All language subtitles for 2. I disabled Spanning Tree! What are the Results

af Afrikaans
sq Albanian
am Amharic
ar Arabic
hy Armenian
az Azerbaijani
eu Basque
be Belarusian
bn Bengali
bs Bosnian
bg Bulgarian
ca Catalan
ceb Cebuano
ny Chichewa
zh-CN Chinese (Simplified)
zh-TW Chinese (Traditional)
co Corsican
hr Croatian
cs Czech
da Danish
nl Dutch
en English
eo Esperanto
et Estonian
tl Filipino
fi Finnish
fr French
fy Frisian
gl Galician
ka Georgian
de German
el Greek
gu Gujarati
ht Haitian Creole
ha Hausa
haw Hawaiian
iw Hebrew
hi Hindi
hmn Hmong
hu Hungarian
is Icelandic
ig Igbo
id Indonesian
ga Irish
it Italian
ja Japanese
jw Javanese
kn Kannada
kk Kazakh
km Khmer
ko Korean
ku Kurdish (Kurmanji)
ky Kyrgyz
lo Lao
la Latin
lv Latvian
lt Lithuanian
lb Luxembourgish
mk Macedonian
mg Malagasy
ms Malay
ml Malayalam
mt Maltese
mi Maori
mr Marathi
mn Mongolian
my Myanmar (Burmese)
ne Nepali
no Norwegian
ps Pashto
fa Persian
pl Polish
pt Portuguese Download
pa Punjabi
ro Romanian
ru Russian
sm Samoan
gd Scots Gaelic
sr Serbian
st Sesotho
sn Shona
sd Sindhi
si Sinhala
sk Slovak
sl Slovenian
so Somali
es Spanish
su Sundanese
sw Swahili
sv Swedish
tg Tajik
ta Tamil
te Telugu
th Thai
tr Turkish
uk Ukrainian
ur Urdu
uz Uzbek
vi Vietnamese
cy Welsh
xh Xhosa
yi Yiddish
yo Yoruba
zu Zulu
or Odia (Oriya)
rw Kinyarwanda
tk Turkmen
tt Tatar
ug Uyghur
Would you like to inspect the original subtitles? These are the user uploaded subtitles that are being translated: 1 00:00:10,450 --> 00:00:14,410 Is spending tree important in switched networks. 2 00:00:14,430 --> 00:00:17,390 What happens when you disable spending creep. 3 00:00:17,520 --> 00:00:23,880 Do you actually need spending tree in a layer to Ethernet to network. 4 00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:29,300 Okay so let's see what happens after the moment on both of these switches. 5 00:00:29,700 --> 00:00:39,810 A default configuration is being used so show spending tree shows us that spending tree is enabled on 6 00:00:39,810 --> 00:00:40,670 the VLAN one 7 00:00:44,260 --> 00:00:53,330 on switch one all ports of forwarding switch one is the root of the spending tree spending tree is also 8 00:00:53,330 --> 00:01:04,700 running on switch to on VLAN one the switch is not the root switch interface gigabit. 9 00:01:04,730 --> 00:01:18,660 1 0 2 is blocking on this switch so lets a disabled spending tree confetti no spending tree VLAN 1 on 10 00:01:18,660 --> 00:01:28,630 the side no spending tree V Line 1 so on such one shows spending tree shows us that spending tree is 11 00:01:28,630 --> 00:01:37,650 disabled on switch to show spending tree shows us of that spending tree is disabled notice all ports 12 00:01:37,650 --> 00:01:46,250 are now showing green no ports are being blocked please note too that I'm running in simulation mode 13 00:01:46,250 --> 00:01:58,620 in packet tracer and what I'm going to do now is send a ping from P.S. 1 2 P.S. to P.S. 2s IP address 14 00:01:59,700 --> 00:02:09,490 is 10 dot 1 dot 1 to 2 the MAC address of P.S. 2 Is this 15 00:02:13,010 --> 00:02:14,150 on P.S. 1 16 00:02:17,210 --> 00:02:25,190 IP address is 10 1 1 1 MAC address is this. 17 00:02:25,420 --> 00:02:37,420 So what happens if we paying P.C. to we sending an ICMP message but the PCI doesn't know the MAC address 18 00:02:38,260 --> 00:02:49,080 of PCI to so it's going to send an OP into the network which is a broadcast and it's going to try and 19 00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:58,910 find out of the MAC address of P.C. to I'm going to click capture forward the a message is sent to the 20 00:02:58,910 --> 00:02:59,390 switch 21 00:03:02,420 --> 00:03:04,030 notice what happens. 