All language subtitles for 2000.Mules.(2022).1080p.WEB-DL.2CH.H264 -

We have put together, I think the most

extensive and inclusive voter fraud

organization in the history

of American politics.

Every time we vote,

we are standing up side by side
with the founding fathers, with the men

of Valley Forge, with patriots
and pioneers throughout our history,

with all those who dedicated their lives
to making this a nation

of the people, by the people
and for the people.

Elections
are the lifeblood of our democracy.

They are the mechanism
by which the American people choose

who is going to rule on their behalf
and for their interests and welfare

Without elections, there would be no way
for the American people for us

to exercise our legitimate sway
on the future direction

of this country.

Polls now closed in half the country,
and we are getting some

interesting results
coming in from those battleground states.

If you're a Republican, you say, wow,
if you're a Democrat, you say,

"oh oh".
Do you see Donald Trump

is now starting to widen his lead.

President Trump now with 54% of the vote.

The president right now
has the lead in the Keystone State

We have a great night and

we're going to have much more importantly,
we can have a great four years

The 2020 election haunts
the American mind.

Here's where it gets really bizarre.

Fulton county, most populous county.

It is Atlanta. They just stopped counting.

Nevada,
meanwhile, has stopped counting votes.

They've all stopped
counting for the night.

All right.

Welcome back.

This is CNN special live coverage.

10:31 a.m. on the East Coast.

Why am I giving you the time?

Well, if you managed to sleep last night,
things changed.

You may have gone to bed
thinking this election was headed one way

and then you woke up
and you saw things were different.

Also, overnight, Joe Biden
pulled ahead in the state of Georgia.

Joe Biden takes the lead in Pennsylvania.

Okay, we have an announcement to make.

Joe Biden has run for president
three times and the third time

has turned out to be the charm.

One side insists
it was the most secure election in U.S.

history.
Let me begin with one immutable fact.

The 2020 election was the most secure
election in American history.

It was the cleanest election,
the safest election,

the most secure election ever run.

And make no mistake,
there has been no evidence

of any significant whites
or widespread voter fraud.

Let me say it again.

The 2020 election was the most secure
election in American history.

Period.

This same side accuses
anyone who disagrees with them

of perpetrating a big lie
or the big delusion.

The big lie keeps getting repeated.

The "big lie" is just that : a big lie.

And despite a relentless media barrage,

the other side remains convinced
there was widespread election fraud

What I saw was not a secure
and transparent election.

Poll watchers claim the Travis
County Clerk's office is locking them out.

Last night,
there was a major software glitch

that actually delayed the counting
of all of the ballots.

A look at election fraud.

And I want to look at secretaries of state
who illegally changed the voter laws

without the permission
of their state legislature.

There have been numerous attempts
to prove election fraud.

The van dropping off ballots in the early
morning hours of November 4th.

8 hours past the deadline.

She said her mother was in a nursing home
and did not have the mental capacity

to vote.

We've obtained videotape that shows a man
dropping several ballot into a drop box.

Scottsdale woman pleads guilty to casting
a ballot in her dad's mother's name.

It shows a man buying a registration form
for an absentee ballot from a voter

giving him, quote, pocket money,
unquote, of $200.

Yet courts have refused
to consider these cases on the merits.

The Supreme Court rejecting an effort
by Republicans

to reverse President elect
Joe Biden's win in Pennsylvania.

The Supreme Court has rejected
the Texas led effort to toss out

election results in four key states.

Even some Republicans
dismiss the idea of systematic

fraud and call for us to move on.

Fraud did not play a role
in the outcome of the election.

The election was fair, as fair
as we've seen

We simply did not win the election
as Republicans for the presidency.

Rather than reject
what happened on the sixth, reject

the lies about the election
and make clear that a president

who engaged in those activities
can never be president again.

But we can't move on
unless we know the truth.

Many other issues
arise out of the 2020 election

Did the January six protesters go to D.C.

to mount an insurrection?

It wasn't an insurrection.

It was a primal scream.

To protect the Constitution of the United States
against enemies foreign or domestic !

They wanted their elected leaders

to adjudicate the claims of election
fraud.

The left's claim
that this was the most secure election

is also the foundation
for the widespread censorship

on social media of the so-called Big Lie.

This morning, President Trump
waking up without his favorite megaphone.

You will never again
see a tweet from President Trump.

But is it a big lie?

Is it a lie at all?

Yeah, well, sound speed

All right. Everybody got me?
- Yes

All right.

SRP

Ready. Set.

Hey, I'm Dinesh D'Souza,
and this is season one,

episode one of my new podcast.

I started my

podcast in early 2021
to speak the truth.

But by simply asking questions
about election fraud,

you get booted from YouTube and Facebook

My podcast is sponsored by Salem Media,

and I knew that other Salem hosts
felt my frustration.

Larry Elder, Dennis Prager,

Eric Metaxas, Sebastian Gorka,

Charlie Kirk,

We begin

by asking a very simple question
Do we feel confident or comfortable

that we know the truth about what
really happened in the 2020 election?

I'm agnostic on this question,
and I am awaiting more information.

What about you, Eric?

I think Dennis is a coward.

I think,

no, honestly, it's
almost funny to me that you are agnostic,

I think most Americans know

that we don't know what happened
and are not okay with that, by the way.

I'm supposed to believe that
a man who didn't campaign or campaign

from his basement got more votes
than the first black president in America.

I don't believe it.

Charlie, we have crumbs.

We have some evidence here and there
that the picture is far from complete.

Larry, in your race, you were
you were asked straight out,

do you believe that
the 2020 election was stolen?

What was your answer?

And do you abide by that

answer as of right now?

My answer was that

Donald Trump is in Mar a Lago

and Joe Biden is in 1600
Pennsylvania Avenue.

The lawsuit did not succeed.

Do I believe there was shenanigans?

Do I believe there were irregularities?

Absolutely.

And said so. This is probably
the most loathed president I've ever seen.

I thought Richard Nixon was loathed.

I thought George W Bush was loathed
because of the Iraq war.

I have never seen the level of vitriol
against this man.

Every single day,
I think there was a study that found

91% of the news of ABC, NBC, CBS Nightly
News against Donald Trump was negative,

dogged by a bogus two and a half year
collusion investigation.

And then on the eve of the election,
this Hunter Biden story drops,

which shows that Joe Biden completely

lied about his lack of knowledge of what
his son was doing, and it was suppressed.

And even the CEO of Twitter later
on admitted that it was suppressed

and shouldn't have been.

That alone
would have altered the election.

You add all that up.

My point is this man is so loathed,

I wouldn't put it past the Democrats
to do virtually anything to make sure

he doesn't get another four years.

If I believed the president were a Nazi
I might steal an election.

If we were Germans in the 1930s,
we'd steal the election from Hitler.

If I'm that indoctrinated,
of course I can justify it.

I think it was Jane Fonda who said that
COVID was God's gift to the left right.

It wrecks the empirical positives
of the Trump economy.

But here's the other.

It enables

a whole bunch of things on the other side
to change the rules of the election.

So the point is, I'm in a COVID
environment.

Is it not conceivable that Trump
could have lost fair and square?

I think millions of Americans know
something went wrong,

and they have little pieces
and no one's really put it together.

They know that there was injustice.
They know it in their gut.

They know it through the Bellweather
counties

where Donald Trump won almost every single
one of the predictive counties

that show who's going to be president.

And then they also know it
when they went to bed thinking

Trump was going to have four more years
and they woke up with the exact opposite.

We have an individual
who could fill a stadium with 60,000

supporters in 24 hours, but an individual

you know, the famous photograph
of the six empty circles at a Biden rally.

