962 00:43:15,260 --> 00:43:23,130 signal through a radial di so when I 963 00:43:20,970 --> 00:43:25,049 record there's three bass tracks there's 964 00:43:23,130 --> 00:43:27,359 the direct you know coming right off the 965 00:43:25,049 --> 00:43:30,119 bass not going through an amp and then 966 00:43:27,359 --> 00:43:33,630 there's two mics on the bass amp one is 967 00:43:30,119 --> 00:43:36,950 this weird old mic that was made in 968 00:43:33,630 --> 00:43:38,990 Pasadena California in the 1950s and 969 00:43:36,950 --> 00:43:41,579 it's a company called American 970 00:43:38,990 --> 00:43:44,490 microphones the microphones look like 971 00:43:41,579 --> 00:43:46,109 these old James Bond laser guns from 972 00:43:44,490 --> 00:43:48,000 early seventies movies they're really 973 00:43:46,109 --> 00:43:50,549 they're really cool-looking 974 00:43:48,000 --> 00:43:52,140 they're about that long you get you can 975 00:43:50,549 --> 00:43:57,829 find them on eBay for three four hundred 976 00:43:52,140 --> 00:44:01,109 dollars and I've got three of them now 977 00:43:57,829 --> 00:44:02,970 they are sort of fantastically not high 978 00:44:01,109 --> 00:44:05,220 five sounding but they're not that 979 00:44:02,970 --> 00:44:08,220 crunchy either they're just they have a 980 00:44:05,220 --> 00:44:10,170 lot of personality and I use that for 981 00:44:08,220 --> 00:44:12,660 kind of the presence and the sort of 982 00:44:10,170 --> 00:44:14,670 real character more top-end sounds of 983 00:44:12,660 --> 00:44:15,240 the bass it sounds good in the lower 984 00:44:14,670 --> 00:44:19,140 mids too 985 00:44:15,240 --> 00:44:20,670 and then I blend that to taste depending 986 00:44:19,140 --> 00:44:26,609 on the song and the kind of bass part 987 00:44:20,670 --> 00:44:28,500 I'm playing with my favorite mic for 988 00:44:26,609 --> 00:44:31,260 this kind of like low rich tone is a 989 00:44:28,500 --> 00:44:33,140 forty seven and a fat forty seven is 990 00:44:31,260 --> 00:44:36,480 great - it's probably say frontal loud 991 00:44:33,140 --> 00:44:40,190 bass amp but I could not afford a second 992 00:44:36,480 --> 00:44:43,410 47 that I really liked so I asked Alan 993 00:44:40,190 --> 00:44:46,710 Venna Tosh at Telefunken USA who built 994 00:44:43,410 --> 00:44:49,680 my two great vocal mics I asked him to 995 00:44:46,710 --> 00:44:53,700 recommend something that would go as low 996 00:44:49,680 --> 00:44:55,320 as that sonically was going to pick up 997 00:44:53,700 --> 00:44:57,930 like you know especially if I 998 00:44:55,320 --> 00:45:00,119 occasionally I'll use a five string bass 999 00:44:57,930 --> 00:45:01,650 just to have a low D or a low whatever I 1000 00:45:00,119 --> 00:45:03,450 know it's not cool to play five string 1001 00:45:01,650 --> 00:45:06,150 but it sounds great sometimes on the 1002 00:45:03,450 --> 00:45:09,540 right song so they have a mic call to 1003 00:45:06,150 --> 00:45:12,690 see you twenty-nine and it sounds 1004 00:45:09,540 --> 00:45:17,280 phenomenal on the bass amp so it's those 1005 00:45:12,690 --> 00:45:21,450 two mics blended going through some nice 1006 00:45:17,280 --> 00:45:27,390 Chandler Mike pries and usually no 1007 00:45:21,450 --> 00:45:30,030 compression on the way in I like to keep 1008 00:45:27,390 --> 00:45:32,520 all the kind of low there all the low 