22 00:03:04,020 --> 00:03:14,630 It's sent to switch to switch to however duplicates of the packet and floods it out of all ports so 23 00:03:14,630 --> 00:03:26,950 it goes back to switch one on gigabit wonder 0 1 and it's received by P.C. to CPC to he's receiving 24 00:03:27,160 --> 00:03:28,480 this broadcast. 25 00:03:29,750 --> 00:03:38,140 And now P.S. One is receiving the broadcast or that it's sent notice of the source MAC addresses. 26 00:03:38,140 --> 00:03:48,520 P.S. One destination is broadcast it's looking for the MAC address of P.C. to CPC one will drop that 27 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:49,660 packet. 28 00:03:49,660 --> 00:03:56,440 But notice we now have multiple packets being flooded through the network. 29 00:03:56,500 --> 00:04:06,760 P.S. One has received the message once again so as P.C. to CPC to is receiving multiple OP requests 30 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:14,760 from the network the switches are also duplicating packets when we look after the MAC address table 31 00:04:14,760 --> 00:04:15,660 of switch to 32 00:04:18,490 --> 00:04:20,240 we can see that. 33 00:04:20,230 --> 00:04:28,590 P.S. To is found on gigabyte 1 0 3 and P.S. 1 is found on gigabit 1 0 2 34 00:04:31,360 --> 00:04:32,260 capture forward 35 00:04:37,070 --> 00:04:46,700 notice now the switch thinks that P.S. 2 is connected to gigabit 1 02 whereas in actual fact P.S. 2 36 00:04:46,700 --> 00:04:50,060 is connected to gigabit 1 0 3. 37 00:04:50,090 --> 00:05:00,610 Once again this is the MAC address of P.C. to so the switch is receiving conflicting information. 38 00:05:00,640 --> 00:05:05,490 Previously it thought that P.S. 2 is connected to this port. 39 00:05:05,590 --> 00:05:15,350 Now it thinks that P.S. 2 is connected to this port capture forward again. 40 00:05:15,440 --> 00:05:26,960 Now it thinks that P.S. To is connected to gigabit 1 0 1 so the switch previously thought that P.S. 41 00:05:26,960 --> 00:05:35,260 2 is connected to 1 0 3 which is correct then it's photo that P.S. 2 is connected to 1 0 2 and now it 42 00:05:35,260 --> 00:05:47,120 thinks that P.S. 2 is connected to 1 0 1 previously it's thought that P.S. 1 is connected to 1 0 2 then 43 00:05:47,180 --> 00:05:52,570 2 1 0 1 and now 2 1 0 2. 44 00:05:53,660 --> 00:05:56,670 So the MAC address table is constantly being updated. 45 00:05:58,620 --> 00:06:03,390 This is how Broadcom storms happen in life networks. 46 00:06:06,160 --> 00:06:09,250 Which can bring down an entire network. 47 00:06:09,310 --> 00:06:11,450 We have duplication of packets. 48 00:06:11,650 --> 00:06:21,500 We have mac address table instability we have hosts receiving the packets that they sent out into the 49 00:06:21,500 --> 00:06:28,300 network such as here P.S. 1 receiving its own op request message. 50 00:06:29,980 --> 00:06:38,530 Generally we don't talk to ourselves and in the same way a P.C. doesn't send a broadcast to itself like 51 00:06:38,530 --> 00:06:40,710 we see in this network. 52 00:06:40,900 --> 00:06:50,200 And if I continued doing that notice we constantly we constantly have these op messages being duplicated 53 00:06:52,190 --> 00:06:58,470 and flooded through the network packet tracer isn't showing all the duplication here. 54 00:06:59,580 --> 00:07:08,250 But notice that this just continues on and on and on and can cause a broadcast storm and network meltdown 55 00:07:08,730 --> 00:07:11,620 in a real network. 56 00:07:12,060 --> 00:07:17,930 The same original packet is being duplicated multiple times. 57 00:07:17,940 --> 00:07:20,670 Notice this is stolen off message. 58 00:07:20,670 --> 00:07:26,250 Looking for the mac address of P.S. 10 1 1 2. 59 00:07:26,600 --> 00:07:35,430 And if I continue to capture forward we just see those messages being sent continuously by the switches 60 00:07:35,860 --> 00:07:38,280 throughout the network. 