We have an incumbent president

who received more votes
than any other incumbent president.

In American history,
who actually got 10 million more votes

than he did four years prior
and who received more support

after four years of being called a racist
and a white supremacist.

More support from the Hispanic
and black community

than any Republican president
since the 1960s.

And he was beaten by a machine politician
who couldn't speak clearly

who on the campaign stage
would confuse his sister with his wife.

It just stinks.

Now, is it possible that the very success
of Republicans down ballot.

I'm talking about Republicans
running for the House

running for the Senate
running for other races.

The fact that the Republicans as a party
did pretty well, but Trump lost.

Doesn't that work the other way
and undercut the idea

that there was systematic fraud ?
It's an anomaly,

because when the president
really loses, he has tails.

What is it called?

Coattails.

And the the down ballot lose.

But they won.

Why didn't they cheat on all of those?

Why didn't they cheat in Virginia
with Youngkin?

But who's to say they didn't cheat?

Not all attempts at cheating succeed.
You're right.

One other question.

In the Republican Party,
I keep hearing people who seem

annoyed
at the revisiting of the 2020 election.

Their attitude appears to be "let bygones
be bygones".

"Let's just move on".

I think the reason that many Republicans
are saying "let's move on" is because

bold accusations require bold evidence
and they haven't seen it.

And because they know

how vulnerable they are
and how much they're going to be bashed.

Well, you're called a sore loser.

You're called a conspiracy theorist.

The people who say that, "let's move
forward", are people

in the elite
who see Donald Trump as an anomaly.

You will not win in any district
in this country,

because you have said that

that the 2020 election was a fraud.

And if they can't win on this issue,
then don't use it.

Well, it doesn't have to be
the only issue, but their unwillingness

even to speak up about it,
I think, is despicable.

Show me the proof, and I'll bet you
they do speak up, just like I will speak

more and I'm not running for office,
but I have not gone on board of

"I know for a fact this was a fraud".

Show me the money

And look, I mean, the Democrats,
they have a history

of voter fraud. Going back to Tammany
Hall in the 19th century.

We fast forward to LBJ
stealing his first race in Texas,

John F Kennedy, the allegations
that he stole the presidency

with voter fraud in Texas and in Illinois.
- They've done it before.

I mean, you can have someone
who has a criminal record

and they're fully capable
of robbing a bank.

But did they run the bank?
- Well, it looks like it.

What does our friend Katherine
think about all this?

Katherine's been a little quiet,

but I think that that means
that they're working on something.

I think that you should give her a call
and see what she thinks.

Hi, I'm Katherine Engelbrecht, founder
and president of True the Vote

Hey Dinesh,

how are you?

Hey, I'm doing fine.
Hey, listen, I'm here with Debbie.

Hey, Katherine.

Hey, Debbie.

You know how crazy it is out there.

Have you guys been digging
into this whole issue of voter fraud?

Well,
we had been working on something big.

It's probably best
we don't discuss it over the phone, but

can we meet

I've been working

with Greg Phillips, I don't think
I've ever introduced him to you,

but he has a deep background in election
intelligence.

He's worked projects all over the world.

He has a massive 30 year experience.

We decided to test a hypothesis,
and we went

really big.

And now

we have something and we think you're
going to really want to see.

So I'll send you the address separately.

Now, Greg

Greg Phillips, what's your background
that prepares you for this kind of work?

I've been in and around election
intelligence and integrity for about 40

years.

We've done investigations
literally all over the world.

It's a combination of data
acquisition, data analysis,

occasionally some in-depth data mining,
our ability to draw meaningful conclusions

that link the who to the when to the
where, is significant in this space.

Katherine, you started the group called
True the Vote in the year 2010.

What was your mission or objective?

We just didn't have enough volunteers
working at the polls

in our local elections.

So we began by training people
to work in the polls.

And then as we got further into it,
we recognized, wow, some of the problems

you see at the polls can be attributed
to problems in the voter rolls.

Well,
what can we do about the voter rolls?

And so it turned into something
much bigger than we had anticipated.

True the vote
has the largest store of election

intelligence
for the 2020 elections in the world.

No one has more data than we do.

So I started True the vote

to ensure that every American voter has an
opportunity to participate in elections.

I think I became familiar with your work
when you gave congressional testimony.

Now, that was in the year 2014.

In fact, I met you through Debbie
and I think what's interesting is that

you not only have known Debbie for years,
but you trained her.

Absolutely, I was
a bilingual poll watcher.

Oh, yes.

So my Spanish language
came in very handy.

I was a poll watcher in Rosenberg.

And the poll judge was telling this couple

that came in, in Spanish, who to vote for.

And of course, she didn't really realize,
but I knew Spanish.

And so there we go.

And you busted them
- I busted them, yes.

So, Katherine, when you set up
True the vote, you set it up

not so much

as a partisan organization.

Is that because you saw shenanigans,

problems with voting,
as coming out of both parties?

Oh, absolutely.

Plus,
we need parity of parties at the polls.

Well, you told me about this
remarkable election win

in which you had vote
harvesting and vote trafficking,

but it was on behalf of a Republican
candidate.

Exactly.

In North Carolina, it was unique in that
it actually overturned an election.

There's
going to be a new election in the North

Carolina congressional district
engulfed in a scandal over voting fraud.

This all centers around alegations
that an operative for Harris

then hired a team of people
to harvest absentee

ballots,
paying them between two and $3 a vote.

So you have an activist,
the guy whose name was McCrae Dowless,

and he worked for the Bladen Improvement
Association,

which was a kind of an African-American
get voters to the polls.

But apparently they were doing
all kinds of vote harvesting.

And he learned the strategy.

Then he broke with them

and he took his services to Mark Harris
a Republican, actually a pastor,

who was running.
- Correct.

And Harris won,

he pulled it off.
- In 40 years of doing this, we've seen this over and over.

Sometimes the schemes
are a little bit different.

Sometimes it's people out
banging on doors, gathering ballots.

Sometimes the ballots are sent here,
gathered here, deposited there.

But the traffic unit
self is always the same basic pattern.

There's a nonprofit
involved somewhere in the middle.

There are people that are either
collecting those ballots on the one hand

or depositing those ballots on the other
and getting paid for it.

And in no case is it acceptable
to be paid for your ballot

or to accept some form of remuneration
for your ballot.

And in no way in no time is that legal.

I notice, Katherine, that in the immediate
aftermath of the election,

when there were a lot of accusations

and charges flying around, all
reflecting these suspicions of something that

went deeply wrong, charges of foreign
intervention, charges of machines,

you and your organization
were kind of dead silent.

I got the impression that you were looking
for a different approach.

Given the outliers that were introduced
in such a major way in 2020,

namely the privately funded drop
boxes, the mass mailout of ballots.

The hypothesis was if you were going
to cheat, how might one go about this?

That would be provable,
trackable, traceable.

Do you said there might be some, let's just

call them "bad actors",
who are delivering ballots

systematically
and illicitly to these mail and drop boxes

and there might be a way to track them
and to bust them.

We didn't know.

We decided
we're going to let the data tell the tale.

And we collected together
a team of highly skilled contractors

and put together a plan
to see where the data would take us.

What Greg is geotracking ?

So the idea is to collect the signals
that are emitted from your phone.

Your cell phone is delivering information
to apps that are collecting that thing.

So there are four key coordinates,
the lat/long, the elevation and the time.

And with that data, we can then

build a pattern of life around you
so that phones here right now.

Well, where's it going to be at 5:00?

And where's it going to be tonight?

Well, here's my cell phone,
my cell phone is off.

Can I be geotracked
even with the cell phone being off?