1009 00:45:30,030 --> 00:45:35,550 end intact and I'll just control my 1010 00:45:32,520 --> 00:45:37,470 dynamics just as a player and then 1011 00:45:35,550 --> 00:45:41,070 usually in the mix I almost never use 1012 00:45:37,470 --> 00:45:43,200 the DI signal it's always the amp I just 1013 00:45:41,070 --> 00:45:47,580 that's in my head that is sort of the 1014 00:45:43,200 --> 00:45:49,550 big gloopy glue a little bass sound that 1015 00:45:47,580 --> 00:45:53,130 I'm looking for that I really like a 1016 00:45:49,550 --> 00:45:56,820 bass through di to me sometimes sounds 1017 00:45:53,130 --> 00:45:57,240 cool but rarely it just it feels a bit 1018 00:45:56,820 --> 00:46:02,310 too 1019 00:45:57,240 --> 00:46:07,710 I like the bass to sound kind of kind of 1020 00:46:02,310 --> 00:46:09,770 dumb and you know simple and the amp 1021 00:46:07,710 --> 00:46:12,750 actress does an amazing job of that so 1022 00:46:09,770 --> 00:46:15,710 if you like the bass sound on anything 1023 00:46:12,750 --> 00:46:20,310 that I've done in the last I don't know 1024 00:46:15,710 --> 00:46:24,839 10 years it is that setup okay we're 1025 00:46:20,310 --> 00:46:27,089 we're now at the final question if 1026 00:46:24,839 --> 00:46:29,270 you've made it this far through my not 1027 00:46:27,089 --> 00:46:31,700 short answer 1028 00:46:29,270 --> 00:46:35,510 question number ten is from Saul how do 1029 00:46:31,700 --> 00:46:38,420 you deal between fidelity and harmonic 1030 00:46:35,510 --> 00:46:40,310 distortion knowing every now and then in 1031 00:46:38,420 --> 00:46:43,670 the process of recording and mixing both 1032 00:46:40,310 --> 00:46:45,260 our relative concepts as all is 1033 00:46:43,670 --> 00:46:47,630 distorted in a certain kind of way 1034 00:46:45,260 --> 00:46:50,540 because of the medium do you prefer the 1035 00:46:47,630 --> 00:46:54,320 old school or these days use 1036 00:46:50,540 --> 00:46:57,530 I mean distortion is really is an 1037 00:46:54,320 --> 00:46:59,270 amazing thing and and you know 1038 00:46:57,530 --> 00:47:02,600 distortion doesn't mean a distortion 1039 00:46:59,270 --> 00:47:03,800 pedal there's all kinds of there's some 1040 00:47:02,600 --> 00:47:06,590 kind of distortion happening right now 1041 00:47:03,800 --> 00:47:08,900 this this you know little mic that is 1042 00:47:06,590 --> 00:47:11,840 attached to my shirt that you're hearing 1043 00:47:08,900 --> 00:47:15,110 but the Beatles records are just covered 1044 00:47:11,840 --> 00:47:20,120 in really all the all recordings are 1045 00:47:15,110 --> 00:47:22,130 absolutely slathered layered in just in 1046 00:47:20,120 --> 00:47:24,950 distortion but it's more like tube 1047 00:47:22,130 --> 00:47:27,800 overdrive the imperfections of tubes and 1048 00:47:24,950 --> 00:47:29,780 what they do to sound is imperfect but 1049 00:47:27,800 --> 00:47:32,630 it sounds amazing same with tape we 1050 00:47:29,780 --> 00:47:34,730 record things to tape its smearing the 1051 00:47:32,630 --> 00:47:36,280 frequencies it rolls off a bunch of high 1052 00:47:34,730 --> 00:47:38,390 end it rolls off a bunch of low end 1053 00:47:36,280 --> 00:47:42,230 ironically it makes things sound bigger 1054 00:47:38,390 --> 00:47:44,330 a lot of the time the minute you audio 1055 00:47:42,230 --> 00:47:46,850 passes through a tube it's being