61 00:07:38,280 --> 00:07:40,740 So is spending three important. 62 00:07:40,740 --> 00:07:50,370 Definitely should you disable spending tree in a layer to network in most cases no late to switch networks 63 00:07:50,910 --> 00:07:53,160 or a single broadcast domain. 64 00:07:53,310 --> 00:07:57,270 A broadcast gets flooded throughout the Layer 2 domain. 65 00:07:57,420 --> 00:08:02,700 If you had a more complex network like this your broadcast form would be even worse. 66 00:08:02,700 --> 00:08:10,300 Here's a very simple example of what happens when spending tree is disabled so get back on to switch 67 00:08:10,300 --> 00:08:16,870 one and all enable spending tree. 68 00:08:16,870 --> 00:08:23,140 I'll do something similar on switch to enable spanning tree. 69 00:08:23,610 --> 00:08:23,950 Notice. 70 00:08:23,950 --> 00:08:29,740 Now we see spending tree messages being sent between the switches. 71 00:08:29,940 --> 00:08:34,010 That's how the switches learn about one another. 72 00:08:34,010 --> 00:08:36,290 They are sending out BP to use 73 00:08:41,060 --> 00:08:46,250 to inspect trace so we can see the actual BP EU messages. 74 00:08:46,250 --> 00:08:54,470 I'll turn this back to real time and what should happen now is the ports should transition to green. 75 00:08:54,470 --> 00:08:56,690 Once the switches have learnt about one another 76 00:08:59,900 --> 00:09:08,630 and decided to the root bridge is notice the ports are currently in the learning state show spanning 77 00:09:08,630 --> 00:09:11,780 tree on switch to we see something similar. 78 00:09:11,780 --> 00:09:19,040 These ports are now forwarding this port is blocking on switch 1 all ports have transitioned to the 79 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:25,800 forwarding state so we can now see that this port is blocking in Packet Tracer. 80 00:09:26,060 --> 00:09:28,530 So let's do that ping again. 81 00:09:28,690 --> 00:09:38,180 We've got an op message being sent into the network that now gets sent to switch to a cross port gigabit 82 00:09:38,190 --> 00:09:39,270 wonder 0 1 83 00:09:42,900 --> 00:09:49,870 it's sent to P.S. 2 but notice of this packet is going to be dropped. 84 00:09:49,870 --> 00:09:58,420 The packet will not be forwarded out of port 1 0 2 spanning trees blocking that broadcast the packet 85 00:09:58,420 --> 00:10:00,850 is only forwarded to P.S. To 86 00:10:04,260 --> 00:10:16,970 we now have the OP or reply from P.S. 2 back to P.S. 1 in the inbound PD you we can see Target MAC address 87 00:10:16,980 --> 00:10:18,580 target IP address. 88 00:10:18,780 --> 00:10:21,490 Source MAC address is P.C. 2. 89 00:10:21,570 --> 00:10:31,760 This is an op a reply message gets sent across the top link to switch 1 and gets sent to P.S. 1 and 90 00:10:31,760 --> 00:10:34,730 now P.S. 1 can send the ICMP message 91 00:10:37,590 --> 00:10:45,180 using the top link to P.S. 2 and the reply can be sent back. 92 00:10:47,330 --> 00:10:48,790 2 P.S. 1. 93 00:10:48,800 --> 00:10:52,750 That's what we want to see in an ether net network. 94 00:10:52,790 --> 00:10:59,530 We want to have the devices communicating with each other so hopefully this package trace a demonstration 95 00:10:59,530 --> 00:11:08,980 has shown you how important spanning tree is in a layer to switched network even into this small topology. 96 00:11:08,980 --> 00:11:15,730 The network breaks when spending tree is disabled on both such as make sure that you have a spending 97 00:11:15,730 --> 00:11:23,440 tree enabled on layer to switch networks unless you have a very good reason to disable spanning tree 98 00:11:23,710 --> 00:11:24,610 on your switches. 10174

Can't find what you're looking for?
Get subtitles in any language from opensubtitles.com, and translate them here.