Possibly, depending on the apps
depending on...

That's what marketing companies
do all day, every day.

This is the point we were just at.

We were at the Apple Store and CBS,

and on both occasions
they knew where you were, evidently.

Absolutely.

And they were telling you about specials.

So people will have experience of this.

There's 300,000 or so apps
that gather that data

and then they sell it to brokers.

Isn't it also true that this geotracking
has now become a vital tool

for the military, for the intelligence
agencies and for law enforcement?

Indeed, they're using it almost every day.

I'll say that there's no question
amongst anyone that I know in the community

that many, if not all of the people
that were involved

in the situation at the Capitol on January
sixth, were being tracked previous

to January 6th because they already knew
what their pattern of life was.

They already knew who to look at.

Many of the people who stormed the US
Capitol on January six left

digital footprints that law enforcement
has used in making arrests.

You're saying they must have known
about these people before

because some of those guys were arrested
one day, three days, five days

after January 6th,
and that's not enough time

to do the geotracking analysis.

The very idea that you could go
from the afternoon of January 6th

to acquiring the data,
tracking the data, unmask

who actually owns that phone,
which the government is required to do,

and then get it to a grand jury,
make an arrest in 72 hours.

Impossible
- It's not possible.

They had to have been tracking
the people in advance.

But the fact of the matter
is, these techniques are used

every single day by law enforcement,
intelligence community,

the Department of Defense.
- Was geo tracking part of the way

that the CIA was able to identify
bin Laden ?

It certainly played a role.

It's even more sophisticated today
than it was when bin Laden was disposed of.

More and more
apps are participating in this.

This program, if you will.
- The reliability

of geotracking
is not substantially different

from the reliability of a fingerprint
or the reliability of DNA.

If it identifies your phone,
I could have given my phone to Debbie.

But the simple truth of it is my phone
was there

on this particular date, and there's
absolutely no question about that.

Now, you decided to purchase
through these brokers,

- that make this information
available to companies,

they make it available
all kinds of places -, to buy data.

Let's talk about the methodology.

You identified data in certain places,
and by and large,

you focused on the states
where the election was decided.

Tell us, what are the areas
that you bought data for

and what were you looking for,
and what's the time period?

October 1st through the election.
In Georgia,

we actually bought from October 1st
through January 6th after the runoff.

So we went in,

we decided to do the Atlanta metro area
because it picks up some rural areas.

It picks up some urban areas
and picks up some suburban areas.

309 drop boxes in the area.

So we thought, okay, well,
this is a pretty good test.

We, in essence, sort of fenced
around those. Geofencing.

And then we were able
to purchase the data

of people
that had been near those drop boxes,

but also near the organizations.
Across the country,

we bought 10 trillion signals.

When they give you this data, this data
that you then have to go through.

What does this data look like?

That's a massive data transfer.

We have more than a petabyte of data.

You're talking about
transacting hundreds of terabytes.

So it's a significant move of data.

You have 10 trillion signals,

that's a lot of signals.

So what was the criteria that you...
- The final decision was

they had to have been to ten

or more drop boxes,
- meaning unique visits inside of a space -,

and five or more visits to one
or more of these organizations.

Those were the outliers.

It was such an aberrant pattern.

So what you're saying,

I mean, it seems to me there's no reason
for someone to go even to drop boxes.

But you're saying that maybe there's
a conceivable reason someone did that,

let's identify a large number
of drop boxes and multiple trips

and that way we're going to catch
not all the offenders,

right, but the worst offenders.

The way we would describe it is we want to
absolutely ensure that we don't have

false positives, meaning including people
that should not have been included.

We're not in any way
saying that this is all there is.

We're
just saying that based on our criteria

that we identified in Atlanta.

242 people that went to an average of 24
drop boxes

and eight organizations during a two week
period.

242 "mules".

Now, let's pause for a second.

What is a "mule"?

When we started the project,
we had to figure out

how are we going
to describe the individuals

and the elements involved, and to us
it felt a lot like a cartel.

It felt a lot like trafficking.

It can be trafficking in drugs,
trafficking in humans.

In this instance, it's ballot trafficking.

And so we began to use that vernacular,
a "mule" is,

by our definition, a person
that is involved in picking up ballots

from locations
and running them to the drop boxes.

So you have the collectors
on the one hand,

you have the stash houses,

which are the nonprofits, and then you
have the mules that are doing the drops.

What do we know about them?

Who are they?

Well, first, let me say
this is not the grandma out walking her dog.

Their backgrounds bear reputations.

We've had encounters with several
that are, you know, not terribly positive.

Violent guys ?
- Can be.

They are interested in one thing.

That's money.

Do we know, by the way,
how much they get paid ?

According to the people
that have shared information with us,

it's generally $10 a ballot.
In the Georgia runoff,

that number was higher.

2020, of course, was

the year of the Antifa
riots, the BLM riots.

And it was all going on in the months
and weeks leading up to the election.

Right.

And so in the data, you have geotracking
data up the drop boxes.

But you also have data on the rioters.

There were several different violent BLM
Antifa riots in Atlanta.

And one of them, we had three dozen

of our mules
participate in these violent riots.

There's an organization that tracks
the device IDs

across
all violent protests around the world.

We took a look at our 242

mules in Atlanta,
and sure enough, dozens and dozens

and dozens of our mules
show up on the ACLED databases.

So, again,
this is not grandma walking her dog.

These are, you know,
violent criminals, sometimes.

There's not just a
criminal element,

but there is an ideological element and
there's an overlap between people.

I mean, you're not going to go in
and Antifa riot and find it overpopulated

with patriots or Christians or Republicans.
These are people generally on the far left.

And turns out that these are people
who also helped to make up the mule

population.

I think that's also borne out
in our target

organizations themselves, do not like
Republican organizations either.

Left wing Democratic organizations.

Well, let's zoom in here.

So the mule is the delivery man,
or delivery woman.

And what you're saying is
they have a starting point or multiple

starting points,
and then they have the end point.

And the end point is the drop box.
Right. Right. That's right.

But you're saying that they
get the ballots from somewhere

and then they go deposit them in
multiple drop boxes.

Right, one of the questions

that will come up in the work
that we've done is,

"how do you know that

"this wasn't just somebody
that's got a big family

and they just deposited
a bunch of ballots ones?"

Or "how do you know that this person didn't
just work at a location

"that is near a drop box,

and so they're constantly
going by a drop box ?"

And the elements that are additive
here, the going to the nonprofits.

The ability to identify
the pattern of approach to a drop box

and that it is going not past drop box
and on, but directly to a drop box,

and back to another point
and then to another drop box,

all of these things.

I mean, isn't the timing significant
of some guys going to a drop box at 2 a.m.

in the morning?

Presumably he's not like out for a walk ?
- Right

So we're going to show you

a visual pattern of life
that someone can see and look at rather

than just a whole spreadsheet of numbers.
Being able to look at it in this manner.

What you see here on the screen
is a single person on a single day

in Atlanta, Georgia,
they went to 28 drop boxes

and five organizations in one day.

What are the orange dots?

Those are drop boxes.

And what is the blue tracks

that is a smoothed out pattern of life
so that we could take the sort

of the movement of the individual
cell phone signals,

marry them together into something
that's visual

so that you can see movement
on the individual.

To get to some of these drop boxes.

You had to be intentional.

You had to get off the highway
to go on surface street.

You had to turn in somewhere
in order to get to those drop boxes.

And the circles I take it reflect
the nonprofit center is lot to places

where the ballots originate, the stash
houses, where the ballots are collected

and handed to the mules
to take to the drop boxes.

Now, let's move over to Arizona.