kind of 1056 00:47:44,330 --> 00:47:50,440 changed and colored and I really like 1057 00:47:46,850 --> 00:47:53,360 all of that stuff I'm a big fan of 1058 00:47:50,440 --> 00:47:57,110 hardware and software that where you can 1059 00:47:53,360 --> 00:47:58,780 control adding harmonic distortion to 1060 00:47:57,110 --> 00:48:02,870 things 1061 00:47:58,780 --> 00:48:04,520 the there's a new plugin by way it's 1062 00:48:02,870 --> 00:48:06,920 called a Saphira I think I'm pronouncing 1063 00:48:04,520 --> 00:48:09,130 it right the virus if you're where you 1064 00:48:06,920 --> 00:48:11,870 can really bring out second and third 1065 00:48:09,130 --> 00:48:15,320 harmonics on the source sometimes I'll 1066 00:48:11,870 --> 00:48:20,300 put it across the entire mix I have a 1067 00:48:15,320 --> 00:48:23,840 unit on in my console called the master 1068 00:48:20,300 --> 00:48:26,240 and servant made by / stair in LA Jeff 1069 00:48:23,840 --> 00:48:31,270 terzo makes great gear and that's really 1070 00:48:26,240 --> 00:48:35,290 fun to use the Decapitator plugin is 1071 00:48:31,270 --> 00:48:35,290 ridiculous really fun 1072 00:48:35,309 --> 00:48:42,599 I like the the level or made by standard 1073 00:48:40,289 --> 00:48:44,459 audio in McGregor and his partner Tom 1074 00:48:42,599 --> 00:48:46,499 standard audio there's actually these 1075 00:48:44,459 --> 00:48:51,150 one here right beside me that mix at the 1076 00:48:46,499 --> 00:48:54,449 Masters level or right there there's all 1077 00:48:51,150 --> 00:48:55,679 kinds of stuff that that helps but most 1078 00:48:54,449 --> 00:48:56,519 of it you don't really hear as 1079 00:48:55,679 --> 00:48:59,669 Distortion 1080 00:48:56,519 --> 00:49:01,759 and sometimes it just makes things sound 1081 00:48:59,669 --> 00:49:04,739 more present sometimes it gives it a 1082 00:49:01,759 --> 00:49:07,739 cohesiveness and a kind of record light 1083 00:49:04,739 --> 00:49:10,049 quality that if you take it out you 1084 00:49:07,739 --> 00:49:13,229 really miss it it's a really fun thing 1085 00:49:10,049 --> 00:49:14,429 to play with it like almost everything 1086 00:49:13,229 --> 00:49:17,159 if not everything it involves 1087 00:49:14,429 --> 00:49:20,459 experimenting and figuring out what too 1088 00:49:17,159 --> 00:49:23,279 much is what not enough is always 1089 00:49:20,459 --> 00:49:27,599 compared always a be with it off and put 1090 00:49:23,279 --> 00:49:31,140 it back in turn it off turn on there's 1091 00:49:27,599 --> 00:49:33,719 different types of it my plugins with 1092 00:49:31,140 --> 00:49:35,869 waves have a fair amount of that stuff 1093 00:49:33,719 --> 00:49:38,640 built in especially the mix centric 1094 00:49:35,869 --> 00:49:41,219 there's a it would sound very different 1095 00:49:38,640 --> 00:49:44,999 actually if the harmonic distortion was 1096 00:49:41,219 --> 00:49:46,650 taken out of the path so I encourage 1097 00:49:44,999 --> 00:49:48,239 everyone to kind of mess with it it does 1098 00:49:46,650 --> 00:49:52,739 do a thing it can make things sound 1099 00:49:48,239 --> 00:49:55,919 really cool it's amazing on bass bass 1100 00:49:52,739 --> 00:49:58,109 synth bass guitar it just makes the 1101 00:49:55,919 --> 00:50:00,150 notes sound better 1102 00:49:58,109 --> 00:50:03,599 not necessarily louder just gives them 1103 