How many mules in Arizona?
A little over 200.

A little over 200 in Phenix alone.

The reason
I think this is all very significant

is because these are very close states.

Right ? What was the margin in Georgia?

10,000 or 11,000, I think in the end.

In the end.

And Arizona also extremely close.

Very close.

Then you moved on to ?
- Wisconsin.

But our initial look was in Milwaukee.

Gross numbers were a little down, but

the average number of visits to the drop
boxes was up.

So instead of having only 24 unique visits,
I think we averaged 28.

I mean, maybe I've heard people in
Milwaukee are really hard working

and maybe they just went overtime.
And then let's go to Michigan.

We have more than 500 mules
that we've identified in Michigan.

Again, the number of boxes is lower.

Now where in Michigan ?
- Detroit mainly, but we have people in Detroit

that went to more than 100 drop boxes.

I mean, this is stunning
because I cannot think

of a rational and innocent reason
for someone to do that.

It just doesn't exist.

So any reasonable person would say,
you're on to something big.

You should take a closer look.

Let's go to
Pennsylvania, a critical state.

I think it was Pennsylvania
that really gave Biden the election.

In Philadelphia alone,
we've identified more

than 1100 mules, at rates

well beyond anything we had seen,

closer to 50 drop boxes each.

Each guy going to 50 drop boxes ?
- Each.

1100.

We saw people driving back and forth
to New Jersey across the bridge.

You're saying the ballots may not even be
from Philadelphia or from Pennsylvania.

We're seeing somebody should investigate.
- That the origin point appears to be Jersey.

Now running 1100 mules times 50.

We are 50,000 drop box visits
by the mules alone in Philadelphia.

Or Greater Philadelphia area.

Now, as you were assessing this data,
you had the two of you and I'm not sure

which of you came up
with this ingenious idea in my view...

it was yours ?

of course you have !

Well to validate your data...

We chose to look at two murders

that were ending on cold case status.

And in Atlanta, eight year old Zachariah
Turner was killed by rounds of gunfire

shot into a car that happened
just outside this Wendy's parking lot.

Bought the data and the team got to work.

You could

see visually
that there were only a handful

of unique devices that could possibly
have pulled the trigger.

So this is the area
and this is where the Wendy's was.

And are you saying that each green dot

is the same guy,
but moving through time?

Each color is one person.

The shooting actually occurred
right here in this parking lot.

Sort of inside of this circle.

Really
the only potentially legitimate shooters.

Each of these devices has a unique

device ID and we turned the bulk

of this information over
to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

Now, I read they've arrested two suspects.

I have two suspected gang members
will appear in court this morning

on charges that include the shooting death
of eight year old Zachariah Turner.

And isn't it
true that tracking these movements,

this parallels exactly
the work you're doing with the mules?

Exactly.

It's one thing
to have the scientific evidence

which is persuasive on its own merits.

But do you have video evidence?

We do.
- How much of it do you have?

4 million minutes of surveillance video
around the country.

Official surveillance video of these

mail in drop boxes?
- Yes.

How do you get it?

You can file for open records request.

Any citizen can do this.

It was a very difficult series of steps
that had to be followed

to procure the actual surveillance video.
- You have video in Georgia ?

We do.

Is it video from the presidential
election, the run off election or both?

Both.
- Do you have video from other states?

Some video from Arizona.

We have recently learned video
was specifically turned off

on particular drop boxes.
- In which state?

Arizona.

Wisconsin, it turns out, even though
the rules require them to have video.

Did they do the video?

No, they did not.

There should be video on every drop box.

Given today's kind of cost of technology,

it would not have been that hard to do it.

And you sent me a screenshot, Katherine,
where you were requesting video,

and I believe it was the state of Georgia
saying this video does not exist

and we can't tell you why it doesn't exist.
- Right.

That was in Fulton County.
We have correspondence

like that from a lot of states,
in the absence of video.

And that geospatial data is key
to decoding what the greater scheme was.

But in the case of what we're going
to show you now, what kicks it up a notch

is that we have the geospatial data
to support the video.

Let's talk about some of the videos.

So we're going to show you
a couple of different ones.

This particular individual
we have in a number of different

locations, in a number of different
times, he's actually a mule

This is the

official surveillance video of Georgia ?

Absolutely.

And so as the person pulls up,
they don't even bother parking.

Of course, in the middle of the night.

So why would they? And gets out.

Approaches the box.

When people walk up
with intention to cheat, they look around.

They basically walk fairly quickly.

They try to stuff it in,
they try to get out of there.

In this case,
he drops a few on the ground,

pick them up, stuff them into the box.

And then he hustles
back and hustles out of there.

So this is what it looks like.

It doesn't necessarily look like, you know,
hundreds of ballots being stuffed in.

You don't need a whole lot of fraud.

Just need a little in the right
places over time.

Is there a way to estimate, even roughly,

how many ballots are being tossed
into a box at a given time?

It might be three or five or six
or ten or something like that.

The idea is to stay under the radar.

And as Greg said, the number is,
you know, three, five, ten ballots.

But then they're not done for the day
either.

They're going place to place to place, day
upon day upon day.

And so that will not show up
in your chain of custody documents,

your tracking documents
that would identify a big blip.

I mean, they're not going up and dumping
in, you know, buckets full of ballots

On the other hand,
we've seen circumstances

where it appears that buckets
full of ballots showed up.

There's one box in Gwinnett County

that had a chain of custody document

with 1962 ballots noted on this.

And first of all, that's
roughly ten times what we normally see.

We sorted through

the geo data, found a few hundred people.

Okay.

Well, that's pretty odd.

We have video of all of this

And guess what it shows.

271 people approached that

ballot drop box during that 25 hour
period.

271. 1962

ballots were deposited. Wow.

Here are election officials
pulling out of that drop box,

two full duffel bags containing over

1900 ballots.

Let's look at another one.

Let's take a look at an interesting thing
about this person is

the device
seems to live in South Carolina.

So this person isn't even from Georgia.

She was here during both election cycles,

but is not a resident of the state.

But as she approaches the drop box,

she never looks at the trash can.

Right. She's looking the other way.

But the other thing
is she has gloves on.

One of our analysts

noticed that the surgical gloves
only appeared

from December 23rd forward in the runoff.

So we didn't see a lot of them
previous to December 23rd

and we couldn't figure out why.

And then it just dawned on us,
on December 22nd, there was an indictment

handed down in Arizona
for people that had stuffed ballots.

And the way the FBI nailed
them was fingerprints.

And then lo and behold, the next day
and days forward...

So this video is now from the Georgia
runoffs.

This was January of 2021.
- This one is at approximately 1:00 in the morning.

on January the fifth.
- She stuffs the ballots in there.

It's like a small stack.

It's maybe three, maybe four, takes the gloves off

and then puts it in the trash can

that she never looked at.

So she knew it was there.

She knew it was there, right.

And so we have her
in a number of locations.

She's an out-of-state mule.

And this is a no way
the only drop box that she attended ?

That's right.

No, she goes to dozens and dozens
over the course of these two elections.

Who's next ?

What you're going to see
as he approaches the drop box on his bike,

he also has a backpack on,

pulls the ballots out of his backpack.

Taking his time,
digging around,

looking for some ballots,
finally pulls them out.

Now he's set and he puts them in

But you also see him get sort of

frustrated as he starts to leave,
because guess what?

At this point, they had started
requiring the mules, apparently,

to take pictures
of the stuffing of the ballots.

It appears that that's how they get paid.

So they take a picture,
stuff it in,

not a selfie, but
a picture of the actual ballot going in.

But this guy gets frustrated, so
he actually has to park his bike, get off.

So if you were there just casting
your own ballot, what reason in the world

would you have to come back
and take a picture of the box?

And he kneels down looking around

and takes some pictures.

Okay. The next one.

So let me show you dog guy.

So dog guy, middle of the day.

This is actually at a polling place.

So the people in line are waiting to go in
and vote early.

They're doing it the right way.

Okay, now, you've got some other
people going to walk up.

This lady

didn't care, but this guy, this next guy
cared.

He's watching the whole thing.

This guy looks up, talks to him.
- Got the ballots under his arm already.

Now he's got the rest
that he pulled out of the bag,

And he's going to get his camera ready
to take the pictures

as he puts them in there.
If you consider the brazenness of this.

Right. This is the middle of the day.

There's people sitting there
watching you cheat,

people that are doing it the right way.

But it's difficult for them
to know what to do

except observe
and maybe say, "what's going on here?",

"what did I just see?"
- They wonder, "what does this all even mean ?",

if this is happening in broad daylight
and nobody is doing anything to stop it.

And so these are the

kind of things, 4 million minutes of this.

This was an organized effort
to subvert a free and fair election.

This is organized crime.

You can't look at this data
in its aggregate

and believe anything otherwise.

That's especially true
when you consider that in places

like Georgia, it was only decided
by 10000, 12000 votes.

And you look at 5000 visits
just from our mules.

It's not a leap

to say, yes,
this would have made a difference.

Adding these numbers up, we have 2000
plus mules.

Based upon
not searching these whole states

and remember, we're only talking
about a small number of states.

We're not talking about the whole country.
- We're not even talking about whole states.

We're not even talking about whole states.
- That's right.

And we're also talking about a gross
undercount of the actual number of mules.

Because you set a high bar,
they had to go to ten drop boxes.

So if there's a mule
who went to seven drop boxes,

you wouldn't catch that guy.
- And they had to go to nonprofits.

So they had to meet those two criteria
and then go to one of the geofenced

drop boxes. If they met the two criteria
but went to a post office box,

we're not going to look at them.

One of the slogans of the Democrats
through all this

debate has been "make every vote count".

And I think we can now see in a chilling
way that this is kind of what they mean.

What they mean is it doesn't matter
if all kinds of illegal ballots

are being dropped
in, let's just count them.

Now, the narrative needs to be
that this is the most secure election.

This is the most fabulous
election we've ever had.

Pay no mind to the millions of Americans
that are saying something is not right.

This does not make sense.

Nothing to see here. Smile and wave, boys.

I mean, wouldn't it be an accurate summary
to say that these voter bills

that the Democrats are desperate to enact,
to federalize the election, isn't it

that they want to take
all these special provisions

that have enabled what we've described
or you've described in the 2020 election

and make it permanent?
- If we don't wake up

and do the hard roll up your sleeves work

that it's going to take to reel this
all back together, then

yes, all the pieces are in place
for our election system

to be in permanent lockdown

and it will be done

under the watchful eye of a media
that will tell you it's all just fine.

It seems like they are

subverting democracy
in the public pretense of protecting it.

Absolutely.

And it won't stop unless we stop it.

If I look across the swath of Republicans

this is not the kind of issue
that they seem to be comfortable with.

It's almost like they would rather endure.

That's right.
As I said, it's a it's a gamble, right?

Because the ones that are enduring
are currently elected and in power.

When you watch these brazen acts
and nobody says a word

because they're scared
that they're going to be sued,

because they're scared
that they're going to be canceled

because they're scared
that they're going to be silenced,

that kind of chilling effect
is exactly what they want.

And as I said on
the other side of fear is freedom.

If you never get past
the fear, you're never free.

Let's sum up what we know

do we know for sure that this was not,

in fact, far
from the most secure election in history?

It was not.

We know that for a fact.

We know for a fact that there was
a coordinated, systematic fraud

in all the key states
where the election was decided.

Yes. Yes.

And therefore, does it follow

that the people who suspected fraud,

even though they didn't have the proof,
their suspicion was right?

Absolutely. Their instincts are right.

And moreover, that these states
that are trying to do something

about systematic fraud
by restoring a modicum of let's

call it the old rules, checking your voter
ID, checking signatures,

you want to mail in ballot, you don't want
you got to request an absentee ballot.

We're not going to send 20 million ballots
out there and see what comes back

that these voter integrity lies
far from being voter suppression,

are actually a legitimate way to make sure

that the people who vote
are actually eligible to vote.

100% accurate. That's absolutely correct.

What you are seeing is a crime.

These are fraudulent votes.

In two of our five key states,
you were allowed to give your ballot

to be delivered by a family member
or a caregiver.

This is vote harvesting, but
it's not the same as ballot trafficking.

In no state in America
Is it legal for nonprofit organizations

to collect ballots
and pay mules to deliver them to mail in

drop boxes.

Now we come to the most important
question of all : was the magnitude

of vote trafficking in these key
swing states enough

to tip the balance in the 2020
presidential election?

Let's first narrow in on just our 2000
mules.

Their average number of drop box visits 38
that were average

number of illegal ballots
deposited per visit five.

That's 380,000 illegal votes.

But was this sufficient
to put Biden in the White House.

To answer that question
we must look at each key state. In Michigan

500 mules

averaging 50 drop box visits
and five illegal ballots per drop.

That's 125,000 illegally trafficked votes.

Not quite the 154,000 vote difference
between Trump and Biden.

So Michigan with its 16 electoral votes

stays in the Biden column.
In Wisconsin

100 mules averaging 28

drop box visits
and five illegal ballots per drop.

That's 14,000 illegally trafficked votes

6000 votes short to give Trump the win,
so using only our mules,

Wisconsin's ten electoral votes
stays in the Biden camp.

But now we come to Georgia : 250 mules,

averaging 24 drop box visits
and five illegal ballots per drop.

That's
30,000 illegally trafficked votes,

far more than the 12,000 vote difference
between Trump and Biden.

So Georgia, with 16 electoral votes,
moves over into the Trump column.

In Arizona, the numbers are roughly
the same.

200 mules averaging 20 drop box visits
and five illegal ballots per drop.

That's 20,000 illegal votes again.

These illegal votes are substantially more
than the 10,000 vote margin

that gave the states 11 electoral votes to Biden.
In Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,

alone : 1100 mules

averaging 50 drop box visits
and five ballots per visit.

That's 275,000 illegal votes, again,
comfortably

exceeding the 80,000 vote margin
between Trump and Biden.

So Pennsylvania's
20 electoral votes goes for Trump.

Shockingly, even this narrow way
of looking at just 2000 mules

in these swing states
gives Trump the win, with 279

electoral votes to Biden's 259

But no one thinks that our 2000 mules

were the only mules
trafficking illegal votes.

To widen the search, Greg
and his team lowered the criterion

from ten or more to five or more drop
boxes.

This revealed a huge upsurge
in the number of mules

from 2000 to 54,000 54,000 mules.

Next,
they used a very conservative estimate

of just three ballots per drop box visit.

Now, when we multiply this increased
number of mules times the five drop

box visits per mule, times
just three illegal votes per drop,

we find election
fraud on an astonishing scale.

In Wisconsin,
83,565 illegal votes were trafficked.

In Georgia 92,670.

In Pennsylvania 209,505.

In Michigan 226,590.

And in Arizona, 207,435.

Using this calculus, Trump
would have won all the key states

and the final electoral vote 305 to 233

I wanted to get my Salem colleagues'

take, on what I'd learned here

How did you get this video?

This is all surveillance footage.

This is like official.

There is 4 million minutes of video.

It's official footage.