00:50:00,150 --> 00:50:06,529 more of a footprint a sonic footprint in 1104 00:50:03,599 --> 00:50:11,150 the track it can be incredible on vocals 1105 00:50:06,529 --> 00:50:13,949 definitely on drums the guitar obviously 1106 00:50:11,150 --> 00:50:15,359 you know if there's all kinds of usages 1107 00:50:13,949 --> 00:50:18,029 for it and then you have somebody like 1108 00:50:15,359 --> 00:50:20,939 Chad Blake who was doing the seminar 1109 00:50:18,029 --> 00:50:25,199 just before me here I'd mix with the 1110 00:50:20,939 --> 00:50:27,509 Masters and Chad is a master of running 1111 00:50:25,199 --> 00:50:30,509 things through things like the sansamp 1112 00:50:27,509 --> 00:50:32,599 or Decapitator or I know he's a big fan 1113 00:50:30,509 --> 00:50:36,390 of the shore level lock which is an old 1114 00:50:32,599 --> 00:50:37,799 I think it was 4p I systems like it's a 1115 00:50:36,390 --> 00:50:40,199 mic pre and there's some sort of weird 1116 00:50:37,799 --> 00:50:42,419 noisy built in compression thing that 1117 00:50:40,199 --> 00:50:45,029 happens and he's all about all of that 1118 00:50:42,419 --> 00:50:47,309 stuff and he is you can hear the 1119 00:50:45,029 --> 00:50:48,740 distortion in his mixes but it just 1120 00:50:47,309 --> 00:50:52,670 gives a character and 1121 00:50:48,740 --> 00:50:55,430 kind of a sculpting element to the stuff 1122 00:50:52,670 --> 00:50:56,810 that he uses in his mixes that I've 1123 00:50:55,430 --> 00:50:59,150 never heard anybody else do it like that 1124 00:50:56,810 --> 00:51:01,310 he's really you know talked about a 1125 00:50:59,150 --> 00:51:03,050 master of so many things but in 1126 00:51:01,310 --> 00:51:05,230 particular like the way he uses 1127 00:51:03,050 --> 00:51:08,930 distortion to just vibe his mixes up 1128 00:51:05,230 --> 00:51:11,240 it's so brilliant from his latest work 1129 00:51:08,930 --> 00:51:14,330 to even you know one of my favorite 1130 00:51:11,240 --> 00:51:17,000 examples of all that is the Latin 1131 00:51:14,330 --> 00:51:19,580 playboys recordings him and Mitchell 1132 00:51:17,000 --> 00:51:23,990 froom and two incredibly talented guys 1133 00:51:19,580 --> 00:51:25,369 from Los Lobos so I hope that helps I've 1134 00:51:23,990 --> 00:51:28,330 mentioned a lot of things that will give 1135 00:51:25,369 --> 00:51:31,100 you distortion that you can use in a mix 1136 00:51:28,330 --> 00:51:32,810 it's really more like overdrive not 1137 00:51:31,100 --> 00:51:34,130 really distortion to me that means like 1138 00:51:32,810 --> 00:51:36,830 more of a fuzzy kind of thing but even 1139 00:51:34,130 --> 00:51:38,780 that can be cool experiment experiment 1140 00:51:36,830 --> 00:51:42,650 experiment compare try to stay objective 1141 00:51:38,780 --> 00:51:45,040 and go make some great music I'm going 1142 00:51:42,650 --> 00:51:47,750 to wrap this up thank you for joining me 1143 00:51:45,040 --> 00:51:50,000 it's a real honor and privilege to be 1144 00:51:47,750 --> 00:51:52,280 able to answer these questions from this 1145 00:51:50,000 --> 00:51:55,900 beautiful studio here in France and 1146 00:51:52,280 --> 00:51:57,530 thanks for submitting the questions and 1147 00:51:55,900 --> 00:52:00,280 I'll see you later 1148 00:51:57,530 --> 00:52:00,280 Thanks 88012

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.