This is official surveillance footage,
just indisputable.

It was taken by the state itself.

I think they did not anticipate
that anyone would go through this video.

So this is 1:00 in the morning.

Don't we all vote at 1:00 in the morning ?

Right?

Right.

This seems

silly, but somebody asked me,
"how do we know this is not normal mail?".

This is a ballot drop box.
- Right.

Okay. This is not the mailbox

you use to write your mom

She's got gloves on.
- She's got gloves on.

And what does she do with the gloves?

Woopsie, Daisy?
- Hang on,

she walked straight past the counter.

You got to show that again.

It's hilarious.

Look, look, she just walks

So this is not the first time she's done it ?
- No.

So that one was in Georgia, is that right?
- Yes.

So in Georgia,
it is illegal to turn in anyone

but yourself or your family
members' ballot. It is illegal.

It is illegal.

So forget the outcome.

That's an illegal practice,
what you just saw.

That's right.
- Video number two.

This is called "Dog guy"

He's taking pictures.

Why would you do that?

So you're getting
paid, it's business.

Business.

What do you suspect if you had actually
caught this person at that moment?

Hand me those ballots and the person did.

What do you think you would see
whose name is on it, in your opinion?

Ineligible voters, people that have moved?

Would you see legitimate ballots?

There's an ambiguity
in what you're saying.

The ballot itself is legitimate, right?

It's not a fake.

Right. Okay.

But again, remember, when you mail
in a ballot, you have a security envelope

with the signature verification standard
that's been all but washed away.

And as soon as it's
taken out of that envelope,

then you then you have a disconnect.

The ballot...
- It's a virgin sheet of paper.

The I.D.

is on the envelope on the outside

This is an example of multiple ballots.

3:57 a.m.

Prime voting time!

This person comes up
with what you're going to see is

when you try to put too many ballots in...

He needs a shoehorn.

And we have lots of those,

where they're just jamming them in
and then they fall on the ground.

And when you can jam...
- I mean, this alone

is, to say the least, suggestive.

Who's voting at 3:57 a.m.

with a whole bunch of ballots?
- And then being able to match

that ping where he's standing there
to the next place he goes.

So we're seeing videos of one.
When each one of these you know,

went to
- On average 23 times

Same guy going different places ?
- Yes, right,

this is their pattern of life.

So in one night, this person,
this mule, went across six counties

to 27 different drop boxes,
5 different organizations.

So he's getting the ballots from the organization?
- Correct.

The Republicans had no idea
this was going on during the election.

But Trump, to his credit, tweeted out
in July, Mail-in ballots are a disaster.

And he was attacked
so hard by Kemp and Ducey and so many...

But he didn't have
this information obviously

He ends up being right.
- This is the tip of the iceberg.

You're talking about
extraordinary criminal activity,

but there's a ton more, you would guess,
that you have not even touched.

You are talking about 200, 300,000 ballots

that were just harvested
in only your geolocated locations.

But you are talking, what, 5% of America ?
- Less.

Okay, so case closed.
Sorry, gentlemen,

lady, case closed.

So I do a heroic thing
that not necessarily others here do.

I read The New York Times every day.
- That's crazy.

We're sorry for you
- It's my martyrdom.

They claim : all of these places

we have found maybe four, maybe 50
phony ballots.

These aren't phony ballots.

They're phony names.

No, no, no.

There's no name on the ballot.

Okay, let's say we got access to every
single ballot thrown into the ballot boxes.

Would we be able to prove this is a fraud?

It's the perfect crime because it cannot
be curated after it is committed

because the evidence has no connection
to the person who was meant to be voting.

That's the problem.

As soon as it gets
taken out of the envelope,

the identity of the voter, disappears.
- A vote from

John Doe is from a John Doe who was dead

or a John Doe who was moved, is that correct ?
- Or voted somewhere else.

So why is that not provable?

There is an easy way to bust it,
but it's not the way you think.

It's not to go find the ballots
in the ballot mix.

You can't do that.

The way to find it
is these guys have the cell phone

identification of all the mules,
all of them.

So law enforcement has to step in
at this point, and their next step...

to go and interview the mules?

Who paid you?
Where did you get the money?

Will any state's law enforcement do this?
- This is a big question.

The mules aren't going to confess up.
They know

they're participating in something that is...
- You got them on videotape.

You've got 2000 people who are committing felonies.
- Right

I'd like you to reflect about what

you've learned today
and how you're feeling

and think about it.

It's just sickening to me.

This is jaw dropping
- What you showed is frightening.

Republicans had no clue this was going on.

I wondered

whether any Republicans who did know.

Investigative journalist
Heather Mullins interviews a whistleblower

hired by the National Republican
Senatorial Committee.

I was hired by the RNC.

My job was basically
to watch the ballot boxes

and this was for the early voting
in Georgia.

So with that started on December 14th
and ended on the 31st of December,

and I would monitor that box from 8 to 8,
all day long.

So consequently, during those 2 weeks,

I monitored those boxes indiscriminately.

I would move around

to the different areas and the boxes and
watch them 30 minutes here, an hour there.

And then I would start to see things where
I'd see people walking up with backpacks

and they were unloading large numbers
of ballots, stuff them in the box.

I recorded

some of that and took pictures of it,
and dates and times and those things

I spotted plates from Texas, from Colorado,

South Carolina, North Carolina.

I just thought that was odd
that all these states were coming in

and these people would get out,
I watched them get out,

and they'd go up to the ballot and stuff
a ballot in the box.

But that was kind of odd.

So, you know,
we took pictures of those things,

record the license plates and those things.

And then I'd upload these
photographs to a Dropbox.

Then when it came to the
the Georgia runoff,

the actual date of the election
was a January 5th.

I was up there.
It was early in the morning.

Now, there were Stacey Abrams people
all along the sidewalk up there.

How did you know that they were Stacey
Abrams people, though?

Well,
they had those mask on and said "vote",

I'm sure is one of those thing they had.

This was during Covid, right?

They were part of that initiative.

I knew that she was part of that
initiative that she had going on about

"get out the vote" kind of thing.

So it was Democratic Party
and it was Abrams people that were

you know,
they're all interacting with each other.

And then the local

Democratic Party chairman was there
also about 6:30 that evening.

We noticed

there was a couple, a female couple.

These two had a big stack of ballots.

And we were standing there
and they try to shove the ballots in there.

We're taking pictures
and the other gentleman took some video

and everything,
and she turned around and looked at us

and she said, "What are you doing?".

And I said, "Well, we're taking pictures".

And she said, "We'll you can't do that".

I said, "Yes, I can".

And she got mad

and she ran up the sidewalk and left.

So you're saying the NRSC was made aware
that there were people stuffing

drop boxes at specific dates and time?
- Yes.

So with what you witnessed
during your time watching these drop boxes,

do you believe that that was enough
for law enforcement to get involved?

Oh, definitely.

But after several weeks, no contact
or anything, you know, I just...

So you're saying, though,
if somebody had contacted you,

you would be willing to testify
to these things

and give those depositions under oath ?
- I would have had to

I would have had to

Kathryn, hey !
- Greg just interviewed an informant in Arizona

who's now cooperating with authorities.

Oh, wow. Okay.

Check your e-mail.

Okay. Awesome. I'll do it. Thanks so much.

Okay, bye.

Hey, honey.

Yeah, take a look at this.

So this is I remember
Greg was going to interview that mule,

and so we got the video

That's her, concealing her identity.

What a brave woman to do this.
- Totally.

Wow.
- Unbelievable.

We know that the mules

got their stashes of ballots
from these activist organizations,

but where did the activist organizations

get the ballots from?

Hans von Spakovsky is a former member

of the Federal Election Commission,
a senior fellow at the Heritage Foundation

and coauthor of the book
"Our Broken Elections".

I will say election fraud is bipartisan,
but most of the cases

I see are unfortunately
the Democratic Party.

Hans, you just watched
a mule kind of confessing up

about participating
in this trafficking operation.

Is this kind of a mule operation,

something familiar to you?

But unfortunately, this is so common

in some parts of America,
particularly the Hispanic community.

They have a special name,
there.

They call them "politicaros".

And these are individuals
who are paid by campaigns

or political parties
to go into neighborhoods

and collect absentee ballots,
to pressure and coerce voters.

People who observe election fraud
have commented that absentee ballot fraud

or mail ballot fraud is the easiest

and the most common type of election
fraud.

Why is that?

Well,
because they're the only kind of ballot

that is voted outside the supervision
of election officials

and outside the observation of poll
watchers.

Transparency, as you know,
is very important in the election process.

And there is no one there at a voter's
home to observe what's happening.

Also, remember,
when you're at a polling place,

you fill out your ballot and you then
deposit it directly into the ballot box.

That obviously is not
what happens with absentee ballot.

There are some states,

I believe about half of them, or 27 states,
that allow voter harvesting.

And by voter harvesting,

what we mean is that you are allowed
to give your ballot to someone else,

and ask them to deliver it.

Now, are there any states

in which you are allowed to pay mules
to deliver ballots to drop boxes?

No, you're not supposed to be doing that.

And allowing vote
trafficking, to begin with,

is a huge mistake because you're giving
third party strangers,

you know, candidates, campaign
staffers, party

activists, all people who have a stake
in the outcome of the election,

you're giving them the ability to handle
something very valuable, a ballot.

Voter fraud is almost incalculably rare
in the United States.

Does it ever happen?

Okay.

Occasionally it does happen,
but it doesn't happen on a national scale.

Doesn't affect the outcome.
- It would affect the outcome.

I read these days
constantly that "the election fraud, well,

it could occur,
but those cases are extremely rare",

"they are so episodic, they don't have
the ability to tip an election"

Is that true?

Fraud happens often enough
that elections get overturned.

I mean, just go back three years to 2018

and a congressional race was overturned.

I can cite to you
another case in Mississippi.

It was just overturned by a court
because of fraud.

Same thing in Florida.

Well, look, that's
just the tip of the iceberg.

Now, we've shown that
you've got these mules

who are picking up
these ballots at various vote stash houses.

And where do these organizations get ballots ?
- Well, to quote Shakespeare,

"Let me count the ways",

you know,

everything from filling out absentee
ballot request forms for voters,

but having the ballot sent to them

to actually going to the voters
and obtaining the ballots from them

to stealing them out of mailboxes,
to actually using high quality

photocopy machines
to make their own ballots.

Look, these cases
unfortunately go on all the time.

You can go to 2018, which was an hour
long ago in North Carolina.

Leslie
McCrae Dowless is accused of mishandling

absentee ballots in North Carolina's
Ninth District.

Dowless would frequently obtain
this report from the Board of Elections,

looking for the date an absentee ballot
was mailed, and if it had been returned.

Jim Dreesen, who first told me
she was hired to pick up ballots,

and Kelly Hendricks, who testified
she did the same thing.

What would you do
if the ballots after you picked them up ?

take them straight to the office in Dublin
and hand them over to them.

Craig,
I don't know what happened to them after.

I know there were stacks of them
on his desk.

There was testimony in the case
that his staffers were falsely signing

as witnesses on those absentee ballots,
because he had done this before.

He actually apparently had signatures of
voters from prior elections in his offices.

Voter rolls are in notoriously bad shape.

States
do a very bad job of taking people off

who are no longer eligible
because they've died or moved away.

And it's very easy to get hold
of a state's voter registration list.

So, you know, if somebody is on the list
and they haven't voted in ten years,

you're probably pretty safe in trying
to cast a ballot - On their behalf.

On their behalf.

Remember, in states that made the mistake
of simply mailing out

a absentee
ballot to every single registered voter?

Well, if you're a fraudster
and you get hold of that absentee ballot,

you've got 90% of the information
you need to fill it out,

because the name is going to be
on the outer envelope, and their registered

address.

Let's follow
the track of these mail out ballots.

Right.

Let's
just say you got students on a campus.

They've voted, but then they graduate
and obviously they move

to a different state.
If they're on the voter rolls,

is it not a fact that mail ballots will be
arriving in the dorms and arriving?

And so presumably they're not going to be
that hard to scoop up

if somebody knows how or where
to where to look for ?

No, that's exactly right.

And, you know,
I work in the District of Columbia.

They mailed out absentee ballots
to all of their registered voters.

And I can't tell you how many phone calls
I had from people that I know

saying that not only had their ballot
arrived in the mail, but five, six, seven

ballots all coming in to their apartment
for people who used to live there.

Now, a former Supreme Court
justice in Wisconsin named Gabe

Bowman has done a preliminary report,
and he talks about the fact

that there are approximately 90,000 people

in Wisconsin who are in resident
care facilities or nursing homes.

So she's basically not capable any longer

of even remaining awake

for more than a few minutes.

And so are you surprised
that she voted in February 2021?

Absolutely.

But I was surprised to hear that she voted
in the last presidential election.

Much to my surprise,

she had voted for the last, off
and on, for the last ten years.

I guess in my mind

I thought
if you put your parent into a facility

because they were incapacitated,
they would not even be offered

the vote.

They make you vote.

They make you vote here?

And so how do they make you vote?

I didn't want to vote
and they told me I had to.

That is a real problem.

Clearly,
it was a problem in Wisconsin, 2020.

But unfortunately,
that's a perennial problem.

In other states too. What happens is

you have staff in those nursing homes.

Sometimes they are activists politically.

They get these individuals registered to
vote, or if they're already registered to vote,

they will request absentee ballots
in their name, sometimes

forging their signatures
and then filling out the ballots for them.

Just prior to the 2020 election,

the State of Texas
indicted a social worker in a home

for young people
who were basically mentally incompetent.

She had sent in over 100 voter
registrations

for these individuals
who were not legally competent to vote.

What about homeless shelters?

Look, if a homeless individual is mentally
capable, they ought to be able to vote,

and if the only place they can
list as a registered address,

is the homeless shelter, that's fine.

But the problem there is
that it's very easy,

I think, for them to be intimidated
and coerced.

In Chicago,
the largest election fraud case the U.S.

Justice Department ever prosecuted.

They were paying homeless individuals

to cast ballots
the way they wanted them to cast ballots.

What made you want to do this?

What made you want to get involved?

Well, I knew that election stuff
was supposed to be something good to do.

And then plus, I needed a little
extra money to get Christmas for my son.

So that's the main reason I did that.

Who do these fraudsters pick on?

They pick on the most vulnerable
in our society.

They go into poor neighborhoods.

They pick on the elderly.

They pick on people for whom
English is not their first language.

When we're trying to stop election fraud,
we're actually trying to protect,

I'd say, the most vulnerable
people in our society.

We now know
where the ballots could have come from.

But to pull off a heist like this on
a national scale would take deep pockets.

I wanted to find out
where the money might have come from.

Who could have funded the heist?

I met with Scott Walter,
an old colleague of mine at the American

Enterprise Institute, who is now head
of the Capital Research Center.

This is an organization
that has produced multiple

reports on the funding of elections.

People think of three rivers of money,
really that empty

into the Gulf of elections.

The hard dollars :

to write a check to a candidate ;
the second : soft money or dark money.

And then there's a third river
that people tend to neglect.

but Capital Research

Center has studied intently,
and that is the 501c3 nonprofit

money, the kind of charity
that you get to take a tax deduction for.

That river is enormous. In the 2018

cycle : about $21 billion.

Now what do the IRS regulations say

about the involvement of these nonprofits ?
- By law,

these nonprofit charities are forbidden

to directly intervene in elections
in any way, or to help a particular party

or candidate.
The IRS is emphatic that you cannot intend

or even have the effect of helping
one party or candidate over the other.

Now let's talk about some of the key

elements of this particular network
that we're focusing on.

We have we have drop boxes,
and those drop boxes are,

most people would think, funded
entirely by the states.

In other words, the drop boxes in Georgia,
funded by the state of Georgia.

But that's not entirely the case, is it?
- In the 2020

election,
there was an unprecedented hundreds

of millions of private dollars
going into government election offices.

The 470 million or so dollars were sent

by Mark Zuckerberg and his wife.

We did our part
to secure the integrity of the election.

There were a few other places
that put in much smaller amounts.

One entity
that put in $25 million was again

a nonprofit
that's part of the Arabella Advisors,

which has a total empire ;
in 2020 took in $1.7 billion.

Is there any evidence
that this operation had

a partizan thrust or a partizan character?

As we all know, big money
rarely comes without strings attached.

One of the big ones is lots
and lots of drop boxes,

also lots and lots of vote by mail.
To get your nice big checks,

you had to do things like have drop
boxes, encourage vote by mail,

have ads in foreign languages,
all kinds of things that little by little

are nudging the turnout
for one particular political party.

In addition to the 470 or so
million dollars that went into the Zuck

Buck operation, you also had in 2020,
a $120 million project,

very secretive, called the Voter
Registration Project.

The 120 million, it came from Soros' Foundation,

it came from Visa's Foundation,
it came from Warren Buffett's foundation,

It came from unions like the SEIU.
The voter registration

project has as its goal : increasing
in the eight target states, over

2 million voters who are overwhelmingly
expected to vote for the Democratic Party.

And so the states that we're talking about
here are Arizona? - Yes.

Georgia ? - Yes.
- North Carolina ? - Yes.

Any others?

Nevada, New Mexico.

Here we've got an operation
of illegal vote trafficking,

you've got thousands of mules
that are being paid to do this.

What you're saying is
there is more than enough money available

to fund any such operation.

In fact, this would be only one part

of a much larger effort
to control the election.

We are talking half a billion dollars
in nonprofit charitable funds

flowing into efforts to register
and get out the vote for Democrats.

Most of the left wing mainstream media,
when they reported on the Zuck Bucks

going through, they made it sound
like "it's all going to go for masks,

and plexiglass and all".

And every study that's ever been done
of some of those grants to the big cities

found a few percent
maybe going to help people that way.

And the massive amounts of money
going into ginning up the vote

by mail operation
and the drop box operation

and those sorts of things that benefit
one political party.

How confident should we be
that this will be a fair election?

They're sending millions of ballots
all over the country.

This is going to be a fraud
like you've never seen. - Trump predicted.

He said the Democrats are going to cheat,
that they're going to use the pretext

of COVID.

They're going to rig the rules
in their favor.

Nevertheless, Republicans
focus their efforts on the campaign,

while Democrats

focus their efforts on the process
of actually running the election.

The two sides don't approach elections
in the same way.

The Democrats, they understand that
the rules, the process

by which elections are
conducted is just critical.

We must now face the chilling reality.

The Democrats conceived the heist.

They funded it.

They organized it.

Then they carried it out.

They rigged

and stole the 2020
presidential election.

We cannot be okay with this.

We cannot simply move on.

I'd like to have your honest assessment

on what you've seen, what you've heard,

and what we can reasonably draw from it.

What do we have empirically?

We have data, geolocated.

We have footage of people
harvesting ballots.

Do we know who those ballots were for?

We can't know who they were for.

However, you have to inject common sense.

Are we saying that in the centers
of Democrat

held districts, we are seeing hundreds

and hundreds of visits
to drop boxes with pro-Trump ballots?

It's beggars belief.

It's ballot laundering,
looks pretty convincing to me.

I don't think
we'll ever know the full story.

And what makes this crime
so compelling and unique,

is that once the ballot enters the system,
it's really hard to reverse engineer it.

But when you have the cell phone
geolocation data

and then the actual footage of them
doing what you expect them to be doing,

taking pictures of the ballots, taking
gloves off, visiting multiple times,

I mean, it seems pretty clear to me
and it explains the sudden spike in

Biden support, that

we saw late at night. Kind of instinct
that people had. The control of the U.S.

Senate, went through Georgia.
With Chuck Schumer as majority leader,

probably because of what we just saw.

I'd like them to answer, the mules,
if they say it's clean, then

be honest and say, "okay..."
- You have two ways they will try to invalidate it.

One is minimizing and then slander. - Right.

So they'll try to slander Dinesh
personally.

They'll say, "Oh, Trump, pardoned him", or whatever,

"therefore, he's trying to get back
to Trump, to try to reinforce the big lie".

I could already see the headline

in the Washington Post, "Trump
ally comes out with questionable movie".

I predict right now they will say,
"What on earth

is a conservative
doing, tracking private citizens?"

"Gee, how dare! What is Dinesh

D'Souza doing to voters at 3 a.m.?"

I mean, that'll be part of intimidation.

The word will be intimidation.

They'll say "No person is safe,

communities of color are being tracked",

"People in black

"neighborhoods
are now going to have to fear

"for their life, that their cell phone pings
will be paired,

and this is this is Jim Crow to point out".

I disagree that this is not going
to be compelling enough.

This is a smoking gun.

This is O.J.

Simpson being seen
leaving the scene of the crime.

I don't care how partizan you are,
you can't dismiss all of this.

How do you explain somebody going
to a whole bunch of different drop boxes

with a whole bunch of different ballots
on the same night at 3:57 a.m.

in the morning?

How do you explain that? That alone?

I'm sorry.

I think a whole bunch of people
in this country are going to go "Oh, my God".

If every American saw that,
I think I think it

would move the needle.

However, their ability to keep their side
ignorant is total.

That's going to be impossible
to keep a lid on this thing.

Well, this movie is an Overton Window
moment, right?

So documentaries can do this
every once in a while.

Michael Moore did it.

He moved the Overton Window
in many different topics.

20 years ago, Al Gore
did it with climate change.

It'll happen, as Ernest Hemingway
said, gradually and then suddenly,

because it's not just how many people
are going to watch this film.

It's who's going to watch it.

It's going be lawmakers.

It's going to be people
that work for the Bureau.

It's got to be someone somewhere
with a conscious that has power.

And to say "This is a problem",

It can't be dismissed.
It can't be dismissed.

They have ruined Election Day
in the United States of America.

That's provable.

And that's enough for me to fight
the left with every fiber in my body.

Without free and fair elections,

we are not a democracy,

we are a nation run by a criminal cartel,

masquerading as a democracy.

Never in U.S.

history, has a presidential election
been as thoroughly corrupted

by coordinated fraud across
multiple states, as we now know

took place in 2020.

Today, totalitarian regimes

camouflage their fake elections
with the appearance of democracy.

But they're not real democracies.

We don't want to join them.

Our elections must represent

the will of American citizens.

We who believe in constitutional democracy
must be diligent.

If we give up, they win.

In fact, if enough of us give up,
they won't need to cheat anymore.

Don't stay home. Get involved.

Get out and vote.

Do what is necessary
to save this great country.

The America
we love needs us now more than ever.

The only way this gets better is

if voters get involved.